Main Page | Report this Page
Science Forum Index  »  Astrology Forum  »  Birth...
Page 3 of 3    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3

Birth...

Author Message
Chris...
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 2:35 pm
Guest
"Spamkiller" <alchameth13 at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:a29f0220-d68a-431a-a40b-8b99947a41f8 at (no spam) z34g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 8, 4:55 am, "Chris" <a... at (no spam) grevillec.freeserve.co.ukNOSPAM>
wrote:
[quote:625c0e1f7d]
..> > Chris wrote:

..> >> "WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.fox.use... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message[/quote:625c0e1f7d]
..> >>news:haidir$te$3 at (no spam) posting2.glorb.com...
[quote:625c0e1f7d]
..>> >> > You know, I learned a valuable piece of info in college psychology,[/quote:625c0e1f7d]
..>> >> > since the 4oz glass is completely full, he does not understand his
lack
[quote:625c0e1f7d]of
resources compared to the full 8oz glass.

Is his 8 oz glass running at half empty or half full?

Nice metaphor tho'.

Do you have information regarding my lawsuit? Would you like to testify
or are you just stupid?
[/quote:625c0e1f7d]

[quote:625c0e1f7d]There is plenty of proof that you are appear to be an idiot.
Just Google on your name.
[/quote:625c0e1f7d]
Morph to avoid killfiles noted

[quote:625c0e1f7d]Every person has their own belief system which they create from
psychological justification and defense mechanisms (and the less
aware, the more this is true) and within those belief structures are
the reinforcing logic that justifies what they already believe is true
to comfort their insecurities and elevate their identity (and the more
inferior they feel the stronger this effect). Therefore, it is
strongly believing is seeing, not seeing is believing in cases such as
yours.
[/quote:625c0e1f7d]
For someone of such a limited intellect, you use a lot of big words. Where
did you copy them from? I notice you didn't acknowledge their copyright.

[quote:625c0e1f7d]And because there is no depth to the thinking processes of simpletons
and spinics like you, you see only things that reinforce and comfort
your ego, and deny all evidence that indicates you are the one with
defective rationale and uncritical thinking processes. This is why you
will remain mediocre.
[/quote:625c0e1f7d]
Ah! Your usual tactic of insults. You are so predictable.
BTW, in this country, you have to have a licence and qualifications to
practice here. Do you have one?
I can see by a Google search that a number of people consider you a
charlatan. Are you?

[quote:625c0e1f7d]"Bigotry is the sacred disease."
Heraclitus
[/quote:625c0e1f7d]
Ed Woolman is a kook.
Homer

(Kooky copyright removed)


--
Cult leader Pyotr Kuznetsov became depressed after his prophesy about the
world ending in May 2008, that he tried to commit suicide by hitting himself
on the head with a log.
 
Cujo DeSockpuppet...
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 3:55 pm
Guest
Spamkiller <alchameth13 at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in
news:a29f0220-d68a-431a-a40b-8b99947a41f8 at (no spam) z34g2000vbl.googlegroups.com:

[quote:9da53cc54a]On Oct 8, 4:55 am, "Chris" <a... at (no spam) grevillec.freeserve.co.ukNOSPAM
wrote:
"Edmond Wollmann" <arcturian... at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote in message

news:4ACCC945.72B0 at (no spam) earthlink.net...





Chris wrote:

"WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.fox.use... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:haidir$te$3 at (no spam) posting2.glorb.com...
Edmond Wollmann wrote:
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
Edmond Wollmann <arcturian... at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote in
news:4ACB7BAC.2DF5 at (no spam) earthlink.net:

Your client continues to post[SPANK!]
Q. Why did Edmo create a reality where he's powerless to stop
this
?

Why would I want to interfere with you leaving an embarassing
recor
d
of
harassment, stupidity and wasting your entire 12 years so far
calli
ng
a
person 100 times your intellect a kook 18,000,000,000,000 times
and enough legal fodder for me should I decide to sue the fuck
out of y
ou
for life?

   You know, I learned a valuable piece of info in college psych
ology,
since the 4oz glass is completely full, he does not understand
his l
ack
of
resources compared to the full 8oz glass.

Is his 8 oz glass running at half empty or half full?

Nice metaphor tho'.

