 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Physics Forum » Editor of Physical Review A, Dr Gordon W.F. Drake does... |
|
Page 10 of 16 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11 ... 14, 15, 16 Next |
|
| Author |
Message |
| ajay... |
 Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:39 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 27, 6:34 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
[quote]"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:12180349-a918-4c71-b5fb-ff8ae1f5efb4 at (no spam) n22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 5:36 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:88e8dcd3-1fd7-4741-9d74-41d3756ca082 at (no spam) p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com....
On Oct 27, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bbd4e288-8223-460c-8541-b01ce80e8a63 at (no spam) j4g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 4:14 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:92b88413-f59b-4457-82b6-0288751f1840 at (no spam) p9g2000vbl.googlegroups..com...
On Oct 26, 4:22 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:26e25ae3-b3c7-48f4-9ded-79ac2088f30e at (no spam) 33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 25, 7:15 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:24042f47-0c84-480c-9ff5-456fe39c6372 at (no spam) l31g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 25, 4:28 am, tomy tomy <tomytomy... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 24, 6:07 pm, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 24, 5:13 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ef4961ff-3ab3-4d03-8f67-21efd534376e at (no spam) 33g2000vbe..googlegroups.com...
On Oct 23, 8:04 pm, doug <x... at (no spam) xx.com> wrote:
ajay wrote:
On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug <x... at (no spam) xx.com> wrote:
ajay wrote:
--------
To
Inertial
How I can believe you , when did not form
correct
eqaution
for
pharse
''The high frequency photon is now passed
through a
machine
that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in
its
ground
state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of
frequency f ''
There are three energies here , but you say 4..
there is no left over energy as you have
claimed.
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
Do you have any clue how silly you look with your
constant
whining? Drake explained your mistake. You cannot
understand
it. That is not his problem, it is yours. Get
over
it.-
Hide
quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
---------
To
Doug
Drake has simply shown his limitations in
understanding
of
LAW
OF
CONSERVATION OF ENERGY.
No, he was explaining to you why you do not
conserve
energy.
You having tantrums here does not help your
credibility
here
which is at zero.
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequotedtext-
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
-------------
To
Doug
Under what conditions energy is conseved?
You mean you don't know? And you're submitting
papers?
Your
theory
(that A
is not always 1) results in energy not being conserved
where
it
should be.
Your theory breaks conservation laws. Your theory is
refuted.-
Hide
quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
--------------
To
Doug
Give specific reply so that we may proceed further
Under what conditions energy is conseved?
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
interesting- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
-------
To
Doug
Give specific reply so that we may proceed further
There is no 'further' to proceed. Drake has already
explained
it
to
you.
We here have explained how he is correct and how you have
misread
what
he
wrote. All have shown that your theory is wrong.- Hide
quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
To
Doug
Can you define Law of Conservation of Energy and which
conditions
it
holds?
Yes .. but that would serve no purpose. Drake has explained
nicely
why
your
theory results in lack of conservation of energy (indeed, it
generates
energy from nothing when A is not 1). If you don't understand
conservation
of energy, you should not be publishing physics. If you do, you
don't
need
to ask me to explain it to you. Stop wasting everyone's time.-
Hide
quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
----------
To
Inertial
Like 8th class math, Dr Drake has misinterpretted Law of
Conservation
of Energy.
No
He has applied Law of Conservation of energy, to NON-ISOLATED
SYETEM.
No
The value of 'A' has been calculated
simply implies the condition, when LAW OF COSERVATION OF ENERGY
HOLDS
good to ISOLATED SYSTEM .
Then A must be 1. Your theory is refuted.
Here condition is A=1, it has nothing to do with E=Ac^2m.
If we apply E=Ac^2m , to isolated system then results are OK..
When A = 1
Recently I have replied him in 15 page reply.
Poor bastard .. you are just being a pathetic pain in the arse
I am also sending the
letter to other officials of American Physical Society,
so the they may also understand his high handedness and misuse of
office and bad name he os getting to APS , New York
They will all see what an idiot you are. Good.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
-------
To
INERTIAL
Let us come to point number 1.
I have written that
DRAKE has applied Law of Conservation of energy, to NON-ISOLATED
SYETEM.
I re-assert it.
Then you are wrong twice
You said NO
And I'll say it again
Can you justify your wrong claim defining ISOLATED SYATEM , NON-
ISOLTED SYSTEM and Law of Conservation of Energy?
It is your claim that is wrong. I am not the one making claims.
Yours is wrong, as Drake clearly demonstrated. If energy is to be
conserved, A = 1, if A is not 1 then energy is not conserved.
You clearly do not understand the physics involved. Perhaps you are
blinded
by your prejudices and over-inflated ego, as are most crackpots such
as
yourself.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
----------
To
Inertial
Drake has applied Law of Conservation of Energy to NON-ISOLATED
SYSTEM.
Nope
The mathematical equations ALLOWS us to calculate the conditions
when system is isolated.
The system is ISOLATED when A=1,thus energy is conserved.
When (A>1, A<1) then system is NON-ISOLTED and Law of Conservation of
Energy is not applicable.
So the law only applies when you want it to apply.
Hence in this case (A>1, A <1 , system is NON-ISOLATED ),
Wrong
the Law of
Conservation of
Energy is not applicable. Thus there is no possibility any conclusion
in this regard. It is simple.
Yes .. you're an annoying little idiot.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
-----
To
Inertial
The law of Conservation of Energy holds good for ISOLATED SYSTEM.
Are you still here whining and complaining? Get a life- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
[/quote]
---------
To
Inertial
The law of Conservation of Energy holds good for ISOLATED SYSTEM.
If it applied to NON-ISOLATED SYSTEM,then we can calculate the
conditions
under which it becomes ISOLATED.
AJAY SHARMA www.AjayOnLine.us |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| ajay... |
| Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 12:53 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 28, 2:37 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
[quote]"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5251bec5-f96d-4665-aa1b-898c9a3e7829 at (no spam) s15g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 6:34 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:12180349-a918-4c71-b5fb-ff8ae1f5efb4 at (no spam) n22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com....
On Oct 27, 5:36 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:88e8dcd3-1fd7-4741-9d74-41d3756ca082 at (no spam) p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bbd4e288-8223-460c-8541-b01ce80e8a63 at (no spam) j4g2000yqe.googlegroups..com...
On Oct 27, 4:14 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:92b88413-f59b-4457-82b6-0288751f1840 at (no spam) p9g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 26, 4:22 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:26e25ae3-b3c7-48f4-9ded-79ac2088f30e at (no spam) 33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 25, 7:15 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:24042f47-0c84-480c-9ff5-456fe39c6372 at (no spam) l31g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 25, 4:28 am, tomy tomy <tomytomy... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 24, 6:07 pm, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 24, 5:13 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ef4961ff-3ab3-4d03-8f67-21efd534376e at (no spam) 33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 23, 8:04 pm, doug <x... at (no spam) xx.com> wrote:
ajay wrote:
On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug <x... at (no spam) xx.com> wrote:
ajay wrote:
--------
To
Inertial
How I can believe you , when did not form
correct
eqaution
for
pharse
''The high frequency photon is now passed
through a
machine
that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in
its
ground
state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon
of
frequency f ''
There are three energies here , but you say
4.
there is no left over energy as you have
claimed.
Ajay Sharma www..AjayOnLine.us
Do you have any clue how silly you look with
your
constant
whining? Drake explained your mistake. You
cannot
understand
it. That is not his problem, it is yours. Get
over
it.-
Hide
quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
---------
To
Doug
Drake has simply shown his limitations in
understanding
of
LAW
OF
CONSERVATION OF ENERGY.
No, he was explaining to you why you do not
conserve
energy.
You having tantrums here does not help your
credibility
here
which is at zero.
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequotedtext-
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
-------------
To
Doug
Under what conditions energy is conseved?
You mean you don't know? And you're submitting
papers?
