 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Medicine - Lyme Forum » WaPo- What's Next for Healthcare? Nothing; DOJ Busy... |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Mort Zuckerman... |
 Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 4:00 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
To: ejdionne at (no spam) washpost.com, Durland.fish at (no spam) yale.edu, Aag1 at (no spam) columbia.edu,
gary_wormser at (no spam) nymc.edu, scientificintegrity at (no spam) ostp.gov,
pkrugman at (no spam) princeton.edu, Stanley.fish at (no spam) fiu.edu,
emcsweegan at (no spam) niaid.nih.gov, afauci at (no spam) niaid.nih.gov,
SpinLyme at (no spam) yahoogroups.com, kshepard at (no spam) calea.org, fitzmas at (no spam) gmail.com,
patrick.fitzgerald at (no spam) usdoj.gov, modelt1918 at (no spam) sbcglobal.net,
jdrazen at (no spam) nejm.org, letters at (no spam) courant.com, Jgerberding at (no spam) cdc.gov,
michael.cole at (no spam) po.state.ct.us, conndcj at (no spam) po.state.ct.us, executive-
editor at (no spam) nytimes.com, managing-editor at (no spam) nytimes.com, news-
tips at (no spam) nytimes.com, bizday at (no spam) nytimes.com, foreign at (no spam) nytimes.com,
national at (no spam) nytimes.com, dvbid at (no spam) cdc.gov, brigidcallahan at (no spam) optonline.net,
trvl at (no spam) hotmail.com, illinoislyme at (no spam) aol.com, jlender at (no spam) courant.com,
tinajgarcia at (no spam) yahoo.com, jhornberger at (no spam) fff.org, thomas.carson at (no spam) usdoj.gov,
thomas.ryan at (no spam) po.state.ct.us, kurtzh at (no spam) washpost.com,
georgewill at (no spam) washpost.com, pj at (no spam) allegorypress.com,
commissioner.dcf at (no spam) po.state.ct.us, bransfield at (no spam) comcast.net,
vtsherr at (no spam) comcast.net, oca at (no spam) po.state.ct.us, freethinker at (no spam) charter.net,
scott.murphy at (no spam) po.state.ct.us, governor.rell at (no spam) po.state.ct.us,
attorney.general at (no spam) po.state.ct.us, randall.samborn at (no spam) usdoj.gov,
Robert.shiller at (no spam) yale.edu, editor at (no spam) greenwich-post.com,
harold.koh at (no spam) yale.edu, sedmonds at (no spam) nswbc.org, rrmcgovern at (no spam) aol.com,
frich at (no spam) nytimes.com, dprice at (no spam) stmartin.edu
Cc: francam at (no spam) ucia.gov, dr-ahmadinejad at (no spam) president.ir,
eugenerobinson at (no spam) washpost.com, afauci at (no spam) niaid.nih.gov,
bmiller at (no spam) newstimes.com, trvl at (no spam) hotmail.com, rastro18 at (no spam) aol.com,
billcurryct at (no spam) gmail.com, amcguigan at (no spam) rms-law.com, rjmurzyn at (no spam) aol.com,
paulcraigroberts at (no spam) yahoo.com, sidney_blumenthal at (no spam) yahoo.com,
criminal.division at (no spam) usdoj.gov, karla.dobinski at (no spam) usdoj.gov,
christopher.christie at (no spam) usdoj.gov, richard.Levin at (no spam) yale.edu,
harold.koh at (no spam) yale.edu, james.phillips at (no spam) yale.edu, inquire at (no spam) aldf.com,
lyme at (no spam) idsociety.org, meganmcardle at (no spam) theatlantic.com,
bob.drogin at (no spam) latimes.com
Subject: WaPo- What's Next for Healthcare?
Date: Nov 2, 2009 8:56 AM
What's Next?
Prosecution of the RICO entity, the
ALDF.com and their association with
Kaiser-Permanente:
http://www.actionlyme.org/USDOJ_COMPLAINT_RICO.htm
Who authorized Allen Steere's junket to
Germany to falsify the diagnostic standard
for Lyme Borreliosis:
(see here on the bottom left:
http://www.actionlyme.org/MUNCHAUSENS.htm )
to "Lyme Disease"
http://www.actionlyme.org/USDOJ_COMPLAINT_RICO.htm
the hypersensitivity reaction in a knee-ONLY.
http://www.actionlyme.org/CRYME_DISEASE.htm
The only problem with that is that such
an investigation would involve one-of-a-
kind data that is still in the CT US Attorney's
Orifice, which also shows that I was falsely
arrested and that DCF defrauded the court.
And when they were losing their case, they
got rid of me with a false arrest:
http://www.actionlyme.org/GAUVIN_DEATH_PENALTY.htm
and gave me the bond of a murderer- "CASH-ONLY"-
$50,000, so that I would never get out and
be able to prove my innocence, and that
AAG Jessica Gauvin bagged me because she
did not want to go to jail herself.
That's a problem, ain't it?
For 6 more years, this cabal was able to
continue to kill people all because some
obvious ho didn't want to do time for
her multiple crimes.
It's ALL still in the US Attorney's office.
All that data about John J. Connolly selling
out the NYMC to Kaiser to get them out of
financial trouble:
http://www.actionlyme.org/CONNOLLY_FISH_WEINSTEIN.htm
AND, we would find out that James Phillips
came up with the "Like Ted Kascynski" "chemist"
bullcrap to avoid a malpractice lawsuit.
http://www.actionlyme.org/PHILLIPS_JE_PERVERT.htm
AND, we would find out that indeed, my kids
have 100% soundly verifiable congenital Lyme:
http://www.actionlyme.org/Schoen.htm
They're murdering kids for a buck and to
spare themselves paying for their crimes.
