| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Anthropology Forum » The Task of the National Alliance
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| Kevin Alfred Strom |
 Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2003 9:23 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=1079
The Task of the National Alliance
Opinion; Posted on: 2003-11-10 00:29:47 [ Printer friendly ]
Editorial by Dr. William L. Pierce
National Vanguard No. 69, 1979
In three earlier issues (National Vanguard Nos. 64, 65, 66) we
examined some of the social factors relevant to a racially oriented
revolution in America and stated several general criteria for any
organizational basis of such a revolution. In this issue we will
look more specifically at the factors which govern the priorities of
the National Alliance and determine the nature of its task. We will
attempt to understand, on the basis of present conditions in
America, what can be done now and what cannot be done, so that we
can see better how to concentrate our energies on those
organizational objectives we can realistically hope to achieve.
One fact of overriding importance should be kept in mind throughout
what follows: the situation faced today by the National Alliance is
historically unique. Very few of the "classical" conditions for
revolution exist in America today, and therefore, the classical
expositions of revolutionary theory are largely irrelevant to an
understanding of our task.
There is, for example, no revolutionary class in the White
population of America, nor a revolutionary consensus. And, as
explained earlier, the system of public opinion control which
functions in America today -- the central nexus -- makes it
extraordinarily difficult for anyone without his fingers on the
controls of that nexus to generate revolutionary sentiment. That is
a situation entirely new under the sun.
America is hurtling down the steep slope of racial mongrelization;
national, cultural and racial death lie in wait at the bottom of the
slope. But the prospect is not one which rouses revolutionary fervor
in large numbers of people; the level of abstraction is too high for
the average person, who does not yet feel personally threatened.
That will change somewhat as the press and clamor of the growing
non-White hordes in America become more vexing and the economy
worsens....
Nevertheless, the relative comfort and sense of security --
justified or not - of the average White American at this time cuts
the ground beneath any strategy based on winning mass support for
revolutionary action.
What applies to the White masses also applies to the business,
professional and intellectual elements of the middle class. Most of
the latter are better informed than the masses about the destructive
processes at work in America, and there is a substantial amount of
concern for the future among them; nevertheless, their state of mind
and their viewpoint are such that there is very little prospect of
winning the support of a majority of them for a radical program at
this time. The same conservatism and egocentrism which afflict the
masses afflict them, although the maladies may be manifested in
somewhat different forms in the two cases.
The masses always have been and always will be essentially
conservative in outlook rather than radical, whether they are
supporting or opposing the government over them at any particular
time.
During the Vietnam War for example, there was a great deal of talk,
especially on university campuses, about opposition to the
government's policies "radicalizing" the students and others opposed
to continued U.S. participation in the war. The talk was sheer
nonsense, as was proved when the whole so-called "movement"
collapsed in 1973. Its existence had depended on the immediate
irritant provided by the war, rather than on any demand for
fundamental social changes.
This editor participated in several of the largest anti-war
demonstrations in Washington during the 1968-1972 period, mingling
with other demonstrators and listening to their conversations (and
getting severely tear-gassed once for his efforts). Not only did the
great majority of the demonstrators have no real understanding of
the issues involved, but they had no more radical an outlook than
the average American.
Even among more violent demonstrators, who "trashed" government
buildings and assaulted policemen, no evidence of real radicalism
was seen, except on the part of their Jewish leaders. There may have
been more alienation, more irresponsibility, but very little
commitment to fundamental ideas of any sort.
The one thing the anti-Vietnam leaders had going for them was an
effective organizational basis for their demonstrations and their
propaganda. This organizational basis was staffed with capable and
highly motivated cadres, and it allowed the Reds to accomplish a
remarkable feat of subversion, even without a revolutionary
consensus or radicalized masses. At the height of their power they
could put more than a quarter-million protesters on the streets of
Washington, and they could make it look convincingly revolutionary.
There are other valuable lessons to be learned from the Jewish
effort to use the Vietnam war as a revolutionary instrument, but for
the moment we are concerned with just two: first, the aforementioned
non-radical outlook of the average White, even when a temporary
situation exists which makes him amenable to recruitment for a
revolutionary purpose; and, second, the absolute necessity of a
thoroughly radicalized cadre organization being already at hand if
any useful action at all is to be gotten from the masses when such a
situation does arise.
