| |
 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Astrology Forum » Updated Website - 2... |
|
Page 2 of 2 Goto page Previous 1, 2 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Chris Krolczyk... |
 Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 1:27 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 25, 11:32 am, The True Edmond Wollmann <EHWollm... at (no spam) aol.com>
wrote:
[quote]Who is your valid ISP Burnette?
[/quote]
Why can't you provide a valid return address for
legal correspondence, dipshit?
-Chris Krolczyk |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Anonymous Remailer (austria)... |
| Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 1:38 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
In article <4AE8D11C.168D at (no spam) earthlink.net>
"Edmond H. Wollmann" <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote:
[quote]
Chris Krolczyk wrote:
On Oct 25, 11:23 am, The True Edmond Wollmann <EHWollm... at (no spam) aol.com
wrote:
Wrong, defamer boy. Keep it up, your obvious malicious intent to cause
me damage to my career and reputation for 12 years is being
documented. Run away again now, and get some real legal advice.
I fail to see how a link to a scanned envelope constitutes
"defamation", Edmo. Then again, only you're stupid enough to
believe it does.
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/Filed_PO_Box.html
-Chris Krolczyk
Defamation= Injuring someone's character or reputation by
[/quote]
Winning kook awards? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Cujo DeSockpuppet... |
| Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 2:13 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Edmond H. Wollmann" <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote in
news:4AE8D11C.168D at (no spam) earthlink.net:
[quote]Chris Krolczyk wrote:
On Oct 25, 11:23 am, The True Edmond Wollmann <EHWollm... at (no spam) aol.com
wrote:
Wrong, defamer boy. Keep it up, your obvious malicious intent to
cause me damage to my career and reputation for 12 years is being
documented. Run away again now, and get some real legal advice.
I fail to see how a link to a scanned envelope constitutes
"defamation", Edmo. Then again, only you're stupid enough to
believe it does.
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/Filed_PO_Box.html
Defamation= Injuring someone's character or reputation by making false
and malicious statements about him to other people.
[/quote]
Canned screed as a reply is an admission of defeat. So noted, loser.
Nobody could defame you as well as you've done it to yourself, dipshit.
[quote]Defamation is stating denigrating or derrogatory things or accusations
that evidence can show are FALSE. Stating an opinion like a woman
being an wrinkly old maid is an opinion or view, staing that I stalk
Cheryl Merrill or that I sleep with my clients (like these idiots have
said) is defamation because the facts will show it is not true. Your
only defense against defamation is that what has been said is true, or
in my case with Merrill, that I am not even the one who said it.
[/quote]
I don't understand why you're trying the case on USenet, waterhead.
Unless you're trying to show us how much you don't care, in that kooky
way of yours, I can only infer you're a complete moron, loser and lying
scumbag.
BTW, I added AAM because I rule there.
--
Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*,
alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy
Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S
award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse
Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895.
"I am entertaining, but not as a clown, but as a thinker who forces
others to think." - Edmo on a pre-meltdown rant. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Edmond H. Wollmann... |
| Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 5:17 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Chris Krolczyk wrote:
[quote]
On Oct 25, 11:23 am, The True Edmond Wollmann <EHWollm... at (no spam) aol.com
wrote:
Wrong, defamer boy. Keep it up, your obvious malicious intent to cause
me damage to my career and reputation for 12 years is being
documented. Run away again now, and get some real legal advice.
I fail to see how a link to a scanned envelope constitutes
"defamation", Edmo. Then again, only you're stupid enough to
believe it does.
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/Filed_PO_Box.html
-Chris Krolczyk
[/quote]
Defamation= Injuring someone's character or reputation by making false
and malicious statements about him to other people. The law recognizes a
difference between defamation and mere criticism of an individual.
Criticism deals only with matters that legitimately invite public
attention or call for public comment. In contrast, defamation usually
involves a person's private life and domestic affairs. Calling a woman a
prostitute or a banker an embezzler, or an astrologer or consultant a
fraud on a television, radio or usenet public forum are examples of
defamation. The term defamation includes both libel and slander.
