 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Astrology Forum » XSforall You must comply Takedown Notice, Copyright... |
|
Page 3 of 4 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next |
|
| Author |
Message |
| WindsorFo... |
 Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 5:11 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
The True Edmond Wollmann wrote:
[quote:cd5ad3a3fa]On Oct 7, 1:48 pm, "WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.fox.use... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
Edmond Wollmann wrote:
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz wrote:
In <4ACC1033.1... at (no spam) earthlink.net>, on 10/06/2009
at 08:51 PM, Edmond Wollmann <arcturian... at (no spam) earthlink.net> said:
VIA email at Earthlink.net.
ROTF,LMAO! This isn't e-mail, bunky, and it isn't EL. Further, it has
nothing to do with net abuse.
This letter is official notification
Not unless you sent a letter somewhere relevant.
Please be advised that law requires you, as a service provider, to
"expeditiously remove or disable access to" the infringing
photographs upon receipt of this notice and that the effect of
noncompliance may result in your being liable for secondary
copyright infringement.
No. Ask your lawyer to explain to you what it actually says.
I have a good faith belief that use of the materials set forth below and
in the manner complained of here is not authorized by me, the copyright
holder, or by the law.
ROTF,LMAO!
I sent it to the corporate office, I know where to send it. Lame header
redirect thwarted.
Have you ever read the DMCA or had it explained?
He, he, he.
I am a published author, with a publishing company. I have been
published all over the world.
[/quote:cd5ad3a3fa]
So is Peewee Herman, that doesn't mean you know jiggldy-shit about
the law which is obvious from your posts here.
--
"You may have noticed that I continue to use the term
'open-carry' rather than "OC" This is avoid confusion
with Oleoresin Capsicum, a Latin term meaning 'Give me
some water, bitch. This sh*t is melting my eyeballs.'" - dawg23 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Edmond Wollmann... |
| Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 5:19 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 7, 4:11 pm, "WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.fox.use... at (no spam) gmail.com>
wrote:
[quote:bf21789eed]The True Edmond Wollmann wrote:
On Oct 7, 1:48 pm, "WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.fox.use... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
Edmond Wollmann wrote:
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz wrote:
In <4ACC1033.1... at (no spam) earthlink.net>, on 10/06/2009
at 08:51 PM, Edmond Wollmann <arcturian... at (no spam) earthlink.net> said:
VIA email at Earthlink.net.
ROTF,LMAO! This isn't e-mail, bunky, and it isn't EL. Further, it has
nothing to do with net abuse.
This letter is official notification
Not unless you sent a letter somewhere relevant.
Please be advised that law requires you, as a service provider, to
"expeditiously remove or disable access to" the infringing
photographs upon receipt of this notice and that the effect of
noncompliance may result in your being liable for secondary
copyright infringement.
No. Ask your lawyer to explain to you what it actually says.
I have a good faith belief that use of the materials set forth below and
in the manner complained of here is not authorized by me, the copyright
holder, or by the law.
ROTF,LMAO!
I sent it to the corporate office, I know where to send it. Lame header
redirect thwarted.
Have you ever read the DMCA or had it explained?
He, he, he.
I am a published author, with a publishing company. I have been
published all over the world.
So is Peewee Herman,
[/quote:bf21789eed]
He has a publishing company and copyrights from writing?? I never knew
that.
[quote:bf21789eed]that doesn't mean you know jiggldy-shit about
the law which is obvious from your posts here.
[/quote:bf21789eed]
Riiiiiiight. From the person who also was teaching me about credit
application rules and laws a few posts ago.
"Pride goeth before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall."
Proverbs 16:18
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| NOYFB... |
| Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 5:22 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Edmond Wollmann" <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:4ACC13E1.547 at (no spam) earthlink.net...
[quote:2f1b3142bd]NOYFB wrote:
USA Law is not enforcable in Holland, you would have to go to Amsterdam,
and
use the applicable Dutch or EU rules. So Fortune Teller, why not hop on
your
broom and scoot over to Holland
WRONG legal brilliant fuckhead, copyright law and the DMCA is
enforceable all over the world.
WRONG DEVINER!!! Under WIPO, you must go to the Nation (Holland) where the[/quote:2f1b3142bd]
infringement has occurred and seek civil remedies.
Quoting your posts on usenet, are considered "Fair Use", so you lose...
Thank's for playing, |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| NOYFB... |
| Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 5:25 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Edmond Wollmann" <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:4ACCC79F.657A at (no spam) earthlink.net...
