 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Astronomy Forum » Albert Einstein... he's the bomb!... |
|
Page 6 of 19 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 5, 6, 7 ... 17, 18, 19 Next |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Helmut Wabnig... |
 Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 4:46 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:19:35 -0700 (PDT), Just Me <jpdm45 at (no spam) gmail.com>
wrote:
[quote]On Oct 24, 7:36 pm, The Starmaker <starma... at (no spam) ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Did you know that Albert Einstein
was arrested twice in 1906 for domestic violence towards his wife?
At the time, Mileva. Police records show that on two instances in
1906, Albert Einstein struck and left bloodied his wife of three
years, Mileva, and was arrested for it.”
“The first police report filed by Mileva on 26 Febrary states that she
merely came up to his study as he worked to ask him if he wanted some
coffee, when suddenly he flew into a rage, and began choking and
striking her. He also threatened to stab her with his pen.”
“The second report,” “indicates that, one morning, as Einstein exited
the bathroom, his wife wished him a ‘good morning’, at which, again,
he flew into a fiery rage, pushing her in the face repeatedly and
gouging her eyes.”
The Starmaker
http://oudeis23.wordpress.com/2008/06/21/einstein-arrested-twice-in-1...
That Einstein *knows* how to treat a woman! That is what you call a
...smart guy...he's the bomb!
And what if it should turn out--given there's any truth to all this--
that Mileva was a nymphomaniac adulteress who was schtupping ALL of
Einstein's best buddies? I mention this on basis of three biographical
facts that have long been reported from many scientifically reputable
sources, namely his friends.
1. Friends of Einstein stated the complaint that they would often find
the man in that small apartment in Bern alone, nursing the baby with a
bottle in one hand, while working his calculations with the other.
Where was Mileva? And why didn't she have the baby with her?
2. After Einstein had been awarded the chair in Theoretical Physics at
the ETR, when Berlin came calling, for some reason Mileva, after only
3 months returned to Zurich. Why? What was back in Zurich that she
couldn't have in Berlin? There she had no relatives, no friends but
Einstein's friends. What about Zurich did Mileva love so much?
3. In 1917, Einstein became seriously ill, he collapsed and when near
death, his cousin Elsa came to care for him and nurse him back to
health. Elsa came. Not Mileva. What was keeping Mileva all THAT busy
in Zurich?
4. Einstein divorced Mileva and married Elsa.
If you ever needed better evidence for the hypothesis that this
Hungarian temptress Mileva Maric was an uncaring, husband abusing,
nymphomaniac adulteress who would have been slapped and spanked to
death by any other man than Albert Einstein, then you'd be out looking
for far more than any proper scientist would ever need.
Just a little ability for filling in the blanks is all you got to
have, along with the empirical background of experience with such
women as to be able to recognize one when you see one.
And why, may you ask, is there no direct testimony out there to the
specific effect of stating that this was indeed the case with Mileva?
1. Mileva was smart, damned near a scientist who handled her affairs
like a scientist to keep them secret.
2. She knew that her own future material comfort depended on letting
no part of such a scandal become public. If there was to be a divorce,
it must be she who brings it.
3. If indeed it were Einstein's friends she was fooling around with,
they would be the last to tell. And now there was Einstein's worldwide
reputation to consider.
4. Not every scientist of those times was an old horn-dog like
Schrödinger who didn't give a damn what anyone thought. Soon as he
found out his wife was schtupping Weil, his best pal, what did he do?
He used it for just the excuse he needed to go out and schtupp ten to
her every one. Einstein sadly did not have that advantage. He had
married one smart little cookie who was so smart that she actually
managed to keep the wool pulled over the eyes of the smartest man in
the world.
You have to give her credit, if not for Relativity, then at least for
an uncanny ability for keeping all her little eggs in one basket.
[/quote]
haha, nicely spoken,
just to complete the picture
http://www.teslasociety.com/theoryofrel.htm
http://www.teslasociety.com/theoryofrel.htm
w. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Helmut Wabnig... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 4:48 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:19:35 -0700 (PDT), Just Me <jpdm45 at (no spam) gmail.com>
wrote:
[quote]On Oct 24, 7:36 pm, The Starmaker <starma... at (no spam) ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Did you know that Albert Einstein
was arrested twice in 1906 for domestic violence towards his wife?
