 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Physics Forum » CERN, LHC. The End is soon.... |
|
Page 2 of 10 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 Next |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Tom Roberts... |
 Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:40 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Magnetic wrote:
[quote]I give the following probabilities:
A. 10% - magnetic collapse will start at 0.45 TeV;
B. 50% - magnetic collapse will start at 3.5 TeV, if A did not
happen;
[/quote]
Well, such a "collapse" has not happened in more than a decade of
running the Tevatron at 1.8 TeV, and a few weeks at 2.0 TeV.
Tom Roberts |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Inertial... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:41 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Magnetic" <magnetic.trap at (no spam) yandex.ua> wrote in message
news:7c48b3d9-ee36-49d6-84d0-0e185daf095e at (no spam) g23g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
[quote]According to Russian online “opinion pole” at November 6, 2009, 52% of
respondents had said that LHC is the dearth threat.
[/quote]
So .. Russians are misinformed idiots. Thanks for letting us know
[quote]But as we can see, CERN continues their preparations to this crime
experiment. Conclusion - the science is criminal now!
[/quote]
No .. your stupidity is criminal.
[quote]Is there online “opinion pole” about LHC in English?
[/quote]
Who cares |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Inertial... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:42 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Magnetic" <magnetic.trap at (no spam) yandex.ua> wrote in message
news:682259ac-aae9-4783-ac9b-3b15ee64cfc1 at (no spam) v30g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
[quote]On Nov 6, 10:40 am, Tom Roberts <tjroberts... at (no spam) sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Magnetic wrote:
I give the following probabilities:
A. 10% - magnetic collapse will start at 0.45 TeV;
B. 50% - magnetic collapse will start at 3.5 TeV, if A did not
happen;
Well, such a "collapse" has not happened in more than a decade of
running the Tevatron at 1.8 TeV, and a few weeks at 2.0 TeV.
Tom Roberts
1. Tevatron gives 1 TeV per particle.
2. Tevatron leads to annihilation of proton and antiproton;
LHC will lead to creation of magnetic holes in proton-proton
collisions.
[/quote]
Drivel drivel drivel. Don't you have a toilet you can use instead? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| eric gisse... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:55 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Magnetic wrote:
[quote]On Nov 6, 10:40 am, Tom Roberts <tjroberts... at (no spam) sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Magnetic wrote:
I give the following probabilities:
A. 10% - magnetic collapse will start at 0.45 TeV;
B. 50% - magnetic collapse will start at 3.5 TeV, if A did not
happen;
Well, such a "collapse" has not happened in more than a decade of
running the Tevatron at 1.8 TeV, and a few weeks at 2.0 TeV.
Tom Roberts
1. Tevatron gives 1 TeV per particle.
2. Tevatron leads to annihilation of proton and antiproton;
LHC will lead to creation of magnetic holes in proton-proton
collisions.
[/quote]
What will you do if nothing happens? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Magnetic... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:11 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
[quote]Start by getting a better education.
o The energy that can be supplied to a collision by the Large
Hadron Collider (LHC) is a piffle, compared to similar collision
(cosmic rays) taking place over your head right here right now.
Cosmic Ray energies range from five to ten orders of magnitude
greater than the maximum energy that can be pumped into a collision
in the LHC.
[/quote]
Comparison with cosmic rays is crude and criminal error. Read my post
upper,
[quote]o There is evidence that a black hole has been created in particle
accelerators in the past. Low mass black holes have an exceedingly
short lifetime. t = m^3/(1.194 x 10^16 kg^3/s)
[/quote]
BHs are safe and impossible.
MHs are possible and extremely dangerous.
[quote]o There is no possibility to pump enough energy into a black hole
to have any substantial mass.
[/quote]
BH’s radius is 10^51 m.
MH’s radius is 10^16 m.
[quote]o There is no way to create a black hole in a laboratory that can
sustain itself.
[/quote]
BHs need more than million years to destroy the Earth.
MHs need about 1000 seconds to destroy the Earth. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Inertial... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:42 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Magnetic" <magnetic.trap at (no spam) yandex.ua> wrote in message
news:3e17be2d-72f0-49a2-a0da-e357d16cb6e5 at (no spam) k17g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
[quote]On Nov 6, 11:51 am, tadchem <tadc... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
You must realize, of course, that the history of eschatology shows
that of the uncounted thousands of predictions of "the End" that have
occurred throughout history, exactly 100% of them have been wrong.
