| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Materials Forum » Desparately seeking thermophysical properties data
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| SLK |
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2003 9:26 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
I am writing an article for eGullet.com about cookware, and I among
the things I hope to do is describe the differences in the thermal
properties of various cookware materials. Thus far, I have the
following from the Handbook of Chemistry and Physics:
Spec Ht Density Thermal Cond
(J/g K) (g/cm^3) (W/cm/K)
------- -------- -----------
Al 0.897 2.70 2.27
Cu 0.385 8.96 4.01
Fe 0.449 7.87 0.80
What I would really like to have is similar and comparable figures for
stainless steel and carbon steel in the types that would normally used
for cookware**. I understand that specific heat and thermal
conductivity change depending on the temperature, so what would really
be useful would be numbers that were directly comparable with those I
have given above.
**For stainless steel I guess these would be 18/10, 18/8, 302, 304 and
316... I have a feeling that some of these are the same thing(?), but
I am not quite sure so any explanation would be welcome.
My thanks to anyone who has such numbers handy and could help me with
some information.
Sam
---
Samuel Lloyd Kinsey
Mail to: 8wesubzeh001 at sneakemail dot com
email sent to the posting email address will bounce |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Uncle Al |
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2003 11:40 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
SLK wrote:
Quote:
I am writing an article for eGullet.com about cookware, and I among
the things I hope to do is describe the differences in the thermal
properties of various cookware materials. Thus far, I have the
following from the Handbook of Chemistry and Physics:
Spec Ht Density Thermal Cond
(J/g K) (g/cm^3) (W/cm/K)
------- -------- -----------
Al 0.897 2.70 2.27
Cu 0.385 8.96 4.01
Fe 0.449 7.87 0.80
What I would really like to have is similar and comparable figures for
stainless steel and carbon steel in the types that would normally used
for cookware**. I understand that specific heat and thermal
conductivity change depending on the temperature, so what would really
be useful would be numbers that were directly comparable with those I
have given above.
**For stainless steel I guess these would be 18/10, 18/8, 302, 304 and
316... I have a feeling that some of these are the same thing(?), but
I am not quite sure so any explanation would be welcome.
My thanks to anyone who has such numbers handy and could help me with
some information.
You probably want to calculate thermal diffusivity as the qualifying
property,
(thermal conductivity)/(density)(specific heat at constant pressure)
http://ift.confex.com/ift/2001/techprogram/paper_8729.htm
http://www.tufts.edu/as/tampl/en43/lecture_notes/ch2.html
http://www.matweb.com/
A CVD moissanite pan would be achievable and awesome, though rather
pricey. It would require an insulating handle.
The obvious thing tactic is clad copper forms within the cookware. A
pancake or crispy omlette will then miraculously present a profile of
Jesus Christ, Elvis, your basic gray big-eyed alien, Mickey Mouse, or
Martha Stewart (horror fans).
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| SLK |
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2003 5:37 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Uncle Al wrote:
Quote: SLK wrote:
I am writing an article for eGullet.com about cookware, and I among
the things I hope to do is describe the differences in the thermal
properties of various cookware materials. Thus far, I have the
following from the Handbook of Chemistry and Physics:
Spec Ht Density Thermal Cond
(J/g K) (g/cm^3) (W/cm/K)
------- -------- -----------
Al 0.897 2.70 2.27
Cu 0.385 8.96 4.01
Fe 0.449 7.87 0.80
What I would really like to have is similar and comparable figures for
stainless steel and carbon steel in the types that would normally used
for cookware**. I understand that specific heat and thermal
conductivity change depending on the temperature, so what would really
be useful would be numbers that were directly comparable with those I
have given above.
**For stainless steel I guess these would be 18/10, 18/8, 302, 304 and
316... I have a feeling that some of these are the same thing(?), but
I am not quite sure so any explanation would be welcome.
My thanks to anyone who has such numbers handy and could help me with
some information.