At the time, Mileva. Police records show that on two instances in
1906, Albert Einstein struck and left bloodied his wife of three
years, Mileva, and was arrested for it.”
“The first police report filed by Mileva on 26 Febrary states that she
merely came up to his study as he worked to ask him if he wanted some
coffee, when suddenly he flew into a rage, and began choking and
striking her. He also threatened to stab her with his pen.”
“The second report,” “indicates that, one morning, as Einstein exited
the bathroom, his wife wished him a ‘good morning’, at which, again,
he flew into a fiery rage, pushing her in the face repeatedly and
gouging her eyes.”
The Starmaker
http://oudeis23.wordpress.com/2008/06/21/einstein-arrested-twice-in-1...
That Einstein *knows* how to treat a woman! That is what you call a
...smart guy...he's the bomb!
And what if it should turn out--given there's any truth to all this--
that Mileva was a nymphomaniac adulteress who was schtupping ALL of
Einstein's best buddies? I mention this on basis of three biographical
facts that have long been reported from many scientifically reputable
sources, namely his friends.
1. Friends of Einstein stated the complaint that they would often find
the man in that small apartment in Bern alone, nursing the baby with a
bottle in one hand, while working his calculations with the other.
Where was Mileva? And why didn't she have the baby with her?
2. After Einstein had been awarded the chair in Theoretical Physics at
the ETR, when Berlin came calling, for some reason Mileva, after only
3 months returned to Zurich. Why? What was back in Zurich that she
couldn't have in Berlin? There she had no relatives, no friends but
Einstein's friends. What about Zurich did Mileva love so much?
3. In 1917, Einstein became seriously ill, he collapsed and when near
death, his cousin Elsa came to care for him and nurse him back to
health. Elsa came. Not Mileva. What was keeping Mileva all THAT busy
in Zurich?
4. Einstein divorced Mileva and married Elsa.
If you ever needed better evidence for the hypothesis that this
Hungarian temptress Mileva Maric was an uncaring, husband abusing,
nymphomaniac adulteress who would have been slapped and spanked to
death by any other man than Albert Einstein, then you'd be out looking
for far more than any proper scientist would ever need.
Just a little ability for filling in the blanks is all you got to
have, along with the empirical background of experience with such
women as to be able to recognize one when you see one.
And why, may you ask, is there no direct testimony out there to the
specific effect of stating that this was indeed the case with Mileva?
1. Mileva was smart, damned near a scientist who handled her affairs
like a scientist to keep them secret.
2. She knew that her own future material comfort depended on letting
no part of such a scandal become public. If there was to be a divorce,
it must be she who brings it.
3. If indeed it were Einstein's friends she was fooling around with,
they would be the last to tell. And now there was Einstein's worldwide
reputation to consider.
4. Not every scientist of those times was an old horn-dog like
Schrödinger who didn't give a damn what anyone thought. Soon as he
found out his wife was schtupping Weil, his best pal, what did he do?
He used it for just the excuse he needed to go out and schtupp ten to
her every one. Einstein sadly did not have that advantage. He had
married one smart little cookie who was so smart that she actually
managed to keep the wool pulled over the eyes of the smartest man in
the world.
You have to give her credit, if not for Relativity, then at least for
an uncanny ability for keeping all her little eggs in one basket.
[/quote]
haha, nicely spoken,
just to complete the picture
http://www.teslasociety.com/theoryofrel.htm
http://www.teslasociety.com/mileva_einstein.htm
w. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Koobee Wublee... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 6:44 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 30, 12:44 am, _ at (no spam) Jeff_Relf.Seattle.inValid wrote:
[quote]
[/quote]
How did you embed that picture?
Let me try.
[IMG]http://www.ember.com/images/Metcalfe.gif[/IMG]
Anyhow, I see these 13 to 14 year olds flocking to grandpa who is
worshipped by Einstein Dingleberries for more than 100 years. When
these kids find out that Einstein was nothing but a nitwit, a
plagiarist, and a liar, see how many children would flock to that
nitwit, that plagiarist, and that liar. However, the only reason who
jeff relf worships Eisntein is that Einstein was indeed a nitwit, a
plagiarist, and a liar. Got anymore photos of Einstein the nitwit,
the plagiarist, and the liar (be it wax or not) in companies of
children?
