 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Energy Forum » Arctic ice to disappear completely by 2020... |
|
Page 4 of 5 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Next |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Bret Cahill... |
 Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 5:00 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
[quote]In real science the burden of proof is always on
the proposer, never on the sceptics.
Then post the proof of your claim.
"Currently more glaciers are growing than shrinking."
"Leonard78sp", unproven claim, 6/20/09
•• Oh, just another oh so clever one, citing a snippet
from a signature, divorced from context and
without any reference to the subject.
[/quote]
You really need to complete your 5 minute youtube video "CO2 Is Good
for You" if you want to influence popular opinion.
Here are some suggestions:
Make sure you use a clear plastic bag so everyone can see your face.
Don't be stingy with the duct tape. Get at least 5 loops around your
neck for a goiod seal.
Post a sign in the background that says, "Natural Organic CO2" -- kind
of fitting for the "Last Post."
Bret Cahill |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Last Post... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 7:56 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 27, 3:36 pm, richp <travelingman95... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 21, 6:02 pm, "leonard7... at (no spam) gmail.com" <leonard7... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 21, 4:50 pm, richp <travelingman95... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 20, 8:08 pm, "leonard7... at (no spam) gmail.com" <leonard7... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
•• poor pissypants can't argue the science so ...
– –
Either way short term or long term the data
doesn't support man made global warming?
short term
http://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/RSSglobe.html> > long term
http://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/Moberg2005l.htm
Junkscience is nothing but filthy rag sheet for the conservative
agenda
•• Why don't you check it out, you might learn
something. That might put you a bit ahead
of the game. You can't remain a fascist leftie
all of your life.
–– ––
In real science the burden of proof is always on
the proposer, never on the sceptics. So far
neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided one
iota of valid data for global warming nor have
they provided data that climate change is being
effected by commerce and industry, and not by
natural phenomena.-
[/quote]
•• Oh, just another oh so clever one, citing
a snippet from a signature, divorced from
context andwithout any reference to the
subject.
[quote]
I already have checked it out you moron
[/quote]
•• Those who would call others, "moron"
need only look in a mirror to see a real one. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Mitchell Holman... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 8:02 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Last Post <last_post at (no spam) primus.ca> wrote in
news:3141d3b8-7906-4ce3-989a-a6137134dbb3 at (no spam) 33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com:
[quote]On Oct 28, 9:00 am, Mitchell Holman <noem... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
"leonard7... at (no spam) gmail.com" <leonard7... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote
innews:7c80afd2-67e
1-4a81-85d8-08675d9a13ca at (no spam) 2g2000prl.googlegroups.com:
–– ––
In real science the burden of proof is always on
the proposer, never on the sceptics.
Then post the proof of your claim.
"Currently more glaciers are growing than shrinking."
"Leonard78sp", unproven claim, 6/20/09
•• Oh, just another oh so clever one, citing a snippet
from a signature, divorced from context and
without any reference to the subject.
[/quote]
You are always demanding proof but never posting any.
Why is that?
[quote]
Hollowman--–– 4Q
[/quote]
"Leonard78" switches back to his "Last Post" handle.
Why? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| leonard78sp at (no spam) gmail.com... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 8:02 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
[quote]•• Oh, just another oh so clever one, citing a snippet
from a signature, divorced from context and
without any reference to the subject.
You really need to complete your 5 minute youtube video "CO2 Is Good
for You" if you want to influence popular opinion.
Here are some suggestions:
Make sure you use a clear plastic bag so everyone can see your face.
Don't be stingy with the duct tape. Get at least 5 loops around your
neck for a goiod seal.
[/quote]
•• Only after you Cahill!!! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| richp... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 9:07 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 27, 2:02 pm, "leonard7... at (no spam) gmail.com" <leonard7... at (no spam) gmail.com>
wrote:
[quote]On Oct 27, 3:36 pm, richp <travelingman95... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 22, 12:45 pm, Leonard <leonard7... at (no spam) primus.ca> wrote:
On 10/21/09 9:02 PM, in article
0484d738-2346-4f25-95fe-29690e347... at (no spam) q14g2000vbi.googlegroups.com,
"leonard7... at (no spam) gmail.com" <leonard7... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 21, 4:50 pm, richp <travelingman95... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 20, 8:08 pm, "leonard7... at (no spam) gmail.com" <leonard7... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 20, 4:57 pm, richp <travelingman95... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 15, 3:52 am, Harry Hope <riv... at (no spam) ix.netcom.com> wrote:
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/280517
Arctic Ice Cap to Become an Open Sea in 10 years
By Leo Reyes.
Some sicentists and climate change explorers predict that the Artic
ice cover will be gone during warmer months in 10 years due to the
effects of global warming.
