Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Mathematics Forum  »  Hexadecimal leads to insight.
Page 1 of 1    
Author Message
Thinkit
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2003 10:59 pm
Guest
Sure, math has little to do with actual numbers. But sometimes you
need to look at literals to look for patterns. Even when you're
result is radix neutral, the elegance of hexadecimal will set your
brain in a mode of logic and intelligence. Unless you're examining
bowling scores, use hexadecimal.
Steven
Posted: Wed Dec 24, 2003 8:31 am
Guest
"Thinkit" <greg_finch2@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:2db4f40b.0312221959.26b3bb92@posting.google.com...
Quote:
Sure, math has little to do with actual numbers

Pardon?
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
Posted: Thu Dec 25, 2003 11:42 pm
Guest
In <2db4f40b.0312221959.26b3bb92@posting.google.com>, on 12/22/2003
at 07:59 PM, greg_finch2@hotmail.com (Thinkit) said:

Quote:
elegance of hexadecimal

How is hexadecimal any more elegant than any other base?

Quote:
Unless you're examining bowling scores, use hexadecimal.

Real programmers use octal. All of our units of measurement are scaled
in decimal. Headecimal is only reasonable for equipment that deals
with numbers in bytes that are multiples of 4 bits.

--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT

Unsolicited bulk E-mail will be subject to legal action. I reserve
the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail.

Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do
not reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org
Mensanator
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2003 12:54 am
Guest
Quote:
Subject: Re: Hexadecimal leads to insight.
From: "Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz" spamtrap@library.lspace.org.invalid
Date: 12/25/2003 10:42 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id: <3febbc35$8$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@news.patriot.net

In <2db4f40b.0312221959.26b3bb92@posting.google.com>, on 12/22/2003
at 07:59 PM, greg_finch2@hotmail.com (Thinkit) said:

elegance of hexadecimal

How is hexadecimal any more elegant than any other base?

Unless you're examining bowling scores, use hexadecimal.

Real programmers use octal. All of our units of measurement are scaled
in decimal. Headecimal is only reasonable for equipment that deals
with numbers in bytes that are multiples of 4 bits.

Which explains why DEC used octal for 16-bit registers and 20-bit addressing?

Quote:

--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT

Unsolicited bulk E-mail will be subject to legal action. I reserve
the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail.

Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do
not reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org


--
Mensanator
Ace of Clubs
Timothy Murphy
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2003 10:36 am
Guest
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz wrote:

Quote:
Real programmers use octal. All of our units of measurement are scaled
in decimal. Headecimal is only reasonable for equipment that deals
with numbers in bytes that are multiples of 4 bits.

Isn't that all equipment?

--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail (<80k only): tim /at/ birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2003 5:52 pm
Guest
In <20031226005435.14277.00001826@mb-m28.aol.com>, on 12/26/2003
at 05:54 AM, mensanator@aol.compost (Mensanator) said:

Quote:
Which explains why DEC used octal for 16-bit registers and 20-bit
addressing?

When did I ever say that everything DEC did with the PDP-11 was
reasonable? For that matter, when did I ever say that anything DEC did
with the PDP-11 was reasonable?

More to the point, "A implies B" is not equivalent to "B implies A".

--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT

Unsolicited bulk E-mail will be subject to legal action. I reserve
the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail.

Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do
not reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2003 5:54 pm
Guest
In <vzYGb.2175$HR.5464@news.indigo.ie>, on 12/26/2003
at 03:36 PM, Timothy Murphy <tim@birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie> said:

Quote:
Isn't that all equipment?

Only if 18 is a multiple of 4.

--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT

Unsolicited bulk E-mail will be subject to legal action. I reserve
the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail.

Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do
not reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org
Mensanator
Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2003 8:17 pm
Guest
Quote:
Subject: Re: Hexadecimal leads to insight.
From: "Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz" spamtrap@library.lspace.org.invalid
Date: 12/27/2003 4:52 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id: <3fee0d35$13$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@news.patriot.net

In <20031226005435.14277.00001826@mb-m28.aol.com>, on 12/26/2003
at 05:54 AM, mensanator@aol.compost (Mensanator) said:

Which explains why DEC used octal for 16-bit registers and 20-bit
addressing?

When did I ever say that everything DEC did with the PDP-11 was
reasonable? For that matter, when did I ever say that anything DEC did
with the PDP-11 was reasonable?

When did I say it was unreasonable? My point apparently went completely over
your head. What you _did_ say was

<quote>
Headecimal is only reasonable for equipment that deals
with numbers in bytes that are multiples of 4 bits.
</quote>

It would be unreasonable for the PDP-11 to use hex because the index register
designations are three bits, thus making the machine language more easily
interpreted when the dump is in octal. If the PDP-11 had 16 registers instead
of 8, then it would be reasonable to use hex. Note that this has nothing to do
with word size or addressing.

Of course, a real programmer would understand that.


Quote:

More to the point, "A implies B" is not equivalent to "B implies A".


--
Mensanator
Ace of Clubs
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
Posted: Sun Dec 28, 2003 7:04 pm
Guest
In <20031227201711.11386.00001753@mb-m11.aol.com>, on 12/28/2003
at 01:17 AM, mensanator@aol.compost (Mensanator) said:

Quote:
My point apparently went completely over your head.

No, your "point" was simply irrelevant.

Quote:
What you _did_ say was

I kinow what I wrote, TYVM. You apparently failed to understand what I
wrote, despite having quoted it.

Quote:
quote
Headecimal is only reasonable for equipment that deals
with numbers in bytes that are multiples of 4 bits.
/quote

K3wl. No read it very carefully and note what I did *NOT* write in it.

Quote:
It would be unreasonable for the PDP-11 to use hex

Whether that is true or not, it has nothing to do with what I wrote.

Quote:
thus making the machine language more easily
interpreted when the dump is in octal.

Only for people whose ability to do mental arithmetic is impaired.

Quote:
Note that this has nothing to do with word size or addressing.

I note your belief to that effect.

Quote:
Of course, a real programmer would understand that.

ROTF,LMAO! There is a difference between understanding why somebody
did something stupid and pretending that it wasn't stupid. The fact
that I don't agree with the decision doesn't mean that I didn't
understand it before you were born.

I repeat,

Quote:
More to the point, "A implies B" is not equivalent to "B implies A".

You quoted it, but appear to have not read and understood it.

--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT

Unsolicited bulk E-mail will be subject to legal action. I reserve
the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail.

Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do
not reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org
Don McDonald
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2003 5:53 pm
Guest
greg_finch2@hotmail.com (Thinkit) wrote in message news:<2db4f40b.0312221959.26b3bb92@posting.google.com>...
Quote:
Sure, math has little to do with actual numbers. But sometimes you
need to look at literals to look for patterns. Even when you're
result is radix neutral, the elegance of hexadecimal will set your
brain in a mode of logic and intelligence. Unless you're examining
bowling scores, use hexadecimal.

Re: Hexadecimal leads to insight. google 4e6 in hex (= 3d 0900.)

don.mcdonald
3 dimension phone calls.
30.12.03
 
Page 1 of 1       All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Tue Oct 07, 2008 4:09 pm