Defamation is stating denigrating or derrogatory things or accusations
that evidence can show are FALSE. Stating an opinion like a woman being
an wrinkly old maid is an opinion or view, staing that I stalk Cheryl
Merrill or that I sleep with my clients (like these idiots have said) is
defamation because the facts will show it is not true. Your only defense
against defamation is that what has been said is true, or in my case
with Merrill, that I am not even the one who said it.
--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Matt... |
| Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 11:29 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Edmond H. Wollmann wrote:
[quote]Chris Krolczyk wrote:
On Oct 25, 11:23 am, The True Edmond Wollmann <EHWollm... at (no spam) aol.com
wrote:
Wrong, defamer boy. Keep it up, your obvious malicious intent to cause
me damage to my career and reputation for 12 years is being
documented. Run away again now, and get some real legal advice.
I fail to see how a link to a scanned envelope constitutes
"defamation", Edmo. Then again, only you're stupid enough to
believe it does.
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/Filed_PO_Box.html
-Chris Krolczyk
Defamation= Injuring someone's character or reputation by making false
and malicious statements about him to other people. The law
[/quote]
states that you must file a claim for defamation within one year of your
awareness of said defamation.
Yet that site has been up, without any real legal effort from you, since
1999. You have accepted those words as published for 12 years.
Therefore, it contains no real legal defamation. So all of your
complaints about "defamation" are meaningless.
[quote]
Defamation is stating denigrating or derrogatory things or accusations
that evidence can show are FALSE. Stating an opinion like a woman being
an wrinkly old maid is an opinion or view, staing that I stalk Cheryl
Merrill or that I sleep with my clients (like these idiots have said) is
defamation because the facts will show it is not true.
[/quote]
And Mr. Burnette said these things when? You really have all this mixed
up in your mind, poor thing.
[quote]Your only defense
against defamation is that what has been said is true,
[/quote]
Or that you have let those "defamatory" things be said about you for
several years... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| SSN Gateway... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 6:47 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
In article <4AE8D11C.168D at (no spam) earthlink.net>
"Edmond H. Wollmann" <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote:
[quote]
Chris Krolczyk wrote:
On Oct 25, 11:23 am, The True Edmond Wollmann <EHWollm... at (no spam) aol.com
wrote:
Wrong, defamer boy. Keep it up, your obvious malicious intent to cause
me damage to my career and reputation for 12 years is being
documented. Run away again now, and get some real legal advice.
I fail to see how a link to a scanned envelope constitutes
"defamation", Edmo. Then again, only you're stupid enough to
believe it does.
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/Filed_PO_Box.html
-Chris Krolczyk
Defamation= Injuring someone's character or reputation by making false
and malicious statements about him to other people.
[/quote]
Or her in your case. You slandered Lili and Susan, two women
who went out of their way to help you and you fucked them over.
[quote]--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/[/quote] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Edmond H. Wollmann... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 9:37 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
SSN Gateway wrote:
[quote]
In article <4AE8D11C.168D at (no spam) earthlink.net
"Edmond H. Wollmann" <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote:
Chris Krolczyk wrote:
On Oct 25, 11:23 am, The True Edmond Wollmann <EHWollm... at (no spam) aol.com
wrote:
Wrong, defamer boy. Keep it up, your obvious malicious intent to cause
me damage to my career and reputation for 12 years is being
documented. Run away again now, and get some real legal advice.
I fail to see how a link to a scanned envelope constitutes
"defamation", Edmo. Then again, only you're stupid enough to
believe it does.
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/Fid_PO_Box.html
-Chris Krolczyk
Defamation= Injuring someone's character or reputation by making false
and malicious statements about him to other people.
Or her in your case. You slandered Lili and Susan, two women
who went out of their way to help you and you fucked them over.
[/quote]
Wrong, two women who tried to buy me and when they couldn't turned to
stalking, harassing, defaming and bringing personal information onto the
web, and then crying because I did the same to refute their lies and
they were exposed for the shalllow egomaniacle frauds that they truly
are.
"You can't buy my love with money, cause I never was that kind!
Silver threads and golden needles cannot mend this heart of mine!"
