|
|
John,
Saw you on the tube today re: election.
A chance to state your case again. Congrats. you look more normal than
you sometimes seem on this zoo poster board.
Re: this court application posting: in para numbered 3, "seems" should
read "seeks"?
Is this a bad enough error to render your application "incoherent" if a
small court trooper wants to find it so, to block another "annoyance"
to the legal system?
Seems you may need a team of proof readers who can keep up with your
volume of output. I would volunteer to assist with a little of the
volume, but would want LETS for the time. I might collect by making you
foredeck crew for a sailing school.
Your stated ideals are noble, if you ask me, but is your method and
approach really productive? Seems an x defense minister, Paul Hellier,
Canada Action Party in BC. might agree with the no interest ideal, at
least for national borrowing policies. Why does the Canadian government
pay interest to itself?
Where and how do the potential future program payouts cross over the
line from unfunded projection to national debt requiring interest
service, and to whom?
Surely, some see you just as a lucky poker guy, even if you argue it's
skill, poker players all seem chancey and losers in the end. This
cannot support your image as a responsible man with a real message and
a real chance to get it across. As I would with any troubled gambler,
I must ask if you have lost more than you won, even not counting
expenses directly attributable to the occupation, such as travel, etc.
Not to stretch this all too far, how many other court applications have
been rejected for minor technical problems, the bane of any engineer or
technician?
Your humble servant, a technician, sailor, drummer, and carpenter,
Terry K |
|
|