Do you have information regarding my lawsuit? Would you like to
testify or are you just stupid?


There is plenty of proof that you are appear to be an idiot.
Just Google on your name.

Chris

Every person has their own belief system
[/quote:9da53cc54a]
Even kooks like you, Pantyhead.

[quote:9da53cc54a]which they create from
psychological justification and defense mechanisms (and the less
aware, the more this is true) and within those belief structures are
the reinforcing logic that justifies what they already believe is true
to comfort their insecurities and elevate their identity (and the more
inferior they feel the stronger this effect). Therefore, it is
strongly believing is seeing, not seeing is believing in cases such as
yours.
[/quote:9da53cc54a]
Nice kookrant. I ran it through my KookBabbleFish(tm) tool and it came
back "Pantyhead is a fool".

[quote:9da53cc54a]And because there is no depth to the thinking processes of simpletons
and spinics like you,
[/quote:9da53cc54a]
Not much depth is required when dealing with loons like yourself,
Eddieeeeeeeeee. You're an incoherent freak who thinks big words will
obfuscate your semantically invalid assumptions. They don't.

[quote:9da53cc54a]you see only things that reinforce and comfort
your ego, and deny all evidence that indicates you are the one with
defective rationale and uncritical thinking processes. This is why you
will remain mediocre.
[/quote:9da53cc54a]
You could only aspire to mediocre in your wildest dreams.

--
Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*,
alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy
Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S
award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse
Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895.
"Tell me people what court would find me guilty of ANYthing?"
- Convicted criminal Edmo after being convicted.
 
Edmond Wollmann...
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 9:17 pm
Guest
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
[quote:eca821c219]
Spamkiller <alchameth13 at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in
news:a29f0220-d68a-431a-a40b-8b99947a41f8 at (no spam) z34g2000vbl.googlegroups.com:

On Oct 8, 4:55 am, "Chris" <a... at (no spam) grevillec.freeserve.co.ukNOSPAM
wrote:
"Edmond Wollmann" <arcturian... at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote in message

news:4ACCC945.72B0 at (no spam) earthlink.net...





Chris wrote:

"WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.fox.use... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:haidir$te$3 at (no spam) posting2.glorb.com...
Edmond Wollmann wrote:
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
Edmond Wollmann <arcturian... at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote in
news:4ACB7BAC.2DF5 at (no spam) earthlink.net:

Your client continues to post[SPANK!]
Q. Why did Edmo create a reality where he's powerless to stop
this
?

Why would I want to interfere with you leaving an embarassing
recor
d
of
harassment, stupidity and wasting your entire 12 years so far
calli
ng
a
person 100 times your intellect a kook 18,000,000,000,000 times
and enough legal fodder for me should I decide to sue the fuck
out of y
ou
for life?

You know, I learned a valuable piece of info in college psych
ology,
since the 4oz glass is completely full, he does not understand
his l
ack
of
resources compared to the full 8oz glass.

Is his 8 oz glass running at half empty or half full?

Nice metaphor tho'.

Do you have information regarding my lawsuit? Would you like to
testify or are you just stupid?


There is plenty of proof that you are appear to be an idiot.
Just Google on your name.

Chris

Every person has their own belief system
which they create from
psychological justification and defense mechanisms (and the less
aware, the more this is true) and within those belief structures are
the reinforcing logic that justifies what they already believe is true
to comfort their insecurities and elevate their identity (and the more
inferior they feel the stronger this effect). Therefore, it is
strongly believing is seeing, not seeing is believing in cases such as
yours.

And because there is no depth to the thinking processes of simpletons
and spinics like you,

Not much depth is required when dealing with loons like yourself,
Eddieeeeeeeeee. You're an incoherent freak who thinks big words will
obfuscate your semantically invalid assumptions. They don't.
[/quote:eca821c219]
No, I don't think correct linguistics will obfuscate your "pantyhead"
vocabulary, you are correct there. I wouldn't want to get you off track
now.
--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/
 
Edmond Wollmann...
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 9:17 pm
Guest
Chris wrote:
[quote:2fdd5bda93]
"Spamkiller" <alchameth13 at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:a29f0220-d68a-431a-a40b-8b99947a41f8 at (no spam) z34g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 8, 4:55 am, "Chris" <a... at (no spam) grevillec.freeserve.co.ukNOSPAM
wrote:

.> > Chris wrote:

.> >> "WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.fox.use... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
.> >>news:haidir$te$3 at (no spam) posting2.glorb.com...