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
I do not predict the End of Universe, but the life of Earth and It’s
Biosphere can be limited.
I want to believe that the reason will win and the LHC will be
stopped.
Inertial wrote:
According to Russian online “opinion pole” at November 6, 2009, 52% of
respondents had said that LHC is the dearth threat.
So .. Russians are misinformed idiots.
Make an "opinion pole" in your country and you will see that you, who
are the misinformed idiot.
[/quote]
I already know it is you. No need to make an opinion poll of others who are
misinformed to find out that. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Magnetic... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:43 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
[quote]BH’s radius is 10^51 m.
MH’s radius is 10^16 m.
[/quote]
tipo, lost the sing "-"!
At mass equivalent to 1 TeV
BH’s radius is 10^-51 m.
MH’s radius is 10^-16 m. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| John Christiansen... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 7:20 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Magnetic" <magnetic.trap at (no spam) yandex.ua> skrev i en meddelelse
news:10fb6bf6-9dd0-421e-8b02-a9805a0466b5 at (no spam) k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
I wrote the letters to President of EU, to President of USA...
But with great probability their secretaries will drop my letters into
rubbish.
So, if you do not want to play in Russian Roulette, compose your own
letter or agree with mine.
Amazing how ignorant it is possible to be. There is not now and there has
never been an EU president. Furthermore CERN is in Switzerland which is not
part of the EU, so even if there were an EU president (which as mentioned
earlier there is not) he or she could do nothing about it.
Dear President!
I am the author of the theory of magnetic hole. According to this
theory magnetic holes can be created soon at the Large Hadron
Collider. That will lead to the collaptical explosion of the Earth.
November the 30-th, according to the preliminary plan for the Large
Hadron Collider, the collisions of protons with energies of 0.45 TeV
will be implemented, the 14-th of December - collisions with energies
of 3.5 TeV. If the magnetic collapse starts, it will be impossible to
stop it. It will end with ejection of the Earth’s shell into outer
space.
I give the following probabilities:
A. 10% - magnetic collapse will start at 0.45 TeV;
B. 50% - magnetic collapse will start at 3.5 TeV, if A did not
happen;
C. 70% - magnetic collapse will start at 7 TeV, if B did not happen.
30% I leave to my mistake.
Why is such confidence?
Compare Newtonian black hole and magnetic hole:
GMm / r = mc^2 / 2;
pB = mc^2.
It was obtained two independent proofs that the equality pB = mc^2 is
reached at the energies, achievable in modern colliders,
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/magtren.html
There are many arguments in favor the fact that magnetic holes exist,
and astronomers see them, but call them on the error as black holes,
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/argen.html
It was found several crude errors and criminal lies in the assessment
documents about the safety of LHC, http://darkenergy.narod.ru/tezeng.html
The Earth after the magnetic collapse will transform into a small
region of exited superconducting vacuum. This region’s diameter is
about 10 meters. The thickness is about 2.5 meters… |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Magnetic... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 7:21 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 6, 5:45 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml... at (no spam) mchsi.com> wrote:
[quote]Magnetic wrote:
BH’s radius is 10^51 m.
MH’s radius is 10^16 m.
tipo, lost the sing "-"!
At mass equivalent to 1 TeV
BH’s radius is 10^-51 m. <=== Wrong again!
MH’s radius is 10^-16 m.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -[/quote] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Magnetic... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 7:23 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
[quote]At mass equivalent to 1 TeV
BH’s radius is 10^-51 m. <=== Wrong again!
[/quote]
OK. I’ll try to explain.
1. CERN physicists say that mBHs are possible if the space-time has
one additional short coordinate.
2. Caluza and Klein (sorry for my English) about hundred years ago
united the gravity and electromagnetism by developing the space-time
with one more additional coordinate.
3. Quantum mechanics connects the energy of particle and its
dimensions by the principle of uncertainty.
CERN specialists use the notion of microscopic black hole, and they
think as if this black hole is bound by gravity force. But that is
incorrect in 5-dimensional space.
Microscopic black hole can be connected by electromagnetic forces,
which are about 10^36 times stronger than gravity forces.
