| Science Forum Index » Astronomy Forum » What is the nature of Light Quanta ?... |
|
Page 1 of 2 Goto page 1, 2 Next |
|
| Author |
Message |
| socratus at (no spam) bezeqint.net... |
 Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 7:03 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
What is the nature of Light Quanta ?
In my opinion this question is similar to other one:
How can the SRT be understood ?
More than 100 years have passed when SRT was created
but the discussions about it are still going on .
I suggest my own opinion about SRT (Light Quanta & Vacuum)
=== .
One of the SRT laws says:
The speed of Light Quanta in the Vacuum is constant
equal to : c=1. No other particles can reach such speed.
If all the other particles cannot reach this seed it means
they are absolutely different particles. Their abilities
are absolutely another. And if they absolutely different,
so we cannot compare them. From our school days
we know that to compare two incommensurable quantities
is not possible.
It is the same as to compare the elephant and the whale.
We can see the elephant in the safari and the whale in the
ocean. But we cannot meet them together in the same
reference frame.
Therefore I say the SRT is theory about Light Quanta.
Once again:
The speed of Light Quanta in the Vacuum is constant
equal to : c=1. In the Vacuum !!!
The conditions of safari created the geometrical form of elephant.
The conditions of ocean created the geometrical form of the whale.
Then we must suppose that the conditions of Vacuum have the
influence on the geometrical form of Light Quanta.
Question: What are the conditions of Vacuum ?
1.
The matter ( and its density) in the Universe is very small.
This small mass cannot roll the Universe into sphere therefore
the Universe must be infinite.
2.
This infinite space is Kingdom of Cold.
Now it is considered that the temperature of this Kingdom
is: T= 2,7K. But this quantity is not constant, it is relative
and decreases, and in the future will reach T= 0K.
and the laws of thermodynamics say: the particles in the
Kingdom of Cold (T= 0K) cannot have volume. It means
they are flat particles. And from all flat geometrical forms
the most symmetrical is circle: c/d= pi = 3,14 ……
3.
According to Quantum Theory the Vacuum is some kind
of energetic space, it means the particles, the Light Quanta
are also some kind of energetic power.
All discussions are tautology without understanding what Vacuum is.
So, in my opinion, the Quantum of Light is some kind of
energetic particle with flat geometrical form of circle.
But if the Quantum of Light always moves only with constant
speed c=1, then, it seems, it is a mad particle. Thinking in such
way it is hard to understand its importance in our life.
But SRT helps us to understand that this view on the Quantum
of Light is wrong. The SRT says: its laws depend on the movement
of the Quantum of Light.
Once again.
The SRT laws (Lorentz transformation ) explain us how the behaviour
( movement ) of the Quantum of Light changes.
The theory says : in the movement
a) the mass and energy of Quantum of Light changes.
b) the geometrical form (circle) of Quantum of Light changes
c) the time of its life changes.
(according to Lorentz transformation )
==== .
Best wishes
Israel Sadovnik. Socratus
http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.php?tab0=Scientists&tab1=Display&id=1372
===================== . . |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| HVAC... |
| Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:58 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
<socratus at (no spam) bezeqint.net> wrote in message
news:1de19908-aba7-469b-9ab3-69f456ffc747 at (no spam) b15g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
What is the nature of Light Quanta ?
In my opinion this question is similar to other one:
How can the SRT be understood ?
More than 100 years have passed when SRT was created
but the discussions about it are still going on .
I suggest my own opinion about SRT (Light Quanta & Vacuum)
=== .
One of the SRT laws says:
The speed of Light Quanta in the Vacuum is constant
equal to : c=1. No other particles can reach such speed.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Neutrinos. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 3:40 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 26, 9:03 pm, "socra... at (no spam) bezeqint.net" <socra... at (no spam) bezeqint.net>
wrote:
[quote]What is the nature of Light Quanta ?
In my opinion this question is similar to other one:
How can the SRT be understood ?
More than 100 years have passed when SRT was created
but the discussions about it are still going on .
I suggest my own opinion about SRT (Light Quanta & Vacuum)
=== .
One of the SRT laws says:
The speed of Light Quanta in the Vacuum is constant
equal to : c=1. No other particles can reach such speed.
If all the other particles cannot reach this seed it means
they are absolutely different particles. Their abilities
are absolutely another. And if they absolutely different,
so we cannot compare them. From our school days
we know that to compare two incommensurable quantities
is not possible.
It is the same as to compare the elephant and the whale.
