 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Energy Forum » Arctic Has Potential To Alter Earth's Climate... |
|
Page 1 of 2 Goto page 1, 2 Next |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Last Post... |
 Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 3:27 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Arctic Has Potential To Alter Earth's Climate:
Arctic Land And Seas Account For Up To 25
Percent Of World's Carbon Sink
ScienceDaily (Oct. 15, 2009) In a new study in the journal
Ecological Monographs, ecologists estimate that Arctic lands and
oceans are responsible for up to 25 percent of the global net sink of
atmospheric carbon dioxide. Under current predictions of global
warming, this Arctic sink could be diminished or reversed, potentially
accelerating predicted rates of climate change.
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091014144729.htm
There is a serious problem here-- "Under
current predictions of global warming ..." those
"predictions" have zero validity or credibility.
Michael Mann and Briffa have totally destroyed
the entire "global warming" theory, with their
fraudulent tree ring chart.
In their review paper, David McGuire of the U.S. Geological Survey and
the University of Alaska at Fairbanks and his colleagues show that the
Arctic has been a carbon sink since the end of the last Ice Age, which
over time has accounted for between zero and 25 percent, or up to
about 800 million metric tons, of the global carbon sink.
That is not as much as it seems-
just 67,000 tonnes per year
On average, says McGuire, the Arctic accounts for 10-15 percent of the
Earth's carbon sink. But the rapid rate of climate change in the
Arctic
Indeed the "rapid rate of climate change" in the
Arctic does not appear to be "warming" in spite
of the USGS and NOAA, who have been caught
with false data.
Arctic" is not what McGuire would suggest.
about twice that of lower latitudes could eliminate the sink and
possibly make the Arctic a source of carbon dioxide.
We need more CO2 for our increasing
populations and growing economies.
Either way short term or long term the data
doesn't support man made global warming?
short term
http://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/RSSglobe.html
long term
http://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/Moberg2005l.htm |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Ouroboros Rex... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 8:21 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Last Post wrote:
[quote:9fb7c5fadc]Arctic Has Potential To Alter Earth's Climate:
Arctic Land And Seas Account For Up To 25
Percent Of World's Carbon Sink
ScienceDaily (Oct. 15, 2009) In a new study in the journal
Ecological Monographs, ecologists estimate that Arctic lands and
oceans are responsible for up to 25 percent of the global net sink of
atmospheric carbon dioxide. Under current predictions of global
warming, this Arctic sink could be diminished or reversed, potentially
accelerating predicted rates of climate change.
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091014144729.htm
There is a serious problem here-- "Under
current predictions of global warming ..." those
"predictions" have zero validity or credibility.
Michael Mann and Briffa have totally destroyed
the entire "global warming" theory, with their
fraudulent tree ring chart.
[/quote:9fb7c5fadc]
As usual, the denialist just makes some shit up. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| richp... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 1:22 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 15, 6:27 am, Last Post <last_p... at (no spam) primus.ca> wrote:
[quote:b349c9b069]Arctic Has Potential To Alter Earth's Climate:
Arctic Land And Seas Account For Up To 25
Percent Of World's Carbon Sink
ScienceDaily (Oct. 15, 2009) In a new study in the journal
Ecological Monographs, ecologists estimate that Arctic lands and
oceans are responsible for up to 25 percent of the global net sink of
atmospheric carbon dioxide. Under current predictions of global
warming, this Arctic sink could be diminished or reversed, potentially
accelerating predicted rates of climate change.
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091014144729.htm
There is a serious problem here-- "Under
current predictions of global warming ..." those
"predictions" have zero validity or credibility.
Michael Mann and Briffa have totally destroyed
the entire "global warming" theory, with their
fraudulent tree ring chart.
In their review paper, David McGuire of the U.S. Geological Survey and
the University of Alaska at Fairbanks and his colleagues show that the
Arctic has been a carbon sink since the end of the last Ice Age, which
over time has accounted for between zero and 25 percent, or up to
about 800 million metric tons, of the global carbon sink.
That is not as much as it seems-
just 67,000 tonnes per year
On average, says McGuire, the Arctic accounts for 10-15 percent of the
Earth's carbon sink. But the rapid rate of climate change in the
Arctic
Indeed the "rapid rate of climate change" in the
Arctic does not appear to be "warming" in spite
of the USGS and NOAA, who have been caught
with false data.
Arctic" is not what McGuire would suggest.
about twice that of lower latitudes could eliminate the sink and
possibly make the Arctic a source of carbon dioxide.
We need more CO2 for our increasing
populations and growing economies.
Either way short term or long term the data
doesn't support man made global warming?
short termhttp://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/RSSglobe.html
long termhttp://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/Moberg2005l.htm
[/quote:b349c9b069]
Hey go shove your junkscience up your ass |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Last Post... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 4:08 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 15, 7:22 pm, richp <travelingman95... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote:a621034773]On Oct 15, 6:27 am, Last Post <last_p... at (no spam) primus.ca> wrote:
Arctic Has Potential To Alter Earth's Climate:
Arctic Land And Seas Account For Up To 25
Percent Of World's Carbon Sink
ScienceDaily (Oct. 15, 2009) In a new study in the journal
Ecological Monographs, ecologists estimate that Arctic lands and
oceans are responsible for up to 25 percent of the global net sink of
atmospheric carbon dioxide. Under current predictions of global
warming, this Arctic sink could be diminished or reversed, potentially
accelerating predicted rates of climate change.