I use terms “magnetic hole” and “electromagnetic hole”. The first has
two poles N and S. The second hole has poles N+ and S-, or N- and S+.
It is possible that electromagnetic hole oscillates. Preliminary
computations show that the frequency of such hole approximately
coincides with the frequency of pulsars of correspondent mass.
So, be ready to space-flight in comets to other stellar systems.
CERN will not study the theory of magnetic holes.
They will make them and explode our beautiful Earth. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Inertial... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 7:34 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Magnetic" <magnetic.trap at (no spam) yandex.ua> wrote in message
news:c9f66d89-47be-4f21-b902-91bd25f2c58c at (no spam) b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
[quote]It was announced on TV that peace of bread was found in the tunnel of
LHC.
That is a bad sign. Slices of bread are usually put at the cemetery on
the remembrance of dead souls.
[/quote]
BAHAHAHA .. you're such a clown. You got any more like that? This is
hilarious |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Ahmed Ouahi, Architect... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 8:52 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Juan R." González-Álvarez... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 9:11 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Magnetic wrote on Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:15:17 -0800:
[quote]I wrote the letters to President of EU, to President of USA... But with
great probability their secretaries will drop my letters into rubbish.
So, if you do not want to play in Russian Roulette, compose your own
letter or agree with mine.
Dear President!
I am the author of the theory of magnetic hole. According to this theory
magnetic holes can be created soon at the Large Hadron Collider. That
will lead to the collaptical explosion of the Earth.
[/quote]
http://abstrusegoose.com/47
[quote]November the 30-th, according to the preliminary plan for the Large
Hadron Collider, the collisions of protons with energies of 0.45 TeV
will be implemented, the 14-th of December - collisions with energies of
3.5 TeV. If the magnetic collapse starts, it will be impossible to stop
it. It will end with ejection of the Earth’s shell into outer space.
I give the following probabilities:
A. 10% - magnetic collapse will start at 0.45 TeV; B. 50% - magnetic
collapse will start at 3.5 TeV, if A did not happen;
C. 70% - magnetic collapse will start at 7 TeV, if B did not happen. 30%
I leave to my mistake.
Why is such confidence?
Compare Newtonian black hole and magnetic hole: GMm / r = mc^2 / 2;
pB = mc^2.
It was obtained two independent proofs that the equality pB = mc^2 is
reached at the energies, achievable in modern colliders,
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/magtren.html There are many arguments in
favor the fact that magnetic holes exist, and astronomers see them, but
call them on the error as black holes,
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/argen.html It was found several crude errors
and criminal lies in the assessment documents about the safety of LHC,
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/tezeng.html
The Earth after the magnetic collapse will transform into a small region
of exited superconducting vacuum. This region’s diameter is about 10
meters. The thickness is about 2.5 meters…
[/quote]
--
http://www.canonicalscience.org/
BLOG:
http://www.canonicalscience.org/en/publicationzone/canonicalsciencetoday/canonicalsciencetoday.html |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Sam Wormley... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 9:35 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Magnetic wrote:
[quote]According to Russian online “opinion pole” at November 6, 2009, 52% of
respondents had said that LHC is the dearth threat.
But as we can see, CERN continues their preparations to this crime
experiment. Conclusion - the science is criminal now!
Is there online “opinion pole” about LHC in English?
[/quote]
So you think some country will bomb the LHC before it can get'm? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Sam Wormley... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 9:40 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Magnetic wrote:
[quote]I wrote the letters to President of EU, to President of USA...
[/quote]
Sniveling Snipped.
Start by getting a better education.
o The energy that can be supplied to a collision by the Large
Hadron Collider (LHC) is a piffle, compared to similar collision
(cosmic rays) taking place over your head right here right now.
Cosmic Ray energies range from five to ten orders of magnitude
greater than the maximum energy that can be pumped into a collision
in the LHC.
o There is evidence that a black hole has been created in particle
accelerators in the past. Low mass black holes have an exceedingly
short lifetime. t = m^3/(1.194 x 10^16 kg^3/s)
o There is no possibility to pump enough energy into a black hole
to have any substantial mass.
o There is no way to create a black hole in a laboratory that can
sustain itself. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Tue Dec 08, 2009 5:53 pm
|
|