| Science Forum Index » Energy - Hydrogen Forum » 250 MPG 277 HP... |
|
Page 4 of 5 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Next |
|
| Author |
Message |
| tj Frazir... |
 Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:53 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
You dont know much about rotors .
This slide vane rotor has its vanes held in flush with valve springs . A
cam wheel inside the rotor hub pushes the vanes out the top of the rotor
as the rotor turns and the gate block moves if the cam wheel does.
You wount find anything else like my rotor anywhere |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| tj Frazir... |
| Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:59 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
west point.
MSU ..then Spartain aeronnotics.
after xcity ussr. then amsterddam.
Im the planets biggest single trader and own 72 ships over 10,000 ton
and 2 over 150,000 ton and run lpe 22 inch cylinders 10 feet tall
without pistons because you cant convert the energy and not waist any so
I dont convert it and dont waist ANY.
IF then I waisted no energy because I did not convert it but used it at
peak duration then how will you convert it to rotation and back to
thrust 3 times and beet me ?
Whale.Steam.Engine.2.jpg
Address:http://jeffrelf.f-m.fm/Whale.Steam.Engine.2.jpg Changed:4:43 PM
on Wednesday, October 14, 2009 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| tj Frazir... |
| Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:09 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Whale.Steam.Engine.2.jpg
Address:http://jeffrelf.f-m.fm/Whale.Steam.Engine.2.jpg Changed:4:43 PM
on Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Mini doble boiler not the 1930 doble 13000 cubic inch per second tube
flash .
The mini is more like 120 cubic inch per second. You cant use the 1930
doble because its tooo much steam for your car .
1200 cubic inch second will run 2000 HP.
1 square inch of vane 1 rotation is 74 cubic inch more or less. at 500
rpm road speed thats 15 rotations per second ,,600 cubic inch per second
per inch of slide vane.
Water is driving the slide vane .
1000 cubic innch per second is 10% of anything else like a piston
engine of any kind.
Your car wishes it had a 30 inch stroke with a 4 inch boar. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| tj Frazir... |
| Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:16 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
The exhaust valve opens and the air exits the top wile te cylinder fills
with water 100 %.
Its got 3 seconds to be full of water but neads 2.
Then the top valve shuts and the steam valve opens for 1/50 seconds .
That blasted the water out of the cylinder like a water rocket.
A relay timmer is programed to run the next cylinder and the next as to
allways run the next 1 second aprt.
Its simple .. tooo simple.
I build th best engines .
The few pics you see are over 13 years old.
fuel savings paid off a fleet.
Its no test engine . |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| tj Frazir... |
| Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:07 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Whale.Steam.Engine.3.jpg
Address:http://jeffrelf.f-m.fm/Whale.Steam.Engine.3.jpg Changed:4:44 PM
on Wednesday, October 14, 2009
drop the tank between the roto and 4 cyclinders because you dont nead
that tank .
You dont nead the rotor either if your pushing a boat with the 4
cylinder water rocket.
The Train ton at 200 MPG is at 110 rpm and the truck is at 800 rpm and
your car is at 6000 rpm.
None of them are the peak duration of gas air steam. Only a water
rocket can run the peak duration of any amount of gas air that is put
in.
The water rocket will pick its own length of time for the stroke and
length of the stroke and use it all.
A steam piston and steam turbine converts steam to rotation but a
water rocket dont convert it to ratation and back to thrust.
Potenutal energy at peak duration is a 1 second thermal exchange at its
peak it is 1.1 seconds.
63 rpm is peak duration in any piston engine.
Whale.Steam.Engine.3.jpg
Address:http://jeffrelf.f-m.fm/Whale.Steam.Engine.3.jpg Changed:4:44 PM
on Wednesday, October 14, 2009
But your piston engine cant do it.
This engine does it so easy your engines can not compete.
Your car dont have 2400 foot pounds of tourk when you nead it. Much
less 5000 foot pounds.
Your car has a trans,,and pistons and smog crap and a bunch of crap that
wears out fast like timming chains.
My engine has flaps that work thm selves a mini doble boiler and a
steam valve rack with a programable relay and an exhaust valve on top
each cylinder .