[quote:4250074289]WindsorFox<[SS]> wrote:
Edmond Wollmann wrote:
USA Law is not enforcable in Holland, you would have to go to
Amsterdam, and
use the applicable Dutch or EU rules. So Fortune Teller, why not hop
on your
broom and scoot over to Holland
WRONG legal brilliant fuckhead, copyright law and the DMCA is
enforceable all over the world.
How pray tell do you plan on that? You can sue them and they can
ignore you, how is that enforceable?
I can bring you into court, are you a cox employee or are you just
representing yourself?
Actually, you would have to get a Subpeona to have Cox release their[/quote:4250074289]
records. It is unlikely that any court will grant a subpeona for calling you
a "poopy-head" |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| NOYFB... |
| Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 5:27 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.fox.usenet at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:haiud4$2di$3 at (no spam) posting2.glorb.com...
[quote:7701aad6f5]Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
Edmond Wollmann <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote in
news:4ACCC79F.657A at (no spam) earthlink.net:
I can bring you into court, are you a cox employee or are you just
representing yourself?
Threaten him some more, Pantyhead. I can't hear him shaking from here.
Court for what? He definitely knows not to whom he speaks  P
Maybe he can join forces with FSS and have a class action suit...[/quote:7701aad6f5] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| NOYFB... |
| Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 5:30 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Seth" <sethb at (no spam) panix.com> wrote in message
news:hain2b$fim$2 at (no spam) reader1.panix.com...
[quote:7748f4e752]In article
e1b5956a-5645-485c-8b0c-90886ac6f17a at (no spam) b18g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>,
The True Edmond Wollmann <EHWollmann at (no spam) aol.com> wrote:
You can't refuse certified mail that is properly delivered.
If I refuse it, then it isn't delivered.
And if you do,
I thought I couldn't. You don't get a Boursey Award for
Self-Contradiction, because you took two sentences to accomplish that
(and the standards are higher now).
Steve Boursy would biatch slap Edmond, but he based on his profile pic had[/quote:7748f4e752]
no arms.. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| NOYFB... |
| Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 5:33 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.fox.usenet at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:haitme$2cg$2 at (no spam) posting2.glorb.com...
[quote:b03368e905]
And there is no law that says you, I or anyone *has* to accept any
mail, certified or not.
Which is why subpeonas, warrants etc are normally handed in person by a[/quote:b03368e905]
Process Server or a Balliff |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| NOYFB... |
| Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 5:39 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"The True Edmond Wollmann" <EHWollmann at (no spam) aol.com> wrote in message
news:9f2f4e7b-cde6-4e11-97b0-38201e7911ca at (no spam) g23g2000vbr.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 7, 1:48 pm, "WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.fox.use... at (no spam) gmail.com>
wrote:
[quote:274fbc7ad9]
Have you ever read the DMCA or had it explained?
I am a published author, with a publishing company. I have been
published all over the world.
Yup many books of FICTION...[/quote:274fbc7ad9] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Fujikawa Yamamoto... |
| Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 6:23 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 07 Oct 2009, The True Edmond Wollmann <EHWollmann at (no spam) aol.com> posted
some
news:e1b5956a-5645-485c-8b0c-90886ac6f17a at (no spam) b18g2000vbl.googlegroups.com:
[quote:f245cf8b47]On Oct 7, 9:57 am, Cujo DeSockpuppet <c... at (no spam) petitmorte.net> wrote:
"WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.fox.use... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote
innews:haidae$te$
2 at (no spam) posting2.glorb.com:
Edmond Wollmann wrote:
USA Law is not enforcable in Holland, you would have to go to
Amsterdam, and use the applicable Dutch or EU rules. So Fortune
Teller, why not hop on your broom and scoot over to Holland
WRONG legal brilliant fuckhead, copyright law and the DMCA is
enforceable all over the world.
How pray tell do you plan on that? You can sue them and they ca
n
ignore you, how is that enforceable?
Given Edmo's considerable history with them, I think they already
refuse any mail from The Pantyhead.
You can't refuse certified mail that is properly delivered.
[/quote:f245cf8b47]
Sure you can. You just refuse to accept it.
[quote:f245cf8b47]And if you do, I will still pursue you.
[/quote:f245cf8b47]
Stalking intent noted.
[quote:f245cf8b47]You allowed me legal status by getting this fake lawsuit going, now I
can subpoena and depose anyone I think relevant, would you like to
tell us under oath why you can't leave me alone?
[/quote:f245cf8b47]
Your problem is your thinking.