<shrug> |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 9:30 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 30, 9:07 am, "Nightcrawler" <Dirtyde... at (no spam) dirtcheap.net> wrote:
[quote]"BradGuth" <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:441e8ea2-89e4-4b3d-8091-50f193628723 at (no spam) j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 29, 7:10 pm, _ at (no spam) Jeff_Relf.Seattle.inValid wrote:
Brad·Guth's “hollow earth” theory is insane. Pressure accrues.
Imagine the pressure you'd feel at the bottom of the Mariana Trench.
The center of earth is like that but, instead of water,
you have zetta·tons of blazing·hot steel pressing down on you.
It's just a theory, although hollow is relative.
Hollow is defined, not relative.
How about a reduced pressure and/or lower density interior?
The pressure at the center is created through compression, not
gravitational attraction AT THE CORE, rather the matter trying to get
TO/THRU the core via the resultant vector created by ALL of the matter
of the earth, not just at the core.
However, do to this compression the matter at the core will have a
higher specific density, thus a bit more gravity than the same material
would have without a large mass trying to press through equally from
all sides.
[/quote]
That’s really odd, because in deep underground caves or mine shafts,
other than the expected atmospheric pressure increase that’s obvious
and somewhat minor (<42% increase per 3.5 km depth unless you plan on
artificially cooling that column of air in order to get a 100%
increase per 3.5 km), there’s hardly any other significant geology
pressures for our physiology to contend with, including while swimming
or scuba diving in those deep underground lakes or aquifers, and
there’s certainly not any big increase in gravity (if anything it only
measurably increases ever so slightly), and there’s certainly no
objective way of telling if the inner core is merely that of a dense
shell that’s hollow inside, or not.
http://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/2506/1/IJRSP%2037(1)%2064-67.pdf
Just because the pressure within the surrounding crust/bedrock is
increasing by roughly something less than 300 bar/km doesn’t mean
squat, especially when the deepest Russian well started getting into
lower pressures and/or somewhat less rock density at depths below 10
km, and at that kind of shaft depth there’s only a relatively slight
atmospheric pressure increase.
A true geode pocket that’s mineral/glass sealed and situated deep (say
at 10 km) might even conceivably offer less internal atmospheric
pressure than its surroundings until it’s broken into.
A geode formulated layer or pocket with any sort of fluid(s) inside is
also technically hollow, because that fluid or even whatever less
density substance(s) (such as sodium) can be easily removed and/or
displaced by hydrogen, helium, methane or some other gasses. An
interior cavity of crystals can even be easily dissolved or simply
fragmented and removed or reutilized as is. On the backside or
farside of our Selene/moon, under that extremely thick and robust
basalt crust that’s also rather unusually mineral saturated, mascon
populated and otherwise very paramagnetic, as such could be offering
quite a large volume of a hollow interior to work with. Being
situated 100 km underground might seem downright testy, but on the
moon it’s actually kind of nifty to ponder.
“The 1~10% hollow moon / Brad Guth”
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.astronomy/browse_frm/thread/b88503c97a50160d?hl=en#
~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 9:32 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 30, 8:44 am, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 30, 12:44 am, _ at (no spam) Jeff_Relf.Seattle.inValid wrote:
How did you embed that picture?
Let me try.
[IMG]http://www.ember.com/images/Metcalfe.gif[/IMG]
Anyhow, I see these 13 to 14 year olds flocking to grandpa who is
worshipped by Einstein Dingleberries for more than 100 years. When
these kids find out that Einstein was nothing but a nitwit, a
plagiarist, and a liar, see how many children would flock to that
nitwit, that plagiarist, and that liar. However, the only reason who
jeff relf worships Eisntein is that Einstein was indeed a nitwit, a
plagiarist, and a liar. Got anymore photos of Einstein the nitwit,
the plagiarist, and the liar (be it wax or not) in companies of
children?
shrug
[/quote]
You forgot to mention "wife beater" and drug induced "Satan
worshiper", because that’s what their Zionist/Jewish policy includes
and approves of, as well as slave ownership and apparently body
snatchings for live organ harvesting, along with their kosher approved
SEC and its Ponzi Madoff types that have no remorse about steeling
from God or their putting of dark-skinned folks on a stick.