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091014144729.htm
There is a serious problem here-- "Under
current predictions of global warming ..." those
"predictions" have zero validity or credibility.
Michael Mann and Briffa have totally destroyed
the entire "global warming" theory, with their
fraudulent tree ring chart.
In their review paper, David McGuire of the U.S. Geological Survey and
the University of Alaska at Fairbanks and his colleagues show that the
Arctic has been a carbon sink since the end of the last Ice Age, which
over time has accounted for between zero and 25 percent, or up to
about 800 million metric tons, of the global carbon sink.
That is not as much as it seems-
just 67,000 tonnes per year
On average, says McGuire, the Arctic accounts for 10-15 percent of the
Earth's carbon sink. But the rapid rate of climate change in the
Arctic
Indeed the "rapid rate of climate change" in the
Arctic does not appear to be "warming" in spite
of the USGS and NOAA, who have been caught
with false data.
Arctic" is not what McGuire would suggest.
about twice that of lower latitudes could eliminate the sink and
possibly make the Arctic a source of carbon dioxide.
We need more CO2 for our increasing
populations and growing economies.
Either way short term or long term the data
doesn't support man made global warming?
short termhttp://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/RSSglobe.html
long termhttp://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/Moberg2005l.htm
Hey go shove your junkscience up your ass
[/quote:a621034773]
Tut tut mr pissypants. Where is "YOUR" junk
science? Oh you don't have any science at all?
Pppiiiiiiittteeeeee!
There are three types of people that you
can_not_talk_into_behaving_well. The
stupid, the religious fanatic, and the evil.
1- The stupid aren't smart enough to follow the
logic of what you say. You have to tell them
what is right in very simple terms. If they do
not agree, you will never be able to change
their mind.
2- The religious fanatic: If what you say goes
against their religious belief, they will cling to
that belief even if it means their death.
3- There is no way to reform evil- not in a
million years. There is no way to convince
the anthropogenic global warming alarmists,
the terrorists, serial killers, paedophiles, and
predators to change their evil ways, They
knew what they were doing was wrong, but
knowledge didn't stop them. It only made
them more careful in how they went about
performing their evil deeds. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| richp... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 10:38 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 15, 6:27 am, Last Post <last_p... at (no spam) primus.ca> wrote:
[quote:fe1b4aac7b]Arctic Has Potential To Alter Earth's Climate:
Arctic Land And Seas Account For Up To 25
Percent Of World's Carbon Sink
ScienceDaily (Oct. 15, 2009) In a new study in the journal
Ecological Monographs, ecologists estimate that Arctic lands and
oceans are responsible for up to 25 percent of the global net sink of
atmospheric carbon dioxide. Under current predictions of global
warming, this Arctic sink could be diminished or reversed, potentially
accelerating predicted rates of climate change.
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091014144729.htm
There is a serious problem here-- "Under
current predictions of global warming ..." those
"predictions" have zero validity or credibility.
Michael Mann and Briffa have totally destroyed
the entire "global warming" theory, with their
fraudulent tree ring chart.
In their review paper, David McGuire of the U.S. Geological Survey and
the University of Alaska at Fairbanks and his colleagues show that the
Arctic has been a carbon sink since the end of the last Ice Age, which
over time has accounted for between zero and 25 percent, or up to
about 800 million metric tons, of the global carbon sink.
That is not as much as it seems-
just 67,000 tonnes per year
On average, says McGuire, the Arctic accounts for 10-15 percent of the
Earth's carbon sink. But the rapid rate of climate change in the
Arctic
Indeed the "rapid rate of climate change" in the
Arctic does not appear to be "warming" in spite
of the USGS and NOAA, who have been caught
with false data.
Arctic" is not what McGuire would suggest.
about twice that of lower latitudes could eliminate the sink and
possibly make the Arctic a source of carbon dioxide.
We need more CO2 for our increasing
populations and growing economies.
Either way short term or long term the data
doesn't support man made global warming?
short termhttp://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/RSSglobe.html
long termhttp://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/Moberg2005l.htm
[/quote:fe1b4aac7b]
To your fucking junk science
Junk science
From SourceWatch
Jump to: navigation, search
The Consumers Union (US) wrote that "as far as we have been able to
trace, the phrase "junk science" has been coined by those practicing
public relations and lobbying activities on behalf of some companies
in certain industries--particularly the plastics, chemical,
biotechnology, and pesticide industries. While its coiners may have
legitimate grounds for debate on some issues, the phrase has been used
far too often to discredit honest public interest organizations and
legitimate scientists who express concerns about consumer safety and
environmental risks." [1]
While the phrase "junk science" is used by corporations, governments
and front groups to discredit public interest and consumer activists,
the phrase "sound science" is employed to describe the research said
to back-up industry's own claims on safety and risk.
With scientific information playing a central role in public policy
development, critics of the U.S. government have accused it of
pursuing a strategy of suppressing science it disagrees with and
ensuring reports that are more supportive of its policy goals.