.>> >> > You know, I learned a valuable piece of info in college psychology,
.>> >> > since the 4oz glass is completely full, he does not understand his
lack
of
resources compared to the full 8oz glass.

Is his 8 oz glass running at half empty or half full?

Nice metaphor tho'.

Do you have information regarding my lawsuit? Would you like to testify
or are you just stupid?

There is plenty of proof that you are appear to be an idiot.
Just Google on your name.

Morph to avoid killfiles noted

Every person has their own belief system which they create from
psychological justification and defense mechanisms (and the less
aware, the more this is true) and within those belief structures are
the reinforcing logic that justifies what they already believe is true
to comfort their insecurities and elevate their identity (and the more
inferior they feel the stronger this effect). Therefore, it is
strongly believing is seeing, not seeing is believing in cases such as
yours.

For someone of such a limited intellect, you use a lot of big words. Where
did you copy them from? I notice you didn't acknowledge their copyright.

And because there is no depth to the thinking processes of simpletons
and spinics like you, you see only things that reinforce and comfort
your ego, and deny all evidence that indicates you are the one with
defective rationale and uncritical thinking processes. This is why you
will remain mediocre.

Ah! Your usual tactic of insults. You are so predictable.
[/quote:2fdd5bda93]
I see, you find truth to be insulting, oh well, not my problem.
--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/
 
Sofa King...
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:49 am
Guest
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:

[quote:aaa94eb7fa]Spamkiller <alchameth13 at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in
news:a29f0220-d68a-431a-a40b-8b99947a41f8 at (no spam) z34g2000vbl.googlegroups.com:

On Oct 8, 4:55 am, "Chris" <a... at (no spam) grevillec.freeserve.co.ukNOSPAM
wrote:
"Edmond Wollmann" <arcturian... at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote in message

news:4ACCC945.72B0 at (no spam) earthlink.net...





Chris wrote:

"WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.fox.use... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:haidir$te$3 at (no spam) posting2.glorb.com...
Edmond Wollmann wrote:
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
Edmond Wollmann <arcturian... at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote in
news:4ACB7BAC.2DF5 at (no spam) earthlink.net:

Your client continues to post[SPANK!]
Q. Why did Edmo create a reality where he's powerless to stop
this
?

Why would I want to interfere with you leaving an embarassing
recor
d
of
harassment, stupidity and wasting your entire 12 years so far
calli
ng
a
person 100 times your intellect a kook 18,000,000,000,000 times
and enough legal fodder for me should I decide to sue the fuck
out of y
ou
for life?

   You know, I learned a valuable piece of info in college psych
ology,
since the 4oz glass is completely full, he does not understand
his l
ack
of
resources compared to the full 8oz glass.

Is his 8 oz glass running at half empty or half full?

Nice metaphor tho'.

Do you have information regarding my lawsuit? Would you like to
testify or are you just stupid?


There is plenty of proof that you are appear to be an idiot.
Just Google on your name.

Chris

Every person has their own belief system

Even kooks like you, Pantyhead.

which they create from
psychological justification and defense mechanisms (and the less
aware, the more this is true) and within those belief structures are
the reinforcing logic that justifies what they already believe is true
to comfort their insecurities and elevate their identity (and the more
inferior they feel the stronger this effect). Therefore, it is
strongly believing is seeing, not seeing is believing in cases such as
yours.

Nice kookrant. I ran it through my KookBabbleFish(tm) tool and it came
back "Pantyhead is a fool".
[/quote:aaa94eb7fa]
yes. because you live in a fuckin comic book.

<remainder flushed>
 
Chris Krolczyk...
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 1:22 pm
Guest
On Oct 12, 10:17 pm, Edmond Wollmann <arcturian... at (no spam) earthlink.net>
wrote:

[quote:8e8aad2873]No, I don't think correct linguistics will obfuscate your "pantyhead"
vocabulary,
[/quote:8e8aad2873]
Ah. Not fond of that word, are you?

