| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Environment Forum » The Cloud-Climate Conundrum
Page 2 of 2 Goto page Previous 1, 2
|
| Author |
Message |
| David Ball |
 Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2003 12:01 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 10:48:29 -0500, "James" <jrapier@dcr.net> wrote:
Quote:
"David Ball" <wraith7@mb.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:3657uvgj5dao8bmpnmnafbi420omcl293o@4ax.com...
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 09:53:06 -0500, "James" <jrapier@dcr.net> wrote:
Only to a fool like you. There are things we can't forecast
effectively, that doesn't mean we don't understand the underlying
processes. I ought to know.
Then what are the underlying processes to natural climate change?
Haven't you been paying attention again, James? That topic has
been covered extensively here. Look it up in the archive.
"I don't know" would have sufficed.
Why would I say that?
Because it's true.
What's true? That you haven't been paying attention during
extensive discussions in this forum on what processes lead to natural
climate change? That much is obvious. Take some time and go through
the archives.
Quote:
That's your answer, James, not mine.
Look up the information in the archive. It has been commented on
extensively.
I doubt your answer would be there. Natural climate change remains pretty
much a mystery.
LOL. Only to you, James. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| James |
| Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2003 12:29 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"David Ball" <wraith7@mb.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:p009uvokjjhk5sdlpo9dbtc2rqo630fu72@4ax.com...
Quote: On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 10:48:29 -0500, "James" <jrapier@dcr.net> wrote:
"David Ball" <wraith7@mb.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:3657uvgj5dao8bmpnmnafbi420omcl293o@4ax.com...
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 09:53:06 -0500, "James" <jrapier@dcr.net> wrote:
Only to a fool like you. There are things we can't forecast
effectively, that doesn't mean we don't understand the underlying
processes. I ought to know.
Then what are the underlying processes to natural climate change?
Haven't you been paying attention again, James? That topic has
been covered extensively here. Look it up in the archive.
"I don't know" would have sufficed.
Why would I say that?
Because it's true.
What's true? That you haven't been paying attention during
extensive discussions in this forum on what processes lead to natural
climate change? That much is obvious. Take some time and go through
the archives.
Dodge, weave, bob. LOL |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| David Ball |
| Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2003 12:46 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 12:29:35 -0500, "James" <jrapier@dcr.net> wrote:
Quote:
"David Ball" <wraith7@mb.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:p009uvokjjhk5sdlpo9dbtc2rqo630fu72@4ax.com...
On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 10:48:29 -0500, "James" <jrapier@dcr.net> wrote:
"David Ball" <wraith7@mb.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:3657uvgj5dao8bmpnmnafbi420omcl293o@4ax.com...
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 09:53:06 -0500, "James" <jrapier@dcr.net> wrote:
Only to a fool like you. There are things we can't forecast
effectively, that doesn't mean we don't understand the underlying
processes. I ought to know.
Then what are the underlying processes to natural climate change?
Haven't you been paying attention again, James? That topic has
been covered extensively here. Look it up in the archive.
"I don't know" would have sufficed.
Why would I say that?
Because it's true.
What's true? That you haven't been paying attention during
extensive discussions in this forum on what processes lead to natural
climate change? That much is obvious. Take some time and go through
the archives.
Dodge, weave, bob. LOL
Just telling the truth, James, something you seem incapable of
doing. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| James |
| Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2003 1:21 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"David Ball" <wraith7@mb.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:a3nbuv4fm878ol6sc9sdsmhh7dju7o46fr@4ax.com...
Quote: On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 12:29:35 -0500, "James" <jrapier@dcr.net> wrote:
"David Ball" <wraith7@mb.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:p009uvokjjhk5sdlpo9dbtc2rqo630fu72@4ax.com...
On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 10:48:29 -0500, "James" <jrapier@dcr.net> wrote:
"David Ball" <wraith7@mb.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:3657uvgj5dao8bmpnmnafbi420omcl293o@4ax.com...
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 09:53:06 -0500, "James" <jrapier@dcr.net> wrote:
Only to a fool like you. There are things we can't forecast
effectively, that doesn't mean we don't understand the
underlying
processes. I ought to know.
Then what are the underlying processes to natural climate
change?
Haven't you been paying attention again, James? That topic has
been covered extensively here. Look it up in the archive.
"I don't know" would have sufficed.
Why would I say that?
Because it's true.
What's true? That you haven't been paying attention during
extensive discussions in this forum on what processes lead to natural
climate change? That much is obvious. Take some time and go through
the archives.