Your
theory
(that A
is not always 1) results in energy not being
conserved
where
it
should be.
Your theory breaks conservation laws. Your theory
is
refuted.-
Hide
quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
--------------
To
Doug
Give specific reply so that we may proceed further
Under what conditions energy is conseved?
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
interesting- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
-------
To
Doug
Give specific reply so that we may proceed further
There is no 'further' to proceed. Drake has already
explained
it
to
you.
We here have explained how he is correct and how you have
misread
what
he
wrote. All have shown that your theory is wrong.- Hide
quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
To
Doug
Can you define Law of Conservation of Energy and which
conditions
it
holds?
Yes .. but that would serve no purpose. Drake has explained
nicely
why
your
theory results in lack of conservation of energy (indeed, it
generates
energy from nothing when A is not 1). If you don't
understand
conservation
of energy, you should not be publishing physics. If you do,
you
don't
need
to ask me to explain it to you. Stop wasting everyone's
time.-
Hide
quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
----------
To
Inertial
Like 8th class math, Dr Drake has misinterpretted Law of
Conservation
of Energy.
No
He has applied Law of Conservation of energy, to NON-ISOLATED
SYETEM.
No
The value of 'A' has been calculated
simply implies the condition, when LAW OF COSERVATION OF
ENERGY
HOLDS
good to ISOLATED SYSTEM .
Then A must be 1. Your theory is refuted.
Here condition is A=1, it has nothing to do with E=Ac^2m.
If we apply E=Ac^2m , to isolated system then results are OK.
When A = 1
Recently I have replied him in 15 page reply.
Poor bastard .. you are just being a pathetic pain in the arse
I am also sending the
letter to other officials of American Physical Society,
so the they may also understand his high handedness and misuse
of
office and bad name he os getting to APS , New York
They will all see what an idiot you are. Good.- Hide quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
-------
To
INERTIAL
Let us come to point number 1.
I have written that
DRAKE has applied Law of Conservation of energy, to NON-ISOLATED
SYETEM.
I re-assert it.
Then you are wrong twice
You said NO
And I'll say it again
Can you justify your wrong claim defining ISOLATED SYATEM , NON-
ISOLTED SYSTEM and Law of Conservation of Energy?
It is your claim that is wrong. I am not the one making claims.
Yours is wrong, as Drake clearly demonstrated. If energy is to be
conserved, A = 1, if A is not 1 then energy is not conserved.
You clearly do not understand the physics involved. Perhaps you
are
blinded
by your prejudices and over-inflated ego, as are most crackpots
such
as
yourself.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
----------
To
Inertial
Drake has applied Law of Conservation of Energy to NON-ISOLATED
SYSTEM.
Nope
The mathematical equations ALLOWS us to calculate the conditions
when system is isolated.
The system is ISOLATED when A=1,thus energy is conserved.
When (A>1, A<1) then system is NON-ISOLTED and Law of Conservation
of
Energy is not applicable.
So the law only applies when you want it to apply.
Hence in this case (A>1, A <1 , system is NON-ISOLATED ),
Wrong
the Law of
Conservation of
Energy is not applicable. Thus there is no possibility any
conclusion
in this regard. It is simple.
Yes .. you're an annoying little idiot.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
-----
To
Inertial
The law of Conservation of Energy holds good for ISOLATED SYSTEM.
Are you still here whining and complaining? Get a life- Hide quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
---------
To
Inertial
The law of Conservation of Energy holds good for ISOLATED SYSTEM.
If it applied to NON-ISOLATED SYSTEM,then we can calculate the
conditions
under which it becomes ISOLATED.
[/quote]
-------
To
Inertial
The understanding of defintion of Law of Conservation of Energy
is absolutely necessary in this regard.
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| ajay... |
| Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 4:00 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 28, 4:50 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
[quote]"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9ccf4809-6d9b-4ac6-a229-1c372b4bdb8c at (no spam) k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 28, 2:37 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5251bec5-f96d-4665-aa1b-898c9a3e7829 at (no spam) s15g2000yqs.googlegroups.com....
On Oct 27, 6:34 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:12180349-a918-4c71-b5fb-ff8ae1f5efb4 at (no spam) n22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 5:36 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:88e8dcd3-1fd7-4741-9d74-41d3756ca082 at (no spam) p8g2000yqb.googlegroups..com...
On Oct 27, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bbd4e288-8223-460c-8541-b01ce80e8a63 at (no spam) j4g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 4:14 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:92b88413-f59b-4457-82b6-0288751f1840 at (no spam) p9g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 26, 4:22 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:26e25ae3-b3c7-48f4-9ded-79ac2088f30e at (no spam) 33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 25, 7:15 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:24042f47-0c84-480c-9ff5-456fe39c6372 at (no spam) l31g2000vbp..googlegroups.com...
On Oct 25, 4:28 am, tomy tomy <tomytomy... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 24, 6:07 pm, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 24, 5:13 am, "Inertial"
relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in
message
news:ef4961ff-3ab3-4d03-8f67-21efd534376e at (no spam) 33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 23, 8:04 pm, doug <x... at (no spam) xx.com> wrote:
ajay wrote:
On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug <x... at (no spam) xx.com
wrote:
ajay wrote:
--------
To
Inertial
How I can believe you , when did not form
correct
eqaution
for
pharse
''The high frequency photon is now passed
through a
machine
that converts it back into a hydrogen atom
in
its
ground
state with mass M plus a low-frequency
photon
of
frequency f ''
There are three energies here , but you
say
4.
there is no left over energy as you have
claimed.
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
Do you have any clue how silly you look
with
your
constant
whining? Drake explained your mistake. You
cannot
understand
it. That is not his problem, it is yours..
Get
over
it.-
Hide
quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
---------
To
Doug
Drake has simply shown his limitations in
understanding
of
LAW
OF
CONSERVATION OF ENERGY.
No, he was explaining to you why you do not
conserve
energy.
You having tantrums here does not help your
credibility
here
which is at zero.
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequotedtext-
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
-------------
To
Doug
Under what conditions energy is conseved?
You mean you don't know? And you're submitting
papers?
Your
theory
(that A
is not always 1) results in energy not being
conserved
where
it
should be.
Your theory breaks conservation laws. Your
theory
is
refuted.-
Hide
quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
--------------
To
Doug
Give specific reply so that we may proceed further
Under what conditions energy is conseved?
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
interesting- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
-------
To
Doug
Give specific reply so that we may proceed further
There is no 'further' to proceed. Drake has already
explained
it
to
you.
We here have explained how he is correct and how you
have
misread
what
he
wrote. All have shown that your theory is wrong.- Hide
quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
To
Doug
Can you define Law of Conservation of Energy and which
conditions
it
holds?
Yes .. but that would serve no purpose. Drake has
explained
nicely
why
your
theory results in lack of conservation of energy (indeed,
it
generates
energy from nothing when A is not 1). If you don't
understand
conservation
of energy, you should not be publishing physics. If you
do,
you
don't
need
to ask me to explain it to you. Stop wasting everyone's
time.-
Hide
quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
----------
To
Inertial
Like 8th class math, Dr Drake has misinterpretted Law of
Conservation
of Energy.
No
He has applied Law of Conservation of energy, to
NON-ISOLATED
SYETEM.
No
The value of 'A' has been calculated
simply implies the condition, when LAW OF COSERVATION OF
ENERGY
HOLDS
good to ISOLATED SYSTEM .
Then A must be 1. Your theory is refuted.
Here condition is A=1, it has nothing to do with E=Ac^2m.
If we apply E=Ac^2m , to isolated system then results are
OK.
When A = 1
Recently I have replied him in 15 page reply.
Poor bastard .. you are just being a pathetic pain in the
arse
I am also sending the
letter to other officials of American Physical Society,
so the they may also understand his high handedness and
misuse
of
office and bad name he os getting to APS , New York
They will all see what an idiot you are. Good.- Hide quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
-------
To
INERTIAL
Let us come to point number 1.