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| ... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 9:45 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|

Mr. Koobee Wublee, who's Mr. Metcalfe ?
···················
Re:
www.Google.COM/groups?selm=_%40Jeff_Relf.Seattle.2009_Oct30.0.46am.Dy
news:_ at (no spam) Jeff_Relf.Seattle.2009_Oct30.0.46am.Dy
To post hand·crafted <img> tags (HTML), as I do (above),
you need a news·client that can post HTML·Only
and a news·server that allows it.
My server ( newsRead.Glorb.COM:80 ) is un·filtered;
it allows HTML·Only posts.
As far as I know, my hand·crafted news·client (X.ZIP)
is the only one that can produce HTML·Only posts.
By “HTML·Only”, I mean: “ Content-Type: Text/HTML ”
not: “ Content-Type: multipart/alternative ”. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| waldofj... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 11:01 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 30, 12:44 pm, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 30, 12:44 am, _ at (no spam) Jeff_Relf.Seattle.inValid wrote:
How did you embed that picture?
Let me try.
[IMG]http://www.ember.com/images/Metcalfe.gif[/IMG]
Anyhow, I see these 13 to 14 year olds flocking to grandpa who is
worshipped by Einstein Dingleberries for more than 100 years. When
these kids find out that Einstein was nothing but a nitwit, a
plagiarist, and a liar, see how many children would flock to that
nitwit, that plagiarist, and that liar. However, the only reason who
jeff relf worships Eisntein is that Einstein was indeed a nitwit, a
plagiarist, and a liar. Got anymore photos of Einstein the nitwit,
the plagiarist, and the liar (be it wax or not) in companies of
children?
shrug
[/quote]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWBUl7oT9sA |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Nightcrawler... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 11:07 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"BradGuth" <bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message news:441e8ea2-89e4-4b3d-8091-50f193628723 at (no spam) j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
[quote]On Oct 29, 7:10 pm, _ at (no spam) Jeff_Relf.Seattle.inValid wrote:
Brad·Guth's “hollow earth” theory is insane. Pressure accrues.
Imagine the pressure you'd feel at the bottom of the Mariana Trench.
The center of earth is like that but, instead of water,
you have zetta·tons of blazing·hot steel pressing down on you.
It's just a theory, although hollow is relative.
[/quote]
Hollow is defined, not relative.
[quote]How about a reduced pressure and/or lower density interior?
[/quote]
The pressure at the center is created through compression, not
gravitational attraction AT THE CORE, rather the matter trying to get
TO/THRU the core via the resultant vector created by ALL of the matter
of the earth, not just at the core.
However, do to this compression the matter at the core will have a
higher specific density, thus a bit more gravity than the same material
would have without a large mass trying to press through equally from
all sides. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Double-A... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 11:31 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 30, 12:30 pm, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 30, 9:07 am, "Nightcrawler" <Dirtyde... at (no spam) dirtcheap.net> wrote:
"BradGuth" <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:441e8ea2-89e4-4b3d-8091-50f193628723 at (no spam) j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 29, 7:10 pm, _ at (no spam) Jeff_Relf.Seattle.inValid wrote:
Brad·Guth's “hollow earth” theory is insane. Pressure accrues.
Imagine the pressure you'd feel at the bottom of the Mariana Trench.
The center of earth is like that but, instead of water,
you have zetta·tons of blazing·hot steel pressing down on you.
It's just a theory, although hollow is relative.
Hollow is defined, not relative.
How about a reduced pressure and/or lower density interior?
The pressure at the center is created through compression, not
gravitational attraction AT THE CORE, rather the matter trying to get
TO/THRU the core via the resultant vector created by ALL of the matter
of the earth, not just at the core.
However, do to this compression the matter at the core will have a
higher specific density, thus a bit more gravity than the same material
would have without a large mass trying to press through equally from
all sides.
