 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Physics - Particle Forum » "Gravity"... |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Rohtau... |
 Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:11 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Gravity"
(See also our sister website reticsessays.com)
Like almost everyone else, the writer started by assuming that General
Relativity represented good science and that it was his task to understand
that science. Almost immediately it became obvious that a flaw must exist
somewhere in its derivation. Allegedly, General Relativity and Special
Relativity followed The Principle of Equivalence but THEIR CONCLUSIONS WERE
NOT EQUIVALENT! In a Force-Length-Time systems of units, Special Relativity
and General Relativity provided:
Quantity Parallel Velocity General Relativity
Force F 1 1
Length L 1/(1-V^2/C^2)^0.5 1
Time T (1-V^2/C^2)^0.5 G*M1*M2/(R*C)^2
One does not need to be a rocket scientist to recognize that these
transformations are NOT ANALOGOUS. Under Special Relativity, the
transformations for length and time are reciprocal. Under General Relativity
such a reciprocal relationship does not exist since the transformations for
length is unity.
It is the lack of such a reciprocal relationship that made it
impossible for Dr. Einstein to solve the equations of General Relativity in
terms of our familiar three dimensional Euclidean space. After struggling
with the problem for about 18 months, he asserted that space was not three
dimensional Euclidean but was curved into an unobservable fourth spatial
dimension! He did not go back to see where a rather naive mathematical error
was preventing the solution. This crutch allowed the mathematical equations
to be solved since they added the degree of freedom that his error hid. The
idea of "curved space" was accepted because "no one can prove it isn't
curved". This is hardly a responsible justification for accepting a physical
theory!
Since I wished to understand gravitation, I proceeded to derive the
nature of the gravitational field by using two completely different and
independent methods. ("There is more than one way to skin a cat.") Under
both of these derivations, the following transformations were found:
Quantity Parallel Velocity General Relativity
Force F 1 1
Length L 1/(1-V^2/C^2)^0.5 1/G*M1*M2/(R*C)^2
Time T (1-V^2/C^2)^0.5 G*M1*M2/(R*C)^2
The result satisfies the Principle of Equivalence since it provides
reciprocal relationship between the transformations for length and time.
These results yield a solution which is consistent with three dimensional
Euclidean space. (Recent cosmological observations have shown that the space
represented by the Universe as a whole is not "curved", it is three
dimensional Euclidean.)
The correct derivation of gravitational theory described is provided in
http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm. The test for its validity is whether it
agrees with both the results of observation and the results of theoretical
derivations. The material presented passes this test. It agrees with the
observations which are alleged to have verified General Relativity. The
Sun's gravitational field is about 5 orders of magnitude too weak to reveal
the difference between the two approaches. Observations of strong
gravitational fields, such as around neutron stars, cannot differentiate
between the theories without a close up observations of orbital parameters.
Such a verification must await the availability of Star Trek's Warp Drive.
The advantage of the revised approach is that, among other results, it
reveals the source of gravitational energy (force), allows the total energy
of the Universe to remain constant over time, eliminates the idea of a
singularities (no black holes), and explains the creation of Universes. The
topics covered are:
Summary of "Gravity"
Chapter Titles
1: - Introduction
2: - Laying the Groundwork
3: - Evaluating the Gravitational Conversion Factors
4: - Comparison with the "Real World"
5: - The Complete Gravitational Field
There are 50,000 words and 22 diagrams.
The source material for this posting may be found in
http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm (1997); http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm
(1987); and http://einsteinhoax.com/relcor.htm (1997). EVERYTHING WHICH WE
ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS
TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE
MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS
REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM
THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.
All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at the
http://einsteinhoax.com/postinglog.htm.
Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on
a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy
as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,
please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you
have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.
E-mail:- einsteinhoax2 at (no spam) verizon.net. If you wish a reply, be sure that
your mail reception is not blocked.
The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 8
years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE
MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without
questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be
objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.
Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one
exception for which a correction was provided. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| iman way... |
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:23 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 4 نوفمبر, 23:11, "Rohtau" <roh... at (no spam) verrizon..net> wrote:
[quote]"Gravity"
(See also our sister website reticsessays.com)
Like almost everyone else, the writer started by assuming that General
Relativity represented good science and that it was his task to understand
that science. Almost immediately it became obvious that a flaw must exist
somewhere in its derivation. Allegedly, General Relativity and Special
Relativity followed The Principle of Equivalence but THEIR CONCLUSIONS WERE
NOT EQUIVALENT! In a Force-Length-Time systems of units, Special Relativity
and General Relativity provided:
Quantity Parallel Velocity General Relativity
Force F 1 1
Length L 1/(1-V^2/C^2)^0.5 1
Time T (1-V^2/C^2)^0.5 G*M1*M2/(R*C)^2
One does not need to be a rocket scientist to recognize that these
transformations are NOT ANALOGOUS. Under Special Relativity, the
transformations for length and time are reciprocal. Under General Relativity
such a reciprocal relationship does not exist since the transformations for
length is unity.