I have written that
DRAKE has applied Law of Conservation of energy, to
NON-ISOLATED
SYETEM.
I re-assert it.
Then you are wrong twice
You said NO
And I'll say it again
Can you justify your wrong claim defining ISOLATED SYATEM ,
NON-
ISOLTED SYSTEM and Law of Conservation of Energy?
It is your claim that is wrong. I am not the one making claims.
Yours is wrong, as Drake clearly demonstrated. If energy is to
be
conserved, A = 1, if A is not 1 then energy is not conserved.
You clearly do not understand the physics involved. Perhaps you
are
blinded
by your prejudices and over-inflated ego, as are most crackpots
such
as
yourself.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
----------
To
Inertial
Drake has applied Law of Conservation of Energy to NON-ISOLATED
SYSTEM.
Nope
The mathematical equations ALLOWS us to calculate the conditions
when system is isolated.
The system is ISOLATED when A=1,thus energy is conserved.
When (A>1, A<1) then system is NON-ISOLTED and Law of
Conservation
of
Energy is not applicable.
So the law only applies when you want it to apply.
Hence in this case (A>1, A <1 , system is NON-ISOLATED ),
Wrong
the Law of
Conservation of
Energy is not applicable. Thus there is no possibility any
conclusion
in this regard. It is simple.
Yes .. you're an annoying little idiot.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
-----
To
Inertial
The law of Conservation of Energy holds good for ISOLATED SYSTEM.
Are you still here whining and complaining? Get a life- Hide quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
---------
To
Inertial
The law of Conservation of Energy holds good for ISOLATED SYSTEM.
If it applied to NON-ISOLATED SYSTEM,then we can calculate the
conditions
under which it becomes ISOLATED.
-------
To
Inertial
The understanding of defintion of Law of Conservation of Energy
is absolutely necessary in this regard.
That is why you fail
[/quote]
----
To
INERTIAL
Tell the definition I will feel you pass.
AJAY SHARMA www.AjayOnLine.us |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| ajay... |
| Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 9:48 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 28, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
[quote]"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9a0ddcf1-d5a5-4f73-b1a2-eee29d44d5ea at (no spam) y23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 28, 4:50 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9ccf4809-6d9b-4ac6-a229-1c372b4bdb8c at (no spam) k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com....
On Oct 28, 2:37 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5251bec5-f96d-4665-aa1b-898c9a3e7829 at (no spam) s15g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 6:34 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:12180349-a918-4c71-b5fb-ff8ae1f5efb4 at (no spam) n22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 5:36 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:88e8dcd3-1fd7-4741-9d74-41d3756ca082 at (no spam) p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bbd4e288-8223-460c-8541-b01ce80e8a63 at (no spam) j4g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 4:14 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:92b88413-f59b-4457-82b6-0288751f1840 at (no spam) p9g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 26, 4:22 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:26e25ae3-b3c7-48f4-9ded-79ac2088f30e at (no spam) 33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 25, 7:15 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:24042f47-0c84-480c-9ff5-456fe39c6372 at (no spam) l31g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 25, 4:28 am, tomy tomy
tomytomy... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 24, 6:07 pm, ajay
ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 24, 5:13 am, "Inertial"
relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in
message
news:ef4961ff-3ab3-4d03-8f67-21efd534376e at (no spam) 33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 23, 8:04 pm, doug <x... at (no spam) xx.com
wrote:
ajay wrote:
On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug <x... at (no spam) xx.com
wrote:
ajay wrote:
--------
To
Inertial
How I can believe you , when did not
form
correct
eqaution
for
pharse
''The high frequency photon is now
passed
through a
machine
that converts it back into a hydrogen
atom
in
its
ground
state with mass M plus a low-frequency
photon
of
frequency f ''
There are three energies here , but you
say
4.
there is no left over energy as you
have
claimed.
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us
Do you have any clue how silly you look
with
your
constant
whining? Drake explained your mistake..
You
cannot
understand
it. That is not his problem, it is
yours.
Get
over
it.-
Hide
quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
---------
To
Doug
Drake has simply shown his limitations
in
understanding
of
LAW
OF
CONSERVATION OF ENERGY.
No, he was explaining to you why you do
not
conserve
energy.
You having tantrums here does not help
your
credibility
here
which is at zero.
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequotedtext-
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
-------------
To
Doug
Under what conditions energy is conseved?
You mean you don't know? And you're
submitting
papers?
Your
theory
(that A
is not always 1) results in energy not being
conserved
where
it
should be.
Your theory breaks conservation laws. Your
theory
is
refuted.-
Hide
quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
--------------
To
Doug
Give specific reply so that we may proceed
further
Under what conditions energy is conseved?
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
interesting- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
-------
To
Doug
Give specific reply so that we may proceed further
There is no 'further' to proceed. Drake has already
explained
it
to
you.
We here have explained how he is correct and how you
have
misread
what
he
wrote. All have shown that your theory is wrong.-
Hide
quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
To
Doug
Can you define Law of Conservation of Energy and
which
conditions
it
holds?
Yes .. but that would serve no purpose. Drake has
explained
nicely
why
your
theory results in lack of conservation of energy
(indeed,
it
generates
energy from nothing when A is not 1). If you don't
understand
conservation
of energy, you should not be publishing physics. If
you
do,
you
don't
need
to ask me to explain it to you. Stop wasting
everyone's
time.-
Hide
quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
----------
To
Inertial
Like 8th class math, Dr Drake has misinterpretted Law of
Conservation
of Energy.
No
He has applied Law of Conservation of energy, to
NON-ISOLATED
SYETEM.
No
The value of 'A' has been calculated
simply implies the condition, when LAW OF COSERVATION OF
ENERGY
HOLDS
good to ISOLATED SYSTEM .
Then A must be 1. Your theory is refuted.
Here condition is A=1, it has nothing to do with
E=Ac^2m.
If we apply E=Ac^2m , to isolated system then results
are
OK.
When A = 1
Recently I have replied him in 15 page reply.
Poor bastard .. you are just being a pathetic pain in the
arse
I am also sending the
letter to other officials of American Physical Society,
so the they may also understand his high handedness and
misuse
of
office and bad name he os getting to APS , New York
They will all see what an idiot you are. Good.- Hide
quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
-------
To
INERTIAL
Let us come to point number 1.
I have written that
DRAKE has applied Law of Conservation of energy, to
NON-ISOLATED
SYETEM.
I re-assert it.
Then you are wrong twice
You said NO
And I'll say it again
Can you justify your wrong claim defining ISOLATED SYATEM ,
NON-
ISOLTED SYSTEM and Law of Conservation of Energy?
It is your claim that is wrong. I am not the one making
claims.
Yours is wrong, as Drake clearly demonstrated. If energy is
to
be
conserved, A = 1, if A is not 1 then energy is not conserved.
You clearly do not understand the physics involved. Perhaps
you
are
blinded
by your prejudices and over-inflated ego, as are most
crackpots
such
as
yourself.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
----------
To
Inertial
Drake has applied Law of Conservation of Energy to
NON-ISOLATED
SYSTEM.
Nope
The mathematical equations ALLOWS us to calculate the
conditions
when system is isolated.
The system is ISOLATED when A=1,thus energy is conserved.
When (A>1, A<1) then system is NON-ISOLTED and Law of
Conservation
of
Energy is not applicable.
So the law only applies when you want it to apply.
Hence in this case (A>1, A <1 , system is NON-ISOLATED ),
Wrong
the Law of
Conservation of
Energy is not applicable. Thus there is no possibility any
conclusion
in this regard. It is simple.
Yes .. you're an annoying little idiot.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
-----
To
Inertial
The law of Conservation of Energy holds good for ISOLATED SYSTEM.
