Main Page | Report this Page
Science Forum Index  »  Mechanics Forum  »  The Law Of The Universe...
Page 1 of 2    Goto page 1, 2  Next

The Law Of The Universe...

Author Message
jdawe...
Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 5:55 pm
Guest
There are only 2 things in this universe:

Energy

or

Matter

There are only 2 states those 2 things can be in:

In Motion

or

At Rest

When 'energy\matter' is 'in motion' it generates positive force
( gravity ).

When 'energy\matter' is 'at rest' it generates negative force
( inverse of gravity ).

-------------------------------------------------------

Understand that law and you will understand everything in this
physical universe.

-Josh.
 
dlzc...
Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 6:05 pm
Guest
Dear jdawe:

On Oct 20, 8:55 pm, jdawe <jd... at (no spam) ncable.com.au> wrote:
[quote]There are only 2 things in this universe:

Energy

or

Matter
[/quote]
Space, time, Dark Matter, Dark Energy, momentum, entropy. You have no
clue, do you?

[quote]There are only 2 states those 2 things can be in:

In Motion

or

At Rest
[/quote]
These two are the same. 0 is just another value for Motion. Try not
to be silly.

[quote]When 'energy\matter' is 'in motion' it generates
positive force ( gravity ).

When 'energy\matter' is 'at rest' it generates
negative force ( inverse of gravity ).
[/quote]
How can we disprove this? Since I am at rest wrt the Earth, then
there is no gravitation on me?

[quote]-------------------------------------------------------

Understand that law and you will understand
everything in this physical universe.
[/quote]
Law #1: Idiots post anything to usenet, post it to inappropriate
newsgroups, never respond in group, and post in vague generalities
being sure to say nothing of import.

David A. Smith
 
dlzc...
Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 6:07 pm
Guest
On Oct 20, 8:47 pm, jdawe <jd... at (no spam) ncable.com.au> wrote:
[quote]There are only 2 things in this universe:

Energy

or

Matter

There are only 2 states those 2 things can be in:

In Motion

or

At Rest

When 'energy\matter' is 'in motion' it generates positive force
( gravity ).

When 'energy\matter' is 'at rest' it generates negative force
( inverse of gravity ).

-------------------------------------------------------

Understand that law and you will understand everything in this
physical universe.

-Josh.
[/quote]
We have a new BURT, one that does not realize he / she can post to
more than one group at a time. So it spams the same empty-headed crap
both here and sci.engr.mech.

David A. Smith
 
jdawe...
Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 6:18 pm
Guest
David,

I have some homework for you to do:

The energy\matter of the star ( our sun ) is 'At Rest' it generates
negative gravity.

The energy\matter of the planets ( including our earth ) are 'In
Motion' they generate positive gravity.

Using the Law Of The Universe see if you can tell me:

Why the sun is composed of more energy than matter?

and

Why the planets are composed of more matter than energy?


On Oct 21, 2:07 pm, dlzc <dl... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 20, 8:47 pm, jdawe <jd... at (no spam) ncable.com.au> wrote:





There are only 2 things in this universe:

Energy

or

Matter

There are only 2 states those 2 things can be in:

In Motion

or

At Rest

When 'energy\matter' is 'in motion' it generates positive force
( gravity ).

When 'energy\matter' is 'at rest' it generates negative force
( inverse of gravity ).

-------------------------------------------------------

Understand that law and you will understand everything in this
physical universe.

-Josh.

We have a new BURT, one that does not realize he / she can post to
more than one group at a time.  So it spams the same empty-headed crap
both here and sci.engr.mech.

David A. Smith- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -[/quote]
 
jdawe...
Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:28 pm
Guest
*DON'T READ THIS UNLESS YOU HAVE ATLEAST TRIED TO SOLVE THE HOMEWORK*

The answer is:

The star 'At Rest' is slowly inverting all the energy of the planets
into matter.

The planets 'In Motion' are slowly inverting all the matter of the
star into energy.

