 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Physics Forum » Discovery of Higgs at Large Hadron Collider might not... |
|
Page 20 of 20 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 18, 19, 20 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Aleph... |
 Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:51 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 2/11/2009 03:22, in
sci.physics,sci.physics.particle,sci.physics.relativity, Y.Porat
<y.y.porat at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]-----------------
the realname of Aleph
[/quote]
Is none of your business.
[quote]is Michael Varny
[/quote]
Incorrect.
[quote]an old psychpath gangster
let his gangster Bosses know
that they are waiting their money on him !!
[/quote]
All part of your fantasy world.
[quote]that is not clever enough even to be a hired gangster
and he will never say a single word of science
[/quote]
If I did, you wouldnt recognise it.
[quote]so let any one know
about whom we are pissing on here
[/quote]
Who is the "we" of which you speak? You are alone here. Your madness is
unique.
Now, the reality is, the real name of Y.Porat is Constantine Dickwad. I
challenge you to prove otherwise, you facist liar crook gangster with no
day job who never speaks a word of science but is only here to distract
good productive members of the group.
--
Aleph
This message was posted to usenet so please reply that way. Emails to
this account are very likely to be ignored. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Nick |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 7:50 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 17 Apr 2005
Posts: 3545
|
On Nov 2, 8:31 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 29, 4:48 pm, PD <thedraperfam... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 11:03 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 4:11 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 2:48 pm, PD <thedraperfam... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 27, 8:51 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 27, 9:43 pm, PD <thedraperfam... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 27, 1:40 pm, "Y.Pora > > evidence against the prevailing theory. The reason for this is that
they probe the places that haven't been tested yet, to see if there is
something out there that would indicate the prevailing theory is wrong
and another theory is right. This is how science is DONE! You don't
just go investigating alternative theories when you suspect there is
trouble with a current one. BUT the alternative theory has to ...
read more »
---------------------
until now you refused to get my book free
why??
No I didn't. You already gave me access to it, and I have it.
-----------------------------
YOU HAVE MY BOOK ??? GHOSH !!
you have all my book ??? ---**the whole of it*** ???
how could you get it
while i never gave it to you
**and it is copyrighted !!!!????
do you have or had another name ???
TIA
Y.Porat
--------------------------------
Mr PD i am waiting to your answer:
how is it that you got my book
while i never gave it to you ???!!
Yes you did, Porat.
I don't know where your mind has gone.
TIA
Y.Porat
----------------------------
Mr PD
since you say that you lost my book :
i am stil waiting to see the correspondence
between us
to fing out were should i post my book to you!!
2
when was it that you got my book ?
(even more or less )
is it one month ago??
is it one year ago??
is it 5 or 10 years ago ??
TIA
Y.Porat
-------------------------- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
[/quote]
If higgs is the mass creator what creates higgs mass?
Mass is C squared infinitely dense point energy in a particle.
God created the initial conditions at the Big Bang or Absolute
Beginning.
Mitch Raemsch |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Nick |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 7:52 am |
|
|
|
Joined: 17 Apr 2005
Posts: 3545
|
On Nov 2, 8:31 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 29, 4:48 pm, PD <thedraperfam... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 11:03 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 4:11 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 2:48 pm, PD <thedraperfam... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 27, 8:51 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 27, 9:43 pm, PD <thedraperfam... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 27, 1:40 pm, "Y.Pora > > evidence against the prevailing theory. The reason for this is that
they probe the places that haven't been tested yet, to see if there is
something out there that would indicate the prevailing theory is wrong
and another theory is right. This is how science is DONE! You don't
just go investigating alternative theories when you suspect there is
trouble with a current one. BUT the alternative theory has to ...
read more »
---------------------
until now you refused to get my book free
why??
No I didn't. You already gave me access to it, and I have it.
-----------------------------
YOU HAVE MY BOOK ??? GHOSH !!
you have all my book ??? ---**the whole of it*** ???
how could you get it
while i never gave it to you
**and it is copyrighted !!!!????
do you have or had another name ???
TIA
Y.Porat
--------------------------------
Mr PD i am waiting to your answer:
how is it that you got my book
while i never gave it to you ???!!
Yes you did, Porat.
I don't know where your mind has gone.
TIA
Y.Porat
----------------------------
Mr PD
since you say that you lost my book :
i am stil waiting to see the correspondence
between us
to fing out were should i post my book to you!!
2
when was it that you got my book ?
(even more or less )
is it one month ago??
is it one year ago??
is it 5 or 10 years ago ??
TIA
Y.Porat
-------------------------- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
[/quote]
Energy flows through space time.
Mitch Raemsch |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Inertial... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:02 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:22203742-bcc6-4307-af09-272761a1d6e2 at (no spam) l2g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
[quote]On Nov 2, 1:48 pm, Aleph <Usenet.... at (no spam) gishpuppy.com> wrote:
On 2/11/2009 03:47, in
sci.physics,sci.physics.particle,sci.physics.relativity, Y.Porat
y.y.po... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
--------------------
it is interesting .....
