 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Medicine - Transcription Forum » Have you heard this?... |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Judity... |
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:00 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
I was watching the news, and two anchors were discussing the bible. It
seems, according to them, that a conservative group of highly educated
people are going to "edit" the bible. Among other changes, they want
to change pronouns to gender neutral.
I'm only familiar with the King James version and then only from what
I learned in years of Sunday school. Here is a link to the article
about the other bible. Do any of you own this one, and what do you
think of this upcoming revision?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32644719/ns/us_news-faith/
Judity |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| sudee... |
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 11:11 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 6, 1:13 pm, "Phyllis Nilsson" <phyllisnils... at (no spam) buckeye-
express.com> wrote:
[quote:433515f746]My opinion? I think it stinks and wouldn't touch it with a 10-foot pole.
"Judity" <Judit... at (no spam) aol.com> wrote in message
news:eee088a8-4c0e-46ee-a10d-f854bc44b98f at (no spam) h14g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
I was watching the news, and two anchors were discussing the bible. It
seems, according to them, that a conservative group of highly educated
people are going to "edit" the bible. Among other changes, they want
to change pronouns to gender neutral.
I'm only familiar with the King James version and then only from what
I learned in years of Sunday school. Here is a link to the article
about the other bible. Do any of you own this one, and what do you
think of this upcoming revision?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32644719/ns/us_news-faith/
Judity
[/quote:433515f746]
The bible has been changed so dang many times from the original that
to believe it is the "way" it originally was is a joke. I believe
there have been deletions about 148,000 times over the years.
Especially by certain religious groups. This is just more "crap".
Sue M |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Phyllis Nilsson... |
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 2:13 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
My opinion? I think it stinks and wouldn't touch it with a 10-foot pole.
"Judity" <Judity01 at (no spam) aol.com> wrote in message
news:eee088a8-4c0e-46ee-a10d-f854bc44b98f at (no spam) h14g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
[quote:bb9a13d0e7]I was watching the news, and two anchors were discussing the bible. It
seems, according to them, that a conservative group of highly educated
people are going to "edit" the bible. Among other changes, they want
to change pronouns to gender neutral.
I'm only familiar with the King James version and then only from what
I learned in years of Sunday school. Here is a link to the article
about the other bible. Do any of you own this one, and what do you
think of this upcoming revision?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32644719/ns/us_news-faith/
Judity[/quote:bb9a13d0e7] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Petro Gibraltar... |
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 5:06 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Judity" <Judity01 at (no spam) aol.com> wrote in message
news:eee088a8-4c0e-46ee-a10d-f854bc44b98f at (no spam) h14g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
[quote:f747d96213]I was watching the news, and two anchors were discussing the bible. It
seems, according to them, that a conservative group of highly educated
people are going to "edit" the bible. Among other changes, they want
to change pronouns to gender neutral.
[/quote:f747d96213]
Much of the NIV 'version' has already been changed to gender neutral forms.
This group, which is responsible for maintaining the NIV "version" (created
by right wing humans in 1978) is now proposing to change it again. Instead
of calling us 'children of God' they propose to revert to 'men of God' .
This 'version', was written in 1978 (31 years ago). |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Doug Jones... |
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 5:30 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Yes, it's true. Needless to say, most of the other blogs are going
nuts satirizing them, errr.... giving them a "helping hand."
http://patriotboy.blogspot.com/2009/10/suggestions-for-new-conservative-bible.html#links
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/10/6/790336/-OMG,-The-Bible-is-Socialist-:(
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/10/6/790207/-Satire:-Editors-notes-re:-Conservative-Bible-Project-Headquarters
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:00:07 -0700 (PDT), Judity <Judity01 at (no spam) aol.com>
wrote:
[quote:c29e7face2]I was watching the news, and two anchors were discussing the bible. It
seems, according to them, that a conservative group of highly educated
people are going to "edit" the bible. Among other changes, they want
to change pronouns to gender neutral.
I'm only familiar with the King James version and then only from what
I learned in years of Sunday school. Here is a link to the article
about the other bible. Do any of you own this one, and what do you
think of this upcoming revision?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32644719/ns/us_news-faith/
Judity[/quote:c29e7face2] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Samatha Hill -- take out TRASH to reply... |
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 7:10 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Judity wrote:
[quote:6f06485985]I was watching the news, and two anchors were discussing the bible. It
seems, according to them, that a conservative group of highly educated
people are going to "edit" the bible. Among other changes, they want
to change pronouns to gender neutral.
[/quote:6f06485985]
That has already been done.
I think that if the English language had nouns that had masculine and
feminine genders, as do Latin languages as well as others, there
wouldn't be so much of a stink about gender.
I have no problem with saying we are children of God rather than sons of
God, because that doesn't really change anything, but when they start
using gender-neutral pronouns to refer to Jesus Christ, I will draw the
line. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Old Doc, Old keypunch operator... |
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:06 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 6, 3:00 pm, Judity <Judit... at (no spam) aol.com> wrote:
[quote:4093b99b34]I was watching the news, and two anchors were discussing the bible. It
seems, according to them, that a conservative group of highly educated
people are going to "edit" the bible. Among other changes, they want
to change pronouns to gender neutral.
I'm only familiar with the King James version and then only from what
I learned in years of Sunday school. Here is a link to the article
about the other bible. Do any of you own this one, and what do you
think of this upcoming revision?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32644719/ns/us_news-faith/
Judity
[/quote:4093b99b34]
The original, of course, is not in English; and this includes the St.
James version.
My friend, a scholar, reads ancient greek, hebrew, aramaic and latin.
Every english version we have is a translation and, as the old saying
goes, To translate is to lie. The only way to truely know God's Word
is to learn to read it in the original. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Judity... |
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 12:21 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
((The only way to truely know God's Word
is to learn to read it in the original. ))
This makes me wonder what language God spoke in!
Too bad there weren't tape recorder or something like YouTube back
then to catch the actual events.
Judity |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Samatha Hill -- take out TRASH to reply... |
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 7:18 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Old Doc, Old keypunch operator wrote:
[quote:29306f50d1]
Every english version we have is a translation and, as the old saying
goes, To translate is to lie. The only way to truely know God's Word
is to learn to read it in the original.
[/quote:29306f50d1]
Maybe, but there are scholars who have translated God's Word into
different languages and tried to remain as true to the original
languages as possible, and there are those who have tried to update it
to make it more modern or whatever and not put a priority on accuracy. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Petro Gibraltar... |
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 7:17 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Old Doc, Old keypunch operator" <n1000101 at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:a297f6e8-7d9c-47b2-ac50-9c3244d2f83d at (no spam) m1g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 6, 3:00 pm, Judity <Judit... at (no spam) aol.com> wrote:
[quote:0deeb017d0]I was watching the news, and two anchors were discussing the bible. It
seems, according to them, that a conservative group of highly educated
people are going to "edit" the bible. Among other changes, they want
to change pronouns to gender neutral.
I'm only familiar with the King James version and then only from what
I learned in years of Sunday school. Here is a link to the article
about the other bible. Do any of you own this one, and what do you
think of this upcoming revision?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32644719/ns/us_news-faith/
Judity
[/quote:0deeb017d0]
The original, of course, is not in English; and this includes the St.
James version.
King James. He was no saint, by any definition. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Tue Nov 24, 2009 4:10 pm
|
|