During the Vietnam era the Left drew its cadres almost exclusively
from the Jewish population, which constitutes a perpetually
radicalized reservoir of manpower and leadership for almost any
anti-White cause. An analogous reservoir of pro-White radicals does
not exist at this time, either among the masses or among the more
illuminated strata of the White population: those White elements
whose intelligence, sense of responsibility, and relative
independence of the media lift them well above the level of the
masses.
The conservatism of the masses is mindless resistance to change and
to new ideas. The conservatism of the other elements is more the
inability to encompass ideas which lie outside a rather rigidly
egocentric mental frame, an inability to rise above a conceptual
basis which is constructed on outmoded values, an inability to
visualize a wholly new kind of world or to grasp the ethical
concepts which must govern that new world and which transcend their
own. And it is ultimately based on a lack of moral courage.
Let us look at this latter conservatism; let us trace its roots and
see how it relates to the task of the National Alliance. Over and
over again one hears this argument: "The National Alliance has a
fundamental lack of goodwill towards Blacks, Jews, and the members
of the present political establishment. Without such goodwill the
Alliance cannot hope to achieve any kind of fair settlement of
America's present problems and internal conflicts. Therefore, most
White Americans, who are fairminded and are people of goodwill, will
not go along with the Alliance."
This argument comes not only from TV-brainwashed nitwits, but also
from a great many intelligent, thoughtful Whites. And it is, with a
couple of important qualifications to be mentioned shortly, a
correct argument.
It is true that the Alliance has no goodwill at all to the enemies
of our race. The Alliance is not concerned with Black survival or
Jewish survival or Mexican survival, but only with White survival.
The Alliance has not an ounce of charity for the gallows birds who
make up the System currently governing America and who have so
shamelessly betrayed our race.
It is also true that the average American is fairminded -- in a
sense. He thinks in an individual-centered frame, while we think in
a race-centered frame. He carefully distinguishes between "good"
Blacks and "bad" Blacks, between "loyal" Jews and Zionists. We lump
them all together, and that clearly is not "fair," by his standards.
Implicit in the argument for fairness and goodwill are two major
assumptions; one concerns the nature of the race problem and the
other its solution.
It is assumed that the race problem is one of street crime,
deteriorating schools, declining military morale and efficiency,
rising welfare burden, etc. There would be, from the viewpoint of
the person making the argument, no race problem if all Blacks obeyed
the law, supported their families by honest labor, adopted a White
life-style, and voted Republican -- as some actually do.
And the only solution of which a person with such a viewpoint can
conceive is a negotiated one, a compromise designed to end the
present strife and unpleasantness, a sitting down with Black and
Jewish leaders and saying to them in effect, "If you will keep your
people in line, if you will reason with them and be reasonable with
us, then we will bend over yet a little further backward for you.
We'll work something out which will protect your interests as well
as ours."
Of course, such an approach to the race problem is not only based on
the wrong values, it is an approach which must ultimately fail, as
it is failing now, because the problem is a biological one, and it
requires a biological solution -- a fact which has been treated at
length in other issues of National Vanguard.
But the relevant point here is that the average American's mental
frame simply cannot expand to encompass that fact and its
implications. And, at this point in history, the same is true of
most un-average Americans as well. Therefore, most Americans
(including most intelligent and thoughtful Americans) will not
support the National Alliance -- at this time.
The divergence of viewpoints between the Alliance and the average
American goes so far that many Americans are suspicious of our
motives. They think, "The Alliance must secretly be a communist
organization, whose purpose is to make the country's problems worse
instead of curing them."
They reason (correctly) that any non-White who reads a National
Vanguard will become more hostile toward Whites as a result, making
a peaceful settlement all the more difficult. Therefore, they
conclude (incorrectly) that we don't want a solution to the race
problem.
It is difficult to convince a person who believes the foregoing that
he is in error, because our value system and his are entirely
different.
Nevertheless, despite the barrier to communication caused by this
difference in viewpoints, the future is not so bleak as it may seem.