We can see the elephant in the safari and the whale in the
ocean. But we cannot meet them together in the same
reference frame.
Therefore I say the SRT is theory about Light Quanta.
Once again:
The speed of Light Quanta in the Vacuum is constant
equal to : c=1. In the Vacuum !!!
The conditions of safari created the geometrical form of elephant.
The conditions of ocean created the geometrical form of the whale.
Then we must suppose that the conditions of Vacuum have the
influence on the geometrical form of Light Quanta.
Question: What are the conditions of Vacuum ?
1.
The matter ( and its density) in the Universe is very small.
This small mass cannot roll the Universe into sphere therefore
the Universe must be infinite.
2.
This infinite space is Kingdom of Cold.
Now it is considered that the temperature of this Kingdom
is: T= 2,7K. But this quantity is not constant, it is relative
and decreases, and in the future will reach T= 0K.
and the laws of thermodynamics say: the particles in the
Kingdom of Cold (T= 0K) cannot have volume. It means
they are flat particles. And from all flat geometrical forms
the most symmetrical is circle: c/d= pi = 3,14 ……
3.
According to Quantum Theory the Vacuum is some kind
of energetic space, it means the particles, the Light Quanta
are also some kind of energetic power.
All discussions are tautology without understanding what Vacuum is.
So, in my opinion, the Quantum of Light is some kind of
energetic particle with flat geometrical form of circle.
But if the Quantum of Light always moves only with constant
speed c=1, then, it seems, it is a mad particle. Thinking in such
way it is hard to understand its importance in our life.
But SRT helps us to understand that this view on the Quantum
of Light is wrong. The SRT says: its laws depend on the movement
of the Quantum of Light.
Once again.
The SRT laws (Lorentz transformation ) explain us how the behaviour
( movement ) of the Quantum of Light changes.
The theory says : in the movement
a) the mass and energy of Quantum of Light changes.
b) the geometrical form (circle) of Quantum of Light changes
c) the time of its life changes.
(according to Lorentz transformation )
==== .
Best wishes
Israel Sadovnik. Socratus
http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.php?tab0=Scientists&tab1=Display&i....
===================== . .
[/quote]
How many Plancks does make an electron?
How many photons (Planck to Graviton) per atom exist?
Perhaps we got this backwards, whereas photons represent mass and
energy, and everything else is secondary.
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 3:42 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 2, 5:06 am, herbertglaz... at (no spam) webtv.net (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
[quote]HVAC Quanta of light means it moves in pulses. Think of the photons
being in units (partitioned) This goes well with QM,and my Pulse Motion
Theory. Photons move as units and are the "quanta" of the EM field.
Bert
[/quote]
In other words, your EM field is secondary because those photons have
to exist first.
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| G=EMC^2 Glazier... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 8:06 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
HVAC Quanta of light means it moves in pulses. Think of the photons
being in units (partitioned) This goes well with QM,and my Pulse Motion
Theory. Photons move as units and are the "quanta" of the EM field.
Bert |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 9:25 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 2, 8:34 am, herbertglaz... at (no spam) webtv.net (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
[quote]BG EM field is a photon structure Getthe picture Bert
[/quote]
Always have, though it's the others here that are worse off than
braille parrots.
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 9:28 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 2, 8:47 am, herbertglaz... at (no spam) webtv.net (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
[quote]HAVAC Yes you are a heavy thinker You are a big dumb bell. If the
universe had the likes of you to see itself "it would be blind" Your
low wit sarcasm is trying to lift up your ego. No use being nice to you
your not worth a grain of salt to humankind. Have a nice day and
hopefully "get lost" You HAVAC are a low wit wonder of the universe.
Bert
[/quote]
Perhaps HVAC is "the right stuff" (aka antimatter or absolute vacuum)
of whatever makes a black hole tick.
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| HVAC... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 11:06 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" <herbertglazier at (no spam) webtv.net> wrote in message
news:12379-4AEED93C-294 at (no spam) storefull-3253.bay.webtv.net...
[quote]HVAC Quanta of light means it moves in pulses. Think of the photons
being in units (partitioned) This goes well with QM,and my Pulse Motion
Theory. Photons move as units and are the "quanta" of the EM field.
[/quote]
Listen up smellbert, I don't want to be lectured by kooks, least
of all a kook like YOU. You are barely literate and know
NOTHING of science except for kook science. You should
stick with giving the weather in kooktown and leave the heavy
thinking to ME.