You probably want to calculate thermal diffusivity as the qualifying
property,
(thermal conductivity)/(density)(specific heat at constant pressure)
http://ift.confex.com/ift/2001/techprogram/paper_8729.htm
http://www.tufts.edu/as/tampl/en43/lecture_notes/ch2.html
http://www.matweb.com/
Thanks for your response. The matweb site has been very helpful.
Who knows why it never showed up in my various Google searches?
A couple of things here... 1) could you explain what, exactly,
is thermal diffusivity? 2) do you happen to know what type of
carbon steel is typically used in cookware (saute pans and the
like as opposed to cutlery). Low carbon, maybe? What AISI number?
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Sam
--
Samuel Lloyd Kinsey
Mail to: 8wesubzeh001 at sneakemail dot com |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Uncle Al |
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2003 6:04 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
SLK wrote:
Quote:
Uncle Al wrote:
SLK wrote:
I am writing an article for eGullet.com about cookware, and I among
the things I hope to do is describe the differences in the thermal
properties of various cookware materials. Thus far, I have the
following from the Handbook of Chemistry and Physics:
Spec Ht Density Thermal Cond
(J/g K) (g/cm^3) (W/cm/K)
------- -------- -----------
Al 0.897 2.70 2.27
Cu 0.385 8.96 4.01
Fe 0.449 7.87 0.80
What I would really like to have is similar and comparable figures for
stainless steel and carbon steel in the types that would normally used
for cookware**. I understand that specific heat and thermal
conductivity change depending on the temperature, so what would really
be useful would be numbers that were directly comparable with those I
have given above.
**For stainless steel I guess these would be 18/10, 18/8, 302, 304 and
316... I have a feeling that some of these are the same thing(?), but
I am not quite sure so any explanation would be welcome.
My thanks to anyone who has such numbers handy and could help me with
some information.
You probably want to calculate thermal diffusivity as the qualifying
property,
(thermal conductivity)/(density)(specific heat at constant pressure)
http://ift.confex.com/ift/2001/techprogram/paper_8729.htm
http://www.tufts.edu/as/tampl/en43/lecture_notes/ch2.html
http://www.matweb.com/
Thanks for your response. The matweb site has been very helpful.
Who knows why it never showed up in my various Google searches?
You have to know how to ask the question. Almost anybody short of a
diversity mercy hump can use Google. You need an old fart to use
Google well - somebody who already knows stuff and can use it to find
more. Even if you know how to cheat,
http://www.researchbuzz.com/
Google hacks
you still need to already possess a knowledge base to do it well.
Quote: A couple of things here... 1) could you explain what, exactly,
is thermal diffusivity? 2) do you happen to know what type of
carbon steel is typically used in cookware (saute pans and the
like as opposed to cutlery). Low carbon, maybe? What AISI number?
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thermal diffusivity is what happens in the real world,
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/ThermalDiffusivity.html
<http://www.iop.org/EJ/S/UNREG/Ad.PE4wcqN1xBw3xFfPfPQ/abstract/0143-0807/24/4/353>
http://www.ms.ornl.gov/researchgroups/cmt/CFCMS/2001.html
Uncle Al is an organiker. Most of the Periodic Table is a rumor.
"8^>) Ask the manufacturers what they use.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| jbuch |
Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2003 11:12 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Most cast aluminum cookware is not pure aluminum , but alloy with metal
additions that promote flow in the casting process to avoid pores and
other defects.
So, if you are going to get into details of one stainless steel versus
another, how about getting into the details of one cookware aluminum
casting alloy after another as well?
Or, just say "Aluminun ....... xxx to yyy" for the thermal conductivity.
Thermal conductivity tends to index the propensity to promote heat flow.
Thermal diffusivity tends to index the rate at which something heats up.
To some extent, either tends to parallel the tendency for thermal
gradients to develop over the bottom with spotty gas flame or electric
element heating.
OF course, thin pans tend to 1)heat up fast and 2)conduct heat through
the thickness readily.
But since thin pans are lousy cooking tools, you can see that
simpleminded thinking about heat flow magnitude and heating rate can
lead to absurdities.
Traditionally, the subject of heat flow characteristics of cookware must
be handled with excess simplicity for the general public.
