 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Astrology Forum » Admins that will be served subpoenas... |
|
Page 2 of 4 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Chris Krolczyk... |
 Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 1:22 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 7, 3:01 pm, Cujo DeSockpuppet <c... at (no spam) petitmorte.net> wrote:
[quote:52382dfd45]Kookiness noted. Thanks for admitting you're a turd!
[/quote:52382dfd45]
Better yet, he seems to have admitted that his URLs are turd
byproduct.
Another B1G W1N for Teh Pantyhead!!1!!
-Chris Krolczyk |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Chris Krolczyk... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 1:25 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 7, 5:18 pm, The Chief Instigator <patr... at (no spam) io.com> wrote:
[quote:ddd5929fb1]On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 17:07:08 +0000 (UTC), Cujo DeSockpuppet <c... at (no spam) petitmorte.net> wrote:
OMIGAWD! It's February of 2002 all over again!
Stamp your feet some more, Pantyhead.
Wollk00k must be able to stamp on his head, which would explain his
behavior of the last few decades.
[/quote:ddd5929fb1]
Ah, the wonders of severe brain trauma.
No offense to anyone with a post-concussion issue
who may be reading this, but Edmo can outdo your
weirdest behavior in a heartbeat.
-Chris Krolczyk |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| U*U... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 6:53 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Edmond Wollmann" <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:4ACCC5E8.3954 at (no spam) earthlink.net...
[quote:7d518763b0]These ISPs have been confirmed by certified US mail that they have
received and TAKEN the DMCAs I sent via postal mail and email.
If the pages do not come down or the pages go back up anywhere else I
will subpoena each and every admin at the ISPs listed and let them tell
a judge under oath WHY they think they can subvert copyright laws. The
defamation case will come after that.
You have to actually have a Process Server hand them a subpoena, then you[/quote:7d518763b0]
have to file suit in civil court in their home jurisdiction. So I guess you
are planning a round-the-World roadtrip??? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| The Chief Instigator... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 9:22 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 20:53:27 -0400, U*U <ceo at (no spam) freespeechstore.ca> wrote:
[quote:607d806ec9]"Edmond Wollmann" <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:4ACCC5E8.3954 at (no spam) earthlink.net...
These ISPs have been confirmed by certified US mail that they have
received and TAKEN the DMCAs I sent via postal mail and email.
If the pages do not come down or the pages go back up anywhere else I
will subpoena each and every admin at the ISPs listed and let them tell
a judge under oath WHY they think they can subvert copyright laws. The
defamation case will come after that.
You have to actually have a Process Server hand them a subpoena, then you
have to file suit in civil court in their home jurisdiction. So I guess you
are planning a round-the-World roadtrip???
[/quote:607d806ec9]
In Edkook's case, he might get off the block he lives on...for a few
seconds.
--
Patrick L. "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick at (no spam) io.com) Houston, Texas
www.io.com/~patrick/aeros.php (TCI's 2008-09 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Houston 4, Manitoba 2 (October 3)
NEXT GAME: Friday, October 9 vs. Texas, 7:35 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Chris... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 2:00 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Chris Krolczyk" <arfiend2009 at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f28db74e-67f7-49ac-9249-4dce82d2924e at (no spam) m20g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
[quote:9b4bf808d5]On Oct 7, 12:58 pm, "Chris" <a... at (no spam) grevillec.freeserve.co.ukNOSPAM
wrote:
Aren't you breaking copyright law by posting three links to a USPS site
without permission?
By Edmo's standards, yes. Now, if you're *sane*...
[/quote:9b4bf808d5]
Sigh! It took a couple of years before Spamtard got a clue, I wonder how
many years before Mr. Wolman will get one
--
The monkey gibbering and screeching used to keep me up at night, although in
the last week or so it's pretty much tailed of to nothing. The smell has
gotten noticeably worse in the last couple of days, too. The next time I get
a barrel full of monkeys, I'm going to try taking the lid off. - groo in
AFCA |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Chris Krolczyk... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 7:50 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 9, 3:00 am, "Chris" <a... at (no spam) grevillec.freeserve.co.ukNOSPAM>
wrote:
[quote:048b6ffa8b]"Chris Krolczyk" <arfiend2... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f28db74e-67f7-49ac-9249-4dce82d2924e at (no spam) m20g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 7, 12:58 pm, "Chris" <a... at (no spam) grevillec.freeserve.co.ukNOSPAM
wrote:
Aren't you breaking copyright law by posting three links to a USPS site
without permission?