Are you still here whining and complaining? Get a life- Hide
quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
---------
To
Inertial
The law of Conservation of Energy holds good for ISOLATED SYSTEM.
If it applied to NON-ISOLATED SYSTEM,then we can calculate the
conditions
under which it becomes ISOLATED.
-------
To
Inertial
The understanding of defintion of Law of Conservation of Energy
is absolutely necessary in this regard.
That is why you fail
----
To
INERTIAL
Tell the definition I will feel you pass.
Look it up yourself. If you can understand it.
No more replies from me .. I have made mine (and your) position very clear.
You failed to understand and interpret Dr Drake's reply, even with my help,
which refutes your theory. You are now on a childish and unfounded vendetta
against him and wasting the time of way too many people who have far better
things to do that deal with a crackpot like you.
Goodbye .. you are not worth any more of my time.
[/quote]
------
To
INERTIAL
You did not even define LAW OF CONSERVATION OF ENERGY .
So how onw can trust you.
If you know it then define and we will proceed further.
If Dr Drake replies I will put here.
It is my duty to put limitations of individual at international forum.
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| ajay... |
| Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 3:03 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 28, 1:05 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
[quote]"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e9f3199f-8cd2-472f-923d-d645b0659c20 at (no spam) w37g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 28, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9a0ddcf1-d5a5-4f73-b1a2-eee29d44d5ea at (no spam) y23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com....
On Oct 28, 4:50 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9ccf4809-6d9b-4ac6-a229-1c372b4bdb8c at (no spam) k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 28, 2:37 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5251bec5-f96d-4665-aa1b-898c9a3e7829 at (no spam) s15g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 6:34 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:12180349-a918-4c71-b5fb-ff8ae1f5efb4 at (no spam) n22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 5:36 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:88e8dcd3-1fd7-4741-9d74-41d3756ca082 at (no spam) p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bbd4e288-8223-460c-8541-b01ce80e8a63 at (no spam) j4g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 4:14 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:92b88413-f59b-4457-82b6-0288751f1840 at (no spam) p9g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 26, 4:22 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:26e25ae3-b3c7-48f4-9ded-79ac2088f30e at (no spam) 33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 25, 7:15 pm, "Inertial"
relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:24042f47-0c84-480c-9ff5-456fe39c6372 at (no spam) l31g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 25, 4:28 am, tomy tomy
tomytomy... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 24, 6:07 pm, ajay
ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 24, 5:13 am, "Inertial"
relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in
message
news:ef4961ff-3ab3-4d03-8f67-21efd534376e at (no spam) 33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 23, 8:04 pm, doug <x... at (no spam) xx.com
wrote:
ajay wrote:
On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug
x... at (no spam) xx.com
wrote:
ajay wrote:
--------
To
Inertial
How I can believe you , when did not
form
correct
eqaution
for
pharse
''The high frequency photon is now
passed
through a
machine
that converts it back into a
hydrogen
atom
in
its
ground
state with mass M plus a
low-frequency
photon
of
frequency f ''
There are three energies here , but
you
say
4.
there is no left over energy as you
have
claimed.
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us
Do you have any clue how silly you
look
with
your
constant
whining? Drake explained your
mistake.
You
cannot
understand
it. That is not his problem, it is
yours.
Get
over
it.-
Hide
quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
---------
To
Doug
Drake has simply shown his
limitations
in
understanding
of
LAW
OF
CONSERVATION OF ENERGY.
No, he was explaining to you why you do
not
conserve
energy.
You having tantrums here does not help
your
credibility
here
which is at zero.
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequotedtext-
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
-------------
To
Doug
Under what conditions energy is
conseved?
You mean you don't know? And you're
submitting
papers?
Your
theory
(that A
is not always 1) results in energy not
being
conserved
where
it
should be.
Your theory breaks conservation laws.
Your
theory
is
refuted.-
Hide
quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
--------------
To
Doug
Give specific reply so that we may proceed
further
Under what conditions energy is conseved?
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
interesting- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
-------
To
Doug
Give specific reply so that we may proceed
further
There is no 'further' to proceed. Drake has
already
explained
it
to
you.
We here have explained how he is correct and how
you
have
misread
what
he
wrote. All have shown that your theory is
wrong.-
Hide
quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
To
Doug
Can you define Law of Conservation of Energy and
which
conditions
it
holds?
Yes .. but that would serve no purpose. Drake has
explained
nicely
why
your
theory results in lack of conservation of energy
(indeed,
it
generates
energy from nothing when A is not 1). If you don't
understand
conservation
of energy, you should not be publishing physics. If
you
do,
you
don't
need
to ask me to explain it to you. Stop wasting
everyone's
time.-
Hide
quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
----------
To
Inertial
Like 8th class math, Dr Drake has misinterpretted Law
of
Conservation
of Energy.
No
He has applied Law of Conservation of energy, to
NON-ISOLATED
SYETEM.
No
The value of 'A' has been calculated
simply implies the condition, when LAW OF COSERVATION
OF
ENERGY
HOLDS
good to ISOLATED SYSTEM .
Then A must be 1. Your theory is refuted.
Here condition is A=1, it has nothing to do with
E=Ac^2m.
If we apply E=Ac^2m , to isolated system then results
are
OK.
When A = 1
Recently I have replied him in 15 page reply.
Poor bastard .. you are just being a pathetic pain in
the
arse
I am also sending the
letter to other officials of American Physical
Society,
so the they may also understand his high handedness
and
misuse
of
office and bad name he os getting to APS , New York
They will all see what an idiot you are. Good.- Hide
quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
-------
To
INERTIAL
Let us come to point number 1.
I have written that
DRAKE has applied Law of Conservation of energy, to
NON-ISOLATED
SYETEM.
I re-assert it.
Then you are wrong twice
You said NO
And I'll say it again
Can you justify your wrong claim defining ISOLATED
SYATEM ,
NON-
ISOLTED SYSTEM and Law of Conservation of Energy?
It is your claim that is wrong. I am not the one making
claims.
Yours is wrong, as Drake clearly demonstrated. If energy
is
to
be
conserved, A = 1, if A is not 1 then energy is not
conserved.
You clearly do not understand the physics involved.
Perhaps
you
are
blinded
by your prejudices and over-inflated ego, as are most
crackpots
such
as
yourself.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
----------
To
Inertial
Drake has applied Law of Conservation of Energy to
NON-ISOLATED
SYSTEM.
Nope
The mathematical equations ALLOWS us to calculate the
conditions
when system is isolated.
The system is ISOLATED when A=1,thus energy is conserved.
When (A>1, A<1) then system is NON-ISOLTED and Law of
Conservation
of
Energy is not applicable.
So the law only applies when you want it to apply.
Hence in this case (A>1, A <1 , system is NON-ISOLATED ),
Wrong
the Law of
Conservation of
Energy is not applicable. Thus there is no possibility any
conclusion
in this regard. It is simple.
Yes .. you're an annoying little idiot.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
-----
To
Inertial
The law of Conservation of Energy holds good for ISOLATED
SYSTEM.
Are you still here whining and complaining? Get a life- Hide
quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
---------
To
Inertial
The law of Conservation of Energy holds good for ISOLATED SYSTEM.
If it applied to NON-ISOLATED SYSTEM,then we can calculate the
conditions
under which it becomes ISOLATED.
-------
To
Inertial
The understanding of defintion of Law of Conservation of Energy
is absolutely necessary in this regard.
That is why you fail
----
To
INERTIAL
Tell the definition I will feel you pass.
Look it up yourself. If you can understand it.
No more replies from me .. I have made mine (and your) position very
clear.
You failed to understand and interpret Dr Drake's reply, even with my
help,
which refutes your theory. You are now on a childish and unfounded
vendetta
against him and wasting the time of way too many people who have far
better
things to do that deal with a crackpot like you.
Goodbye .. you are not worth any more of my time.
------
To
INERTIAL
You did not even define LAW OF CONSERVATION OF ENERGY .
