Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Optics Forum  »  form error of coated optics
Page 1 of 1    
Author Message
sankar
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2003 6:22 am
Guest
Dear Coating guys,

I have a query. If precision polished flat is coated with edge
filter which transmits 633nm, what will happen to the form error or
power on the coated surface of the flat? To be more precise, I wish to
know whether the power increases or decreases and why?
Repeating Decimal
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2003 12:39 pm
Guest
in article 78d30f36.0311060322.7ff524c7@posting.google.com, sankar at
sandivp@hotmail.com wrote on 11/6/03 3:22 AM:

Quote:
Dear Coating guys,

I have a query. If precision polished flat is coated with edge
filter which transmits 633nm, what will happen to the form error or
power on the coated surface of the flat? To be more precise, I wish to
know whether the power increases or decreases and why?

Ussually, a coating placed upon a hot substrate, will shrink faster than the
substrate upon cooling. This puts the coating in tension. On a thin
substrate, it is very likely that the coating surface will become concave.

As for details, you are on your own.

Bill
sankar
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2003 12:48 am
Guest
Repeating Decimal <salmonfry@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:<BBCFC77F.36F2%salmonfry@sbcglobal.net>...
Quote:
in article 78d30f36.0311060322.7ff524c7@posting.google.com, sankar at
sandivp@hotmail.com wrote on 11/6/03 3:22 AM:

Dear Coating guys,

I have a query. If precision polished flat is coated with edge
filter which transmits 633nm, what will happen to the form error or
power on the coated surface of the flat? To be more precise, I wish to
know whether the power increases or decreases and why?

Ussually, a coating placed upon a hot substrate, will shrink faster than the
substrate upon cooling. This puts the coating in tension. On a thin
substrate, it is very likely that the coating surface will become concave.

As for details, you are on your own.

Bill

Dear Bill,

Thank you very much for your info.
I have one more query. For coated precision polished flat, since
coating changes the form error, is it required to choose a convex
polished surface to compensate for concave surface after coating or
form error measurement after coating is not relevant?

Sankar
Repeating Decimal
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2003 2:00 am
Guest
in article 78d30f36.0311072148.2de1e88b@posting.google.com, sankar at
sandivp@hotmail.com wrote on 11/7/03 9:48 PM:

Quote:
Thank you very much for your info.
I have one more query. For coated precision polished flat, since
coating changes the form error, is it required to choose a convex
polished surface to compensate for concave surface after coating or
form error measurement after coating is not relevant?

I think that you will find coatings on highly precise flats such as used in
Fabry-Perot interferometr mirros with rms variations in the neighborhood of
lambda/100 or so use SOFT coating materials that cannot support stress. For
that reason, the coatings are easily damaged.

Bill
sankar
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2003 12:39 am
Guest
Repeating Decimal <salmonfry@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:<BBD1D4B9.386B%salmonfry@sbcglobal.net>...
Quote:
in article 78d30f36.0311072148.2de1e88b@posting.google.com, sankar at
sandivp@hotmail.com wrote on 11/7/03 9:48 PM:

Thank you very much for your info.
I have one more query. For coated precision polished flat, since
coating changes the form error, is it required to choose a convex
polished surface to compensate for concave surface after coating or
form error measurement after coating is not relevant?

I think that you will find coatings on highly precise flats such as used in
Fabry-Perot interferometr mirros with rms variations in the neighborhood of
lambda/100 or so use SOFT coating materials that cannot support stress. For
that reason, the coatings are easily damaged.

Bill

Thank you for your info.
Is form error measurement before coating relevant or that after coating relevant?
 
Page 1 of 1       All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Tue Oct 07, 2008 3:58 pm