| Science Forum Index » Physics Forum » galactic cycle... |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| john... |
 Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 9:01 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
http://users.accesscomm.ca/john/
galaxy model for the atom
Yes, I've thought about black holes as being a
volume in which the rotation is taking spacetime
faster than c when inside the event horizon.
And since no matter can do this, they just keep getting
accelerated up to where they are High Energy Particles
and they are shot out the jets. The jets' output at some
point condenses back into stars in the galactic arms.
It's a cycle. Galaxies have been around for ever.
john |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Sam Wormley... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:16 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
john wrote:
[quote]http://users.accesscomm.ca/john/
galaxy model for the atom
Yes, I've thought about black holes as being a
volume in which the rotation is taking spacetime
faster than c when inside the event horizon.
And since no matter can do this, they just keep getting
accelerated up to where they are High Energy Particles
and they are shot out the jets. The jets' output at some
point condenses back into stars in the galactic arms.
It's a cycle. Galaxies have been around for ever.
[/quote]
John--One can "look back" in time and see that the finite
universe has and is evolving. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Jan Panteltje... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 4:31 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On a sunny day (Sat, 31 Oct 2009 23:40:48 -0800) it happened Uncle Al
<UncleAl0 at (no spam) hate.spam.net> wrote in <4AED3B80.27E85CD0 at (no spam) hate.spam.net>:
[quote]john wrote:
[snip crap]
Yes, I've thought about black holes as being a
volume in which the rotation is taking spacetime
faster than c when inside the event horizon.
[snip rest of crap]
One imagines you've also wiped your bum after defecating. Neither is
justification for public declamation.
[/quote]
Actually I agree with him that the centre spits out stars,
as opposed to starts falling into the black hole or whatever it is.
That also supports a Le Sage model,
if we assume the Le Sage particles originate in the centre,
that also explains the star speed anomality that we see in the galaxies.
Unlike yet an other formula (MOND), a practical explanation.
Have a look at pictures from galaxies, you will see it looks like
a garden sprinkler, NOT like stuff falling in.
There are clearly jets. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| tj Frazir... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 6:49 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Uncle Al... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 11:02 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
john wrote:
[snip crap]
[quote]Yes, I've thought about black holes as being a
volume in which the rotation is taking spacetime
faster than c when inside the event horizon.
[snip rest of crap][/quote]
One imagines you've also wiped your bum after defecating. Neither is
justification for public declamation.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| john... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 3:11 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 31, 4:31 pm, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
[quote]On a sunny day (Sat, 31 Oct 2009 23:40:48 -0800) it happened Uncle Al
Uncle... at (no spam) hate.spam.net> wrote in <4AED3B80.27E85... at (no spam) hate.spam.net>:
john wrote:
[snip crap]
Yes, I've thought about black holes as being a
volume in which the rotation is taking spacetime
faster than c when inside the event horizon.
[snip rest of crap]
One imagines you've also wiped your bum after defecating. Neither is
justification for public declamation.
Actually I agree with him that the centre spits out stars,
as opposed to starts falling into the black hole or whatever it is.
That also supports a Le Sage model,
if we assume the Le Sage particles originate in the centre,
that also explains the star speed anomality that we see in the galaxies.
Unlike yet an other formula (MOND), a practical explanation.
Have a look at pictures from galaxies, you will see it looks like
a garden sprinkler, NOT like stuff falling in.
There are clearly jets.
Thanks, Jan.[/quote]
I mean why not consider
explanations that make more
sense than what they are being forced
into these days by new observations.
It's going to be the new
telescopes that bring down
the big bang, black hole,
dark matter, dark energy
point particle bullshit.
john |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