[quote:f245cf8b47]Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/
[/quote:f245cf8b47] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| WindsorFo... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 7:24 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Edmond Wollmann wrote:
[quote:407b56bc50]On Oct 7, 4:11 pm, "WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.fox.use... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
The True Edmond Wollmann wrote:
On Oct 7, 1:48 pm, "WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.fox.use... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
Edmond Wollmann wrote:
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz wrote:
In <4ACC1033.1... at (no spam) earthlink.net>, on 10/06/2009
at 08:51 PM, Edmond Wollmann <arcturian... at (no spam) earthlink.net> said:
VIA email at Earthlink.net.
ROTF,LMAO! This isn't e-mail, bunky, and it isn't EL. Further, it has
nothing to do with net abuse.
This letter is official notification
Not unless you sent a letter somewhere relevant.
Please be advised that law requires you, as a service provider, to
"expeditiously remove or disable access to" the infringing
photographs upon receipt of this notice and that the effect of
noncompliance may result in your being liable for secondary
copyright infringement.
No. Ask your lawyer to explain to you what it actually says.
I have a good faith belief that use of the materials set forth below and
in the manner complained of here is not authorized by me, the copyright
holder, or by the law.
ROTF,LMAO!
I sent it to the corporate office, I know where to send it. Lame header
redirect thwarted.
Have you ever read the DMCA or had it explained?
He, he, he.
I am a published author, with a publishing company. I have been
published all over the world.
So is Peewee Herman,
He has a publishing company and copyrights from writing?? I never knew
that.
that doesn't mean you know jiggldy-shit about
the law which is obvious from your posts here.
Riiiiiiight. From the person who also was teaching me about credit
application rules and laws a few posts ago.
[/quote:407b56bc50]
Tried, you won't listen. I have a knowledge base that you don't and
I know things like, forging an admittedly abandoned email address does
not constitute identity theft and quoting your Usenet posts is not a
copy right violation. You never did point out where the DMCA violation
was on that smbtech page. Am I to assume you knowingly sent a false DMCA
complaint? Did you know doing so is as much a violation of the law than
the OC?
You're FOS and you and everyone here knows it, that's why they
constantly call you on it. And like a dumbass instead of saying ok, you
caught me and going away, you continue to try to BS them. You can not
bullshit a bullshitter and Cujo and Co. are at the top of their list.
After what you say is 12 years you should know you are NOT going to win
anything but ko0k awards in that battle.
--
..
All people have the right to stupidity
but some abuse the privilege. - Steve Linford |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Chris Krolczyk... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 1:36 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 7, 5:07 pm, The True Edmond Wollmann <EHWollm... at (no spam) aol.com>
wrote:
[quote:b92c5242d5]He, he, he.
I am a published author, with a publishing company. I have been
published all over the world.
[/quote:b92c5242d5]
So has *anyone else* who's posted to Usenet or has a web site,
you egomaniacal twat.
What's your point, other than proving how pointless your
whining and bitching on NANAU is? Do you actually think
that this is somehow going to convince either a Dutch
or American judge that your little fantasies concerning
international subpoena powers are real?
-Chris Krolczyk |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Chris Krolczyk... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 1:47 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 7, 10:19 pm, Edmond Wollmann <AArctophi... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
[quote:102bf7e859]On Oct 7, 4:11 pm, "WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.fox.use... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
The True Edmond Wollmann wrote:
He, he, he.
I am a published author, with a publishing company. I have been
published all over the world.
So is Peewee Herman,
He has a publishing company and copyrights from writing?? I never knew
that.
[/quote:102bf7e859]
I'm not going to waste my time reposting it, but I already pointed
out in news:<b6e8d0ea-844e-42c3-
a917-2f184107cfc8 at (no spam) r36g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
how utterly poinltess your bragging about this is.
But hey, just for fun, here it is once more, and with feeling:
the fact that you published *a book* says nothing about the
quality of the book, the truth of the author's claims or
anything else. You just published a book. Big deal. Kevin
Trudeau has published *more* than one, has done infomercials
and radio spots promoting them, and the only thing all of that
proves is that criminal assclowns with money can get all sorts
of garbage published. Is that the standard you aspire to?