I don't have to. I'm not the one who has a problem with it
So how onw can trust you.
Because I'm not an idiot stalker like you
If you know it then define and we will proceed further.
You have nowhere to go to
If Dr Drake replies I will put here.
Why would he .. he has already refuted your theory
It is my duty to put limitations of individual at international forum.
What a load of crap .. you're deluded as well as an idiot.
Sorry for replying again .. no more.
Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
[/quote]
-----
To
INERTIAL
Is it Law of Conservation of Energy?
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| zimdoo zimdoo... |
| Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 6:45 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 28, 6:03 pm, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 28, 1:05 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e9f3199f-8cd2-472f-923d-d645b0659c20 at (no spam) w37g2000prg.googlegroups.com....
On Oct 28, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9a0ddcf1-d5a5-4f73-b1a2-eee29d44d5ea at (no spam) y23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 28, 4:50 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9ccf4809-6d9b-4ac6-a229-1c372b4bdb8c at (no spam) k19g2000yqc.googlegroups..com...
On Oct 28, 2:37 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5251bec5-f96d-4665-aa1b-898c9a3e7829 at (no spam) s15g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 6:34 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:12180349-a918-4c71-b5fb-ff8ae1f5efb4 at (no spam) n22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 5:36 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:88e8dcd3-1fd7-4741-9d74-41d3756ca082 at (no spam) p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bbd4e288-8223-460c-8541-b01ce80e8a63 at (no spam) j4g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 4:14 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:92b88413-f59b-4457-82b6-0288751f1840 at (no spam) p9g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 26, 4:22 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:26e25ae3-b3c7-48f4-9ded-79ac2088f30e at (no spam) 33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 25, 7:15 pm, "Inertial"
relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:24042f47-0c84-480c-9ff5-456fe39c6372 at (no spam) l31g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 25, 4:28 am, tomy tomy
tomytomy... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 24, 6:07 pm, ajay
ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 24, 5:13 am, "Inertial"
relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in
message
news:ef4961ff-3ab3-4d03-8f67-21efd534376e at (no spam) 33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 23, 8:04 pm, doug <x... at (no spam) xx.com
wrote:
ajay wrote:
On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug
x... at (no spam) xx.com
wrote:
ajay wrote:
--------
To
Inertial
How I can believe you , when did not
form
correct
eqaution
for
pharse
''The high frequency photon is now
passed
through a
machine
that converts it back into a
hydrogen
atom
in
its
ground
state with mass M plus a
low-frequency
photon
of
frequency f ''
There are three energies here , but
you
say
4.
there is no left over energy as you
have
claimed.
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us
Do you have any clue how silly you
look
with
your
constant
whining? Drake explained your
mistake.
You
cannot
understand
it. That is not his problem, it is
yours.
Get
over
it.-
Hide
quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
---------
To
Doug
Drake has simply shown his
limitations
in
understanding
of
LAW
OF
CONSERVATION OF ENERGY.
No, he was explaining to you why you do
not
conserve
energy.
You having tantrums here does not help
your
credibility
here
which is at zero.
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequotedtext-
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
-------------
To
Doug
Under what conditions energy is
conseved?
You mean you don't know? And you're
submitting
papers?
Your
theory
(that A
is not always 1) results in energy not
being
conserved
where
it
should be.
Your theory breaks conservation laws.
Your
theory
is
refuted.-
Hide
quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
--------------
To
Doug
Give specific reply so that we may proceed
further
Under what conditions energy is conseved?
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
interesting- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
-------
To
Doug
Give specific reply so that we may proceed
further
There is no 'further' to proceed. Drake has
already
explained- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -...
read more »
[/quote]
--------
Inertial
You are making tall claims then why dont you define Law of
Conservation of Momentum.
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| ajay... |
| Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 12:03 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 28, 9:45 pm, zimdoo zimdoo <zim... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 28, 6:03 pm, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 1:05 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e9f3199f-8cd2-472f-923d-d645b0659c20 at (no spam) w37g2000prg.googlegroups.com....
On Oct 28, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9a0ddcf1-d5a5-4f73-b1a2-eee29d44d5ea at (no spam) y23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 28, 4:50 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9ccf4809-6d9b-4ac6-a229-1c372b4bdb8c at (no spam) k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 28, 2:37 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5251bec5-f96d-4665-aa1b-898c9a3e7829 at (no spam) s15g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 6:34 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:12180349-a918-4c71-b5fb-ff8ae1f5efb4 at (no spam) n22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 5:36 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:88e8dcd3-1fd7-4741-9d74-41d3756ca082 at (no spam) p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bbd4e288-8223-460c-8541-b01ce80e8a63 at (no spam) j4g2000yqe..googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 4:14 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:92b88413-f59b-4457-82b6-0288751f1840 at (no spam) p9g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 26, 4:22 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:26e25ae3-b3c7-48f4-9ded-79ac2088f30e at (no spam) 33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 25, 7:15 pm, "Inertial"
relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:24042f47-0c84-480c-9ff5-456fe39c6372 at (no spam) l31g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 25, 4:28 am, tomy tomy
tomytomy... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 24, 6:07 pm, ajay
ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 24, 5:13 am, "Inertial"
relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in
message
news:ef4961ff-3ab3-4d03-8f67-21efd534376e at (no spam) 33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 23, 8:04 pm, doug <x... at (no spam) xx..com
wrote:
ajay wrote:
On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug
x... at (no spam) xx.com
wrote:
ajay wrote:
--------
To
Inertial
How I can believe you , when did not
form
correct
eqaution
for
pharse
''The high frequency photon is now
passed
through a
machine
that converts it back into a
hydrogen
atom
in
its
ground
state with mass M plus a
low-frequency
photon
of
frequency f ''
There are three energies here , but
you
say
4.
there is no left over energy as you
have
claimed.
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us
Do you have any clue how silly you
look
with
your
constant
whining? Drake explained your
mistake.
You
cannot
understand
it. That is not his problem, it is
yours.
Get
over
it.-
Hide
quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
---------
To
Doug
Drake has simply shown his
limitations
in
understanding
of
LAW
OF
CONSERVATION OF ENERGY.
No, he was explaining to you why you do
not
conserve
energy.
You having tantrums here does not help
your
credibility
here
which is at zero.
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequotedtext-
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
-------------
To
Doug
Under what conditions energy is
conseved?
You mean you don't know? And you're
submitting
papers?
Your
theory
(that A
is not always 1) results in energy not
being
conserved
where
it
should be.
Your theory breaks conservation laws.
Your
theory
is
refuted.-
Hide
quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
--------------
To
Doug
Give specific reply so that we may proceed
further
Under what conditions energy is conseved?
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
interesting- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
-------
To
Doug
Give specific reply so that we may proceed
further
There is no 'further' to proceed. Drake has
already
explained- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -...
read more »
--------
Inertial
You are making tall claims then why dont you define Law of
Conservation of Momentum.
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
[/quote]
++++++++++++++++++
To
INETRIAL
If you know LAW OF CONSERVATION OF ENERGY DISCUSS IT HERE.