"Meanwhile, the Bush White House is purging, censoring, and
blacklisting scientists and engineers whose work threatens the profits
of the Administration's corporate paymasters or challenges the
ideological underpinnings of their radical anti-environmental agenda,"
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. wrote in The Nation.[2]
The controversy over science under the Bush Administration has also
prompted:
the U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Government Reform, to
develop the Politics & Science website as an ongoing record of
interference with science by the Bush Administration; and
a report by the Union of Concerned Scientists "issued a statement
calling for regulatory and legislative action to restore scientific
integrity to federal policymaking. According to the scientists, the
Bush administration has, among other abuses, suppressed and distorted
scientific analysis from federal agencies, and taken actions that have
undermined the quality of scientific advisory panels." [3] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| richp... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 10:39 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 15, 6:27 am, Last Post <last_p... at (no spam) primus.ca> wrote:
[quote:a0d72823f0]Arctic Has Potential To Alter Earth's Climate:
Arctic Land And Seas Account For Up To 25
Percent Of World's Carbon Sink
ScienceDaily (Oct. 15, 2009) In a new study in the journal
Ecological Monographs, ecologists estimate that Arctic lands and
oceans are responsible for up to 25 percent of the global net sink of
atmospheric carbon dioxide. Under current predictions of global
warming, this Arctic sink could be diminished or reversed, potentially
accelerating predicted rates of climate change.
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091014144729.htm
There is a serious problem here-- "Under
current predictions of global warming ..." those
"predictions" have zero validity or credibility.
Michael Mann and Briffa have totally destroyed
the entire "global warming" theory, with their
fraudulent tree ring chart.
In their review paper, David McGuire of the U.S. Geological Survey and
the University of Alaska at Fairbanks and his colleagues show that the
Arctic has been a carbon sink since the end of the last Ice Age, which
over time has accounted for between zero and 25 percent, or up to
about 800 million metric tons, of the global carbon sink.
That is not as much as it seems-
just 67,000 tonnes per year
On average, says McGuire, the Arctic accounts for 10-15 percent of the
Earth's carbon sink. But the rapid rate of climate change in the
Arctic
Indeed the "rapid rate of climate change" in the
Arctic does not appear to be "warming" in spite
of the USGS and NOAA, who have been caught
with false data.
Arctic" is not what McGuire would suggest.
about twice that of lower latitudes could eliminate the sink and
possibly make the Arctic a source of carbon dioxide.
We need more CO2 for our increasing
populations and growing economies.
Either way short term or long term the data
doesn't support man made global warming?
short termhttp://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/RSSglobe.html
long termhttp://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/Moberg2005l.htm
[/quote:a0d72823f0]
Mr Milloy
[quote:a0d72823f0]http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Steven_Milloy
[/quote:a0d72823f0]
Fuck him |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Last Post... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 10:51 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 17, 4:38 pm, richp <travelingman95... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote:5f085fe9d4]On Oct 15, 6:27 am, Last Post <last_p... at (no spam) primus.ca> wrote:
Arctic Has Potential To Alter Earth's Climate:
Arctic Land And Seas Account For Up To 25
Percent Of World's Carbon Sink
ScienceDaily (Oct. 15, 2009) In a new study in the journal
Ecological Monographs, ecologists estimate that Arctic lands and
oceans are responsible for up to 25 percent of the global net sink of
atmospheric carbon dioxide. Under current predictions of global
warming, this Arctic sink could be diminished or reversed, potentially
accelerating predicted rates of climate change.
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091014144729.htm
There is a serious problem here-- "Under
current predictions of global warming ..." those
"predictions" have zero validity or credibility.
Michael Mann and Briffa have totally destroyed
the entire "global warming" theory, with their
fraudulent tree ring chart.
In their review paper, David McGuire of the U.S. Geological Survey and
the University of Alaska at Fairbanks and his colleagues show that the
Arctic has been a carbon sink since the end of the last Ice Age, which
over time has accounted for between zero and 25 percent, or up to
about 800 million metric tons, of the global carbon sink.
That is not as much as it seems-
just 67,000 tonnes per year
On average, says McGuire, the Arctic accounts for 10-15 percent of the
Earth's carbon sink. But the rapid rate of climate change in the
Arctic
Indeed the "rapid rate of climate change" in the
Arctic does not appear to be "warming" in spite
of the USGS and NOAA, who have been caught
with false data.
Arctic" is not what McGuire would suggest.
about twice that of lower latitudes could eliminate the sink and
possibly make the Arctic a source of carbon dioxide.
We need more CO2 for our increasing
populations and growing economies.
Either way short term or long term the data
doesn't support man made global warming?
short termhttp://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/RSSglobe.html
long termhttp://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/Moberg2005l.htm
To your fucking junk science
Junk science
From SourceWatch
[/quote:5f085fe9d4]
SourceWatch -- the fascist slander site.
Poor pissypants he can't get a dry diaper. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| richp... |
| Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 11:00 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 17, 1:51 pm, Last Post <last_p... at (no spam) primus.ca> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 17, 4:38 pm, richp <travelingman95... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 15, 6:27 am, Last Post <last_p... at (no spam) primus.ca> wrote:
Arctic Has Potential To Alter Earth's Climate:
Arctic Land And Seas Account For Up To 25
Percent Of World's Carbon Sink
ScienceDaily (Oct. 15, 2009) In a new study in the journal
Ecological Monographs, ecologists estimate that Arctic lands and
oceans are responsible for up to 25 percent of the global net sink of
atmospheric carbon dioxide. Under current predictions of global
warming, this Arctic sink could be diminished or reversed, potentially
accelerating predicted rates of climate change.
