 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Astronomy Forum » Albert Einstein... he's the bomb!... |
|
Page 13 of 19 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 12, 13, 14 ... 17, 18, 19 Next |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Nightcrawler... |
 Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:18 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1 at (no spam) mchsi.com> wrote in message news:gUJIm.122819$la3.23060 at (no spam) attbi_s22...
[quote]That's just backed-up farts!
[/quote]
Are you trying to state that they indirectly talk out of their asses? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Sam Wormley... |
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:23 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Nightcrawler wrote:
[quote]"Sam Wormley" <swormley1 at (no spam) mchsi.com> wrote in message news:gUJIm.122819$la3.23060 at (no spam) attbi_s22...
That's just backed-up farts!
Are you trying to state that they indirectly talk out of their asses?
[/quote]
Hard to tell the difference! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Saul Levy... |
| Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:27 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
That could be! I'm waiting for an answer. lmfjao!
Saul Levy
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 15:25:56 -0600, "Nightcrawler"
<Dirtydeeds at (no spam) dirtcheap.net> wrote:
[quote]A testicle clamp?
"Saul Levy" <saullevy1 at (no spam) cox.net> wrote in message news:m3g6f55kqcp26ccepfjkjg371drgonvn5p at (no spam) 4ax.com...
What the FUCK'S a tortogal? lmfjao!
You're making this SHIT UP!
Saul Levy[/quote] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 2:54 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 3, 2:18 pm, HW at (no spam) ..(Henry Wilson DSc). wrote:
[quote]On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:11:56 -0800 (PST), BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 3, 12:49 pm, Double-A <double... at (no spam) hush.com> wrote:
On Nov 3, 12:36 pm, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 3, 11:57 am, Double-A <double... at (no spam) hush.com> wrote:
On Nov 3, 10:52 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 3, 10:11 am, Double-A <double... at (no spam) hush.com> wrote:
On Oct 29, 10:43 pm, _ at (no spam) Jeff_Relf.Seattle.inValid wrote:
Pressure accrues.
The deeper you go the higher the pressure and temperature.
What could produce “ reduced pressure and/or lower density ”
at the center of the earth ?
At the center of the Earth it's like you are in a vice that has
tightened on you to terrific pressure. Only difference is that the
pressure is from all sides equally, so there is no direction for your
brains to squirt out!
Double-A
However, at near zero gravity (say within a 1% volume of Earth as
representing its inner most core where gravity is less than 0.1%)
whereas the center most zone of dead center is actually zero or even
reverse gravity (meaning you'd oscillate or vibrate within this final
sphere), how can there be pressure?
~ BG
If your head were clamped in a vice that was tightening, what would
you care about gravity? Get the point?
Double-A
At near zero gravity, where's all that pressure coming from?
How much does lead or any other element weigh at zero gravity?
~ BG
The pressure is coming from the mass on all sides of you that IS
feeling gravity and is all pushing inwards, each side attracting the
opposite side.
Double-A
However, an eggshell would likely protect you, because the vast bulk
of whatever is surrounding yourself is being pulled outwards unless
you yourself represented more density than anything else (thus you'd
be representing gravity).
If the core substance were that of hydrogen and helium?
~ BG
Earth is slowly rotating so centrifugal force is insufficiet to obercome
gratvity near the centre. But what about a very rapidly spinning neutron
star?
It could easily be hollow.
There is no gravity field inside homogeneous shell.
Henry Wilson...www.scisite.info/index.htm
Einstein...World's greatest SciFi writer..
[/quote]
Only if that neutron star were spinning in all possible directions at
the same time (atom like), as otherwise it would have to be near solid
from its outermost shell to its core.
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:01 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 31, 9:48 pm, "Nightcrawler" <Dirtyde... at (no spam) dirtcheap.net> wrote:
[quote]"BradGuth" <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:d717a1dc-3ee5-4769-bdac-29eaef85426d at (no spam) g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
It's perhaps called "Gravitomagnetism and the Newtonian Law of
Gravity"
Are you suggesting that the "Newtonian Law of Gravity" is bogus?
Are you suggesting a nearby nova is nothing to take seriously?