Linda Ronstadt
--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Cujo DeSockpuppet... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 10:43 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Edmond H. Wollmann" <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote in
news:4AE9B6CC.3A0E at (no spam) earthlink.net:
[quote]SSN Gateway wrote:
In article <4AE8D11C.168D at (no spam) earthlink.net
"Edmond H. Wollmann" <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote:
Chris Krolczyk wrote:
On Oct 25, 11:23 am, The True Edmond Wollmann
EHWollm... at (no spam) aol.com> wrote:
Wrong, defamer boy. Keep it up, your obvious malicious intent
to cause me damage to my career and reputation for 12 years is
being documented. Run away again now, and get some real legal
advice.
I fail to see how a link to a scanned envelope constitutes
"defamation", Edmo. Then again, only you're stupid enough to
believe it does.
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/Fid_PO_Box.html
-Chris Krolczyk
Defamation= Injuring someone's character or reputation by making
false and malicious statements about him to other people.
Or her in your case. You slandered Lili and Susan, two women
who went out of their way to help you and you fucked them over.
Wrong, two women who tried to buy me
[/quote]
You aren't worth very much. But you're the one who claimed that Lili was
on food stamps, Susan was almost broke and you were the richest, most
successful person in the world. You're a fucking liar.
[quote]and when they couldn't turned to
stalking, harassing, defaming and bringing personal information
[/quote]
No, Susan checked into Usenet to find you trashing her and she ripped
into you with the truth. Lili eventually figured out you're an asshole
and after you tried to not repay her got her land sharks to get you to
fork over the money you owed.
[quote]onto
the web, and then crying because I did the same to refute their lies
and they were exposed for the shalllow egomaniacle frauds that they
truly are.
[/quote]
How did you do that? You posted private email that you edited. You've
been exposed as a fraud, deadbeat and a liar.
--
Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*,
alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy
Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S
award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse
Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895.
"Be careful though, your kookshit about how I am this and that will
reveal who the real kook is." - Edmo in PKB mode. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| The True Edmond Wollmann... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 11:45 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 29, 1:43 pm, Cujo DeSockpuppet <c... at (no spam) petitmorte.net> wrote:
[quote]"Edmond H. Wollmann" <arcturian... at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote innews:4AE9B6CC.3A0E at (no spam) earthlink.net:
SSN Gateway wrote:
In article <4AE8D11C.1... at (no spam) earthlink.net
"Edmond H. Wollmann" <arcturian... at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote:
Chris Krolczyk wrote:
On Oct 25, 11:23 am, The True Edmond Wollmann
EHWollm... at (no spam) aol.com> wrote:
Wrong, defamer boy. Keep it up, your obvious malicious intent
to cause me damage to my career and reputation for 12 years is
being documented. Run away again now, and get some real legal
advice.
I fail to see how a link to a scanned envelope constitutes
"defamation", Edmo. Then again, only you're stupid enough to
believe it does.
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/Fid_PO_Box.html
-Chris Krolczyk
Defamation= Injuring someone's character or reputation by making
false and malicious statements about him to other people.
Or her in your case. You slandered Lili and Susan, two women
who went out of their way to help you and you fucked them over.
Wrong, two women who tried to buy me
You aren't worth very much. But you're the one who claimed that Lili was
on food stamps,
[/quote]
I don't know iof she was "on" them, but I used to work for the county
social services and I have a friend who works there now, and you can't
get them legally without reporting your income etc. All I know is she
had them when I was visiting her because I saw them.
[quote]Susan was almost broke
[/quote]
Never said such a thing, why don't you ever provide evidence for your
lies? Susan told me she was filthy rich (stores all over etc.) and
that her father was in Alaska politics. Could have been lies I don't
know, I just assumed she was telling the truth. She insisted that she
wanted to give me money and that I not even try to pay it back, I was
a starving student and probably shouldn't have taken it even so she
said that. After I broke up with her it suddenly became a loan. She
gave me a scanner for Christmas . Thats it.
[quote]and you were the richest, most
successful person in the world. You're a fucking liar.
[/quote]
Never said that, WHERE is that statement? I have never said such a
thing, but you have said a whole lot of shit not true.
[quote]and when they couldn't turned to
stalking, harassing, defaming and bringing personal information
No, Susan checked into Usenet to find you trashing her and she ripped
into you with the truth.
[/quote]
I wasn't trashing her, I suspected her of trashing me, then she
actually did because of my suspicion (I guess to prove she was?) and
then she started lying.