Veteran polar explorers who spent considerable time doing research in
the Arctic revealed that the Artctic ice cap will disappear in 20-30
years.
€€ Hog wash !!
It will be largely ice-free during warmer months within a decade.
€€ Total falsehood.
Hopeless Harry
You are crap science
€€ poor pissypants can't argue the science so ...
Either way short term or long term the data
doesn't support man made global warming?
short term
http://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/RSSglobe.html
long term
http://junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/Moberg2005l.htm
Junkscience is nothing but filthy rag sheet for the conservative
agenda
•• Why don't you check it out, you might learn
something. That might put you a bit ahead
of the game. You can't remain a fascist leftie
all of your life.
Maybe two decades
•• Now what does that mean?
Perhaps in means you have a
screw loose somewhere.
–– ––
In real science the burden of proof is always on
the proposer, never on the sceptics. So far
neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided one
iota of valid data for global warming nor have
they provided data that climate change is being
effected by commerce and industry, and not by
natural phenomena.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
[/quote]
It is melting you fukkin stooge |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| richp... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 9:08 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 28, 6:00 am, Mitchell Holman <noem... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
[quote]"leonard7... at (no spam) gmail.com" <leonard7... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote innews:7c80afd2-67e1-4a81-85d8-08675d9a13ca at (no spam) 2g2000prl.googlegroups.com:
–– ––
In real science the burden of proof is always on
the proposer, never on the sceptics.
Then post the proof of your claim.
"Currently more glaciers are growing than shrinking."
"Leonard78sp", unproven claim, 6/20/09
[/quote]
You sure got that one right |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| richp... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 8:28 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 28, 2:59 pm, Last Post <last_p... at (no spam) primus.ca> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 28, 9:00 am, Mitchell Holman <noem... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
"leonard7... at (no spam) gmail.com" <leonard7... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote innews:7c80afd2-67e1-4a81-85d8-08675d9a13ca at (no spam) 2g2000prl.googlegroups.com:
–– ––
In real science the burden of proof is always on
the proposer, never on the sceptics.
Then post the proof of your claim.
"Currently more glaciers are growing than shrinking."
"Leonard78sp", unproven claim, 6/20/09
•• Oh, just another oh so clever one, citing a snippet
from a signature, divorced from context and
without any reference to the subject.
Hollowman--–– 4Q
[/quote]
STFU Mr Hollowbrain |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Last Post... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 9:00 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Last Post... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 9:05 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 29, 3:08 pm, richp <travelingman95... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 28, 6:00 am, Mitchell Holman <noem... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
"leonard7... at (no spam) gmail.com" <leonard7... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote innews:7c80afd2-67e1-4a81-85d8-08675d9a13ca at (no spam) 2g2000prl.googlegroups.com:
–– ––
In real science the burden of proof is always on
the proposer, never on the sceptics.
Then post the proof of your claim.
"Currently more glaciers are growing than shrinking."
"Leonard78sp", unproven claim, 6/20/09
You sure got that one right
[/quote]
•• Not that guy with the hollow head
just another oh so clever one, citing a snippet
from a signature, divorced from context and
without any reference to the subject.
•• And pissy pants gets nothing right at all |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Mitchell Holman... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 6:55 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"leonard78sp at (no spam) gmail.com" <leonard78sp at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in news:39ed685a-
7327-4609-83fb-b546d54f12ea at (no spam) a37g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
[quote]•• Oh, just another oh so clever one, citing a snippet
from a signature, divorced from context and
without any reference to the subject.
You really need to complete your 5 minute youtube video "CO2 Is Good
for You" if you want to influence popular opinion.
Here are some suggestions:
Make sure you use a clear plastic bag so everyone can see your face.
Don't be stingy with the duct tape. Get at least 5 loops around your
neck for a goiod seal.
Post a sign in the background that says, "Natural Organic CO2" -- kind
of fitting for the "Last Post."
•• Only after you Cahill!!!
[/quote]
"Last Post" morphs back into "leonard78".
What's with that? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Mitchell Holman... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 6:57 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Last Post <last_post at (no spam) primus.ca> wrote in
news:49c31b92-b2cf-42ac-a5c7-082cc56169a6 at (no spam) j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com:
[quote]On Oct 29, 3:08 pm, richp <travelingman95... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 6:00 am, Mitchell Holman <noem... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
"leonard7... at (no spam) gmail.com" <leonard7... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote
innews:7c80afd2-6
7e1-4a81-85d8-08675d9a13ca at (no spam) 2g2000prl.googlegroups.com:
–– ––
In real science the burden of proof is always on
the proposer, never on the sceptics.
Then post the proof of your claim.
"Currently more glaciers are growing than shrinking."