By Edmo's standards, yes. Now, if you're *sane*...
Sigh! It took a couple of years before Spamtard got a clue, I wonder how
many years before Mr. Wolman will get one
[/quote:048b6ffa8b]
As dumb as Spamford was, he's not that dumb.
Wollkook won't even figure it out when those ISPs continue to
ignore him. Shit, he won't even get it if he files in court and
a judge doesn't even allow him to proceed due to jurisdictional
issues, much less the legal validity of the case.
-Chris Krolczyk |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| chris... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 11:12 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 10 Oct, 18:50, Chris Krolczyk <arfiend2... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote:04b6517900]On Oct 9, 3:00 am, "Chris" <a... at (no spam) grevillec.freeserve.co.ukNOSPAM
wrote:
"Chris Krolczyk" <arfiend2... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f28db74e-67f7-49ac-9249-4dce82d2924e at (no spam) m20g2000vbp.googlegroups.com....
On Oct 7, 12:58 pm, "Chris" <a... at (no spam) grevillec.freeserve.co.ukNOSPAM
wrote:
Aren't you breaking copyright law by posting three links to a USPS site
without permission?
By Edmo's standards, yes. Now, if you're *sane*...
Sigh! It took a couple of years before Spamtard got a clue, I wonder how
many years before Mr. Wolman will get one
As dumb as Spamford was, he's not that dumb.
[/quote:04b6517900]
Spamford was before my time, I'm talking about Jamie aka Spamtard.
[quote:04b6517900]
Wollkook won't even figure it out when those ISPs continue to
ignore him. Shit, he won't even get it if he files in court and
a judge doesn't even allow him to proceed due to jurisdictional
issues, much less the legal validity of the case.
[/quote:04b6517900]
The more I look at Mr. Wolfmans DMCA posts, the more I wonder if he is
on *any* planet at all. Most of his complaints appear to be about
images, yet his links are always text only. The only reference I can
find to a picture mentioned anywhere of a head covered by a pair of
panties.
Very strange
> -Chris Krolczyk |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Cujo DeSockpuppet... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 12:11 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
chris <chrishaskett at (no spam) myguide.net> wrote in
news:49c5ee03-3145-4535-999b-c24de2cbbda1 at (no spam) b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com:
[quote:70e6f9c5df]On 10 Oct, 18:50, Chris Krolczyk <arfiend2... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 9, 3:00 am, "Chris" <a... at (no spam) grevillec.freeserve.co.ukNOSPAM
wrote:
"Chris Krolczyk" <arfiend2... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f28db74e-67f7-49ac-9249-4dce82d2924e at (no spam) m20g2000vbp.googlegroups.co
m..
.
On Oct 7, 12:58 pm, "Chris"
a... at (no spam) grevillec.freeserve.co.ukNOSPAM> wrote:
Aren't you breaking copyright law by posting three links to a
USPS s
ite
without permission?
By Edmo's standards, yes. Now, if you're *sane*...
Sigh! It took a couple of years before Spamtard got a clue, I
wonder ho
w
many years before Mr. Wolman will get one
As dumb as Spamford was, he's not that dumb.
Spamford was before my time, I'm talking about Jamie aka Spamtard.
Wollkook won't even figure it out when those ISPs continue to
ignore him. Shit, he won't even get it if he files in court and
a judge doesn't even allow him to proceed due to jurisdictional
issues, much less the legal validity of the case.
The more I look at Mr. Wolfmans DMCA posts, the more I wonder if he is
on *any* planet at all. Most of his complaints appear to be about
images, yet his links are always text only. The only reference I can
find to a picture mentioned anywhere of a head covered by a pair of
panties.
[/quote:70e6f9c5df]
Wollkook has always, like a bad meal, repeated himself. This is just
another SSDD that Pantyhead whines about. See this link for the first
instance of DMCA whines, at least to my knowledge:
http://www.sonic.net/scott/sheesh/ed.txt <- Funny!