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091014144729.htm
There is a serious problem here-- "Under
current predictions of global warming ..." those
"predictions" have zero validity or credibility.
Michael Mann and Briffa have totally destroyed
the entire "global warming" theory, with their
fraudulent tree ring chart.
In their review paper, David McGuire of the U.S. Geological Survey and
the University of Alaska at Fairbanks and his colleagues show that the
Arctic has been a carbon sink since the end of the last Ice Age, which
over time has accounted for between zero and 25 percent, or up to
about 800 million metric tons, of the global carbon sink.
That is not as much as it seems-
just 67,000 tonnes per year
On average, says McGuire, the Arctic accounts for 10-15 percent of the
Earth's carbon sink. But the rapid rate of climate change in the
Arctic
Indeed the "rapid rate of climate change" in the
Arctic does not appear to be "warming" in spite
of the USGS and NOAA, who have been caught
with false data.
Arctic" is not what McGuire would suggest.
about twice that of lower latitudes could eliminate the sink and
possibly make the Arctic a source of carbon dioxide.
We need more CO2 for our increasing
populations and growing economies.
Either way short term or long term the data
doesn't support man made global warming?
short termhttp://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/RSSglobe.html
long termhttp://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/Moberg2005l.htm
To your fucking junk science
Junk science
From SourceWatch
SourceWatch -- the fascist slander site.
Poor pissypants he can't get a dry diaper.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
[/quote]
Your answer is a bull shit |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Peter Muehlbauer... |
| Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 5:06 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
richp <travelingman95667 at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 17, 1:51 pm, Last Post <last_p... at (no spam) primus.ca> wrote:
On Oct 17, 4:38 pm, richp <travelingman95... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 15, 6:27 am, Last Post <last_p... at (no spam) primus.ca> wrote:
Arctic Has Potential To Alter Earth's Climate:
Arctic Land And Seas Account For Up To 25
Percent Of World's Carbon Sink
ScienceDaily (Oct. 15, 2009) In a new study in the journal
Ecological Monographs, ecologists estimate that Arctic lands and
oceans are responsible for up to 25 percent of the global net sink of
atmospheric carbon dioxide. Under current predictions of global
warming, this Arctic sink could be diminished or reversed, potentially
accelerating predicted rates of climate change.
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091014144729.htm
There is a serious problem here-- "Under
current predictions of global warming ..." those
"predictions" have zero validity or credibility.
Michael Mann and Briffa have totally destroyed
the entire "global warming" theory, with their
fraudulent tree ring chart.
In their review paper, David McGuire of the U.S. Geological Survey and
the University of Alaska at Fairbanks and his colleagues show that the
Arctic has been a carbon sink since the end of the last Ice Age, which
over time has accounted for between zero and 25 percent, or up to
about 800 million metric tons, of the global carbon sink.
That is not as much as it seems-
just 67,000 tonnes per year
On average, says McGuire, the Arctic accounts for 10-15 percent of the
Earth's carbon sink. But the rapid rate of climate change in the
Arctic
Indeed the "rapid rate of climate change" in the
Arctic does not appear to be "warming" in spite
of the USGS and NOAA, who have been caught
with false data.
Arctic" is not what McGuire would suggest.
about twice that of lower latitudes could eliminate the sink and
possibly make the Arctic a source of carbon dioxide.
We need more CO2 for our increasing
populations and growing economies.
Either way short term or long term the data
doesn't support man made global warming?
short termhttp://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/RSSglobe.html
long termhttp://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/Moberg2005l.htm
To your fucking junk science
Junk science
From SourceWatch
SourceWatch -- the fascist slander site.
Poor pissypants he can't get a dry diaper.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Your answer is a bull shit
[/quote]
Shit is your life. You came from shit and you'll go to shit.
Shit is what you deserve.
Amen.
--
Go fuck your mother you simpleton - Get a new brain - FUCK SENATOR INHOFE -
Yo MORON - FUCK YOU AND YOUR MOTHER - FOR YOU ASSHOLE - Where in the fuck to
you get your information asshole??? - HEY YOU FUKKIN FOOL...YOU PIECE OF SHIT
- you are rubbish you piece of crap - F U - you f'ing fool - Can't find your
ass with both hands - Hey fuck brains - FUCK YOU - The hell with you you right
wing fascist pig - you dumb ass - you jackassa piece of conservative right
wing repuke shit - Hey Fuk Brains - I call you fuk brains because that is what
you are - I wouldn't try to prove anything to a dumb ass like yourself - Lick
my diaper you asshole - Stick that foryou up your ass - MINDLESS MENTAL MORON
- Hey fuck you asshole - that's the shit that drives you - You are full of
shit - STFU CRAPHEAD - makes you a fukkin idiot - Please go fuck yourself -
BULLSHIT YOU FUCKFACE
["richp", valuable AGW proponent and AGW leading dancer in alt.global-warming] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| leonard78sp at (no spam) gmail.com... |
| Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 9:16 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Re: Arctic Has Potential To Alter Earth's Climate
~~ nothing has changed
On Oct 20, 7:06 pm, Peter Muehlbauer
<spamtrap... at (no spam) AT.frankenexpress.de> wrote:
[quote]richp <travelingman95... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 17, 1:51 pm, Last Post <last_p... at (no spam) primus.ca> wrote:
On Oct 17, 4:38 pm, richp <travelingman95... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 15, 6:27 am, Last Post <last_p... at (no spam) primus.ca> wrote:
Arctic Has Potential To Alter Earth's Climate:
Arctic Land And Seas Account For Up To 25
Percent Of World's Carbon Sink
ScienceDaily (Oct. 15, 2009) In a new study in the journal
Ecological Monographs, ecologists estimate that Arctic lands and
oceans are responsible for up to 25 percent of the global net sink of
atmospheric carbon dioxide. Under current predictions of global
warming, this Arctic sink could be diminished or reversed, potentially
accelerating predicted rates of climate change.