I suppose if Cujo just came out and called you
a egotistical, neurotic, dishonest, gutless,
dishonorable and ultimately forgettable sack
of shit he'd be a bit more descriptive, but
"pantyhead" is more to the point.

BTW, how's your "complaint" to Covad going?
Still as insubstantial as ever, is it?

-Chris Krolczyk
 
Chris Krolczyk...
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 1:26 pm
Guest
On Oct 12, 10:17 pm, Edmond Wollmann <arcturian... at (no spam) earthlink.net>
wrote:
[quote:f3ccbf9093]Chris wrote:

"Spamkiller" <alchamet... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:a29f0220-d68a-431a-a40b-8b99947a41f8 at (no spam) z34g2000vbl.googlegroups.com....
On Oct 8, 4:55 am, "Chris" <a... at (no spam) grevillec.freeserve.co.ukNOSPAM
wrote:

.> > Chris wrote:

.> >> "WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.fox.use... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
.> >>news:haidir$te$3 at (no spam) posting2.glorb.com...

.>> >> > You know, I learned a valuable piece of info in college psychology,
.>> >> > since the 4oz glass is completely full, he does not understand his
lack
of
resources compared to the full 8oz glass.

Is his 8 oz glass running at half empty or half full?

Nice metaphor tho'.

Do you have information regarding my lawsuit? Would you like to testify
or are you just stupid?

There is plenty of proof that you are appear to be an idiot.
Just Google on your name.

Morph to avoid killfiles noted

Every person has their own belief system which they create from
psychological justification and defense mechanisms (and the less
aware, the more this is true) and within those belief structures are
the reinforcing logic that justifies what they already believe is true
to comfort their insecurities and elevate their identity (and the more
inferior they feel the stronger this effect). Therefore, it is
strongly believing is seeing, not seeing is believing in cases such as
yours.

For someone of such a limited intellect, you use a lot of big words. Where
did you copy them from? I notice you didn't acknowledge their copyright..

And because there is no depth to the thinking processes of simpletons
and spinics like you, you see only things that reinforce and comfort
your ego, and deny all evidence that indicates you are the one with
defective rationale and uncritical thinking processes. This is why you
will remain mediocre.

Ah! Your usual tactic of insults. You are so predictable.

I see, you find truth to be insulting, oh well, not my problem.
[/quote:f3ccbf9093]
Found of snipping a thing or two, are we?

[quote:f3ccbf9093]BTW, in this country, you have to have a licence and qualifications to
practice here. Do you have one?

I can see by a Google search that a number of people consider you a
charlatan. Are you?
[/quote:f3ccbf9093]
Well, shucks. Selective outrage rears its ugly
head yet again. The other Chris is right concerning
your predictability. And before you make an ass of
yourself by accusing someone else of being a sock (!),
I'm not him.

-Chris Krolczyk
 
Chris Krolczyk...
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 2:21 pm
Guest
On Oct 12, 10:17 pm, Edmond Wollmann <arcturian... at (no spam) earthlink.net>
wrote:
[quote:db3c5626ee]Chris wrote:

Ah! Your usual tactic of insults. You are so predictable.

I see, you find truth to be insulting, oh well, not my problem.
[/quote:db3c5626ee]
Fond of snipping a thing or two, are we?

Here's a couple of things you ignored in
your search for TRVTH:

[quote:db3c5626ee]BTW, in this country, you have to have a licence and qualifications to
practice here. Do you have one?

I can see by a Google search that a number of people consider you a
charlatan. Are you?
[/quote:db3c5626ee]
Well, shucks. Selective outrage rears its ugly
head yet again. The other Chris is right concerning
your predictability. And before you make an ass of
yourself by accusing someone else of being a sock (!),
I'm not him.

-Chris Krolczyk
 
Chris...
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 1:39 pm
Guest
"Edmond Wollmann" <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:4AD3F152.2DA9 at (no spam) earthlink.net...
[quote:3e7e02e5cc]Chris wrote:

"Spamkiller" <alchameth13 at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:a29f0220-d68a-431a-a40b-8b99947a41f8 at (no spam) z34g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 8, 4:55 am, "Chris" <a... at (no spam) grevillec.freeserve.co.ukNOSPAM
wrote:

.> > Chris wrote:


Morph to avoid killfiles noted

Every person has their own belief system which they create from
psychological justification and defense mechanisms (and the less
aware, the more this is true) and within those belief structures are
the reinforcing logic that justifies what they already believe is true
to comfort their insecurities and elevate their identity (and the more
inferior they feel the stronger this effect). Therefore, it is
strongly believing is seeing, not seeing is believing in cases such as
yours.