As seen from the above link, Wollkook traditionally just tries to use as
broad a brush as possible and hopes that someone will tire of it and just
cave in. It's just another example of Ed expecting everyone to not only
"think" like the whiner but accede to his demands.
But it's a simple formula, Ed acts nice until he's disagreed with and
turns into a total fr00tcake.
--
Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*,
alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy
Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S
award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse
Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895.
"Irrelevant. The unaware fear me. The aware welcome me." - Edmo, brave
explorer of PF Chang's explains why he's always on topic in kook groups. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| chris... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 10:05 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 10, 11:11 pm, Cujo DeSockpuppet <c... at (no spam) petitmorte.net> wrote:
[quote:f8a3d89c44]
http://www.sonic.net/scott/sheesh/ed.txt<- Funny!
[/quote:f8a3d89c44]
Indeed, it is a classic.
[quote:f8a3d89c44]
As seen from the above link, Wollkook traditionally just tries to use as
broad a brush as possible and hopes that someone will tire of it and just
cave in. It's just another example of Ed expecting everyone to not only
"think" like the whiner but accede to his demands.
[/quote:f8a3d89c44]
Yup, certainly seems to be the pattern,
[quote:f8a3d89c44]
But it's a simple formula, Ed acts nice until he's disagreed with and
turns into a total fr00tcake.
[/quote:f8a3d89c44]
Talking of fruitcake, for some reason yesterday, when reading his
posts in google, the first sponsored link was for a cure bad breath.
My rather simplistic mind thought that a guillotine would have the
same effect. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Chris Krolczyk... |
| Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 2:33 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 10, 4:12 pm, chris <chrishask... at (no spam) myguide.net> wrote:
[quote:f3520922e8]On 10 Oct, 18:50, Chris Krolczyk <arfiend2... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
As dumb as Spamford was, he's not that dumb.
Spamford was before my time, I'm talking about Jamie aka Spamtard.
[/quote:f3520922e8]
Meh. Like kooks, sometimes you can't tell the spammers
without a scorecard.
[quote:f3520922e8]Wollkook won't even figure it out when those ISPs continue to
ignore him. Shit, he won't even get it if he files in court and
a judge doesn't even allow him to proceed due to jurisdictional
issues, much less the legal validity of the case.
The more I look at Mr. Wolfmans DMCA posts, the more I wonder if he is
on *any* planet at all. Most of his complaints appear to be about
images, yet his links are always text only. The only reference I can
find to a picture mentioned anywhere of a head covered by a pair of
panties.
Very strange
[/quote:f3520922e8]
What's really strange here is that he
only happened to think of this strategy
nearly 11 years after the DMCA was passed
by the Senate. As laughable as his tactic
is, it's incredibly late.
Case in point:
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/edonsmb.htm
1999 is a loooooong time ago, even for
Usenet. And he wasn't even using the
DMCA as a fig leaf back then even though
he could have.
My theory is that he's been talking to
a lawyer. Just a very, very incomptent one.
-Chris Krolczyk |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Edmond Wollmann... |
| Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 9:48 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Chris Krolczyk wrote:
[quote:b045576b96]
On Oct 10, 4:12 pm, chris <chrishask... at (no spam) myguide.net> wrote:
On 10 Oct, 18:50, Chris Krolczyk <arfiend2... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
As dumb as Spamford was, he's not that dumb.
Spamford was before my time, I'm talking about Jamie aka Spamtard.
Meh. Like kooks, sometimes you can't tell the spammers
without a scorecard.
Wollkook won't even figure it out when those ISPs continue to
ignore him. Shit, he won't even get it if he files in court and
a judge doesn't even allow him to proceed due to jurisdictional
issues, much less the legal validity of the case.
The more I look at Mr. Wolfmans DMCA posts, the more I wonder if he is
on *any* planet at all. Most of his complaints appear to be about
images, yet his links are always text only. The only reference I can
find to a picture mentioned anywhere of a head covered by a pair of
panties.
[/quote:b045576b96]
Text or pictures, many have come down already, nitwits.