That’s really odd, because in deep underground caves or mine shafts,
other than the expected atmospheric pressure increase that’s obvious
and somewhat minor (<42% increase per 3.5 km depth unless you plan on
artificially cooling that column of air in order to get a 100%
increase per 3.5 km), there’s hardly any other significant geology
pressures for our physiology to contend with, including while swimming
or scuba diving in those deep underground lakes or aquifers, and
there’s certainly not any big increase in gravity (if anything it only
measurably increases ever so slightly), and there’s certainly no
objective way of telling if the inner core is merely that of a dense
shell that’s hollow inside, or not.
http://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/2506/1/IJRSP%2037(1)%2....
[/quote]
The fact that gravity increases measurably in deep caves/mines tells
you that the interior of the Earth is denser than the rock above you.
Otherwise gravity would have already begun to decrease.
Double-A |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Koobee Wublee... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 12:28 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 29, 10:20 am, "hanson" <han... at (no spam) quick.net> wrote:
[quote]"Koobee Wublee" <koobee.wub... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote
I understand that you regard these historic things as serious matters.
To me however, having left academia, ever since I freed myself from
the slavery of post-docing, these events have become very entertaining
tid-bits worth enjoying with laughs... ahahahaha
When and if fancy strikes I may wanna take up and discuss with you
some issues about the nature of Black holes. A case can be made
for their nature to be a very different animal then the popular
Schwartzschild solution (which was propose IIRC century earlier
by B. Pascal). Here are my notions about it. You do the math on it
(make a new thread):
http://tinyurl.com/ykf356z> Barycenters Black Holes / Ghez.
[/quote]
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/3f25ece8394b7228?hl=en |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Aleph... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 1:50 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 30/10/2009 03:10, _ at (no spam) Jeff_Relf.Seattle.inValid
<_ at (no spam) Jeff_Relf.Seattle.inValid> gave it no where near enough thought and
then wrote:
[quote]
Brad·Guth is insane.
[/quote]
It is ok, Mr Relf, I fixed your post for you.
--
Aleph
This message was posted to usenet so please reply that way. Emails to
this account are very likely to be ignored. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Robb... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:11 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Jeff Relf wrote:
[quote]As far as I know, my hand·crafted news·client (X.ZIP)
is the only one that can produce HTML·Only posts.
[/quote]
Does having a short-term memory loss hurt??
User-Agent: CRAP.ZIP
Content-Type: Text/HTML
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <4c859lBA$45447F.38ZNNNE at (no spam) relfsabonehead.za>
--
Robb | Shared Secrets Usenet |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:22 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 30, 1:31 pm, Double-A <double... at (no spam) hush.com> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 30, 12:30 pm, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 30, 9:07 am, "Nightcrawler" <Dirtyde... at (no spam) dirtcheap.net> wrote:
"BradGuth" <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:441e8ea2-89e4-4b3d-8091-50f193628723 at (no spam) j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 29, 7:10 pm, _ at (no spam) Jeff_Relf.Seattle.inValid wrote:
Brad·Guth's “hollow earth” theory is insane. Pressure accrues.
Imagine the pressure you'd feel at the bottom of the Mariana Trench.
The center of earth is like that but, instead of water,
you have zetta·tons of blazing·hot steel pressing down on you.
It's just a theory, although hollow is relative.
Hollow is defined, not relative.
How about a reduced pressure and/or lower density interior?
The pressure at the center is created through compression, not
gravitational attraction AT THE CORE, rather the matter trying to get
TO/THRU the core via the resultant vector created by ALL of the matter
of the earth, not just at the core.
However, do to this compression the matter at the core will have a
higher specific density, thus a bit more gravity than the same material
would have without a large mass trying to press through equally from
all sides.
That’s really odd, because in deep underground caves or mine shafts,
other than the expected atmospheric pressure increase that’s obvious
and somewhat minor (<42% increase per 3.5 km depth unless you plan on
artificially cooling that column of air in order to get a 100%
increase per 3.5 km), there’s hardly any other significant geology
pressures for our physiology to contend with, including while swimming
or scuba diving in those deep underground lakes or aquifers, and
there’s certainly not any big increase in gravity (if anything it only
measurably increases ever so slightly), and there’s certainly no
objective way of telling if the inner core is merely that of a dense
shell that’s hollow inside, or not.
http://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/2506/1/IJRSP%2037(1)%2...
The fact that gravity increases measurably in deep caves/mines tells
you that the interior of the Earth is denser than the rock above you.
Otherwise gravity would have already begun to decrease.