Unlike your "theories" anyway.
i was talking to Inertial
No, you were posting to USENET. If you were, as you claim, "talking" to
Inertial, you should have been using a your voice, a phone, letters or
even email.
USENET, as you seem to realise elsewhere, means your ramblings go out
into a public forum. If you want a private conversation where no one
else joins in, then pick a different medium.
Its not hard to work out.
and Aleph is popping out
You wish.
and responding as if he was Inertial ...
How am I responding as if I was Inertial. You made claims, I mocked
them, then you DIRECTED your questions to me and I responded.
Good luck with your attempt at a distraction argument though.
and yet they say that i am senile .... (:-)
You are.
2
may be Aleph is another name of inertial
Nope. Are you George Hammond in disguise? Maybe you are Jeff Relf?
not likely
Well done.
it is more likely that Aleph9the professional crook )
Well, you are half right.
tries
to divert the issue of his indentity
There is no issue of my identity.
to a side direction..
i any case
we have here two pump parasites
moron parrots that sit all day next to the computer because they cant
get a
decent day job!!
Here is your attempt at an argument in a nutshell. The only bit missing
is to claim I am a moron Nazi, criminal parrot who sits at a computer
all day because I dont get a day job.
You are slacking.
I have a day job and I dont sit at a computer all day. My day job
occupies 40 hours of my life every week. Even for someone as
mathematically challenged as yourself you can see that there is a
significant amount of extra time remaining.
and all their '''skills'''' are
to disturbe other productive innovative people
ROTFLMAO.
You are neither productive, nor innovative. You say the same crap now as
you did a decade ago. You are stagnant. You have stagnated because your
ideas are simply wrong.
--
Aleph
This message was posted to usenet so please reply that way. Emails to
this account are very likely to be ignored.
-------------------
imbecile idiot
th e issue was
that Inertial claimed that he is
under 50
[/quote]
Which I am
[quote]and you poped in as an idiot
because i was not discussion **your age**
but *Inertials age *as a test of credibility
[/quote]
And I passed with flying colors as always |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Inertial... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:03 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"BURT" <macromitch at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:9a53198a-391a-4f28-9234-2a84dda7e614 at (no spam) f18g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
[quote]On Nov 2, 8:31 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 29, 4:48 pm, PD <thedraperfam... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 11:03 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 4:11 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 2:48 pm, PD <thedraperfam... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 27, 8:51 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 27, 9:43 pm, PD <thedraperfam... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 27, 1:40 pm, "Y.Pora > > evidence against the
prevailing theory. The reason for this is that
they probe the places that haven't been tested yet, to see if
there is
something out there that would indicate the prevailing theory
is wrong
and another theory is right. This is how science is DONE! You
don't
just go investigating alternative theories when you suspect
there is
trouble with a current one. BUT the alternative theory has to
...
read more »
---------------------
until now you refused to get my book free
why??
No I didn't. You already gave me access to it, and I have it.
-----------------------------
YOU HAVE MY BOOK ??? GHOSH !!
you have all my book ??? ---**the whole of it*** ???
how could you get it
while i never gave it to you
**and it is copyrighted !!!!????
do you have or had another name ???
TIA
Y.Porat
--------------------------------
Mr PD i am waiting to your answer:
how is it that you got my book
while i never gave it to you ???!!
Yes you did, Porat.
I don't know where your mind has gone.
TIA
Y.Porat
----------------------------
Mr PD
since you say that you lost my book :
i am stil waiting to see the correspondence
between us
to fing out were should i post my book to you!!
2
when was it that you got my book ?
(even more or less )
is it one month ago??
is it one year ago??
is it 5 or 10 years ago ??
TIA
Y.Porat
-------------------------- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
If higgs is the mass creator what creates higgs mass?
Mass is C squared infinitely dense point energy in a particle.
God created the initial conditions at the Big Bang or Absolute
Beginning.
[/quote]
God? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Huang... |
| Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 7:49 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
So many silly people arguing.
Silly artists, silly scientists, silly philosophers, silly silly
silly.
All of them puzzling over some silly mathematics.....very silly one-
sided mathematics which models everything as being
proveable.....imposing determinacy on nature by fiat in a very subtle
way......very silly. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Inertial... |
| Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:07 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Huang" <huangxienchen at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:42a8324d-900a-461a-9e6b-4fd6ca335e90 at (no spam) j24g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
[quote]
So many silly people arguing.
Silly artists, silly scientists, silly philosophers, silly silly
silly.
All of them puzzling over some silly mathematics.....very silly one-
sided mathematics which models everything as being
proveable.....imposing determinacy on nature by fiat in a very subtle
way......very silly.
[/quote]
Which, of course, mathematics doesn't have to do |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Dec 11, 2009 6:12 am
|
|