Are you suggesting a relatively nearby 12.5e6 Ms molecular cloud is
insignificant?
I'll just say that jumping from earth to Sirius is quite a leap.
[/quote]
What if Sirius was at times nearby, such as within 1 ly or even 0.1
ly?
How else did our terrestrial diatoms thrive (becoming DE)?
Exclude that unusual biodiversity of diatoms and you exclude humanity,
as well as most other biodiversity.
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Henry Wilson DSc... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:03 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 21:48:15 -0000, "Androcles" <Headmaster at (no spam) Hogwarts.physics_p>
wrote:
[quote]
"Henry Wilson DSc ." <HW at (no spam) ..> wrote in message
news:c8a6f5loloo9tbl133mm0l2pndjb8mhei5 at (no spam) 4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 09:17:42 -0000, "Androcles"
Headmaster at (no spam) Hogwarts.physics_p
wrote:
what
we
think we know about the universe.
A black hole is just a big neutron star or similar. where's the
problem?.
In Oz. Anything it doesn't understand it invents a quick solution to,
according to its faulty intuition. It's called a "Wilson".
Prove I'm wrong then.
The fuckwit's fallacy: "Prove I'm wrong"...
Burden of proof is upon the claimant.
Bright green flying elephants lay their eggs in black holes.
Prove I'm wrong then.
The Easter Bunny lays chocolate eggs.
Prove I'm wrong then.
The Tooth Fairy buys children's milk teeth.
Prove I'm wrong then.
Time dilates as speed increases.
Prove Einstein wrong then.
Where's the problem?
The problem is in Oz, it's called an illogical Wilson.
[/quote]
Hahahahahahahaha! You'd never make a good suicide bomber.....
Henry Wilson...www.scisite.info/index.htm
Einstein...World's greatest SciFi writer.. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Henry Wilson DSc... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:07 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:24:56 GMT, Sam Wormley <swormley1 at (no spam) mchsi.com> wrote:
[quote]Henry Wilson DSc wrote:
The thing first condensed into a ball. Then, under intense gravitational
pressure, the conditions in the cente became such that a mini nuclear fusion
explosion occured, expanding and fusing the outside shell into a very strong
structure. So it became a hollow ball, still attracting more external matter.
Here's the scoop, Wilson... gas (mostly hydrogen) does collapse to form stars
and fused hydrogen into helium while on the main sequence. Massive enough
stars can have other fusion process than can result in some iron core*
implosions. The iron core can never undergo a fission or fusion reaction.
*for main sequence stars that have at least ten solar masses.
Fusion of the iron core just can't happen! It's a dead end.
[/quote]
Wormey, what exactly causes a SN to explode?
[quote]Gravitation is so strong that the cores collapse forming
o white dwarf held up against further collapse by electron degeneracy pressure,
o neutron stars held up against further collapse by neutron degeneracy pressure,
o or not held up at all and collapse within the core's Schwarzschild radius.
In any of these cases, gravity is a big winner and leaves no place for a void.
I can go into a lot more detail if you like.
[/quote]
I suppose you've been up to see one have you?
Henry Wilson...www.scisite.info/index.htm
Einstein...World's greatest SciFi writer.. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Henry Wilson DSc... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:07 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 21:51:20 -0000, "Androcles" <Headmaster at (no spam) Hogwarts.physics_p>
wrote:
[quote]
"Henry Wilson DSc ." <HW at (no spam) ..> wrote in message
news:haa6f5lm43ev4jvlfbdej13p2lqptqm8a7 at (no spam) 4ax.com...
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:59:43 GMT, Sam Wormley <swormley1 at (no spam) mchsi.com> wrote:
Henry Wilson DSc wrote:
What are the required conditions for spinning matter to condense into a
HOLLOW
ball rather than a solid one?
Perhaps you could tell us how you think neutron starts come
to exist in the first place, Henry!
Gravity.
It condensed lots of matter into a spinning ball...then a bloody big
explosion
in the middle blew out an enormous spherical cavity. It wasn't enough to
blow
the star completely apart though.
Then the inside is padded and called a cell, the ideal habitat for a Wilson.
[/quote]
filled with bottle of red wine.....