[quote:b045576b96]Very strange
What's really strange here is that he
only happened to think of this strategy
nearly 11 years after the DMCA was passed
by the Senate. As laughable as his tactic
is, it's incredibly late.
[/quote:b045576b96]
Its never too late to claim copyright infringement, especially when the
damages mount and can be used for further legal action for that. Nobody
ever paid attention to the idiot's page, but some people took it as
authoritative rather than just a vindictive assholes vengence website
recently, so now I will make it part of my legal case.
[quote:b045576b96]My theory is that he's been talking to
a lawyer. Just a very, very incomptent one.
[/quote:b045576b96]
That's why you should consult someone with a brain before you actually
try to theorize anything so far above your capacity and hurt yourself.
--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| The Chief Instigator... |
| Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:05 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:48:00 -0700, Edmond Wollmann <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote:
[quote:1286f82c0e]Chris Krolczyk wrote:
On Oct 10, 4:12 pm, chris <chrishask... at (no spam) myguide.net> wrote:
On 10 Oct, 18:50, Chris Krolczyk <arfiend2... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
As dumb as Spamford was, he's not that dumb.
Spamford was before my time, I'm talking about Jamie aka Spamtard.
Meh. Like kooks, sometimes you can't tell the spammers
without a scorecard.
Wollkook won't even figure it out when those ISPs continue to
ignore him. Shit, he won't even get it if he files in court and
a judge doesn't even allow him to proceed due to jurisdictional
issues, much less the legal validity of the case.
The more I look at Mr. Wolfmans DMCA posts, the more I wonder if he is
on *any* planet at all. Most of his complaints appear to be about
images, yet his links are always text only. The only reference I can
find to a picture mentioned anywhere of a head covered by a pair of
panties.
Text or pictures, many have come down already, nitwits.
Very strange
What's really strange here is that he only happened to think of this
strategy nearly 11 years after the DMCA was passed by the Senate. As
laughable as his tactic is, it's incredibly late.
Its never too late to claim copyright infringement, especially when the
damages mount and can be used for further legal action for that. Nobody
ever paid attention to the idiot's page, but some people took it as
authoritative rather than just a vindictive assholes vengence website
recently, so now I will make it part of my legal case.
My theory is that he's been talking to a lawyer. Just a very, very
incomptent one.
That's why you should consult someone with a brain before you actually try
to theorize anything so far above your capacity and hurt yourself.
[/quote:1286f82c0e]
Unlike you, he's got a brain, Pantyhead. That's why you're destined to lose
every time. Too bad for you I've got two P.F. Chang's within a short drive
of this part of the town...and are you *ever* going to actually write a book
that gets an Amazon rating of _fewer_ than seven digits?
--
Patrick L. "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick at (no spam) io.com) Houston, Texas
www.io.com/~patrick/aeros.php (TCI's 2008-09 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Houston 2, Texas 1 (SO, October 10)
NEXT GAME: Friday, October 16 vs. San Antonio, 7:35 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| EHWollmann... |
| Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 5:36 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 13, 10:05 pm, The Chief Instigator <patr... at (no spam) io.com> wrote:
[quote:29766b8f1e]On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:48:00 -0700, Edmond Wollmann <arcturian... at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote:
Chris Krolczyk wrote:
On Oct 10, 4:12 pm, chris <chrishask... at (no spam) myguide.net> wrote:
On 10 Oct, 18:50, Chris Krolczyk <arfiend2... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
As dumb as Spamford was, he's not that dumb.
Spamford was before my time, I'm talking about Jamie aka Spamtard.
Meh. Like kooks, sometimes you can't tell the spammers
without a scorecard.
Wollkook won't even figure it out when those ISPs continue to
ignore him. Shit, he won't even get it if he files in court and
a judge doesn't even allow him to proceed due to jurisdictional
issues, much less the legal validity of the case.
The more I look at Mr. Wolfmans DMCA posts, the more I wonder if he is
on *any* planet at all. Most of his complaints appear to be about
images, yet his links are always text only. The only reference I can
find to a picture mentioned anywhere of a head covered by a pair of
panties.
Text or pictures, many have come down already, nitwits.
Very strange
What's really strange here is that he only happened to think of this
strategy nearly 11 years after the DMCA was passed by the Senate. As
laughable as his tactic is, it's incredibly late.