Oh.... Have a nice day! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| G=EMC^2 Glazier... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 11:34 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
| BG EM field is a photon structure Getthe picture Bert |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| G=EMC^2 Glazier... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 11:47 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
HAVAC Yes you are a heavy thinker You are a big dumb bell. If the
universe had the likes of you to see itself "it would be blind" Your
low wit sarcasm is trying to lift up your ego. No use being nice to you
your not worth a grain of salt to humankind. Have a nice day and
hopefully "get lost" You HAVAC are a low wit wonder of the universe.
Bert |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Saul Levy... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:26 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
A SENILE OLD FART BEATS anyone else, LIAR B! lmfjao!
You CLAIM to be a THINKER?
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
With IDIOT THEORIES?
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
What happened to snow last January in Tucson, or those TWO BIG
METEORITES in Antarctica?
You're SENILE and a FUCKING LIAR too!
Why don't you JUST SHUT THE FUCK UP?
Saul Levy
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 11:47:07 -0500, herbertglazier at (no spam) webtv.net (G=EMC^2
Glazier) wrote:
[quote]HAVAC Yes you are a heavy thinker You are a big dumb bell. If the
universe had the likes of you to see itself "it would be blind" Your
low wit sarcasm is trying to lift up your ego. No use being nice to you
your not worth a grain of salt to humankind. Have a nice day and
hopefully "get lost" You HAVAC are a low wit wonder of the universe.
Bert[/quote] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Saul Levy... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:37 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
RIGHT ON, HVAC! lmfjao!
Another STUPID THEORY from LIAR B?
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Saul Levy
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 11:06:36 -0500, "HVAC" <harlowcampbell at (no spam) gmail.com>
wrote:
[quote]
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" <herbertglazier at (no spam) webtv.net> wrote in message
news:12379-4AEED93C-294 at (no spam) storefull-3253.bay.webtv.net...
HVAC Quanta of light means it moves in pulses. Think of the photons
being in units (partitioned) This goes well with QM,and my Pulse Motion
Theory. Photons move as units and are the "quanta" of the EM field.
Listen up smellbert, I don't want to be lectured by kooks, least
of all a kook like YOU. You are barely literate and know
NOTHING of science except for kook science. You should
stick with giving the weather in kooktown and leave the heavy
thinking to ME.
Oh.... Have a nice day![/quote] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| HVAC... |
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 6:15 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" <herbertglazier at (no spam) webtv.net> wrote in message
news:12378-4AEF0D0B-939 at (no spam) storefull-3253.bay.webtv.net...
[quote]HAVAC Yes you are a heavy thinker You are a big dumb bell. If the
universe had the likes of you to see itself "it would be blind" Your
low wit sarcasm is trying to lift up your ego. No use being nice to you
your not worth a grain of salt to humankind. Have a nice day and
hopefully "get lost" You HAVAC are a low wit wonder of the universe.
[/quote]
Good comeback there smellbert. Soon you'll be reporting
me to General Killemall and telling me to show up at a
FEMA death camp.
--
Fate rarely calls upon us at a moment of our choosing. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| HVAC... |
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 6:16 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"BradGuth" <bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:88e5b4c8-c42d-4677-b358-a790df6ad604 at (no spam) 2g2000prl.googlegroups.com...
Perhaps HVAC is "the right stuff" (aka antimatter or absolute vacuum)
of whatever makes a black hole tick.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
They got a new name for that 'stuff', Bradtard.... It's called gravity. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 8:40 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 3, 3:16 am, "HVAC" <harlowcampb... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]"BradGuth" <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:88e5b4c8-c42d-4677-b358-a790df6ad604 at (no spam) 2g2000prl.googlegroups.com...
Perhaps HVAC is "the right stuff" (aka antimatter or absolute vacuum)
of whatever makes a black hole tick.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
They got a new name for that 'stuff', Bradtard.... It's called gravity.
[/quote]
Though supposedly no amount of gravity affects those pesky photons of
supposedly zero mass. And according to yourself and rabbi Saul that
always speaks on behalf of all Zionist Jews (especially including
Einstein), whereas that extremely weak Newtonian force of gravity
doesn't even affect stellar motions or whatever tidal radii
considerations between any given pair or more of nearby stellar masses
(including those in blueshift with us).
Therefore, it's not strictly gravity that's primarily in charge of
making and sustaining a given black hole, although there may in fact
be more than one kind of black hole (including those involving
gravity). It seems positrons could be at the core of a given black
hole, and as such that's worth loads more than mere gravity.
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