-Josh


On Oct 21, 2:18 pm, jdawe <jd... at (no spam) ncable.com.au> wrote:
[quote]David,

I have some homework for you to do:

The energy\matter of the star ( our sun ) is 'At Rest' it generates
negative gravity.

The energy\matter of the planets ( including our earth ) are 'In
Motion' they generate positive gravity.

Using the Law Of The Universe see if you can tell me:

Why the sun is composed of more energy than matter?

and

Why the planets are composed of more matter than energy?

On Oct 21, 2:07 pm, dlzc <dl... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:



On Oct 20, 8:47 pm, jdawe <jd... at (no spam) ncable.com.au> wrote:

There are only 2 things in this universe:

Energy

or

Matter

There are only 2 states those 2 things can be in:

In Motion

or

At Rest

When 'energy\matter' is 'in motion' it generates positive force
( gravity ).

When 'energy\matter' is 'at rest' it generates negative force
( inverse of gravity ).

-------------------------------------------------------

Understand that law and you will understand everything in this
physical universe.

-Josh.

We have a new BURT, one that does not realize he / she can post to
more than one group at a time.  So it spams the same empty-headed crap
both here and sci.engr.mech.

David A. Smith- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -[/quote]
 
dlzc...
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 5:27 am
Guest
Dear jdawe:

On Oct 20, 9:18 pm, jdawe <jd... at (no spam) ncable.com.au> wrote:
[quote]David,

I have some homework for you to do:

The energy\matter of the star ( our sun )
is 'At Rest' it generates negative gravity.
[/quote]
It is never at rest. It swallows comets. The Sun loses atmosphere,
just like the Earth does.

[quote]The energy\matter of the planets ( including
our earth ) are 'In Motion' they generate
positive gravity.
[/quote]
Which is why we lose atmosphere, and why the Moon is receding from
Earth?

[quote]Using the Law Of The Universe see if
you can tell me:
[/quote]
That law seems to be that silly people seem to also post to usenet.

[quote]Why the sun is composed of more energy
than matter?
[/quote]
Since matter *is* energy, what sense have you made?

[quote]and

Why the planets are composed of more matter
than energy?
[/quote]
Please place your brains back in your head. When you take them out
like this, you just get them dirty.

David A. Smith
 
dlzc...
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 5:31 am
Guest
On Oct 21, 2:13 am, jdawe <jd... at (no spam) ncable.com.au> wrote:
[quote]There are only 2 things in this universe:
[/quote]
Those that think before writing, and those that regret after writing.

Usenet posts are archived for years, and for discussion of news in the
appropriate context, and can be used to weed out candidates for jobs.

You are painting yourself into a corner, exposing your ignorance. Are
you sure you need to go there?

David A. Smith
 
Paul O...
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 7:52 am
Guest
jdawe wrote, On 10/21/2009 12:18 AM:
[quote]David,

I have some homework for you to do:

The energy\matter of the star ( our sun ) is 'At Rest' it generates
negative gravity.

The energy\matter of the planets ( including our earth ) are 'In
Motion' they generate positive gravity.

Using the Law Of The Universe see if you can tell me:

Why the sun is composed of more energy than matter?

and

Why the planets are composed of more matter than energy?


snip
Here is some homework for you...[/quote]

Our local star (our sun) is in Motion as it orbits around the center of
our galaxy.

Our galaxy is in motion in in relation to the other galaxies in our
local group.

Our local group is in motion in relation to our Local Supercluster of
galaxies (surrounding the Virgo Cluster)

Ponder....

--

Paul D Oosterhout
I work for SAIC (but I don't speak for SAIC)
 
Androcles...
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 8:05 am
Guest
"Paul O" <first.d.last at (no spam) company.com> wrote in message
news:4ADF122D.3030305 at (no spam) company.com...
[quote]jdawe wrote, On 10/21/2009 12:18 AM:
David,

I have some homework for you to do:

The energy\matter of the star ( our sun ) is 'At Rest' it generates
negative gravity.