Its never too late to claim copyright infringement, especially when the
damages mount and can be used for further legal action for that. Nobody
ever paid attention to the idiot's page, but some people took it as
authoritative rather than just a vindictive assholes vengence website
recently, so now I will make it part of my legal case.
My theory is that he's been talking to a lawyer. Just a very, very
incomptent one.
That's why you should consult someone with a brain before you actually try
to theorize anything so far above your capacity and hurt yourself.
Unlike you, he's got a brain, Pantyhead. That's why you're destined to lose
every time. Too bad for you I've got two P.F. Chang's within a short drive
of this part of the town...and are you *ever* going to actually write a book
that gets an Amazon rating of _fewer_ than seven digits?
[/quote:29766b8f1e]
You mean like Ken Kizer?
http://www.amazon.com/Rebirthing-Life-Astrology-Emtional-Healing/dp/0964701030/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1255534536&sr=8-1
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Der Kommisar... |
| Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:20 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
In article <4AD549F0.1F53 at (no spam) earthlink.net>
Edmond Wollmann <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote:
[quote:ec5aab8e42]
Chris Krolczyk wrote:
On Oct 10, 4:12 pm, chris <chrishask... at (no spam) myguide.net> wrote:
On 10 Oct, 18:50, Chris Krolczyk <arfiend2... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
As dumb as Spamford was, he's not that dumb.
Spamford was before my time, I'm talking about Jamie aka Spamtard.
Meh. Like kooks, sometimes you can't tell the spammers
without a scorecard.
Wollkook won't even figure it out when those ISPs continue to
ignore him. Shit, he won't even get it if he files in court and
a judge doesn't even allow him to proceed due to jurisdictional
issues, much less the legal validity of the case.
The more I look at Mr. Wolfmans DMCA posts, the more I wonder if he is
on *any* planet at all. Most of his complaints appear to be about
images, yet his links are always text only. The only reference I can
find to a picture mentioned anywhere of a head covered by a pair of
panties.
Text or pictures, many have come down already, nitwits.
[/quote:ec5aab8e42]
Every time you take one down, it pops up somewhere else.
http://tinypic.com/r/4k6xit/4
[quote:ec5aab8e42]--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/[/quote:ec5aab8e42] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Chris... |
| Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:13 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Chris Krolczyk" <arfiend2009 at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f12b8c5c-397d-4f8c-9ca4-4413b83e93f1 at (no spam) d10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 10, 4:12 pm, chris <chrishask... at (no spam) myguide.net> wrote:
[quote:ed8bd29071]On 10 Oct, 18:50, Chris Krolczyk <arfiend2... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
As dumb as Spamford was, he's not that dumb.
Spamford was before my time, I'm talking about Jamie aka Spamtard.
Meh. Like kooks, sometimes you can't tell the spammers
without a scorecard.
[/quote:ed8bd29071]
Very true.
[quote:ed8bd29071]What's really strange here is that he
only happened to think of this strategy
nearly 11 years after the DMCA was passed
by the Senate. As laughable as his tactic
is, it's incredibly late.
[/quote:ed8bd29071]
It only took Mr. Baillie 2 years or so to realise that you can't copyright a
usenet post, maybe it has taken Mr. Willmeen 11 years to realise that this
was a chance to try and make some money at last.
I wonder how many years it will take Mr Woolman to discover that you can't.
[quote:ed8bd29071]Case in point:
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/edonsmb.htm
[/quote:ed8bd29071]
Gives two short planks a bad name.
[quote:ed8bd29071]1999 is a loooooong time ago, even for
Usenet. And he wasn't even using the
DMCA as a fig leaf back then even though
he could have.
[/quote:ed8bd29071]
That is an image I could do without!
[quote:ed8bd29071]My theory is that he's been talking to
a lawyer. Just a very, very incomptent one.
[/quote:ed8bd29071]
Possibly one of about the same quality as Mark Felstein of Emarketers of
America fame. He suddenly realised that discovery worked both ways, and
backed out at a great rate of knots.
Chris the Sock
(C)2009 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Dec 11, 2009 6:03 am
|
|