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| ajay... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 2:08 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 29, 3:03 am, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 28, 9:45 pm, zimdoo zimdoo <zim... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 6:03 pm, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 1:05 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e9f3199f-8cd2-472f-923d-d645b0659c20 at (no spam) w37g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 28, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9a0ddcf1-d5a5-4f73-b1a2-eee29d44d5ea at (no spam) y23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 28, 4:50 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9ccf4809-6d9b-4ac6-a229-1c372b4bdb8c at (no spam) k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 28, 2:37 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5251bec5-f96d-4665-aa1b-898c9a3e7829 at (no spam) s15g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 6:34 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:12180349-a918-4c71-b5fb-ff8ae1f5efb4 at (no spam) n22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 5:36 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:88e8dcd3-1fd7-4741-9d74-41d3756ca082 at (no spam) p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bbd4e288-8223-460c-8541-b01ce80e8a63 at (no spam) j4g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 4:14 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest..com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:92b88413-f59b-4457-82b6-0288751f1840 at (no spam) p9g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 26, 4:22 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:26e25ae3-b3c7-48f4-9ded-79ac2088f30e at (no spam) 33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 25, 7:15 pm, "Inertial"
relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:24042f47-0c84-480c-9ff5-456fe39c6372 at (no spam) l31g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 25, 4:28 am, tomy tomy
tomytomy... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 24, 6:07 pm, ajay
ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 24, 5:13 am, "Inertial"
relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in
message
news:ef4961ff-3ab3-4d03-8f67-21efd534376e at (no spam) 33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 23, 8:04 pm, doug <x... at (no spam) xx.com
wrote:
ajay wrote:
On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug
x... at (no spam) xx.com
wrote:
ajay wrote:
--------
To
Inertial
How I can believe you , when did not
form
correct
eqaution
for
pharse
''The high frequency photon is now
passed
through a
machine
that converts it back into a
hydrogen
atom
in
its
ground
state with mass M plus a
low-frequency
photon
of
frequency f ''
There are three energies here , but
you
say
4.
there is no left over energy as you
have
claimed.
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us
Do you have any clue how silly you
look
with
your
constant
whining? Drake explained your
mistake.
You
cannot
understand
it. That is not his problem, it is
yours.
Get
over
it.-
Hide
quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
---------
To
Doug
Drake has simply shown his
limitations
in
understanding
of
LAW
OF
CONSERVATION OF ENERGY.
No, he was explaining to you why you do
not
conserve
energy.
You having tantrums here does not help
your
credibility
here
which is at zero.
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequotedtext-
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
-------------
To
Doug
Under what conditions energy is
conseved?
You mean you don't know? And you're
submitting
papers?
Your
theory
(that A
is not always 1) results in energy not
being
conserved
where
it
should be.
Your theory breaks conservation laws.
Your
theory
is
refuted.-
Hide
quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
--------------
To
Doug
Give specific reply so that we may proceed
further- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -...
read more »
[/quote]
.. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| zimdoo zimdoo... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 6:31 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 29, 5:08 pm, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 29, 3:03 am, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 9:45 pm, zimdoo zimdoo <zim... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 6:03 pm, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 1:05 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e9f3199f-8cd2-472f-923d-d645b0659c20 at (no spam) w37g2000prg.googlegroups..com...
On Oct 28, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9a0ddcf1-d5a5-4f73-b1a2-eee29d44d5ea at (no spam) y23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 28, 4:50 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9ccf4809-6d9b-4ac6-a229-1c372b4bdb8c at (no spam) k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 28, 2:37 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5251bec5-f96d-4665-aa1b-898c9a3e7829 at (no spam) s15g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 6:34 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:12180349-a918-4c71-b5fb-ff8ae1f5efb4 at (no spam) n22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 5:36 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:88e8dcd3-1fd7-4741-9d74-41d3756ca082 at (no spam) p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bbd4e288-8223-460c-8541-b01ce80e8a63 at (no spam) j4g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 4:14 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:92b88413-f59b-4457-82b6-0288751f1840 at (no spam) p9g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 26, 4:22 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:26e25ae3-b3c7-48f4-9ded-79ac2088f30e at (no spam) 33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 25, 7:15 pm, "Inertial"
relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:24042f47-0c84-480c-9ff5-456fe39c6372 at (no spam) l31g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 25, 4:28 am, tomy tomy
tomytomy... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 24, 6:07 pm, ajay
ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 24, 5:13 am, "Inertial"
relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in
message
news:ef4961ff-3ab3-4d03-8f67-21efd534376e at (no spam) 33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 23, 8:04 pm, doug <x.... at (no spam) xx.com
wrote:
ajay wrote:
On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug
x... at (no spam) xx.com
wrote:
ajay wrote:
--------
To
Inertial
How I can believe you , when did not
form
correct
eqaution
for
pharse
''The high frequency photon is now
passed
through a
machine
that converts it back into a
hydrogen
atom
in
its
ground
state with mass M plus a
low-frequency
photon
of
frequency f ''
There are three energies here , but
you
say
4.
there is no left over energy as you
have
claimed.
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us
Do you have any clue how silly you
look
with
your
constant
whining? Drake explained your
mistake.
You
cannot
understand
it. That is not his problem, it is
yours.
Get
over
it.-
Hide
quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
---------
To
Doug
Drake has simply shown his
limitations
in
understanding
of
LAW
OF
CONSERVATION OF ENERGY.
No, he was explaining to you why you do
not
conserve
energy.
You having tantrums here does not help
your
credibility
here
which is at zero.
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequotedtext-
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
-------------
To
Doug
Under what conditions energy is
conseved?
You mean you don't know? And you're
submitting
papers?
Your
theory
(that A
is not always 1) results in energy not
being
conserved
where
it
should be.
Your theory breaks conservation laws.
Your
theory
is
refuted.-
Hide
quoted- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -...
read more »
....
[/quote]
To
INERIAL
Why dont you define law of conservation of energy, if you know it.
zimdoo |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| ajay... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 12:54 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 29, 9:31 pm, zimdoo zimdoo <zim... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 29, 5:08 pm, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 29, 3:03 am, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 9:45 pm, zimdoo zimdoo <zim... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 6:03 pm, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 1:05 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e9f3199f-8cd2-472f-923d-d645b0659c20 at (no spam) w37g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 28, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9a0ddcf1-d5a5-4f73-b1a2-eee29d44d5ea at (no spam) y23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 28, 4:50 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9ccf4809-6d9b-4ac6-a229-1c372b4bdb8c at (no spam) k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 28, 2:37 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5251bec5-f96d-4665-aa1b-898c9a3e7829 at (no spam) s15g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 6:34 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:12180349-a918-4c71-b5fb-ff8ae1f5efb4 at (no spam) n22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 5:36 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:88e8dcd3-1fd7-4741-9d74-41d3756ca082 at (no spam) p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bbd4e288-8223-460c-8541-b01ce80e8a63 at (no spam) j4g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 4:14 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:92b88413-f59b-4457-82b6-0288751f1840 at (no spam) p9g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 26, 4:22 am, "Inertial" <relativ.... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:26e25ae3-b3c7-48f4-9ded-79ac2088f30e at (no spam) 33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 25, 7:15 pm, "Inertial"
relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:24042f47-0c84-480c-9ff5-456fe39c6372 at (no spam) l31g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 25, 4:28 am, tomy tomy
tomytomy... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 24, 6:07 pm, ajay
ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 24, 5:13 am, "Inertial"
relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in
message
news:ef4961ff-3ab3-4d03-8f67-21efd534376e at (no spam) 33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 23, 8:04 pm, doug <x.... at (no spam) xx.com
wrote:
ajay wrote:
On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug
x... at (no spam) xx.com
wrote:
ajay wrote:
--------
To
Inertial
How I can believe you , when did not
form
correct
eqaution
for
pharse
''The high frequency photon is now
passed
through a
machine
that converts it back into a
hydrogen
atom
in
its
ground
state with mass M plus a
low-frequency
photon
of
frequency f ''
There are three energies here , but
you
say
4.
there is no left over energy as you
have
claimed.
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us
Do you have any clue how silly you
look
with
your
constant
whining? Drake explained your
mistake.
You
cannot
understand
it. That is not his problem, it is
yours.
Get
over
it.-
Hide
quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
---------
To
Doug
Drake has simply shown his
limitations
in
understanding
of
LAW
OF
CONSERVATION OF ENERGY.
No, he was explaining to you why you do
not
conserve
energy.
You having tantrums here does not help
your
credibility
here
which is at zero.
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequotedtext-
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
-------------
To
Doug
Under what conditions energy is
conseved?