[quote]Lili eventually figured out you're an asshole
and after you tried to not repay her got her land sharks to get you to
fork over the money you owed.
[/quote]
No, that's not what happened asshole. I WAS THERE. She was always
drunk and fucked up on drugs and shit and she FORGOT that I was
repaying her for a loan she gave me at the end of August and halfway
through the month accused me of not paying her because she was
delusional. I then paid her immediately anyway and the fact that she
did that to me for no reason ended our relationship. BY ME. She has
just recently asking to be my friend on facebook, I let her be. She
said "I wish ther was something I could do to make up for that past"
and I said there is; and I asked her to RECANT her lie on usenet, she
did not do it, so I blocked her on Facebook and told her goodbye
forever.
THAT is the true story, fuckhead.
[quote]onto
the web, and then crying because I did the same to refute their lies
and they were exposed for the shalllow egomaniacle frauds that they
truly are.
How did you do that? You posted private email that you edited. You've
been exposed as a fraud, deadbeat and a liar.
[/quote]
Because Susan said she loaned me the money (after I dumped her), when
the email clearly shows she insisted it was a gift and not to even try
to pay it back. Please try to clear your brain of DEAD CELLS so you
can follow along you fraud.
"Don't you hear any voices cryin'?
That's the sound of my love dyin'
Here comes the rain.
You don't know how to play the game,
You cheat! You lie! You don't even know how to saaay goodbye!!
You make me wanna cry!
You don't knooooow.
You don't even know how to say goodbye!!!
You make me wanna cry!!
You don't even know how to say goodbye!!!
You make me wanna cryCry...Crrrrrrrryyyyyyyyyyyyy" Godley and Creme,
Cry
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
The SUN http://www.edmondwollmann.com/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Cujo DeSockpuppet... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 12:04 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
The True Edmond Wollmann <EHWollmann at (no spam) aol.com> wrote in
news:c0fa064b-8a3f-4aa8-a8f4-85fd8c1df015 at (no spam) o10g2000yqa.googlegroups.com:
[quote]On Oct 29, 1:43 pm, Cujo DeSockpuppet <c... at (no spam) petitmorte.net> wrote:
"Edmond H. Wollmann" <arcturian... at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote
innews:4AE9B6CC.3
A0E at (no spam) earthlink.net:
SSN Gateway wrote:
In article <4AE8D11C.1... at (no spam) earthlink.net
"Edmond H. Wollmann" <arcturian... at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote:
Chris Krolczyk wrote:
On Oct 25, 11:23 am, The True Edmond Wollmann
EHWollm... at (no spam) aol.com> wrote:
Wrong, defamer boy. Keep it up, your obvious malicious
intent to cause me damage to my career and reputation for 12
years is being documented. Run away again now, and get some
real legal advice.
I fail to see how a link to a scanned envelope constitutes
"defamation", Edmo. Then again, only you're stupid enough to
believe it does.
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/Fid_PO_Box.html
-Chris Krolczyk
Defamation= Injuring someone's character or reputation by making
false and malicious statements about him to other people.
Or her in your case. You slandered Lili and Susan, two women
who went out of their way to help you and you fucked them over.
Wrong, two women who tried to buy me
You aren't worth very much. But you're the one who claimed that Lili
was on food stamps,
I don't know iof she was "on" them, but I used to work for the county
social services and I have a friend who works there now, and you can't
get them legally without reporting your income etc. All I know is she
had them when I was visiting her because I saw them.
[/quote]
You sure didn't have a problem grabbing them out of her purse to tip the
valet at the restaurant you freeloaded at, deadbeat.
[quote]Susan was almost broke
Never said such a thing,
[/quote]
Liar.
[quote]why don't you ever provide evidence for your
lies? Susan told me she was filthy rich (stores all over etc.) and
that her father was in Alaska politics. Could have been lies I don't
know, I just assumed she was telling the truth. She insisted that she
wanted to give me money and that I not even try to pay it back, I was
a starving student and probably shouldn't have taken it even so she
said that. After I broke up with her it suddenly became a loan. She
gave me a scanner for Christmas . Thats it.
[/quote]
Liar.
[quote]and you were the richest, most
successful person in the world. You're a fucking liar.
