| Science Forum Index » Archaeology Forum » A word about evidence... |
|
Page 3 of 5 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Next |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Tiglath... |
 Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 12:59 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 29, 2:32 pm, JTEM <jte... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote] Tiglath <te... at (no spam) tiglath.net> wrote:
Given that your training
What you dod or do not imagine my "training" to be
is irrelevant. I ask you again, shit for brains:
Are you saying that it would be unreasonable for someone
to assume that a glyph which appears like a feather might
actually depict a feather, or is it the idea that two signs might
be able to make up one letter that's taxed your brain?
Which is it, shit for brains?
[/quote]
Given that your training on Semitic language and knowledge of the
ancient Levant is -- I will no longer put it gently -- is as erudite
as the donkey whose dick you like to suck on, your assumption is as
reasonable as a dozen hollowpoints in center mass. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Whiskers... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 3:27 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 2009-10-29, JTEM <jtem01 at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
[quote]pure drivel.
[/quote]
QED
--
-- ^^^^^^^^^^
-- Whiskers
-- ~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Tiglath... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 6:17 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 29, 10:17 am, JTEM <jte... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]
I'll let you add up the rest on your own, comfortable in
the knowledge that you won't....
[/quote]
You don't really have to be a cheese-dick everyday of your life, did
you know? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Weland... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 10:47 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
JTEM wrote:
[quote]Weland <gi... at (no spam) poetic.com> wrote:
JTEM wrote:
The first two, the ones that kind of look like feathers
(they're not though), count as one...
Indeed, which would then make the number of symbols
in the name 6.
Seven, actually. But math was always your worst subject,
after ancient history.
[/quote]
So tell us about each of these signs, which image you are using, and
what sounds each sign signifies. That should be simple for one as
knowledgeable as you, right? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Weland... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 11:00 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
JTEM wrote:
[quote]Weland <gi... at (no spam) poetic.com> wrote:
The problem is that the 7 signs JTEM identifies must
include the initial flowering reeds twice.
Not at all. That would result in eight.
Man, you really do suck at counting...
The flowering reed represents a palatal glide
and is usually transliterated as "i" or "ii" in some contexts; the
double flowering reed is taken as a "y"
It's rare to see anything but the double reed in the beginning of
a word.... immediately contradicting myself with the example
of Amon, but at least beating you to the punch.
Counted as one, that brings the total to seven.
[/quote]
So tell us about each sign, what sound it signifies. This is the
beginning of answering the challenge for you to provide a single valid
reason that it doesn't read as a reference to Israel. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| JTEM... |
| Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 7:24 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Weland <gi... at (no spam) poetic.com> wrote:
[quote]So tell us about each sign, what sound it signifies.
[/quote]
Why? If I don't then one of the signs will vanish, leaving
only six? Is that what that dry rot you call a brain
believe? Sheesh!
Go read the first article in this thread, again. You're
highlighting my point here -- the fact that you and
other bible thumpers honestly don't know what is or
is not a legitimate argument, what is and is not
"Evidence."
...which is why your conclusions are so faulty. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| JTEM... |
| Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 7:28 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Weland <gi... at (no spam) poetic.com> wrote:
[quote]So tell us about each of these signs,
[/quote]
So you're back to constructing illegitimate tests,
ones that can't possibly reveal anything relevant.
You're simply hoping to trip me up.
...or am I giving you too much credit here, and
you really believe that I either jump through your
hoops or one of the signs will vanish, leaving only
six?
So which is it, shit for brains? Are you intellectually
bankrupt and must resort to cheap gimmicks, or
are you retarded and unaware of the fact that you're
spewing cheap gimmicks & misrepresenting them
as arguments? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| JTEM... |
| Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 7:29 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Whiskers <catwhee... at (no spam) operamail.com> wrote:
[quote]QED
[/quote]
Q.E.D. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| JTEM... |
| Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 7:31 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Tiglath <te... at (no spam) tiglath.net> wrote:
[quote]Given that
[/quote]
Wow. So now you're misrepresenting your emotional
problems as "insight."
You just keep getting funnier, and funnier and funnier... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| JTEM... |
| Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 7:33 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Tiglath <te... at (no spam) tiglath.net> wrote:
[quote]Imagine all the potential employees, girlfriends,
boyfriends, googling
[/quote]
This explains the "Tiglath" handle, not to mention the
adoption of "Weland." |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| JTEM... |
| Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 7:35 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Tiglath <te... at (no spam) tiglath.net> wrote:
[quote]a few missing screws
[/quote]
You're being modest. You've actually got quite a
few screws missing. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Weland... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:58 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
JTEM wrote:
[quote]Weland <gi... at (no spam) poetic.com> wrote:
So tell us about each of these signs,
So you're back to constructing illegitimate tests,
ones that can't possibly reveal anything relevant.
[/quote]
LOL!!!!!!!!!! Do you work at being this stupid, or does it come
naturally? Please, do explain discussing the graphemes and what they
mean is irrelevant to a discussion about the graphemes and what they mean!
[quote]You're simply hoping to trip me up.
[/quote]
HAHHAHAHA!! No, you do that all by yourself. I'm simply giving you
another opportunity to do so.
[quote]...or am I giving you too much credit here, and
you really believe that I either jump through your
hoops or one of the signs will vanish, leaving only
six?
[/quote]
Oh, what I know is that you know neither the language nor the script and
so any claim you make regarding the number of signs and what they mean
is based in your own ignorance. If you knew the language or script
you'd produce already and prove me wrong: but since you keep avoiding
answering, we can sit and laugh at you.
[quote]So which is it, shit for brains?
[/quote]
False dichotomy....another fallacy. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Weland... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 1:02 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
JTEM wrote:
[quote]Weland <gi... at (no spam) poetic.com> wrote:
So tell us about each sign, what sound it signifies.
Why? If I don't then one of the signs will vanish, leaving
only six? Is that what that dry rot you call a brain
believe? Sheesh!
[/quote]
Oooo, and now a straw man argument....AGAIN! Addressed in previous post.
[quote]
Go read the first article in this thread, again.
[/quote]
You mean the one that out of one side of your mouth you accuse me of
fallacies while each accusation is merely a fallacy itself and you've
been caught out? I thought so.
You're
[quote]highlighting my point here -- the fact that you and
other bible thumpers honestly don't know what is or
is not a legitimate argument, what is and is not
"Evidence."
[/quote]
Considering that you believe that discussion of what a text says is
irrelevant to knowing what a text says, no one should take your word on
what evidence is and is not. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| JTEM... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 7:51 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Weland <gi... at (no spam) poetic.com> wrote:
[quote]LOL!!!!!!!!!!
[/quote]
Well that was insightful.
However, people who aren't emotionally disturbed as you
are know that I am right -- that your reply was irrelevant,
that it in no way would or could alter the facts here.
[quote]You're simply hoping to trip me up.
HAHHAHAHA!! No, you do that all by yourself.
[/quote]
So I was granting you too much credit, and you only
do these things because you honestly don't know
the difference between a legitimate argument and an
illegitimate one... Okay.
This is not exactly difficult to believe, not will all the
crap you've spewed over the years. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Tiglath... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 7:57 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 2, 12:33 am, JTEM <jte... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]Tiglath <te... at (no spam) tiglath.net> wrote:
Imagine all the potential employees, girlfriends,
boyfriends, googling
This explains the "Tiglath" handle, not to mention the
adoption of "Weland."
[/quote]
JTEM accusing people of "handles."
Hilarious.
There are no mirrors in JTEM's trailer, and for good reason. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