The qualification made a couple of paragraphs earlier -- "at this
time" -- is an important one. That is because the famous American
"fairmindedness" is a rather more tenuous thing than those who
presently glory in it are willing to admit. The time may never come
when honest Americans -- even intelligent ones -- will be able to
expand their mental frameworks enough to fully encompass our view of
the world, but the time will certainly come when their view of what
is "fair" will change drastically.
The fact is that White Americans like to think of themselves as
fairminded, as just, as humane, but the truth is that the great
majority of them simply do not have the moral courage which is a
necessary concomitant to those traits.
Consider, for example, America's entry into the Second World War.
The masses, of course, were oblivious to what was going on, as
always. But a great many Americans were not. Tens of thousands of
journalists, of public officials, of teachers and professors, of
leaders of German-American groups, of influential writers knew the
truth of the matter at first hand.
They knew the true nature of the National Socialist awakening in
Germany, and they approved of it. They knew that something of the
sort was necessary for a resurgence of the White race. And they knew
that the Jews were behind all of Roosevelt's deceitful moves to get
America involved in the war to destroy Germany -- in particular, his
maneuvering to bring about the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and
enter the war via the back door, after his infamous orders to the
U.S. Navy to fire on sight at all German vessels on the high seas
failed to provoke the Germans into a declaration of war.
And in 1939 and 1940 many of those who knew what was going on spoke
out. Even after the war started in Europe in September 1939 National
Geographic, for example, carried unbiased reporting on Germany,
despite the torrent of venomous Jewish abuse this policy caused to
be directed at the magazine. While the Jew-owned Washington Post and
New York Times shrieked about the German annexation of Danzig in
terms of a "brutal crushing of Danzigers' independence under the
hobnailed jackboots of Nazi stormtroopers," the National Geographic
quietly pointed out in its issue of November 1939 that 93% of the
Danzigers were Germans, and that the city-state had joyfully
welcomed its reunification with Germany after the artificial
separation imposed 20 years earlier by the Versailles treaty.
Well-known speakers, including aviation pioneer Charles Lindbergh,
addressed huge public meetings denouncing Roosevelt and the Jews and
the other war schemers. History, political science, and law
professors at Yale and Harvard openly scoffed at the official
government lies of German aggression and of Hitler's supposed plans
for invading the United States via South America.
There were even a few politicians in the congress who were still
willing to speak the truth as late as 1941.
But as the Jewish economic and political pressure mounted, as more
and more politicians were bought for the Jewish side, as the pro-war
newspapers became shriller and more insistent, the fairminded people
who knew what was going on began to become more timid about speaking
out. After the successful engineering of the Pearl Harbor attack,
virtually all of them fell silent. Hardly any of them were brave
enough to say what they all knew: that it was the United States, not
Germany, that was the aggressor.
Only a tiny handful, a few dozen out of the former tens of
thousands, continued to stand up for the truth, for justice, for
humanity, for what was right. The rest fell into line with Roosevelt
and the Jews.
When the U.S. government announced that the Germans were boiling
down babies to make soap, the thousands who knew it was a lie kept
their mouths shut. When the United States began its policy of
saturation bombing of German population centers in response to the
hate-crazed Jews’ demands that as many German civilians as possible
be killed, all those White Americans who knew it was genocide
remained silent.
They not only remained silent, but most of them hastened to appease
those they should have opposed. They joined the armed forces; they
did volunteer work; they became even more "patriotic" than the
warmongers, so no one could suspect them of being pro-Nazi.
There were liberals, true pacifists opposed to all wars on
principle, who were more courageous in their opposition to the Jews
than these "fairminded" conservatives. When fairmindedness became
inconvenient, they abandoned it. When it became dangerous to stand
up for justice, they accepted injustice. When the moral pressure to
conform became sufficiently great, they switched sides and supported
policies they had previously opposed.
It wasn't just that they weren't willing to put their lives on the
line for what they thought was right; they weren't even willing to
put income or social status on the line.
And it has always been the same. In World War I the eminent British
historian Arnold Toynbee wrote a jingoistic pamphlet for mass
distribution in which he claimed that the Germans were bayoneting
Belgian babies and cutting off their hands for souvenirs. He knew it
was a lie, and he knew it would encourage British counter-atrocities
against the Germans, but he didn't have the moral courage to refuse
to "do his bit" for the British war effort.