Henry Wilson...www.scisite.info/index.htm
Einstein...World's greatest SciFi writer.. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Androcles... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 7:23 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Henry Wilson DSc ." <HW at (no spam) ..> wrote in message
news:71t7f5994tc392sdrnvtdpda6ej44klp7l at (no spam) 4ax.com...
[quote]On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 21:48:15 -0000, "Androcles"
Headmaster at (no spam) Hogwarts.physics_p
wrote:
"Henry Wilson DSc ." <HW at (no spam) ..> wrote in message
news:c8a6f5loloo9tbl133mm0l2pndjb8mhei5 at (no spam) 4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 09:17:42 -0000, "Androcles"
Headmaster at (no spam) Hogwarts.physics_p
wrote:
what
we
think we know about the universe.
A black hole is just a big neutron star or similar. where's the
problem?.
In Oz. Anything it doesn't understand it invents a quick solution to,
according to its faulty intuition. It's called a "Wilson".
Prove I'm wrong then.
The fuckwit's fallacy: "Prove I'm wrong"...
Burden of proof is upon the claimant.
Bright green flying elephants lay their eggs in black holes.
Prove I'm wrong then.
The Easter Bunny lays chocolate eggs.
Prove I'm wrong then.
The Tooth Fairy buys children's milk teeth.
Prove I'm wrong then.
Time dilates as speed increases.
Prove Einstein wrong then.
Where's the problem?
The problem is in Oz, it's called an illogical Wilson.
Hahahahahahahaha! You'd never make a good suicide bomber.....
Right. And you'll never find a black hole... but if you do,[/quote]
look inside for broken eggshell, it'll prove my theory that
the hatchlings have left. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Sam Wormley... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 1:26 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Henry Wilson DSc wrote:
[quote]
Wormey, what exactly causes a SN to explode?
[/quote]
Contributors include shock wave bounce and a tremendous outpouring of
neutrinos.
In the case of SN 1987A
o total anti-neutrino energy 3 x 10^52 erg
o total neutrino energy 2.5 x 10^53 erg
o total neutrino luminosity 10^55 erg/s
o average neutrino temperature 4 MeV or 10^10 K
o number of neutrinos produced 10^58 neutrinos
o neutrino flux density at the earth 5 x 10^10 /cm^2 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| HVAC... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 2:49 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Henry Wilson DSc ." <HW at (no spam) ..> wrote in message
news:j7t7f5l8mp9rhiv6us7g9tu2o5vu210r6h at (no spam) 4ax.com...
[quote]
Wormey, what exactly causes a SN to explode?
[/quote]
The short answer is gravity. If you want I can
go further into the details.
--
The world will scream out, "Help Us!"
I'll answer, "No". |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Henry Wilson DSc... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:00 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 12:23:05 -0000, "Androcles" <Headmaster at (no spam) Hogwarts.physics_p>
wrote:
[quote]
"Henry Wilson DSc ." <HW at (no spam) ..> wrote in message
news:71t7f5994tc392sdrnvtdpda6ej44klp7l at (no spam) 4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 21:48:15 -0000, "Androcles"
Headmaster at (no spam) Hogwarts.physics_p
Headmaster at (no spam) Hogwarts.physics_p
wrote:
what
we
think we know about the universe.
A black hole is just a big neutron star or similar. where's the
problem?.
In Oz. Anything it doesn't understand it invents a quick solution to,
according to its faulty intuition. It's called a "Wilson".
Prove I'm wrong then.
The fuckwit's fallacy: "Prove I'm wrong"...
Burden of proof is upon the claimant.
Bright green flying elephants lay their eggs in black holes.
Prove I'm wrong then.
The Easter Bunny lays chocolate eggs.
Prove I'm wrong then.
The Tooth Fairy buys children's milk teeth.
Prove I'm wrong then.
Time dilates as speed increases.
Prove Einstein wrong then.
Where's the problem?
The problem is in Oz, it's called an illogical Wilson.
Hahahahahahahaha! You'd never make a good suicide bomber.....
Right. And you'll never find a black hole... but if you do,
look inside for broken eggshell, it'll prove my theory that
the hatchlings have left.
[/quote]
You know the funniest aspect of all this is that the idiots here lke Wormey
think I'm serious....