Quite a bit of heat flow must be treaded with near excess simplicty for
the general public, even if it is not cookware related.
Just use thermal conductivity and you will be consistent with what has
traditionally been accepted as "high tech" in cookware. Even though
this is only a part of the story of materials for cookware, it is enough
to make slightly better psuedo-technical selections by lay buyers.
Jim Buch
SLK wrote:
Quote: I am writing an article for eGullet.com about cookware, and I among
the things I hope to do is describe the differences in the thermal
properties of various cookware materials. Thus far, I have the
following from the Handbook of Chemistry and Physics:
Spec Ht Density Thermal Cond
(J/g K) (g/cm^3) (W/cm/K)
------- -------- -----------
Al 0.897 2.70 2.27
Cu 0.385 8.96 4.01
Fe 0.449 7.87 0.80
What I would really like to have is similar and comparable figures for
stainless steel and carbon steel in the types that would normally used
for cookware**. I understand that specific heat and thermal
conductivity change depending on the temperature, so what would really
be useful would be numbers that were directly comparable with those I
have given above.
**For stainless steel I guess these would be 18/10, 18/8, 302, 304 and
316... I have a feeling that some of these are the same thing(?), but
I am not quite sure so any explanation would be welcome.
My thanks to anyone who has such numbers handy and could help me with
some information.
Sam
---
Samuel Lloyd Kinsey
Mail to: 8wesubzeh001 at sneakemail dot com
email sent to the posting email address will bounce |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Gregg |
Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2003 5:45 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Most of the less expensive Al cookware (drawn) is 3003 alloy if that helps.
Gregg
"jbuch" <jbuch@revealed.net> wrote in message
news:bgooev02ko2@enews1.newsguy.com...
Quote: Most cast aluminum cookware is not pure aluminum , but alloy with metal
additions that promote flow in the casting process to avoid pores and
other defects.
So, if you are going to get into details of one stainless steel versus
another, how about getting into the details of one cookware aluminum
casting alloy after another as well?
Or, just say "Aluminun ....... xxx to yyy" for the thermal conductivity.
Thermal conductivity tends to index the propensity to promote heat flow.
Thermal diffusivity tends to index the rate at which something heats up.
To some extent, either tends to parallel the tendency for thermal
gradients to develop over the bottom with spotty gas flame or electric
element heating.
OF course, thin pans tend to 1)heat up fast and 2)conduct heat through
the thickness readily.
But since thin pans are lousy cooking tools, you can see that
simpleminded thinking about heat flow magnitude and heating rate can
lead to absurdities.
Traditionally, the subject of heat flow characteristics of cookware must
be handled with excess simplicity for the general public.
Quite a bit of heat flow must be treaded with near excess simplicty for
the general public, even if it is not cookware related.
Just use thermal conductivity and you will be consistent with what has
traditionally been accepted as "high tech" in cookware. Even though
this is only a part of the story of materials for cookware, it is enough
to make slightly better psuedo-technical selections by lay buyers.
Jim Buch
SLK wrote:
I am writing an article for eGullet.com about cookware, and I among
the things I hope to do is describe the differences in the thermal
properties of various cookware materials. Thus far, I have the
following from the Handbook of Chemistry and Physics:
Spec Ht Density Thermal Cond
(J/g K) (g/cm^3) (W/cm/K)
------- -------- -----------
Al 0.897 2.70 2.27
Cu 0.385 8.96 4.01
Fe 0.449 7.87 0.80
What I would really like to have is similar and comparable figures for
stainless steel and carbon steel in the types that would normally used
for cookware**. I understand that specific heat and thermal
conductivity change depending on the temperature, so what would really
be useful would be numbers that were directly comparable with those I
have given above.
**For stainless steel I guess these would be 18/10, 18/8, 302, 304 and
316... I have a feeling that some of these are the same thing(?), but
I am not quite sure so any explanation would be welcome.
My thanks to anyone who has such numbers handy and could help me with
some information.
Sam
---
Samuel Lloyd Kinsey
Mail to: 8wesubzeh001 at sneakemail dot com
email sent to the posting email address will bounce
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:57 pm
|
|