The energy\matter of the planets ( including our earth ) are 'In
Motion' they generate positive gravity.

Using the Law Of The Universe see if you can tell me:

Why the sun is composed of more energy than matter?

and

Why the planets are composed of more matter than energy?


snip
Here is some homework for you...

Our local star (our sun) is in Motion as it orbits around the center of
our galaxy.

Our galaxy is in motion in in relation to the other galaxies in our local
group.

Our local group is in motion in relation to our Local Supercluster of
galaxies (surrounding the Virgo Cluster)

Ponder....
[/quote]
Ok, pondered.
Conclusion... nothing I can do about it, it doesn't change my life.

Some simple facts about climate.

Negative feedback:
1) Sun heats ocean.
2) Ocean evaporates.
3) Clouds reflect sunlight into space, reduce evaporation.
4) Less cloud forms, more heat is absorbed, more cloud forms,
less heat is absorbed; Earth's temperature remains constant.
If it gets warmer, it will cool. If it gets cooler, it will
warm.


Positive feedback:
5) Snow falls on land and polar ice.
6) Snow/ice reflect sunlight into space, reduce heat absorption.
7) Earth cools as it radiates heat to space, more snow falls,
more sunlight is reflected, result is an Ice Age. The colder
it is, the colder it will get. The warmer it is, the warmer
it will get.

Changing the balance:
Cool Earth's orbit is elliptical.
9) Sunlight obeys the inverse square law.
10) Earth is tilted.
11) More sunlight reaches Earth at perihelion than at aphelion.
12) Earth's Great White Spot, Antarctica, reflects sunlight at
aphelion (Southern summer). Result, positive feedback
predominates, Ice Age.
13) Earth precesses. Earth's Great White Spot reflects sunlight
at perihelion (Northern summer). But Earth's Great White Spot
has no sunlight to reflect and the Northern Wet Spot (the Arctic
Ocean) has even more sunlight to melt its ice cap than it had
when it faced the Sun at aphelion. Water absorbs far more heat
than ice. Result: more sunlight absorbed, positive feedback,
global warming.

14) But it is offset by more cloud, see negative feedback above.
Overall result - a small change in temperature as a function of
precession.

15) CO2 levels rise as a consequence of a warmer planet, not
as the cause. Far more strange gases are vented to atmosphere by
volcanoes than by man.

Ponder...
 
jdawe...
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 7:12 pm
Guest
You can use the Law Of The Universe to unlock everything in the
physical universe not just the big questions but small everyday
things.

For example:

A human = matter\energy.

When a human is 'In Motion' ( going for a walk ) the negative gravity
of the star will begin inverting the energy in the human into matter.

When a human is 'At Rest' ( asleep in bed ) the positive gravity of
the planets will begin inverting the matter in the human into energy.

So,

if you need more energy have a rest!

if you need more matter ( bigger muscles ) go for a walk!

When a human consumes energy\matter in the form of food the 'In
Motion' state of the digestive system uses the negative gravity of the
star to:

First invert as much energy in the food into matter.

When the digested matter settles, 'At Rest' in your stomach, the
positive gravity of the planets will begin to invert the digested
matter into energy.

So, after you've eaten make sure you have a good rest and let your
food fully invert into energy before commencing physical activity.

-----------------------------

The law is the most powerful law ever given to humankind.

The question now is will humankind accept it or try to cover it up?

-Josh.



On Oct 22, 1:31 am, dlzc <dl... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 21, 2:13 am, jdawe <jd... at (no spam) ncable.com.au> wrote:

There are only 2 things in this universe:

Those that think before writing, and those that regret after writing.

Usenet posts are archived for years, and for discussion of news in the
appropriate context, and can be used to weed out candidates for jobs.

You are painting yourself into a corner, exposing your ignorance.  Are
you sure you need to go there?

David A. Smith[/quote]
 
jdawe...
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 7:38 pm
Guest
[quote]Here is some homework for you...