But one doesn't have to go to history to understand the point being
made here. Every member of the National Alliance has had the
experience of hearing a "fairminded" conservative explaining that he
can't support the Alliance because we are not as concerned about
justice for non-Whites as we are about justice for Whites, but who
has been conspicuously silent about the Jewish treatment of the
Palestinians -- and about every other glaring injustice in today's
world, when silence was the only safe response.
One might point out to one of these virtuous citizens that unless
drastic and sweeping measures to bring about total, geographical
racial separation are taken -- measures which are sure to cause
hardship to a great many non-Whites who have never deliberately
harmed us -- then the White race will continue to suffer the
contamination of its gene pool which is the inevitable consequence
of racial integration. One might point out that if this
contamination continues, it will eventually destroy the White race,
as it has destroyed segments of our race in various parts of the
world throughout history, from India to South America, and one might
ask what is "fair" about that.
One might ask whether he favors giving North America back to the
Indians, since it was certainly "unfair" of our ancestors to take it
away from them. One might ask whether he believes the whole White
race should just lie down and die, since the entire history of the
world in reality consists of nothing more than a series of
“injustices” perpetrated on the weak by the strong in Nature's
unending process of upward struggle -- and it is a fact that until
this peculiar obsession with “fairness” to non-Whites took hold of
us in recent years, it has been the White race which has most often
been strong -- and which has, in other words, been most "unfair."
One might point out to him that the notion of fairness is one which
arose and exists in the White man’s mind only. It is a notion
concerned only with the White man’s dealings with his own kind, and
it loses its whole meaning when applied to interracial relations.
But, of course, there is no point in asking such questions, in
raising such points, for the fairminded Americans who criticize our
lack of charity for the enemies of are race are totally inconsistent
in their logic, and logic will not persuade them.
They are like the Pharisees in the old parable who fastidiously
strain out a gnat from their wine but swallow a camel without
noticing it. Their position has nothing to do with fairness or
justice, but only with hypocrisy and cowardice.
A lion might be fair or just, if he were so inclined, but the
possibility does not even exist for a sheep.
What all this means for the Alliance is that the moral attitudes of
the better-informed elements, just like those of the masses, are
almost wholly dependent on external circumstances rather than on any
unyielding inner convictions. Most will never expand their ethical
concepts to the extent that they see fairness and justice from a
racial or cosmic viewpoint instead of an egocentric one, just as a
sheep will never become a lion. But they most assuredly will change
their attitudes about what is fair as their personal circumstances
change, and a great many who will not support the Alliance now will
support it in the future.
The Alliance does not have the capability at this time to change the
objective conditions which determine most people's attitudes; it
must depend on the forces of history for that.
It follows, therefore, that the Alliance must pursue a minority
strategy rather than a majority strategy for the time being, unless
it abandons its fundamental approach altogether and caters instead
to the shortsighted prejudices of the majority. The latter is a
course wholly alien to the Alliance, one which would destroy the
very foundations on which it rests.
Thus, the short- and intermediate-term strategy of the Alliance is
based on participation by an elite minority carefully sifted out of
the overall White population rather than on direct participation by
the White masses or by the bulk of the conservative elements among
the professional/intellectual class.
For the foreseeable future our program is to appeal to, reach, move
and recruit the members of this radicalizable elite, wherever they
may be, and to build with them a function-oriented organizational
structure; a structure made up of cadres, each of whom has specific
functional responsibilities.
It is one thing to tackle such a building program during a time of
mass revolutionary ferment, when these functional responsibilities
can be oriented directly toward immediate revolutionary goals
involving large numbers of people; it is quite another thing during
times of relative public lethargy and indifference, when cadres and
masses have much more strongly divergent interests.
The latter case prevails, and the tasks of the National Alliance
have been defined accordingly.
These tasks, in accordance with the conclusions reached above, are
not directed at attempting to persuade or mobilize the masses, or to
change the objective conditions or irritants to which the masses are
subjected. They are directed instead toward building a permanent
basis and a permanent structure which exist independently of the
masses and which grow and develop without mass participation, but
which nevertheless have the capability of persuading the masses, for
changing the conditions which motivate them, and for mobilizing at
least portions of them at some later time.
The difference may seem only one of emphasis, but it is a very
important difference. One cannot hope for much success in building
an organization whose entire raison d'etre is its ability to
mobilize masses, when it is clear to any intelligent observer that
the chance of accomplishing such mobilization is vanishingly slim.