"Leonard78sp", unproven claim, 6/20/09
You sure got that one right
•• Not that guy with the hollow head
just another oh so clever one, citing a snippet
from a signature, divorced from context and
without any reference to the subject.
[/quote]
Oh, dear, Leonard has been proven wrong.
Melting glaciers start countdown to climate
The Observer
16 March 2008
Worldwide, the vast majority of the planet's 160,000
glaciers are receding, 'at least' as much as this, says
Haeberli, probably more - a claim supported by evidence
from around the world.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/mar/16/glaciers.climatechange
Oh, the shock. Oh, the surprise. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Tim Heise... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 12:58 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Mitchell Holman" <noemail at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9CB550AA7E836noemailcomcastnet at (no spam) 216.196.97.130...
[quote]"leonard78sp at (no spam) gmail.com" <leonard78sp at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in news:39ed685a-
7327-4609-83fb-b546d54f12ea at (no spam) a37g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
.. Oh, just another oh so clever one, citing a snippet
from a signature, divorced from context and
without any reference to the subject.
You really need to complete your 5 minute youtube video "CO2 Is Good
for You" if you want to influence popular opinion.
Here are some suggestions:
Make sure you use a clear plastic bag so everyone can see your face.
Don't be stingy with the duct tape. Get at least 5 loops around your
neck for a goiod seal.
Post a sign in the background that says, "Natural Organic CO2" -- kind
of fitting for the "Last Post."
.. Only after you Cahill!!!
"Last Post" morphs back into "leonard78".
[/quote]
He actually morphs back into "Leonard Part 6"
[quote]What's with that?
//[/quote]
tbh |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| leonard78sp at (no spam) gmail.com... |
| Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 3:34 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 31, 7:57 am, Mitchell Holman <noem... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
[quote]Last Post <last_p... at (no spam) primus.ca> wrote innews:49c31b92-b2cf-42ac-a5c7-082cc56169a6 at (no spam) j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com:
On Oct 29, 3:08 pm, richp <travelingman95... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 6:00 am, Mitchell Holman <noem... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
"leonard7... at (no spam) gmail.com" <leonard7... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote
innews:7c80afd2-6
7e1-4a81-85d8-08675d9a1... at (no spam) 2g2000prl.googlegroups.com:
–– ––
In real science the burden of proof is always on
the proposer, never on the sceptics.
Then post the proof of your claim.
"Currently more glaciers are growing than shrinking."
"Leonard78sp", unproven claim, 6/20/09
You sure got that one right
•• Not that guy with the hollow head
just another oh so clever one, citing a snippet
from a signature, divorced from context and
without any reference to the subject.
Oh, dear, Leonard has been proven wrong.
Melting glaciers start countdown to climate
The Observer
16 March 2008
Worldwide, the vast majority of the planet's 160,000
glaciers are receding, 'at least' as much as this, says
Haeberli, probably more - a claim supported by evidence
from around the world.http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/mar/16/glaciers.climatechange
Oh, the shock. Oh, the surprise.
[/quote]
•• Yes you should be be shocked, Hollowhead
When you take your news from the Guardian
you are sure to be wrong.
–– ––
In real science the burden of proof is always on
the proposer, never on the sceptics. So far
neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided one
iota of valid data for global warming nor have
they provided data that climate change is being
effected by commerce and industry, and not by
natural phenomena. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| leonard78sp at (no spam) gmail.com... |
| Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 3:45 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 1, 8:34 am, "leonard7... at (no spam) gmail.com" <leonard7... at (no spam) gmail.com>
wrote:
[quote]On Oct 31, 7:57 am, Mitchell Holman <noem... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
•• Not that guy with the hollow head
just another oh so clever one, citing a snippet
from a signature, divorced from context and
without any reference to the subject.
Oh, dear, Leonard has been proven wrong.
Melting glaciers start countdown to climate
The Observer
16 March 2008
Worldwide, the vast majority of the planet's 160,000
glaciers are receding, 'at least' as much as this, says
Haeberli, probably more - a claim supported by evidence
from around the world.http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/mar/16/glaciers.climatechange
Oh, the shock. Oh, the surprise.
[/quote]
•• Yes you should be be shocked, Hollowhead
When you take your news from the Guardian
you are sure to be wrong.
–– ––
In real science the burden of proof is always on
the proposer, never on the sceptics. So far
neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided one
iota of valid data for global warming nor have
they provided data that climate change is being
effected by commerce and industry, and not by
natural phenomena. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Bret Cahill... |
| Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 4:31 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
[quote] In real science the burden of proof is always on
the proposer, never on the sceptics.
[/quote]
How's your "CO2 Is Good for You Video" coming along?
See if your case worker will put you in a straight jacker first.
And remember, the burden of proof is on the proposer.
Bret Cahill |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Tue Dec 01, 2009 9:21 pm
|
|