For someone of such a limited intellect, you use a lot of big words.
Where
did you copy them from? I notice you didn't acknowledge their copyright.

And because there is no depth to the thinking processes of simpletons
and spinics like you, you see only things that reinforce and comfort
your ego, and deny all evidence that indicates you are the one with
defective rationale and uncritical thinking processes. This is why you
will remain mediocre.

[/quote:3e7e02e5cc]
If being famous is to be an author who a reviewer said about their book
"This book should not be put down lightly, it should be thrown with great
force", I'll settle for mediocrity.

[quote:3e7e02e5cc]Ah! Your usual tactic of insults. You are so predictable.

I see, you find truth to be insulting, oh well, not my problem.
[/quote:3e7e02e5cc]
You insult me by still breathing, even if you do it through your mouth.
However, despite your snipping, how about answering some of my questions. If
you can.

BTW, I am not a disbeliever in astrology, it's just that I dislike
charlatans and crooks.

Chris Sock.

Chris





[quote:3e7e02e5cc]--
Edmond H. Wolfman P.M.A.F.A.
© 2900 Altair Pubications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.bistroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.bistroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthling.net/~sockarcturianone/[/quote:3e7e02e5cc]
 
Chris...
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 1:46 pm
Guest
"Chris Krolczyk" <arfiend2009 at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c4e51072-5595-4aac-b080-a4a0d1a90b47 at (no spam) m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 12, 10:17 pm, Edmond Wollmann <arcturian... at (no spam) earthlink.net>
wrote:
[quote:fe21e02889]Chris wrote:

Ah! Your usual tactic of insults. You are so predictable.

I see, you find truth to be insulting, oh well, not my problem.
[/quote:fe21e02889]
Fond of snipping a thing or two, are we?

Here's a couple of things you ignored in
your search for TRVTH:

[quote:fe21e02889]BTW, in this country, you have to have a licence and qualifications to
practice here. Do you have one?

I can see by a Google search that a number of people consider you a
charlatan. Are you?
[/quote:fe21e02889]
Well, shucks. Selective outrage rears its ugly
head yet again. The other Chris is right concerning
your predictability. And before you make an ass of
yourself by accusing someone else of being a sock (!),
I'm not him.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Well said, Sir, but I'm not that good that I needs quoting twice.
And I'm pretty certain I ain't got my hand around Uranus, so you ain't my
sock either

Chris
 
Sofa King...
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 3:02 pm
Guest
Chris wrote:

[quote:f934c77b45]"Edmond Wollmann" <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:4AD3F152.2DA9 at (no spam) earthlink.net...
Chris wrote:

"Spamkiller" <alchameth13 at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:a29f0220-d68a-431a-a40b-8b99947a41f8 at (no spam) z34g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 8, 4:55 am, "Chris" <a... at (no spam) grevillec.freeserve.co.ukNOSPAM
wrote:

.> > Chris wrote:


Morph to avoid killfiles noted

Every person has their own belief system which they create from
psychological justification and defense mechanisms (and the less
aware, the more this is true) and within those belief structures are
the reinforcing logic that justifies what they already believe is true
to comfort their insecurities and elevate their identity (and the more
inferior they feel the stronger this effect). Therefore, it is
strongly believing is seeing, not seeing is believing in cases such as
yours.

For someone of such a limited intellect, you use a lot of big words.
Where
did you copy them from? I notice you didn't acknowledge their copyright.

And because there is no depth to the thinking processes of simpletons
and spinics like you, you see only things that reinforce and comfort
your ego, and deny all evidence that indicates you are the one with
defective rationale and uncritical thinking processes. This is why you
will remain mediocre.


If being famous is to be an author who a reviewer said about their book
"This book should not be put down lightly, it should be thrown with great
force", I'll settle for mediocrity.
[/quote:f934c77b45]
of course you will. who doubted that?
 
 
Page 3 of 3    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Dec 06, 2009 6:03 am