It is the lack of such a reciprocal relationship that made it
impossible for Dr. Einstein to solve the equations of General Relativity in
terms of our familiar three dimensional Euclidean space. After struggling
with the problem for about 18 months, he asserted that space was not three
dimensional Euclidean but was curved into an unobservable fourth spatial
dimension! He did not go back to see where a rather naive mathematical error
was preventing the solution. This crutch allowed the mathematical equations
to be solved since they added the degree of freedom that his error hid. The
idea of "curved space" was accepted because "no one can prove it isn't
curved". This is hardly a responsible justification for accepting a physical
theory!
Since I wished to understand gravitation, I proceeded to derive the
nature of the gravitational field by using two completely different and
independent methods. ("There is more than one way to skin a cat.") Under
both of these derivations, the following transformations were found:
Quantity Parallel Velocity General Relativity
Force F 1 1
Length L 1/(1-V^2/C^2)^0.5 1/G*M1*M2/(R*C)^2
Time T (1-V^2/C^2)^0.5 G*M1*M2/(R*C)^2
The result satisfies the Principle of Equivalence since it provides
reciprocal relationship between the transformations for length and time.
These results yield a solution which is consistent with three dimensional
Euclidean space. (Recent cosmological observations have shown that the space
represented by the Universe as a whole is not "curved", it is three
dimensional Euclidean.)
The correct derivation of gravitational theory described is provided inhttp://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm. The test for its validity is whether it
agrees with both the results of observation and the results of theoretical
derivations. The material presented passes this test. It agrees with the
observations which are alleged to have verified General Relativity. The
Sun's gravitational field is about 5 orders of magnitude too weak to reveal
the difference between the two approaches. Observations of strong
gravitational fields, such as around neutron stars, cannot differentiate
between the theories without a close up observations of orbital parameters.
Such a verification must await the availability of Star Trek's Warp Drive..
The advantage of the revised approach is that, among other results, it
reveals the source of gravitational energy (force), allows the total energy
of the Universe to remain constant over time, eliminates the idea of a
singularities (no black holes), and explains the creation of Universes. The
topics covered are:
Summary of "Gravity"
Chapter Titles
1: - Introduction
2: - Laying the Groundwork
3: - Evaluating the Gravitational Conversion Factors
4: - Comparison with the "Real World"
5: - The Complete Gravitational Field
There are 50,000 words and 22 diagrams.
The source material for this posting may be found inhttp://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm(1997);http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm
(1987); andhttp://einsteinhoax.com/relcor.htm(1997). EVERYTHING WHICH WE
ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS
TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE
MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS
REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM
THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.
All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at thehttp://einsteinhoax.com/postinglog.htm.
Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on
a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy
as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,
please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you
have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.
E-mail:- einsteinho... at (no spam) verizon.net. If you wish a reply, be sure that
your mail reception is not blocked.
The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 8
years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE
MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without
questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be
objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.
Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one
exception for which a correction was provided.
[/quote]
I believe that my topic is useful and I would like to share my
thoughts.
THANK YOU.
WHO IS MUHAMMAD?
Muhammad was born in Makkah in the year 570, at a time when
Christianity was not yet fully established in Europe. Since his father
died before his birth, and his mother shortly afterwards, he was
raised by his uncle from the respected tribe of Quraysh. As he grew
up, he became known for his truthfulness, generosity and sincerity and
was sought after for his ability to arbitrate in disputes. The
historians describe him as calm and contemplative. Muhammad was of a
deeply religious nature, and had long detested the decadence of his
society. It became his habit to contemplate from time to time in the
Cave of Hira near the summit of Jaba al-Nur, the ‘Mountain of Light’
near Makkah.
HOW DID HE BECOME A PROPHET AND A MESSENGER OF GOD?
At the age of 40, while engaged in a meditative retreat,
Muhammad,peace be upon him, received his first revelation from God
through the Angel Gabriel. This revelation, which continued for 23
years, is known as the Quran. As soon as he began to recite the words
he heard from Gabriel, and to preach the truth which God had revealed
to him, he and his small group of followers suffered bitter
persecution which grew so fierce that in the year 622 God gave them
the command to emigrate. This event, the Hijra, ‘migration’, in which
they left Makkah for the city of Madinah some 260 miles to the north,
marks the beginning of the Muslim calendar.
After several years, the Prophet and his followers were able to return
to Makkah, where they forgave their enemies and established Islam
definitively. Before the Prophet died at the age of 63, the greater
part of Arabia was Muslim, and within a century of his death Islam had
spread to Spain in the West and as far East as China.
—————–
For more information about Islam
http://english.islamway.com/
http://www.islamhouse.com/
http://www.discoverislam.com/
http://www.islambasics.com/index.php
http://english.islamway.com/
http://www.islamtoday.net/english/
http://www.islamweb.net/ver2/MainPage/indexe.php
http://www.sultan.org/
Contact Us At
Imanway.group at (no spam) gmail.com |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Nov 27, 2009 7:47 pm
|
|