Main Page | Report this Page
Science Forum Index  »  Philosophy Forum  »  Drug adviser sacked in U.K. Today...
Page 2 of 2    Goto page Previous  1, 2

Drug adviser sacked in U.K. Today...

Author Message
bigfletch8 at (no spam) gmail.com...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 2:02 pm
Guest
On Nov 1, 7:53 pm, "Giga" <"Giga" <just(removetheseandaddmatthe end)
ho... at (no spam) yahoo.co> wrote:
[quote]bigflet... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message

news:5adbba52-de1f-4394-8901-d16834d9248c at (no spam) f18g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 31, 7:13 pm, "Giga" <"Giga" <just(removetheseandaddmatthe end)

ho... at (no spam) yahoo.co> wrote:
bigflet... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message

As often happens just keep sacking scientists until you find one who'll
give
you the results you want.- Hide quoted text -

It is not hard to imagine the number of scientists who will feel
financially vulnerable given the amount of information coming out re
CO2, counter to the politically motivated agendas.

Interesting times indeed.

Notice there is not much publicity regarding last decades''gloom'
focus, being the repairing of the ozone layer.

In Perth,where I live,we were supposed to be roasted by now.

I believe the massive lightening storms, in the Kimberlies,  (NW
wilderness), similar to those in Bolivia, creates massive amounts of
ozone.

Over the years I have developed more confidence in natures way of
balancing, than the information we get from our lords and masters. It
is not the science that misleads, but the way information is released,
and on such issues it is not difficult to speculate on a feasable
political motive.

Sure, there are the ethical tomes, like Nature and New Sciensits, but
that info often doesnt spread. There seems to be little appetite for
good news in the main media, and of course, most of the media is owned
by a few with strong political agendas.

=Not sure it is right to blame media owners for the content of the media.
This is mostly driven by the consumers of that media, I would say. If people
didn't buy it they would soon change the message, and indeed do. People like
clear and dramatic news, not complex and unsurprising, like reality
basically is often.
[/quote]
Im not laying blame, just observing the interaction..

For what it is worth, I have my doubts that anyone could win political
'high' office if they are in Rupert's 'bad books'.

BOfL
 
John Stafford...
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 2:15 pm
Guest
"John Jones" <jonescard... at (no spam) btinternet.com> wrote in message
[quote]

There is little doubt in my mind that cannabis (and other drugs) can open
the mind (sometimes a little too much). If we look at how Western society
has changed (60s-80s) in spiritual terms, New Agism etc, [...]
[/quote]
Learn up: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hashshashin
 
 
Page 2 of 2    Goto page Previous  1, 2
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Tue Dec 15, 2009 12:10 am