Never said that, WHERE is that statement? I have never said such a
thing, but you have said a whole lot of shit not true.
[/quote]
You lie again. Pantyhead.
[quote]and when they couldn't turned to
stalking, harassing, defaming and bringing personal information
No, Susan checked into Usenet to find you trashing her and she ripped
into you with the truth.
I wasn't trashing her, I suspected her of trashing me, then she
actually did because of my suspicion (I guess to prove she was?) and
then she started lying.
[/quote]
How credible do you think you are? Anyone reading this would say you're a
first class asshole.
[quote]Lili eventually figured out you're an asshole
and after you tried to not repay her got her land sharks to get you
to fork over the money you owed.
No, that's not what happened asshole. I WAS THERE. She was always
drunk and fucked up on drugs and shit and she FORGOT that I was
repaying her for a loan she gave me at the end of August and halfway
through the month accused me of not paying her because she was
delusional. I then paid her immediately anyway and the fact that she
did that to me for no reason ended our relationship. BY ME. She has
just recently asking to be my friend on facebook, I let her be. She
said "I wish ther was something I could do to make up for that past"
and I said there is; and I asked her to RECANT her lie on usenet, she
did not do it, so I blocked her on Facebook and told her goodbye
forever.
THAT is the true story, fuckhead.
[/quote]
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!1!!! You got trolled. Lili still
thinks you're an asshole.
[quote]onto
the web, and then crying because I did the same to refute their
lies and they were exposed for the shalllow egomaniacle frauds that
they truly are.
How did you do that? You posted private email that you edited. You've
been exposed as a fraud, deadbeat and a liar.
Because Susan said she loaned me the money (after I dumped her), when
the email clearly shows she insisted it was a gift and not to even try
to pay it back. Please try to clear your brain of DEAD CELLS so you
can follow along you fraud.
[/quote]
We're back to the email you edited, are we? This is why you're a scumbag.
--
Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*,
alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy
Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S
award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse
Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895.
"At the moment, half the spool of this group is subsequent to things
that
I wrote. That bores the hell out of me too." - Fucknozzle Jr. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Dave U. Random... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 2:00 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
In article <c0fa064b-8a3f-4aa8-a8f4-85fd8c1df015 at (no spam) o10g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
The True Asshole Edmond Wollmann <EHWollmann at (no spam) aol.com> wrote:
[quote]
Edmond H. Wollmann D.e.a.d.b.e.a.T.
Astrological Consulting http://www.smbtech.com/ed
[/quote]
URL fixed. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Chris Krolczyk... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:06 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 28, 6:17 pm, "Edmond H. Wollmann" <arcturian... at (no spam) earthlink.net>
wrote:
[quote]Chris Krolczyk wrote:
On Oct 25, 11:23 am, The True Edmond Wollmann <EHWollm... at (no spam) aol.com
wrote:
Wrong, defamer boy. Keep it up, your obvious malicious intent to cause
me damage to my career and reputation for 12 years is being
documented. Run away again now, and get some real legal advice.
I fail to see how a link to a scanned envelope constitutes
"defamation", Edmo. Then again, only you're stupid enough to
believe it does.
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/Filed_PO_Box.html
-Chris Krolczyk
Defamation= Injuring someone's character or reputation by making false
and malicious statements about him to other people. The law recognizes a
difference between defamation and mere criticism of an individual.
[/quote]
Are you saying Steve's scan of that returned envelope
amounts to defamation? Bullshit. It's a returned
envelope. Nothing more, nothing less. How that
amounts to him making a "false and malicious
statement is beyond me.
Better yet, are you insisting that he *faked* that
digital image in order to "defame" you? That the
USPS was in on it? My, but this has high comic
potential.
(snip)
[quote]Defamation is stating denigrating or derrogatory things or accusations
that evidence can show are FALSE. Stating an opinion like a woman being
an wrinkly old maid is an opinion or view, staing that I stalk Cheryl
Merrill or that I sleep with my clients (like these idiots have SLAP!
[/quote]
My post had nothing to do with any of that; it had *everything* to do
with the undeliverable mail, Edmo. Any attempt to glue your usual
obsessions onto that is more than a bit pathetic. .
-Chris Krolczyk |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Mon Nov 23, 2009 9:48 am
|
|