Such an organization is in essence an ad hoc organization, and the
hoc is just not credible at this point in history.
Yet the fact remains that without an organizational basis for
mobilization at hand when we reach a different point of history, one
at which mass mobilization is conceivable, it cannot be
accomplished. And the conditions which will prevail at such time
will not be conducive to laying careful foundations and erecting
sound, well-designed structures on them. The prize will fall to the
faction which has done its building beforehand, not to the one which
begins then.
And so the National Alliance has backed off a bit from the ad hoc
approach and has addressed itself more instead to providing an
organizational embodiment of a world view, an embodiment whose value
is as much per se as ad hoc, as much intrinsic as extrinsic.
That is, while the tasks and functions of the Alliance are never
wholly divorced from the eventual necessity of mass mobilization,
neither are they wholly dependent on that eventuality. They offer to
the prospective cadre worthwhile goals to which he can
wholeheartedly devote all his energies, for a lifetime if need be,
even if he never engages in any mass-oriented activity. At the same
time, however, he is never allowed to forget that such activity must
eventually come and that the capability for it must have been
prepared beforehand if it is to be meaningful and productive.
The intrinsic tasks and functions of the Alliance, those necessary
for their own sake, are several. One is to provide a fixed pole of
the spirit in the swirling chaos of falsehood and illusion
surrounding our people in this era, an outcropping of bedrock of
immutable principle amid the drifting sands of change and decay, a
citadel of the ageless values of our race.
At a time when not only the alien-controlled media, but also the
schools, the churches, the government, the political parties, big
business and big labor -- every institution with a stake in the
present System -- habitually lie, changing their tune from month to
month, holding a moistened forefinger to the shifting breezes of
opportunity before deciding what stand to take, tolerating every
evil and encouraging every weakness for the sake of expediency,
riddled with cynicism and a total disregard for the truth, it is
essential that there be one institution which knows and speaks the
truth.
Even the supposedly "patriotic" and "conservative" institutions in
the society of today weasel on the really vital issues, fawning at
the feet of alien masters, denying the differences in the value of
the various races.
One institution must be incorruptible and uncompromising, speaking
the truth not just on the "safe" issues, but on all issues; not just
the fashionable and convenient aspects of the truth, but the whole
truth.
One institution must, in particular, say the things about race,
about the Jews, about the inequality of individuals, about the
corruptions of this society, about the false values on which it is
based, about the inadequacy of democracy, about the falsification of
our history, and about all the other things which are essential to
the material and spiritual life of our people but which other
institutions will not speak about.
And this one institution must not be merely a dusty repository of
the truth, speaking in a quiet voice heard only by a few. Many
academicians are already doing that much, on at least a few issues,
reporting the truth about race in their dry professional journals,
or quietly setting the historical record straight. But very few
people hear or see those truths. There must be one institution which
is a beacon of truth for all those who want to see, a loudspeaker
for all who are willing to hear, so that the truth is at least
accessible to every intelligent and open-minded man and woman of our
race, to every potential member of the elite mentioned above. The
masses may not want to hear or see at this time, but there are a
great many individuals who do.
Even though this institution may not be able to compete with the
controlled media for the minds of the masses -- even though it may
not even try to compete -- it nevertheless needs to be more than a
static oracle. It needs to elaborate and elucidate the truth, to
simplify and explain it as well as proclaim it. It must speak to
more than scholars, and it must be dynamic, exploring new
ramifications, developing new vehicles: fiction, poetry, film,
drama. It must speak to the heart as well as to the mind.
In addition to the propagation of truth, a vital task of the
Alliance is keeping hope alive. A key element of the strategy of the
enemies of our people is convincing all of us that the destruction
of the White race through racemixing is inevitable, that there is no
point in resistance, that mongrelization and White decline are the
wave of the future, that the Jews are unbeatable, that all the smart
money is on their side and that anyone who opposes them is a sucker,
a loser, a fool.
One of our responsibilities is to remind people -- not necessarily
the masses, but those individuals concerned with more than their sex
lives and their bank accounts, our elite -- that the Jews are
beatable; that not everyone has given up; that there are
intelligent, responsible, articulate people who are unconditionally
committed to putting a final end to Jewish scheming and to this
system based on Jewish values, no matter how long it takes or how
much sacrifice is required.