Our local star (our sun) is in Motion as it orbits around the center of
our galaxy.

Our galaxy is in motion in in relation to the other galaxies in our
local group.

Our local group is in motion in relation to our Local Supercluster of
galaxies (surrounding the Virgo Cluster)

Ponder....

--

Paul D Oosterhout
I work for SAIC (but I don't speak for SAIC)



[/quote]
Using the Law Of The Universe I will solve it as follows:

The planets are 'in motion' *IN* the solar system producing positive
gravity. The sun is 'at rest' *IN* the solar system producing negative
gravity.

Outside of that, the solar system is 'In Motion' *IN* a galaxy
producing positive gravity. The galactic centre of a a galaxy is 'At
Rest' *IN* a galaxy producing negative gravity.

Outside of that the galaxies as a whole are 'in motion' *IN* the local
group producing positive gravity. The centre of the local group is 'At
Rest' *IN* a local group producing negative gravity.

and so on and so on..

-Josh.
 
jdawe...
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:06 pm
Guest
Using the Law Of The Universe you can fix:

E = MC2

into:

E = ~M

M = ~E

Where m is matter not mass. Mass is a term for a 'thing' of matter
\energy.

To invert energy into matter you use negative gravity ( the gravity of
the star ).

To invert matter into energy you use positive gravity ( the gravity of
the planets ).

-Josh.
 
jdawe...
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 1:16 pm
Guest
On Oct 22, 6:09 pm, jdawe <jd... at (no spam) ncable.com.au> wrote:
[quote]Using the Law Of The Universe you can fix:

E = MC2

into:

E = ~M

M = ~E

Where m is matter not mass. Mass is a term for a 'thing' of matter
\energy.

To invert energy into matter you use negative gravity ( the gravity of
the star ).

To invert matter into energy you use positive gravity ( the gravity of
the planets ).

-Josh.
[/quote]
Forgot to mention:

To use negative gravity to invert energy into matter set the energy
'In Motion'.

To use positive gravity to invert matter into energy set the matter
'At Rest'.

-Josh.
..
 
jdawe...
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 1:42 pm
Guest
That's all I will be posting in these science groups.

I have explained everything to the best of my ability.

If someone wants specific help with applying the law to your field of
research contact me and I will be happy to help.

Understand I will help anybody - you do not have to work for some well
known organisation. As long as you send your questions in a polite and
logical manner.

Thank you,

Joshua Dawe

By phone:

+61 432 971 741

By email:

jdawe (AT) ncable.com.au

By mail:

JDawe
PO Box 417
Strawberry Hills
NSW 2012
Australia

Any sort of abusive or threatening correspondence received will be
referred immediately to the appropriate law enforcement agency in the
country of origin.
 
Paul O...
Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:05 am
Guest
jdawe wrote, On 10/22/2009 7:42 PM:
[quote]That's all I will be posting in these science groups.

I have explained everything to the best of my ability.

If someone wants specific help with applying the law to your field of
research contact me and I will be happy to help.

Understand I will help anybody - you do not have to work for some well
known organisation. As long as you send your questions in a polite and
logical manner.

Thank you,

Joshua Dawe

By phone:

+61 432 971 741

By email:

jdawe (AT) ncable.com.au

By mail:

JDawe
PO Box 417
Strawberry Hills
NSW 2012
Australia

Any sort of abusive or threatening correspondence received will be
referred immediately to the appropriate law enforcement agency in the
country of origin.

I have to admire your courage for publishing your address and phone number.[/quote]

I am curious as to why you decided to strike out on your own and develop
an original Theory of the Universe instead of starting with the basics -
Newton, Faraday, Kelvin, Maxwell, Lorentz, Plank, Einstein, Fermi,
Feynman, Bethe, Chandrasekhar, etc. - and build on their work?

--

Paul D Oosterhout
I work for SAIC (but I don't speak for SAIC)
 
 
Page 1 of 2    Goto page 1, 2  Next
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Mon Nov 23, 2009 1:40 pm