It drives a slide vane rotor with inner cam .
Not a thing you can bust or wear out in your life time . |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Eeyore... |
| Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:16 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Eeyore... |
| Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:21 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
tj Frazir wrote:
[quote]I know its low.
Without looking id say its 235 mpg per train ton.
And a 25 ton truck IS 7 mpg and that IS 175 MPG per ton.
[/quote]
Which, since it can go 'door to door' is a far better bet.
Graham |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| DanB... |
| Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:27 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Eeyore wrote:
[quote]DanB wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
tj Frazir wrote:
a train can pull your ton 200 miles on a gallon
Did you study at The University of Idiocy ?
Why ask that? Because his number is low?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_efficiency_in_transportation#Trains
Ever heard of inclines ?
[/quote]
Have another pint and you will argue with any published number, I'm sure... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Eeyore... |
| Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:29 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
tj Frazir wrote:
[quote]west point.
MSU ..then Spartain aeronnotics.
after xcity ussr. then amsterddam.
Im the planets biggest single trader
[/quote]
I suspect a mental illness at work here.
[quote]and own 72 ships over 10,000 ton and 2 over 150,000 ton and run lpe 22 inch cylinders 10 feet tall
without pistons
[/quote]
Care to post a link to an engine like that without pistons ?
In the meantime there's a REAL company called Maersk that has very large
ships using engines like this that DO have pistons ......
http://www.emma-maersk.com/engine/Wartsila_Sulzer_RTA96-C.htm
" At maximum economy the engine exceeds 50% thermal efficiency.
That is, more than 50% of the energy in the fuel in converted to motion."
Graham |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Eeyore... |
| Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:31 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
tj Frazir wrote:
[quote]Whale.Steam.Engine.2.jpg
Address:http://jeffrelf.f-m.fm/Whale.Steam.Engine.2.jpg
[/quote]
You're a clueless MORON. Standard for webtv users.
Graham |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Eeyore... |
| Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:32 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
tj Frazir wrote:
[quote]Its simple .. tooo simple.
[/quote]
A good description of yourself.
Graham |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Eeyore... |
| Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:36 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
tj Frazir wrote:
[quote]Whale.Steam.Engine.3.jpg
Address:http://jeffrelf.f-m.fm/Whale.Steam.Engine.3.jpg Changed:4:44 PM
on Wednesday, October 14, 2009
drop the tank
[/quote]
On your head hopefully. You never know, it might shake your grey cells
into a configurattion where they work !
Graham |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Eeyore... |
| Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:39 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
tj Frazir wrote:
[quote]Whale.Steam.Engine.3.jpg
Address:http://jeffrelf.f-m.fm/Whale.Steam.Engine.3.jpg Changed:4:44 PM
on Wednesday, October 14, 2009
My engine has flaps that work thm selves a mini doble boiler and a
steam valve rack with a programable relay and an exhaust valve on top
each cylinder .
It drives a slide vane rotor with inner cam .
[/quote]
Your 'engine' doesn't exist.
Graham |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Eeyore... |
| Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:46 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
DanB wrote:
[quote]Eeyore wrote:
DanB wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
tj Frazir wrote:
a train can pull your ton 200 miles on a gallon
Did you study at The University of Idiocy ?
Why ask that? Because his number is low?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_efficiency_in_transportation#Trains
Ever heard of inclines ?
Have another pint and you will argue with any published number, I'm sure...
[/quote]
Don't you have any hills where you live ?
Graham |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| DanB... |
| Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:54 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Eeyore wrote:
[quote]DanB wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
DanB wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
tj Frazir wrote:
a train can pull your ton 200 miles on a gallon
Did you study at The University of Idiocy ?
Why ask that? Because his number is low?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_efficiency_in_transportation#Trains
Ever heard of inclines ?
Have another pint and you will argue with any published number, I'm
sure...
Don't you have any hills where you live ?
[/quote]
If you have a problem with published numbers, show your study. I don't
have to defend published numbers. I don't have to 'prove' they take
terrain into consideration. Your claim, you fetch...
I've seen this stupid ploy many hundreds of time on usenet. You are not
clever. Amusing? Yes... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