We must always keep one light burning and one door open, no matter
how black the darkness before the dawn, so that every racially
conscious White person has a place to turn when he is finally ready
to take up the fight himself.
Propagating truth, upholding hope, even for the few -- those are two
very concrete and vital functions. And there is another, which is
the closely related function of maintaining a living community
embodying the spiritual values of our race.
In a certain sense every spiritually healthy White person does this,
whether he is a member of the Alliance or not, because these values
are inherent in the race-soul of our people; they exist at the
genetic level. But aside from the fact that there are all too few
spiritually healthy people in today's sick world, that living in the
midst of soul-sick people tends to be spiritually unhealthy in
itself, it is important that spiritual values do more than lie
dormant in our genes; it is important that they be manifested in the
life of a community, that they be expressed in the program, the
activities, the propaganda of a living group.
And all these functions, involving truth, hope, and spirit, are
clearly tied quite closely together. As already stated, the
organization which wants to effectively propagate truth must do more
than simply print dry news, accessible only to specialists. In order
to have any effect on even an intelligent and open-minded minority
of our people, it must, as stated above, speak to the heart as well
as to the mind. It must employ media other than newspapers.
And it follows, then, that when the Alliance is fulfilling its task
of propagating truth effectively it is also upholding hope for White
survival and manifesting the spiritual values of our race at the
same time.
Now, because our task involves these several interrelated functions
-- because we are concerned not just with printing a newspaper but
with doing all the other things necessary to reach, to inform, and
to move an elite minority of our people -- it must also involve
certain organizational functions.
Even if our only function were to be the publication of a newspaper,
requiring a full-time writing, editorial, and business staff of only
a dozen or so cadres, we would still be obliged to concern ourselves
with organization, because of the necessity of carrying out our own
distribution. The elite minority capable of responding to our
message now consists of several hundred-thousand persons -- perhaps
as many as one per cent of the adult White population of the United
States -- and reaching them effectively requires an active
membership of several thousand persons willing to participate in a
vigorous distribution program.
And doing the other things we must do besides publishing and
distributing a newspaper requires much more in the way of
organizational capacity. It requires more cadres; it requires a
larger rank-and-file membership from which to draw those cadres and
to carry out supporting functions (newspaper distribution being only
one); and it requires a well-designed, smoothly operating
organizational framework within which both cadres and rank-and-file
members can function effectively in the performance of their
coordinated tasks.
All of these things fall into the category labeled above as
"intrinsic." They are necessary and worthwhile even in an era in
which mass organization for a radical purpose cannot be
realistically attempted. But it is clear that our intrinsic and
extrinsic functions are closely tied together. The intrinsic
capabilities described above are very similar to the capabilities
needed for reaching and moving a much larger number of people, when
conditions are proper. The organizational structure necessary for
coordinating our intrinsic activities provides a nucleus around
which a much larger organization can eventually be built.
Today -- and next year -- we concern ourselves almost solely with
our intrinsic task. But at a later time, no matter when, we shall
find that all our intrinsic labors, if we perform them well, have
laid the necessary and sufficient foundation for accomplishing our
extrinsic task.
W. L. P.
(National Vanguard, Issue No. 69, 1979)
This article was transcribed by William Wilson from the book, The
Best of Attack and National Vanguard 1970-1982, edited by Kevin
Alfred Strom, ©1984 National Vanguard Books, Box 330, Hillsboro WV
24946 USA. The portrait of Dr. Pierce above was painted by Will W.
Williams, a North Carolina artist and active partisan of our race.
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=1079
Source: William Wilson
--
Kevin Alfred Strom.
News: http://www.nationalvanguard.org/
The Works of R. P. Oliver: http://www.revilo-oliver.com
Personal site: http://www.kevin-strom.com |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| steve wolk |
| Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2003 9:23 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Kevin Alfred Strom" <kevin.strom@revilo-oliver.com> wrote in message
news:3FB0483A.3F3DE7B@revilo-
Y-A-W-N |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Joebruno |
| Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 1:34 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Kevin Alfred Strom <kevin.strom@revilo-oliver.com> wrote in message news:<3FB0483A.3F3DE7B@revilo-oliver.com>...