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091014144729.htm
There is a serious problem here-- "Under
current predictions of global warming ..." those
"predictions" have zero validity or credibility.
Michael Mann and Briffa have totally destroyed
the entire "global warming" theory, with their
fraudulent tree ring chart.
In their review paper, David McGuire of the U.S. Geological Survey and
the University of Alaska at Fairbanks and his colleagues show that the
Arctic has been a carbon sink since the end of the last Ice Age, which
over time has accounted for between zero and 25 percent, or up to
about 800 million metric tons, of the global carbon sink.
That is not as much as it seems-
just 67,000 tonnes per year
On average, says McGuire, the Arctic accounts for 10-15 percent of the
Earth's carbon sink. But the rapid rate of climate change in the
Arctic
Indeed the "rapid rate of climate change" in the
Arctic does not appear to be "warming" in spite
of the USGS and NOAA, who have been caught
with false data.
Arctic" is not what McGuire would suggest.
about twice that of lower latitudes could eliminate the sink and
possibly make the Arctic a source of carbon dioxide.
We need more CO2 for our increasing
populations and growing economies.
Either way short term or long term the data
doesn't support man made global warming?
short termhttp://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/RSSglobe.html
long termhttp://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/Moberg2005l.htm
To your fucking junk science
Junk science
From SourceWatch
SourceWatch -- the fascist slander site.
Poor pissypants he can't get a dry diaper.
Your answer is bull shit
Shit is your life. You came from shit and you'll go to shit.
Shit is what you deserve.
Amen.
--
Go fuck your mother you simpleton - Get a new brain - FUCK SENATOR INHOFE -
Yo MORON - FUCK YOU AND YOUR MOTHER - FOR YOU ASSHOLE - Where in the fuck to
you get your information asshole??? - HEY YOU FUKKIN FOOL...YOU PIECE OF SHIT
- you are rubbish you piece of crap - F U - you f'ing fool - Can't find your
ass with both hands - Hey fuck brains - FUCK YOU - The hell with you you right
wing fascist pig - you dumb ass - you jackassa piece of conservative right
wing repuke shit - Hey Fuk Brains - I call you fuk brains because that is what
you are - I wouldn't try to prove anything to a dumb ass like yourself - Lick
my diaper you asshole - Stick that foryou up your ass - MINDLESS MENTAL MORON
- Hey fuck you asshole - that's the shit that drives you - You are full of
shit - STFU CRAPHEAD - makes you a fukkin idiot - Please go fuck yourself -
BULLSHIT YOU FUCKFACE
["richp", valuable AGW proponent and AGW leading dancer in alt.global-warming]
[/quote]
What can you expect from pissypants????
Either way short term or long term the data
doesn't support man made global warming?
short term
http://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/RSSglobe.html
long term
http://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/Moberg2005l.htm |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| richp... |
| Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 9:38 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 20, 4:06 pm, Peter Muehlbauer
<spamtrap... at (no spam) AT.frankenexpress.de> wrote:
[quote]richp <travelingman95... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 17, 1:51 pm, Last Post <last_p... at (no spam) primus.ca> wrote:
On Oct 17, 4:38 pm, richp <travelingman95... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 15, 6:27 am, Last Post <last_p... at (no spam) primus.ca> wrote:
Arctic Has Potential To Alter Earth's Climate:
Arctic Land And Seas Account For Up To 25
Percent Of World's Carbon Sink
ScienceDaily (Oct. 15, 2009) In a new study in the journal
Ecological Monographs, ecologists estimate that Arctic lands and
oceans are responsible for up to 25 percent of the global net sink of
atmospheric carbon dioxide. Under current predictions of global
warming, this Arctic sink could be diminished or reversed, potentially
accelerating predicted rates of climate change.
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091014144729.htm
There is a serious problem here-- "Under
current predictions of global warming ..." those
"predictions" have zero validity or credibility.
Michael Mann and Briffa have totally destroyed
the entire "global warming" theory, with their
fraudulent tree ring chart.
In their review paper, David McGuire of the U.S. Geological Survey and
the University of Alaska at Fairbanks and his colleagues show that the
Arctic has been a carbon sink since the end of the last Ice Age, which
over time has accounted for between zero and 25 percent, or up to
about 800 million metric tons, of the global carbon sink.
