 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Anthropology - Paleo Forum » A Martian monster-dog?... |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| desperately... |
 Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:05 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| rwalker... |
| Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:18 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| desperately... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 4:05 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| rwalker... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 1:25 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 07:05:25 -0700 (PDT), desperately
<wretchfossil at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote:de54c2e405]On 10?8?, ??1?18?, rwalker <rwal... at (no spam) despammed.com> wrote:
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 00:05:37 -0700 (PDT), desperately
wretchfos... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
A Martian monster-dog?
Labelled:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=20&f=1555999737&p=88
Original:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/hortonheardawho/3979083408/
Well, this confirms it. You are completely insane.
Hey, professor of anatomy, you majored in electron microscope. Maybe I
will believe you if you can confirm these were not myofilaments:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=20&f=1555672203&p=78
In my country, no professor denied they were.
[/quote:de54c2e405]
Well, god knows where you are. They are about as much
myofilaments as your "osteons" were osteons. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| desperately... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 6:17 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 10月9日, 上午3時25分, rwalker <rwal... at (no spam) despammed.com> wrote:
[quote:02d52cd94a]On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 07:05:25 -0700 (PDT), desperately
wretchfos... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On 10?8?, ??1?18?, rwalker <rwal... at (no spam) despammed.com> wrote:
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 00:05:37 -0700 (PDT), desperately
wretchfos... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
A Martian monster-dog?
Labelled:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=20&f=1555999737&p=88
Original:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/hortonheardawho/3979083408/
Well, this confirms it. You are completely insane.
Hey, professor of anatomy, you majored in electron microscope. Maybe I
will believe you if you can confirm these were not myofilaments:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=20&f=1555672203&p=78
In my country, no professor denied they were.
Well, god knows where you are.
[/quote:02d52cd94a]
They are about as much
[quote:02d52cd94a]myofilaments as your "osteons" were osteons.
[/quote:02d52cd94a]
Thank you for your advice.
- 隱藏被引用文字 -
[quote:02d52cd94a]
- 顯示被引用文字 -[/quote:02d52cd94a] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| brady r... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 7:34 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 9, 9:02 am, RichTravsky <traRvE... at (no spam) hotMOVEmail.com> wrote:
[quote:6f9f08cfb3]linliangtai wrote:
On 10月8æ—¥, ä¸‹å ˆ1時18分, rwalker <rwal.... at (no spam) despammed.com> wrote:
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 00:05:37 -0700 (PDT), desperately
wretchfos... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
A Martian monster-dog?
Labelled:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=20&f=1555999737&p=88
Original:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/hortonheardawho/3979083408/
Well, this confirms it. Â You are completely insane. Â
Hey, professor of anatomy, you majored in electron microscope. Maybe I
will believe you if you can confirm these were not myofilaments:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=20&f=1555672203&p=78
In my country, no professor denied they were.
[/quote:6f9f08cfb3]
[quote:6f9f08cfb3]You are lying. Prove your claim by giving all their anems and email addresses
so this can be confirmed.
[/quote:6f9f08cfb3]
Oh, I'll easily believe that "no professor denied
they were". In fact, I'd be a little skeptical
that any professor anywhere even bothered to
express any opinion whatsoever. Sort of
like you'll not find any biologist expressing
skepticism that the Big Bad Wolf could
actually eat Granny in one sitting.
SlothyR |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| RichTravsky... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 10:02 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| RichTravsky... |
| Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:51 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| RichTravsky... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 1:51 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Wretch Fossil... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 5:22 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 10月10日, 上午12時02分, RichTravsky <traRvE... at (no spam) hotMOVEmail.com> wrote:
[quote:a2486dfa91]linliangtai wrote:
On 10月8æ—¥, ä¸‹å ˆ1時18分, rwalker <rwal.... at (no spam) despammed.com> wrote:
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 00:05:37 -0700 (PDT), desperately
wretchfos... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
A Martian monster-dog?
Labelled:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=20&f=1555999737&p=88
Original:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/hortonheardawho/3979083408/
Well, this confirms it. Â You are completely insane. Â
Hey, professor of anatomy, you majored in electron microscope. Maybe I
will believe you if you can confirm these were not myofilaments:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=20&f=1555672203&p=78
In my country, no professor denied they were.
You are lying. Prove your claim by giving all their anems and email addresses
so this can be confirmed.- 隱藏被引用文字 -
- 顯示被引用文字 -
[/quote:a2486dfa91]
You know that I must protect their identity just as reporters do in
sensitive cases. Otherwise, no anatomists would help me and confirm my
findings. I asked a few professors of anatomy in Taiwan. They all
told me they never saw any AFM (atomic force microscope) images of
myofilaments, although they did see many TEM/SEM images of
myofilaments. I searched Google images and found nothing for AFM
images of myofilaments.
By the way, anatomists must get used to fossils by studying them under
microscopes before they can confidently identify small details in
fossils, especially fossils in micrographs from Mars that are far from
beautiful, high-power micrographs. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| RichTravsky... |
| Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:02 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Wretch Fossil wrote:
[quote]On 10月10日, 上午12時02分, RichTravsky <traRvE... at (no spam) hotMOVEmail.com> wrote:
linliangtai wrote:
On 10月8æ—¥, ä¸‹å ˆ1時18åˆ , rwalker <rwal... at (no spam) despammed.com> wrote:
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 00:05:37 -0700 (PDT), desperately
wretchfos... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
A Martian monster-dog?
Labelled:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=20&f=1555999737&p=88
Original:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/hortonheardawho/3979083408/
Well, this confirms it. Â You are completely insane. Â
Hey, professor of anatomy, you majored in electron microscope. Maybe I
will believe you if you can confirm these were not myofilaments:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=20&f=1555672203&p=78
In my country, no professor denied they were.
You are lying. Prove your claim by giving all their anems and email addresses
so this can be confirmed.-
You know that I must protect their identity just as reporters do in
[/quote]
Lie.
[quote]sensitive cases. Otherwise, no anatomists would help me and confirm my
findings. I asked a few professors of anatomy in Taiwan. They all
[/quote]
You asked no one.
Such a discovery would make one famous. NASA makes the images publicly available.
You are lying.
[quote]told me they never saw any AFM (atomic force microscope) images of
myofilaments, although they did see many TEM/SEM images of
myofilaments. I searched Google images and found nothing for AFM
images of myofilaments.
By the way, anatomists must get used to fossils by studying them under
microscopes before they can confidently identify small details in
fossils, especially fossils in micrographs from Mars that are far from
beautiful, high-power micrographs.[/quote] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Thu Nov 26, 2009 12:33 pm
|
|