Quote: http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=1079
The Task of the National Alliance
Opinion; Posted on: 2003-11-10 00:29:47 [ Printer friendly ]
<deletia>
From Shakespeare's MacBeth:
'Tis a tale told by an idiot
Full of sound and fury
Signifying nothing |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Bob Dog |
| Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 9:51 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Kevin Alfred Strom <kevin.strom@revilo-oliver.com> wrote in message news:<3FB0483A.3F3DE7B@revilo-oliver.com>...
Quote: http:// idiotic URL removed /story.php?id=1079
National Vanguard?
National Blackguard or National Blowhard, is more like it.
Bob Dog |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Douglas Berry |
| Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 12:31 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Lo, many moons past, on Mon, 10 Nov 2003 21:23:54 -0500, a stranger
called by some Kevin Alfred Strom <kevin.strom@revilo-oliver.com>
came forth and told this tale in alt.atheism
Quote: The Task of the National Alliance
Is to emulate Hitler.
1. Be delusional.
2. When faced with reality, blow their brains out.
3. Be forgotten.
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Ezekiel 13:20 "Wherefore thus saith the
Lord GOD; Behold, I am against your pillows" |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Joebruno |
| Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 2:32 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
bg12345@apexmail.com (Bob Dog) wrote in message news:<4fa573de.0311110651.170dcc2f@posting.google.com>...
Quote: Kevin Alfred Strom <kevin.strom@revilo-oliver.com> wrote in message news:<3FB0483A.3F3DE7B@revilo-oliver.com>...
http:// idiotic URL removed /story.php?id=1079
National Vanguard?
National Blackguard or National Blowhard, is more like it.
Bob Dog
Both Strom and Pierce get their speech material from the same
place-the South end of a North bound bull. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| steve wolk |
| Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 3:30 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Bob Dog" <bg12345@apexmail.com> wrote in message
news:4fa573de.0311110651.170dcc2f@posting.google.com...
Quote: Kevin Alfred Strom <kevin.strom@revilo-oliver.com> wrote in message
news:<3FB0483A.3F3DE7B@revilo-oliver.com>...
http:// idiotic URL removed /story.php?id=1079
National Vanguard?
National Blackguard or National Blowhard, is more like it.
Bob Dog
Maybe the National Can'tgethard? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Alexander Maclennan |
| Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 5:51 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Kevin Alfred Strom <kevin.strom@revilo-oliver.com> wrote:
Quote: "brutal crushing of Danzigers' independence under the hobnailed
jackboots of Nazi stormtroopers," the National Geographic quietly
pointed out in its issue of November 1939 that 93% of the Danzigers were
Germans, and that the city-state had joyfully welcomed its reunification
with Germany after the artificial separation imposed 20 years earlier by
the Versailles treaty
Does anyone remember the whole of a version of `Twas brillig`
I can only recall two lines
Twas Danzig and the Nazi coves....
Came goering down the Corridor and goebled as it came.`
--
Alexander MacLennan sandymac@sandymac.demon.co.uk |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Mac The Finger |
| Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 7:11 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message news:<j572rv8ukdbjm1nf8bgu46eo92c7o63cbh@4ax.com>...
Quote: Lo, many moons past, on Mon, 10 Nov 2003 21:23:54 -0500, a stranger
called by some Kevin Alfred Strom <kevin.strom@revilo-oliver.com
came forth and told this tale in alt.atheism
The Task of the National Alliance
Is to emulate Hitler.
1. Be delusional.
2. When faced with reality, blow their brains out.
3. Be forgotten.
you white dog. eatee? takeee outeee? #4 gets you spareribs n'
fuckin' saurkraut. chinee mee speakee. maneadarin duck sooo goodie.
eatee outee. you vagina eatee outee!!! mmmmmm so good. blackee
pussyeee likeeeee fuckeee all night! dim sum yum yum. tahkeee
controleee of yhour lifeeeee!!! NOW!!!
heroin so good baby. mmmmmmmm.......chinee numbah foah! white powdah
mah HEADLESS!!! no gotee head no moh. too much too beaucoup black
soul brother boom boom. takeeeee outeeee; bean spr4otursprouts stir
flyeee gahlic n' shit!