That is not as much as it seems-
just 67,000 tonnes per year
On average, says McGuire, the Arctic accounts for 10-15 percent of the
Earth's carbon sink. But the rapid rate of climate change in the
Arctic
Indeed the "rapid rate of climate change" in the
Arctic does not appear to be "warming" in spite
of the USGS and NOAA, who have been caught
with false data.
Arctic" is not what McGuire would suggest.
about twice that of lower latitudes could eliminate the sink and
possibly make the Arctic a source of carbon dioxide.
We need more CO2 for our increasing
populations and growing economies.
Either way short term or long term the data
doesn't support man made global warming?
short termhttp://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/RSSglobe.html
long termhttp://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/Moberg2005l.htm
To your fucking junk science
Junk science
From SourceWatch
SourceWatch -- the fascist slander site.
Poor pissypants he can't get a dry diaper.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Your answer is a bull shit
Shit is your life. You came from shit and you'll go to shit.
Shit is what you deserve.
Amen.
--
Go fuck your mother you simpleton - Get a new brain - FUCK SENATOR INHOFE -
Yo MORON - FUCK YOU AND YOUR MOTHER - FOR YOU ASSHOLE - Where in the fuck to
you get your information asshole??? - HEY YOU FUKKIN FOOL...YOU PIECE OF SHIT
- you are rubbish you piece of crap - F U - you f'ing fool - Can't find your
ass with both hands - Hey fuck brains - FUCK YOU - The hell with you you right
wing fascist pig - you dumb ass - you jackassa piece of conservative right
wing repuke shit - Hey Fuk Brains - I call you fuk brains because that is what
you are - I wouldn't try to prove anything to a dumb ass like yourself - Lick
my diaper you asshole - Stick that foryou up your ass - MINDLESS MENTAL MORON
- Hey fuck you asshole - that's the shit that drives you - You are full of
shit - STFU CRAPHEAD - makes you a fukkin idiot - Please go fuck yourself -
BULLSHIT YOU FUCKFACE
["richp", valuable AGW proponent and AGW leading dancer in alt.global-warming]- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
[/quote]
Usual post from Peter the PRICK |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| leonard78sp at (no spam) gmail.com... |
| Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 10:38 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 17, 4:39 pm, richp <travelingman95... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 15, 6:27 am, Last Post <last_p... at (no spam) primus.ca> wrote:
Arctic Has Potential To Alter Earth's Climate:
Arctic Land And Seas Account For Up To 25
Percent Of World's Carbon Sink
ScienceDaily (Oct. 15, 2009) In a new study in the journal
Ecological Monographs, ecologists estimate that Arctic lands and
oceans are responsible for up to 25 percent of the global net sink of
atmospheric carbon dioxide. Under current predictions of global
warming, this Arctic sink could be diminished or reversed, potentially
accelerating predicted rates of climate change.
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091014144729.htm
There is a serious problem here-- "Under
current predictions of global warming ..." those
"predictions" have zero validity or credibility.
Michael Mann and Briffa have totally destroyed
the entire "global warming" theory, with their
fraudulent tree ring chart.
In their review paper, David McGuire of the U.S. Geological Survey and
the University of Alaska at Fairbanks and his colleagues show that the
Arctic has been a carbon sink since the end of the last Ice Age, which
over time has accounted for between zero and 25 percent, or up to
about 800 million metric tons, of the global carbon sink.
That is not as much as it seems-
just 67,000 tonnes per year
On average, says McGuire, the Arctic accounts for 10-15 percent of the
Earth's carbon sink. But the rapid rate of climate change in the
Arctic
Indeed the "rapid rate of climate change" in the
Arctic does not appear to be "warming" in spite
of the USGS and NOAA, who have been caught
with false data.
Arctic" is not what McGuire would suggest.
about twice that of lower latitudes could eliminate the sink and
possibly make the Arctic a source of carbon dioxide.
We need more CO2 for our increasing
populations and growing economies.
Either way short term or long term the data
doesn't support man made global warming?
short termhttp://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/RSSglobe.html
long termhttp://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/Moberg2005l.htm
Mr Milloy
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Steven_Milloy
Fuck him
[/quote]
Indeed pissypants ~~ Ask your mother to get
you to a brain surgeon. You are in need of a
transplant. <GG>
In real science the burden of proof is always on
the proposer, never on the sceptics. So far
neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided one
iota of valid data for global warming nor have
they provided data that climate change is being
effected by commerce and industry, and not by
natural phenomena. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| richp... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 9:03 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 21, 12:16 am, "leonard7... at (no spam) gmail.com" <leonard7... at (no spam) gmail.com>
wrote:
[quote]Re: Arctic Has Potential To Alter Earth's Climate
~~ nothing has changed
On Oct 20, 7:06 pm, Peter Muehlbauer
spamtrap... at (no spam) AT.frankenexpress.de> wrote:
richp <travelingman95... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 17, 1:51 pm, Last Post <last_p... at (no spam) primus.ca> wrote:
On Oct 17, 4:38 pm, richp <travelingman95... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 15, 6:27 am, Last Post <last_p... at (no spam) primus.ca> wrote:
Arctic Has Potential To Alter Earth's Climate:
Arctic Land And Seas Account For Up To 25
Percent Of World's Carbon Sink
ScienceDaily (Oct. 15, 2009) In a new study in the journal
Ecological Monographs, ecologists estimate that Arctic lands and
oceans are responsible for up to 25 percent of the global net sink of
atmospheric carbon dioxide. Under current predictions of global
warming, this Arctic sink could be diminished or reversed, potentially
accelerating predicted rates of climate change.