-Chris Krolczyk |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Cujo DeSockpuppet... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 3:48 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Edmond Wollmann <AArctophilax at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in
news:b21434bd-79f6-4069-96a0-d17c0241de0f at (no spam) j19g2000vbp.googlegroups.com:
[quote:489fc60b57]On Oct 7, 4:11 pm, "WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.fox.use... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
The True Edmond Wollmann wrote:
On Oct 7, 1:48 pm, "WindsorFox<[SS]>"
windsor.fox.use... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Edmond Wollmann wrote:
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz wrote:
In <4ACC1033.1... at (no spam) earthlink.net>, on 10/06/2009
at 08:51 PM, Edmond Wollmann <arcturian... at (no spam) earthlink.net> sai
d:
VIA email at Earthlink.net.
ROTF,LMAO! This isn't e-mail, bunky, and it isn't EL. Further,
it ha
s
nothing to do with net abuse.
This letter is official notification
Not unless you sent a letter somewhere relevant.
Please be advised that law requires you, as a service provider,
to "expeditiously remove or disable access to" the infringing
photographs upon receipt of this notice and that the effect of
noncompliance may result in your being liable for secondary
copyright infringement.
No. Ask your lawyer to explain to you what it actually says.
I have a good faith belief that use of the materials set forth
belo
w and
in the manner complained of here is not authorized by me, the
copyr
ight
holder, or by the law.
ROTF,LMAO!
I sent it to the corporate office, I know where to send it. Lame
head
er
redirect thwarted.
Have you ever read the DMCA or had it explained?
He, he, he.
I am a published author, with a publishing company. I have been
published all over the world.
So is Peewee Herman,
He has a publishing company and copyrights from writing?? I never knew
that.
[/quote:489fc60b57]
you have a self-published piece of shit that no reputable publisher would
touch despite flogging it for years to them. The "publishing company'
that you claim to own has published exactly one book, the aformentioned
pice of shit.
[quote:489fc60b57]that doesn't mean you know jiggldy-shit about
the law which is obvious from your posts here.
Riiiiiiight. From the person who also was teaching me about credit
application rules and laws a few posts ago.
[/quote:489fc60b57]
No, it comes from your obvious stupidity about certified mail.
--
Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*,
alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy
Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S
award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse
Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895.
"I am entertaining, but not as a clown, but as a thinker who forces
others to think." - Edmo on a pre-meltdown rant. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Cujo DeSockpuppet... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 3:50 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Chris Krolczyk <arfiend2009 at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in news:5db13b8d-5f1a-4e45-
96e2-33aaac92627d at (no spam) h30g2000vbr.googlegroups.com:
[quote:89262022bf]On Oct 7, 5:07 pm, The True Edmond Wollmann <EHWollm... at (no spam) aol.com
wrote:
He, he, he.
I am a published author, with a publishing company. I have been
published all over the world.
So has *anyone else* who's posted to Usenet or has a web site,
you egomaniacal twat.
What's your point, other than proving how pointless your
whining and bitching on NANAU is? Do you actually think
that this is somehow going to convince either a Dutch
or American judge that your little fantasies concerning
international subpoena powers are real?
[/quote:89262022bf]
I'm still trying to figure out what the alleged DMCA is and where it
could be found. Ed appears to be going with the "fling shit and see what
sticks". Anyone doing due diligence on his claims would laugh at Ed if
they didn't simply ignore the kook.
--
Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*,
alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy
Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S
award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse
Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895.
"I can see why you have difficulty understanding why I am a babe
magnet" - Edmo understates the facts. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Chris... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 2:10 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Cujo DeSockpuppet" <cujo at (no spam) petitmorte.net> wrote in message
news:ham4sj$633$2 at (no spam) blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
[quote:deba864322]Chris Krolczyk <arfiend2009 at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in news:5db13b8d-5f1a-4e45-
96e2-33aaac92627d at (no spam) h30g2000vbr.googlegroups.com:
On Oct 7, 5:07 pm, The True Edmond Wollmann <EHWollm... at (no spam) aol.com
wrote:
He, he, he.
I am a published author, with a publishing company. I have been
published all over the world.
So has *anyone else* who's posted to Usenet or has a web site,
you egomaniacal twat.
What's your point, other than proving how pointless your
whining and bitching on NANAU is? Do you actually think
that this is somehow going to convince either a Dutch
or American judge that your little fantasies concerning
international subpoena powers are real?
I'm still trying to figure out what the alleged DMCA is and where it
could be found. Ed appears to be going with the "fling shit and see what
sticks". Anyone doing due diligence on his claims would laugh at Ed if
they didn't simply ignore the kook.
[/quote:deba864322]
He seems to be claiming copyright on his Usenet posts. :-)
Stupid is as stupid does - Forest Gump |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Wed Dec 02, 2009 1:24 am
|
|