;putke guts ouf. numbagh foah beaucoup strongeee. sooooo good baby.
soooo good bun buns. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Douglas Berry |
| Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 9:26 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Lo, many moons past, on 11 Nov 2003 16:11:25 -0800, a stranger called
by some seymourscagnetti@msn.com (Mac The Finger) came forth and told
this tale in alt.atheism
Quote: Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message news:<j572rv8ukdbjm1nf8bgu46eo92c7o63cbh@4ax.com>...
Lo, many moons past, on Mon, 10 Nov 2003 21:23:54 -0500, a stranger
called by some Kevin Alfred Strom <kevin.strom@revilo-oliver.com
came forth and told this tale in alt.atheism
The Task of the National Alliance
Is to emulate Hitler.
1. Be delusional.
2. When faced with reality, blow their brains out.
3. Be forgotten.
you white dog. eatee? takeee outeee? #4 gets you spareribs n'
fuckin' saurkraut. chinee mee speakee. maneadarin duck sooo goodie.
eatee outee. you vagina eatee outee!!! mmmmmm so good. blackee
pussyeee likeeeee fuckeee all night! dim sum yum yum. tahkeee
controleee of yhour lifeeeee!!! NOW!!!
heroin so good baby. mmmmmmmm.......chinee numbah foah! white powdah
mah HEADLESS!!! no gotee head no moh. too much too beaucoup black
soul brother boom boom. takeeeee outeeee; bean spr4otursprouts stir
flyeee gahlic n' shit!
;putke guts ouf. numbagh foah beaucoup strongeee. sooooo good baby.
soooo good bun buns.
I'd run this through AltaVista, but I'm not sure what language it
is...
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Ezekiel 13:20 "Wherefore thus saith the
Lord GOD; Behold, I am against your pillows" |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| tim gueguen |
| Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 10:48 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message
news:2h63rv4uv5477gdd6du4ofk5tstrcio4ue@4ax.com...
Quote: Lo, many moons past, on 11 Nov 2003 16:11:25 -0800, a stranger called
by some seymourscagnetti@msn.com (Mac The Finger) came forth and told
this tale in alt.atheism
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message
news:<j572rv8ukdbjm1nf8bgu46eo92c7o63cbh@4ax.com>...
Lo, many moons past, on Mon, 10 Nov 2003 21:23:54 -0500, a stranger
called by some Kevin Alfred Strom <kevin.strom@revilo-oliver.com
came forth and told this tale in alt.atheism
The Task of the National Alliance
Is to emulate Hitler.
1. Be delusional.
2. When faced with reality, blow their brains out.
3. Be forgotten.
you white dog. eatee? takeee outeee? #4 gets you spareribs n'
fuckin' saurkraut. chinee mee speakee. maneadarin duck sooo goodie.
eatee outee. you vagina eatee outee!!! mmmmmm so good. blackee
pussyeee likeeeee fuckeee all night! dim sum yum yum. tahkeee
controleee of yhour lifeeeee!!! NOW!!!
heroin so good baby. mmmmmmmm.......chinee numbah foah! white powdah
mah HEADLESS!!! no gotee head no moh. too much too beaucoup black
soul brother boom boom. takeeeee outeeee; bean spr4otursprouts stir
flyeee gahlic n' shit!
;putke guts ouf. numbagh foah beaucoup strongeee. sooooo good baby.
soooo good bun buns.
I'd run this through AltaVista, but I'm not sure what language it
is...
Sounds like the Moronovingian dialect of Stupidonese.
tim gueguen 101867 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| tim gueguen |
| Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 10:55 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Kevin Alfred Strom" <kevin.strom@revilo-oliver.com> wrote
Quote: The Task of the National Alliance
Opinion; Posted on: 2003-11-10 00:29:47 [ Printer friendly ]
Editorial by Dr. William L. Pierce
National Vanguard No. 69, 1979
Given that Pierce has gone off to Valhalla, or more likely the hot place
with that pitchfork dude, it would seem the task of the NA, namely being a
meal ticket for Pierce, has ended. Sure, Willie no doubt believed in the
crap he spewed, but being the boss of your own private collection of dupes
and idiots must have generated a tidy little income.
tim gueguen 101867 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:47 am
|
|