Double-A
[/quote]
3.5 km isn't gong very deep, and that still doesn't tell us how much
of Earth's interior is hollow or displaced by some kinds of low
density fluids.
Obviously the interior is not of a uniform density, nor is it getting
uniformly compressed, as otherwise there wouldn't be those 500 km deep
quakes.
The objectively deep Russian drilling at 12+ km doesn't agree with
your analogy. It's as though the inner layer of our crust (say from 6
to 10 km depth) is extremely dense, though below that mark it gets
less dense (and they still do not know why).
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:34 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 30, 1:42 pm, "Nightcrawler" <Dirtyde... at (no spam) dirtcheap.net> wrote:
[quote]"BradGuth" <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:27da353b-147c-4ed3-bfda-3ed5cb612cf1 at (no spam) i12g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
That’s really odd, because in deep underground caves or mine shafts,
other than the expected atmospheric pressure increase that’s obvious
and somewhat minor (<42% increase per 3.5 km depth unless you plan on
artificially cooling that column of air in order to get a 100%
increase per 3.5 km), there’s hardly any other significant geology
pressures for our physiology to contend with, including while swimming
or scuba diving in those deep underground lakes or aquifers, and
there’s certainly not any big increase in gravity (if anything it only
measurably increases ever so slightly), and there’s certainly no
objective way of telling if the inner core is merely that of a dense
shell that’s hollow inside, or not.
irrelevant snipped
1)
Non related items, Guthie. Caves and mine shafts are cavities in
the crust. The only pressure that would be evident there would be
atmospheric. The pressure inside the Channel tube is relatively
the same as that on the surface, as well as that inside of a sub at
great depth. The pressure on the walls of the caves/mine shafts,
or sub, is much greater. Since they are solids that pressure is
contained by the structure of their substance and does not flow as
with a liquid.
However, if the pressure is great enough the structure of either will
fail. A cave will collapse and a sub will implode. Increase the
pressure sufficiently and the friction will cause any solid to lose the
molecular bonds that make it a solid.
2)
A gas does not behave like a liquid or a solid. Nor does a liquid
behave like a solid.
3)
What happens to a can of air that is immersed to a depth of 3.5km
in water? Now, drill a hole that deep in ice. Place the can down there
and slowly fill with water, letting the water freeze 1mm at a time. What
then happens to that can?
[/quote]
Your objective proof that that our Selene/moon crust is 100% solid, as
is everything inside of that?
Before you bother, your obfuscation is noted.
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Just Me... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 3:08 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 30, 2:32 pm, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 30, 8:44 am, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 30, 12:44 am, _ at (no spam) Jeff_Relf.Seattle.inValid wrote:
How did you embed that picture?
Let me try.
[IMG]http://www.ember.com/images/Metcalfe.gif[/IMG]
Anyhow, I see these 13 to 14 year olds flocking to grandpa who is
worshipped by Einstein Dingleberries for more than 100 years. When
these kids find out that Einstein was nothing but a nitwit, a
plagiarist, and a liar, see how many children would flock to that
nitwit, that plagiarist, and that liar. However, the only reason who
jeff relf worships Eisntein is that Einstein was indeed a nitwit, a
plagiarist, and a liar. Got anymore photos of Einstein the nitwit,
the plagiarist, and the liar (be it wax or not) in companies of
children?
shrug
You forgot to mention "wife beater" and drug induced "Satan
worshiper", because that’s what their Zionist/Jewish policy includes
and approves of, as well as slave ownership and apparently body
snatchings for live organ harvesting, along with their kosher approved
SEC and its Ponzi Madoff types that have no remorse about steeling
[/quote]
Like, 'steeling" for "steal"? Does it really get that dumb? In a
science newsgroup, no less? When you're too stupid to spell at that
elementary level it ony tells ya the guy is too stupid to read
anything above that level. Hence the kind of "thinking" he does.
I'll give him a "Zionist/Jewish policy". Let this hair-on-fire Ernst
Rohm in his little Nazi boots go to Gaza and join up with Hamas. Then
let the IDF give him the "Zionist/Jewish policy" right close up and
personal. :-)
Where is my closest IDF recruiter?
--
JM http://doo-dads.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Dec 11, 2009 10:36 pm
|
|