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091014144729.htm
There is a serious problem here-- "Under
current predictions of global warming ..." those
"predictions" have zero validity or credibility.
Michael Mann and Briffa have totally destroyed
the entire "global warming" theory, with their
fraudulent tree ring chart.
In their review paper, David McGuire of the U.S. Geological Survey and
the University of Alaska at Fairbanks and his colleagues show that the
Arctic has been a carbon sink since the end of the last Ice Age, which
over time has accounted for between zero and 25 percent, or up to
about 800 million metric tons, of the global carbon sink.
That is not as much as it seems-
just 67,000 tonnes per year
On average, says McGuire, the Arctic accounts for 10-15 percent of the
Earth's carbon sink. But the rapid rate of climate change in the
Arctic
Indeed the "rapid rate of climate change" in the
Arctic does not appear to be "warming" in spite
of the USGS and NOAA, who have been caught
with false data.
Arctic" is not what McGuire would suggest.
about twice that of lower latitudes could eliminate the sink and
possibly make the Arctic a source of carbon dioxide.
We need more CO2 for our increasing
populations and growing economies.
Either way short term or long term the data
doesn't support man made global warming?
short termhttp://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/RSSglobe.html
long termhttp://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/Moberg2005l.htm
To your fucking junk science
Junk science
From SourceWatch
SourceWatch -- the fascist slander site.
Poor pissypants he can't get a dry diaper.
Your answer is bull shit
Shit is your life. You came from shit and you'll go to shit.
Shit is what you deserve.
Amen.
--
Go fuck your mother you simpleton - Get a new brain - FUCK SENATOR INHOFE -
Yo MORON - FUCK YOU AND YOUR MOTHER - FOR YOU ASSHOLE - Where in the fuck to
you get your information asshole??? - HEY YOU FUKKIN FOOL...YOU PIECE OF SHIT
- you are rubbish you piece of crap - F U - you f'ing fool - Can't find your
ass with both hands - Hey fuck brains - FUCK YOU - The hell with you you right
wing fascist pig - you dumb ass - you jackassa piece of conservative right
wing repuke shit - Hey Fuk Brains - I call you fuk brains because that is what
you are - I wouldn't try to prove anything to a dumb ass like yourself - Lick
my diaper you asshole - Stick that foryou up your ass - MINDLESS MENTAL MORON
- Hey fuck you asshole - that's the shit that drives you - You are full of
shit - STFU CRAPHEAD - makes you a fukkin idiot - Please go fuck yourself -
BULLSHIT YOU FUCKFACE
["richp", valuable AGW proponent and AGW leading dancer in alt.global-warming]
What can you expect from pissypants????
Either way short term or long term the data
doesn't support man made global warming?
short termhttp://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/RSSglobe.html
long termhttp://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/Moberg2005l.htm- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
[/quote]
Junkscience is run by Mr. Milloy a paid political advocate |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| richp... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 8:30 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 27, 1:38 pm, "leonard7... at (no spam) gmail.com" <leonard7... at (no spam) gmail.com>
wrote:
[quote]On Oct 17, 4:39 pm, richp <travelingman95... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 15, 6:27 am, Last Post <last_p... at (no spam) primus.ca> wrote:
Arctic Has Potential To Alter Earth's Climate:
Arctic Land And Seas Account For Up To 25
Percent Of World's Carbon Sink
ScienceDaily (Oct. 15, 2009) In a new study in the journal
Ecological Monographs, ecologists estimate that Arctic lands and
oceans are responsible for up to 25 percent of the global net sink of
atmospheric carbon dioxide. Under current predictions of global
warming, this Arctic sink could be diminished or reversed, potentially
accelerating predicted rates of climate change.
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091014144729.htm
There is a serious problem here-- "Under
current predictions of global warming ..." those
"predictions" have zero validity or credibility.
Michael Mann and Briffa have totally destroyed
the entire "global warming" theory, with their
fraudulent tree ring chart.
In their review paper, David McGuire of the U.S. Geological Survey and
the University of Alaska at Fairbanks and his colleagues show that the
Arctic has been a carbon sink since the end of the last Ice Age, which
over time has accounted for between zero and 25 percent, or up to
about 800 million metric tons, of the global carbon sink.
That is not as much as it seems-
just 67,000 tonnes per year
On average, says McGuire, the Arctic accounts for 10-15 percent of the
Earth's carbon sink. But the rapid rate of climate change in the
Arctic
Indeed the "rapid rate of climate change" in the
Arctic does not appear to be "warming" in spite
of the USGS and NOAA, who have been caught
with false data.
Arctic" is not what McGuire would suggest.
about twice that of lower latitudes could eliminate the sink and
possibly make the Arctic a source of carbon dioxide.
We need more CO2 for our increasing
populations and growing economies.