Dodge, weave, bob. LOL
Just telling the truth, James, something you seem incapable of
doing.
Well since you always say you "know", why not take a paragraph or two and
splain it? Oh wait... it can't be done. It takes years of study and volumes
of data to compile that paragraph doesn't it. LOL |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| David Ball |
| Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2003 2:00 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 13:21:42 -0500, "James" <jrapier@dcr.net> wrote:
Quote:
"David Ball" <wraith7@mb.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:a3nbuv4fm878ol6sc9sdsmhh7dju7o46fr@4ax.com...
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 12:29:35 -0500, "James" <jrapier@dcr.net> wrote:
"David Ball" <wraith7@mb.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:p009uvokjjhk5sdlpo9dbtc2rqo630fu72@4ax.com...
On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 10:48:29 -0500, "James" <jrapier@dcr.net> wrote:
"David Ball" <wraith7@mb.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:3657uvgj5dao8bmpnmnafbi420omcl293o@4ax.com...
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 09:53:06 -0500, "James" <jrapier@dcr.net> wrote:
Only to a fool like you. There are things we can't forecast
effectively, that doesn't mean we don't understand the
underlying
processes. I ought to know.
Then what are the underlying processes to natural climate
change?
Haven't you been paying attention again, James? That topic has
been covered extensively here. Look it up in the archive.
"I don't know" would have sufficed.
Why would I say that?
Because it's true.
What's true? That you haven't been paying attention during
extensive discussions in this forum on what processes lead to natural
climate change? That much is obvious. Take some time and go through
the archives.
Dodge, weave, bob. LOL
Just telling the truth, James, something you seem incapable of
doing.
Well since you always say you "know", why not take a paragraph or two and
splain it? Oh wait... it can't be done. It takes years of study and volumes
of data to compile that paragraph doesn't it. LOL
But, James, your trolling would suggest that YOU can
unequivocally point to places in where the science is a SHAM. Point
them out please, using purely technical language. Hell, pick one and
explain it in detail. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| James |
| Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2003 10:54 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"David Ball" <wraith7@mb.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:lbrbuv86se00hrof759b01nsqkn2i81n3q@4ax.com...
Quote: On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 13:21:42 -0500, "James" <jrapier@dcr.net> wrote:
"David Ball" <wraith7@mb.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:a3nbuv4fm878ol6sc9sdsmhh7dju7o46fr@4ax.com...
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 12:29:35 -0500, "James" <jrapier@dcr.net> wrote:
"David Ball" <wraith7@mb.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:p009uvokjjhk5sdlpo9dbtc2rqo630fu72@4ax.com...
On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 10:48:29 -0500, "James" <jrapier@dcr.net> wrote:
"David Ball" <wraith7@mb.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:3657uvgj5dao8bmpnmnafbi420omcl293o@4ax.com...
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 09:53:06 -0500, "James" <jrapier@dcr.net
wrote:
Only to a fool like you. There are things we can't forecast
effectively, that doesn't mean we don't understand the
underlying
processes. I ought to know.
Then what are the underlying processes to natural climate
change?
Haven't you been paying attention again, James? That topic has
been covered extensively here. Look it up in the archive.
"I don't know" would have sufficed.
Why would I say that?
Because it's true.
What's true? That you haven't been paying attention during
extensive discussions in this forum on what processes lead to
natural
climate change? That much is obvious. Take some time and go through
the archives.
Dodge, weave, bob. LOL
Just telling the truth, James, something you seem incapable of
doing.
Well since you always say you "know", why not take a paragraph or two and
splain it? Oh wait... it can't be done. It takes years of study and
volumes
of data to compile that paragraph doesn't it. LOL
But, James, your trolling would suggest that YOU can
unequivocally point to places in where the science is a SHAM. Point
them out please, using purely technical language. Hell, pick one and
explain it in detail.
Look in the archives David. This has all been explained to you many times.
LOL |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| David Ball |
| Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2003 7:50 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 10:54:54 -0500, "James" <jrapier@dcr.net> wrote:
Quote:
But, James, your trolling would suggest that YOU can
unequivocally point to places in where the science is a SHAM. Point
them out please, using purely technical language. Hell, pick one and
explain it in detail.
Look in the archives David. This has all been explained to you many times.
LOL
It's quite clear to everyone that you don't have a bloody
clue, so your posting about sham science is just more of your pathetic
trolling. Keep trying though. Sooner or later you might post something
useful. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Page 2 of 2 Goto page Previous 1, 2
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Tue Oct 07, 2008 3:10 am
|
|