What's next for healthcare is more of the
same because nobody in this country has any
brains or balls.
http://www.actionlyme.org/Pam3Cys_Version15.htm
OspA or Pam3Cys was the cause of an entire
spectrum and line of immune suppression
disorders- all of the worse diseases:
ALS, Cancer, Tuberculosis, HIV and MS.
How "Dangerously Intelligent like Ted
Kascynski Chemist" of me to have solved
a 500 year old riddle.
A further question is: Pretend Tufts
actually intends to carry out this
Mouse Infectivity Test and not pull another
Funky Urine Samples Klempnerism:
http://www.actionlyme.org/MKLEMPNER.htm
Do we get a rebate?
Do we get our homes and our children back?
Of course not. This is America.
The "Justice Department" protects themselves
and Israeli criminals. And that's really
all they do. Think about it. The CT AG
sued this Yale Lyme gang because he knew it
was all FRAUD.
And the crooks caved when we all saw
Yale's Eugene Shapiro lying his eyeballs out
on Under Our Skin about Congenital Lyme
and the crooks found out Blumenthal's office
was OFF THE CHARTS *FURIOUS!*:
http://www.actionlyme.org/UCONNS_ABUSE_OF_CZECH_CHILDREN.htm
The crooks were SCARED UH DAT!
They then came to Blumy with an offer:
http://www.actionlyme.org/080430_RICO_CABAL_CAVES.htm
One business day later.
One day after the Saturday when the film
was shown in NYC (April 26, 2008).
The next Monday they found out the AG's office
was livid, and then the next day, Tuesday,
they put out an offer.
It was over Shapiro getting caught lying
about Congenital Lyme in the movie:
http://www.actionlyme.org/Schoen.htm
Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
================================
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/01/AR2009110101703_pf.html
Hearts, minds and health care
By E.J. Dionne Jr.
Monday, November 2, 2009
The next health-care fight has already started. It's the battle to
define the bill that President Obama will eventually sign as a victory
for consumers, taxpayers and the common good.
You might say this view is premature. Legislation has yet to pass the
House or the Senate, there are differences between the two bodies, and
some moderates still have doubts.
But barring astoundingly self-defeating behavior by Democrats, a
decent bill will get to Obama's desk. He and his party will then own
the most sweeping reform of the American social safety net since the
passage of Medicare in the 1960s and, arguably, Social Security in the
1930s.
Both parties know this. That's why much of the rhetoric you'll hear in
the coming weeks will not really be about whether to pass a bill. It
will be designed to shape how the voters who will decide the 2010
elections -- and, ultimately, the fate of health-care reform itself --
come to view the new system.
Republicans will try hard to minimize the benefits that will flow from
the reform and set themselves up to claim that anything bad that
happens to anyone's health care in the next few years is Obama's
fault. It will be a bit like those New York City taxi drivers during
the late 1960s and early '70s who despised Mayor John V. Lindsay so
much that they were prepared to blame him for bad weather.
And since most of the changes don't become effective until 2013, the
next few years will be a time of uncertainties and unknowns. Citizens
typically want to know what's in this for them, and what they'll get
right now.
That's why the most important document House Democrats released when
they unveiled their bill last week was a list of 14 benefits that
would be created immediately.
These include insurance reforms to ban lifetime limits on coverage and
an end to "rescissions," under which insurers abruptly nullify
patients' policies after they file claims. One of the most popular
reforms in the bill -- barring insurers from denying coverage to those
with pre-existing conditions -- wouldn't take effect until later. So
the House bill creates an interim high-risk pool to help those who
need coverage in the meantime.
There are also particular benefits for Medicare recipients, including
an immediate reduction in drug costs, and a very popular provision
that would allow parents to keep their children on the family health
plan through age 26.
Especially important are new investments in community health centers
and in efforts to increase the number of primary care doctors. As
millions more people get access to decent care, the system will have
to provide more doctors, nurses and facilities to treat them.
"People will be excited about 2013," said Rep. George Miller, chairman
of the House Education and Labor Committee, which shares jurisdiction
on the health-care bill. "But there are enough benefits between now
and then to keep them engaged and to keep them favorably disposed."
The key word here is "excited," and the central task of supporters of
health-care reform is to elevate the discussion to the central
question at stake: Will the United States join all the other wealthy
democracies in providing nearly everyone with health insurance? Or
will we kick away the opportunity?
Miller focuses on how much a guarantee of health insurance will lift
needless anxiety from the average family. "Right now, when you lose
your job, you also lose your health care, your ability to send your
kid to college and sometimes your home," he says. Knowing that health
coverage will always be there doesn't solve all those problems, but it
removes a burden.
While negotiations between the two houses will be difficult, my hunch
is that they could be less challenging than many are predicting.
For example, the two houses could split their differences on financing
by including a scaled-back version of the Senate's tax on high-end
health plans while reducing the House's tax on millionaires. Some of
the Senate's cost controls could be added while preserving the House's
more generous approach to coverage. And a public plan will survive
because it's an option most Americans understand and want.
Above all, the negotiators need to know that if they make the process
look like a bad day at the sausage factory, they will undermine public
confidence in the outcome. From now on, they are not simply enacting a
bill. They are rolling out a product.
ejdionne at (no spam) washpost.com
"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sat Nov 28, 2009 12:19 pm
|
|