Hahahahhahahhahahhahahaha!
Of course the fucking things are not hollow.
Henry Wilson...www.scisite.info/index.htm
Einstein...World's greatest SciFi writer.. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Henry Wilson DSc... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:02 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 14:49:32 -0500, "HVAC" <harlowcampbell at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]
"Henry Wilson DSc ." <HW at (no spam) ..> wrote in message
news:j7t7f5l8mp9rhiv6us7g9tu2o5vu210r6h at (no spam) 4ax.com...
Wormey, what exactly causes a SN to explode?
The short answer is gravity. If you want I can
go further into the details.
[/quote]
We're already far beyond 'gravity', dopey.
Henry Wilson...www.scisite.info/index.htm
Einstein...World's greatest SciFi writer.. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Henry Wilson DSc... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:03 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:26:30 GMT, Sam Wormley <swormley1 at (no spam) mchsi.com> wrote:
[quote]Henry Wilson DSc wrote:
Wormey, what exactly causes a SN to explode?
Contributors include shock wave bounce and a tremendous outpouring of
neutrinos.
In the case of SN 1987A
o total anti-neutrino energy 3 x 10^52 erg
o total neutrino energy 2.5 x 10^53 erg
o total neutrino luminosity 10^55 erg/s
o average neutrino temperature 4 MeV or 10^10 K
o number of neutrinos produced 10^58 neutrinos
o neutrino flux density at the earth 5 x 10^10 /cm^2
[/quote]
Which comes first, the neutrinos or the explosion?
Henry Wilson...www.scisite.info/index.htm
Einstein...World's greatest SciFi writer.. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Henry Wilson DSc... |
| Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:04 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 04:54:00 -0800 (PST), BradGuth <bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Nov 3, 2:18 pm, HW at (no spam) ..(Henry Wilson DSc). wrote:
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:11:56 -0800 (PST), BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 3, 12:49 pm, Double-A <double... at (no spam) hush.com> wrote:
On Nov 3, 12:36 pm, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 3, 11:57 am, Double-A <double... at (no spam) hush.com> wrote:
On Nov 3, 10:52 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 3, 10:11 am, Double-A <double... at (no spam) hush.com> wrote:
On Oct 29, 10:43 pm, _ at (no spam) Jeff_Relf.Seattle.inValid wrote:
Pressure accrues.
The deeper you go the higher the pressure and temperature.
What could produce “ reduced pressure and/or lower density ”
at the center of the earth ?
At the center of the Earth it's like you are in a vice that has
tightened on you to terrific pressure. Only difference is that the
pressure is from all sides equally, so there is no direction for your
brains to squirt out!
Double-A
However, at near zero gravity (say within a 1% volume of Earth as
representing its inner most core where gravity is less than 0.1%)
whereas the center most zone of dead center is actually zero or even
reverse gravity (meaning you'd oscillate or vibrate within this final
sphere), how can there be pressure?
~ BG
If your head were clamped in a vice that was tightening, what would
you care about gravity? Get the point?
Double-A
At near zero gravity, where's all that pressure coming from?
How much does lead or any other element weigh at zero gravity?
~ BG
The pressure is coming from the mass on all sides of you that IS
feeling gravity and is all pushing inwards, each side attracting the
opposite side.
Double-A
However, an eggshell would likely protect you, because the vast bulk
of whatever is surrounding yourself is being pulled outwards unless
you yourself represented more density than anything else (thus you'd
be representing gravity).
If the core substance were that of hydrogen and helium?
~ BG
Earth is slowly rotating so centrifugal force is insufficiet to obercome
gratvity near the centre. But what about a very rapidly spinning neutron
star?
It could easily be hollow.
There is no gravity field inside homogeneous shell.
Henry Wilson...www.scisite.info/index.htm
Einstein...World's greatest SciFi writer..
Only if that neutron star were spinning in all possible directions at
the same time (atom like), as otherwise it would have to be near solid
from its outermost shell to its core.
[/quote]
Or flattened...
[quote]~ BG
[/quote]
Henry Wilson...www.scisite.info/index.htm
Einstein...World's greatest SciFi writer.. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:27 pm
|
|