You mean you don't know? And you're
submitting
papers?
Your
theory
(that A
is not always 1) results in energy not
being
conserved
where
it
should be.
Your theory breaks conservation laws.
Your
theory
is
refuted.-
Hide
quoted- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -...
read more »
....
To
INERIAL
Why dont you define law of conservation of energy, if you know it.
zimdoo
[/quote]
----------
To
Zimdoo
That is the main problem, one c |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| ajay... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:43 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 30, 3:54 am, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 29, 9:31 pm, zimdoo zimdoo <zim... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 29, 5:08 pm, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 29, 3:03 am, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 9:45 pm, zimdoo zimdoo <zim... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 6:03 pm, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 1:05 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e9f3199f-8cd2-472f-923d-d645b0659c20 at (no spam) w37g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 28, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9a0ddcf1-d5a5-4f73-b1a2-eee29d44d5ea at (no spam) y23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 28, 4:50 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9ccf4809-6d9b-4ac6-a229-1c372b4bdb8c at (no spam) k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 28, 2:37 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5251bec5-f96d-4665-aa1b-898c9a3e7829 at (no spam) s15g2000yqs..googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 6:34 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:12180349-a918-4c71-b5fb-ff8ae1f5efb4 at (no spam) n22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 5:36 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest..com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:88e8dcd3-1fd7-4741-9d74-41d3756ca082 at (no spam) p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bbd4e288-8223-460c-8541-b01ce80e8a63 at (no spam) j4g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 4:14 am, "Inertial" <relativ.... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:92b88413-f59b-4457-82b6-0288751f1840 at (no spam) p9g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 26, 4:22 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:26e25ae3-b3c7-48f4-9ded-79ac2088f30e at (no spam) 33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 25, 7:15 pm, "Inertial"
relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:24042f47-0c84-480c-9ff5-456fe39c6372 at (no spam) l31g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 25, 4:28 am, tomy tomy
tomytomy... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 24, 6:07 pm, ajay
ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 24, 5:13 am, "Inertial"
relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail..com> wrote in
message
news:ef4961ff-3ab3-4d03-8f67-21efd534376e at (no spam) 33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 23, 8:04 pm, doug <x... at (no spam) xx.com
wrote:
ajay wrote:
On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug
x... at (no spam) xx.com
wrote:
ajay wrote:
--------
To
Inertial
How I can believe you , when did not
form
correct
eqaution
for
pharse
''The high frequency photon is now
passed
through a
machine
that converts it back into a
hydrogen
atom
in
its
ground
state with mass M plus a
low-frequency
photon
of
frequency f ''
There are three energies here , but
you
say
4.
there is no left over energy as you
have
claimed.
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us
Do you have any clue how silly you
look
with
your
constant
whining? Drake explained your
mistake.
You
cannot
understand
it. That is not his problem, it is
yours.
Get
over
it.-
Hide
quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
---------
To
Doug
Drake has simply shown his
limitations
in
understanding
of
LAW
OF
CONSERVATION OF ENERGY..
No, he was explaining to you why you do
not
conserve
energy.
You having tantrums here does not help
your
credibility
here
which is at zero.
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequotedtext-
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
-------------
To
Doug
Under what conditions energy is
conseved?
You mean you don't know? And you're
submitting
papers?
Your
theory
(that A- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -...
read more »
[/quote]
The Law of Conservation of energy is that FOR ISOLATED SYSTEM THE
ENERGY IS CONSERVED.
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| zimdoo zimdoo... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 1:33 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 30, 5:43 pm, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 30, 3:54 am, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 29, 9:31 pm, zimdoo zimdoo <zim... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 29, 5:08 pm, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 29, 3:03 am, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 9:45 pm, zimdoo zimdoo <zim... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 6:03 pm, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 1:05 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e9f3199f-8cd2-472f-923d-d645b0659c20 at (no spam) w37g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 28, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9a0ddcf1-d5a5-4f73-b1a2-eee29d44d5ea at (no spam) y23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 28, 4:50 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9ccf4809-6d9b-4ac6-a229-1c372b4bdb8c at (no spam) k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 28, 2:37 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5251bec5-f96d-4665-aa1b-898c9a3e7829 at (no spam) s15g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 6:34 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:12180349-a918-4c71-b5fb-ff8ae1f5efb4 at (no spam) n22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 5:36 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:88e8dcd3-1fd7-4741-9d74-41d3756ca082 at (no spam) p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bbd4e288-8223-460c-8541-b01ce80e8a63 at (no spam) j4g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 4:14 am, "Inertial" <relativ.... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:92b88413-f59b-4457-82b6-0288751f1840 at (no spam) p9g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 26, 4:22 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:26e25ae3-b3c7-48f4-9ded-79ac2088f30e at (no spam) 33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 25, 7:15 pm, "Inertial"
relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:24042f47-0c84-480c-9ff5-456fe39c6372 at (no spam) l31g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 25, 4:28 am, tomy tomy
tomytomy... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 24, 6:07 pm, ajay
ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 24, 5:13 am, "Inertial"
relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in
message
news:ef4961ff-3ab3-4d03-8f67-21efd534376e at (no spam) 33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 23, 8:04 pm, doug <x... at (no spam) xx.com
wrote:
ajay wrote:
On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug
x... at (no spam) xx.com
wrote:
ajay wrote:
--------
To
Inertial
How I can believe you , when did not
form
correct
eqaution
for
pharse
''The high frequency photon is now
passed
through a
machine
that converts it back into a
hydrogen
atom
in
its
ground
state with mass M plus a
low-frequency
photon
of
frequency f ''
There are three energies here , but
you
say
4.
there is no left over energy as you
have
claimed.
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us
Do you have any clue how silly you
look
with
your
constant
whining? Drake explained your
mistake.
You
cannot
understand
it. That is not his problem, it is
yours.
Get
over
it.-
Hide
quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
---------
To
Doug
Drake has simply shown his
limitations
in
understanding
of
LAW
OF
CONSERVATION OF ENERGY.
No, he was explaining to you why you do
not
conserve
energy.
You having tantrums here does not help
your
credibility
here
which is at zero.
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequotedtext-
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
-------------
To
Doug
Under what conditions energy is
conseved?
...
read more »- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
[/quote]
what about conditions ? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| ajay... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 5:37 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 31, 4:33 am, zimdoo zimdoo <zim... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 30, 5:43 pm, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 30, 3:54 am, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 29, 9:31 pm, zimdoo zimdoo <zim... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 29, 5:08 pm, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 29, 3:03 am, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 9:45 pm, zimdoo zimdoo <zim... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 6:03 pm, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 1:05 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e9f3199f-8cd2-472f-923d-d645b0659c20 at (no spam) w37g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 28, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9a0ddcf1-d5a5-4f73-b1a2-eee29d44d5ea at (no spam) y23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 28, 4:50 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9ccf4809-6d9b-4ac6-a229-1c372b4bdb8c at (no spam) k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 28, 2:37 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5251bec5-f96d-4665-aa1b-898c9a3e7829 at (no spam) s15g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 6:34 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:12180349-a918-4c71-b5fb-ff8ae1f5efb4 at (no spam) n22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 5:36 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:88e8dcd3-1fd7-4741-9d74-41d3756ca082 at (no spam) p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ.... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bbd4e288-8223-460c-8541-b01ce80e8a63 at (no spam) j4g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 4:14 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:92b88413-f59b-4457-82b6-0288751f1840 at (no spam) p9g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 26, 4:22 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:26e25ae3-b3c7-48f4-9ded-79ac2088f30e at (no spam) 33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 25, 7:15 pm, "Inertial"
relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:24042f47-0c84-480c-9ff5-456fe39c6372 at (no spam) l31g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 25, 4:28 am, tomy tomy
tomytomy... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 24, 6:07 pm, ajay
ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 24, 5:13 am, "Inertial"
relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in
message
news:ef4961ff-3ab3-4d03-8f67-21efd534376e at (no spam) 33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 23, 8:04 pm, doug <x... at (no spam) xx.com
wrote:
ajay wrote:
On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug
x... at (no spam) xx.com
wrote:
ajay wrote:
--------
To
Inertial
How I can believe you , when did not
form
correct
eqaution
for
pharse
''The high frequency photon is now
passed
through a
machine
that converts it back into a
hydrogen
atom
in
its
ground
state with mass M plus a
low-frequency
photon
of
frequency f ''
There are three energies here , but
you
say
4.
there is no left over energy as you
have
claimed.