Either way short term or long term the data
doesn't support man made global warming?
short termhttp://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/RSSglobe.html
long termhttp://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/Moberg2005l.htm
Mr Milloy
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Steven_Milloy
Fuck him
Indeed pissypants ~~ Ask your mother to get
you to a brain surgeon. You are in need of a
transplant. <GG
In real science the burden of proof is always on
the proposer, never on the sceptics. So far
neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided one
iota of valid data for global warming nor have
they provided data that climate change is being
effected by commerce and industry, and not by
natural phenomena.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
[/quote]
Mr Milloy is a paid political hack |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Last Post... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 1:15 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 29, 3:03 pm, richp <travelingman95... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 21, 12:16 am, "leonard7... at (no spam) gmail.com" <leonard7... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
Re: Arctic Has Potential To Alter Earth's Climate
~~ nothing has changed
On Oct 20, 7:06 pm, Peter Muehlbauer
spamtrap... at (no spam) AT.frankenexpress.de> wrote:
richp <travelingman95... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 17, 1:51 pm, Last Post <last_p... at (no spam) primus.ca> wrote:
On Oct 17, 4:38 pm, richp <travelingman95... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 15, 6:27 am, Last Post <last_p... at (no spam) primus.ca> wrote:
Arctic Has Potential To Alter Earth's Climate:
Arctic Land And Seas Account For Up To 25
Percent Of World's Carbon Sink
ScienceDaily (Oct. 15, 2009) In a new study in the journal
Ecological Monographs, ecologists estimate that Arctic lands and
oceans are responsible for up to 25 percent of the global net sink of
atmospheric carbon dioxide. Under current predictions of global
warming, this Arctic sink could be diminished or reversed, potentially
accelerating predicted rates of climate change.
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091014144729.htm
There is a serious problem here-- "Under
current predictions of global warming ..." those
"predictions" have zero validity or credibility.
Michael Mann and Briffa have totally destroyed
the entire "global warming" theory, with their
fraudulent tree ring chart.
In their review paper, David McGuire of the U.S. Geological Survey and
the University of Alaska at Fairbanks and his colleagues show that the
Arctic has been a carbon sink since the end of the last Ice Age, which
over time has accounted for between zero and 25 percent, or up to
about 800 million metric tons, of the global carbon sink.
That is not as much as it seems-
just 67,000 tonnes per year
On average, says McGuire, the Arctic accounts for 10-15 percent of the
Earth's carbon sink. But the rapid rate of climate change in the
Arctic
Indeed the "rapid rate of climate change" in the
Arctic does not appear to be "warming" in spite
of the USGS and NOAA, who have been caught
with false data.
Arctic" is not what McGuire would suggest.
about twice that of lower latitudes could eliminate the sink and
possibly make the Arctic a source of carbon dioxide.
We need more CO2 for our increasing
populations and growing economies.
Either way short term or long term the data
doesn't support man made global warming?
short termhttp://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/RSSglobe.html
long termhttp://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/Moberg2005l.htm
To your fucking junk science
Junk science
From SourceWatch
SourceWatch -- the fascist slander site.
Poor pissypants he can't get a dry diaper.
Your answer is bull shit
Shit is your life. You came from shit and you'll go to shit.
Shit is what you deserve.
Amen.
--
Go fuck your mother you simpleton - Get a new brain - FUCK SENATOR INHOFE -
Yo MORON - FUCK YOU AND YOUR MOTHER - FOR YOU ASSHOLE - Where in the fuck to
you get your information asshole??? - HEY YOU FUKKIN FOOL...YOU PIECE OF SHIT
- you are rubbish you piece of crap - F U - you f'ing fool - Can't find your
ass with both hands - Hey fuck brains - FUCK YOU - The hell with you you right
wing fascist pig - you dumb ass - you jackassa piece of conservative right
wing repuke shit - Hey Fuk Brains - I call you fuk brains because that is what
you are - I wouldn't try to prove anything to a dumb ass like yourself - Lick
my diaper you asshole - Stick that foryou up your ass - MINDLESS MENTAL MORON
- Hey fuck you asshole - that's the shit that drives you - You are full of
shit - STFU CRAPHEAD - makes you a fukkin idiot - Please go fuck yourself -
BULLSHIT YOU FUCKFACE
["richp", valuable AGW proponent and AGW leading dancer in alt.global-warming]
What can you expect from pissypants????
Either way short term or long term the data
doesn't support man made global warming?
short termhttp://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/RSSglobe.html
long termhttp://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/Moberg2005l.htm-
Junkscience is run by Mr. Milloy a paid political advocate
[/quote]
So what? He has more science in one finger
than you will ever have in your whole body.
What we can ever expect from pissypants ...
And he still has not learned the basics of
good usenet posting
There are three types of people that you
can_not_talk_into_behaving_well. The
stupid, the religious fanatic, and the evil.
1- The stupid aren't smart enough to follow the
logic of what you say. You have to tell them
what is right in very simple terms. If they do
not agree, you will never be able to change
their mind.
2- The religious fanatic: If what you say goes
against their religious belief, they will cling to
that belief even if it means their death.
3- There is no way to reform evil- not in a
million years. There is no way to convince
the anthropogenic global warming alarmists,
the terrorists, serial killers, paedophiles, and
predators to change their evil ways, They
knew what they were doing was wrong, but
knowledge didn't stop them. It only made
them more careful in how they went about
performing their evil deeds. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Thu Nov 26, 2009 6:52 pm
|
|