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us
Do you have any clue how silly you
look
with
your
constant
whining? Drake explained your
mistake.
You
cannot
understand
it. That is not his problem, it is
yours.
Get
over
it.-
Hide
quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
---------
To
Doug
Drake has simply shown his
limitations
in
understanding
of
LAW
OF
CONSERVATION OF ENERGY.
No, he was explaining to you why you do
not
conserve
energy.
You having tantrums here does not help
your
credibility
here
which is at zero.
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequotedtext-
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
-------------
To
Doug
Under what conditions energy is
conseved?
...
read more »- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
what about conditions ?
[/quote]
-----
ISOLATED SYSTEM MEANS WHEN NO FORCES ACT ON THE SYSTEM.
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| tomy tomy... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:19 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 31, 8:37 pm, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 31, 4:33 am, zimdoo zimdoo <zim... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 30, 5:43 pm, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 30, 3:54 am, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 29, 9:31 pm, zimdoo zimdoo <zim... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 29, 5:08 pm, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 29, 3:03 am, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 9:45 pm, zimdoo zimdoo <zim... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 6:03 pm, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 1:05 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e9f3199f-8cd2-472f-923d-d645b0659c20 at (no spam) w37g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 28, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9a0ddcf1-d5a5-4f73-b1a2-eee29d44d5ea at (no spam) y23g2000yqd..googlegroups.com...
On Oct 28, 4:50 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9ccf4809-6d9b-4ac6-a229-1c372b4bdb8c at (no spam) k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 28, 2:37 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest..com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5251bec5-f96d-4665-aa1b-898c9a3e7829 at (no spam) s15g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 6:34 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:12180349-a918-4c71-b5fb-ff8ae1f5efb4 at (no spam) n22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 5:36 pm, "Inertial" <relativ.... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:88e8dcd3-1fd7-4741-9d74-41d3756ca082 at (no spam) p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bbd4e288-8223-460c-8541-b01ce80e8a63 at (no spam) j4g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 4:14 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:92b88413-f59b-4457-82b6-0288751f1840 at (no spam) p9g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 26, 4:22 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:26e25ae3-b3c7-48f4-9ded-79ac2088f30e at (no spam) 33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 25, 7:15 pm, "Inertial"
relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:24042f47-0c84-480c-9ff5-456fe39c6372 at (no spam) l31g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 25, 4:28 am, tomy tomy
tomytomy... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 24, 6:07 pm, ajay
ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 24, 5:13 am, "Inertial"
relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in
message
news:ef4961ff-3ab3-4d03-8f67-21efd534376e at (no spam) 33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 23, 8:04 pm, doug <x... at (no spam) xx.com
wrote:
ajay wrote:
On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug
x... at (no spam) xx.com
wrote:
ajay wrote:
--------
To
Inertial
How I can believe you , when did not
form
correct
eqaution
for
pharse
''The high frequency photon is now
passed
through a
machine
that converts it back into a
hydrogen
atom
in
its
ground
state with mass M plus a
low-frequency
photon
of
frequency f ''
There are three energies here , but
you
say
4.
there is no left over energy as you
have
claimed.
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us
Do you have any clue how silly you
look
with
your
constant
whining? Drake explained your
mistake.
You
cannot
understand
it. That is not his problem, it is
yours.
Get
over
it.-
Hide
quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
---------
To
Doug
Drake has simply shown his
limitations
in
understanding
of
LAW
OF
CONSERVATION OF ENERGY.
No, he was explaining to you why you do
not
conserve
energy.
You having tantrums here does not help
your
credibility
here
which is at zero.
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequotedtext-
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
-------------
To
Doug
Under what conditions energy is
conseved?
...
read more »- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
what about conditions ?
-----
ISOLATED SYSTEM MEANS WHEN NO FORCES ACT ON THE SYSTEM.
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
[/quote]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
But how Dr DRAKES comes in discussion here. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| ajay... |
| Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 6:19 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Nov 1, 4:19 am, tomy tomy <tomytomy... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 31, 8:37 pm, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 31, 4:33 am, zimdoo zimdoo <zim... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 30, 5:43 pm, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 30, 3:54 am, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 29, 9:31 pm, zimdoo zimdoo <zim... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 29, 5:08 pm, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 29, 3:03 am, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 9:45 pm, zimdoo zimdoo <zim... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 6:03 pm, ajay <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 28, 1:05 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e9f3199f-8cd2-472f-923d-d645b0659c20 at (no spam) w37g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 28, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9a0ddcf1-d5a5-4f73-b1a2-eee29d44d5ea at (no spam) y23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 28, 4:50 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9ccf4809-6d9b-4ac6-a229-1c372b4bdb8c at (no spam) k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 28, 2:37 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5251bec5-f96d-4665-aa1b-898c9a3e7829 at (no spam) s15g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 6:34 pm, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:12180349-a918-4c71-b5fb-ff8ae1f5efb4 at (no spam) n22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 5:36 pm, "Inertial" <relativ.... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:88e8dcd3-1fd7-4741-9d74-41d3756ca082 at (no spam) p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com> wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bbd4e288-8223-460c-8541-b01ce80e8a63 at (no spam) j4g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 27, 4:14 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:92b88413-f59b-4457-82b6-0288751f1840 at (no spam) p9g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 26, 4:22 am, "Inertial" <relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:26e25ae3-b3c7-48f4-9ded-79ac2088f30e at (no spam) 33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 25, 7:15 pm, "Inertial"
relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:24042f47-0c84-480c-9ff5-456fe39c6372 at (no spam) l31g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 25, 4:28 am, tomy tomy
tomytomy... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 24, 6:07 pm, ajay
ajayonline... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 24, 5:13 am, "Inertial"
relativ... at (no spam) rest.com
wrote:
"ajay" <ajayonline.... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in
message
news:ef4961ff-3ab3-4d03-8f67-21efd534376e at (no spam) 33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 23, 8:04 pm, doug <x... at (no spam) xx.com
wrote:
ajay wrote:
On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug
x... at (no spam) xx.com
wrote:
ajay wrote:
--------
To
Inertial
How I can believe you , when did not
form
correct
eqaution
for
pharse
''The high frequency photon is now
passed
through a
machine
that converts it back into a
hydrogen
atom
in
its
ground
state with mass M plus a
low-frequency
photon
of
frequency f ''
There are three energies here , but
you
say
4.
there is no left over energy as you
have
claimed.
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us
Do you have any clue how silly you
look
with
your
constant
whining? Drake explained your
mistake.
You
cannot
understand
it. That is not his problem, it is
yours.
Get
over
it.-
Hide
quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
---------
To
Doug
Drake has simply shown his
limitations
in
understanding
of
LAW
OF
CONSERVATION OF ENERGY.
No, he was explaining to you why you do
not
conserve
energy.
You having tantrums here does not help
your
credibility
here
which is at zero..
Ajay Sharma
www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequotedtext-
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
-------------
To
Doug
Under what conditions energy is
conseved?
...
read more »- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
what about conditions ?
-----
ISOLATED SYSTEM MEANS WHEN NO FORCES ACT ON THE SYSTEM.
Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
But how Dr DRAKES comes in discussion here.
[/quote]
------
He misinterpretted the law of conservation of energy.
AJAY SHARMA www.AjayOnline.us |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Wed Dec 02, 2009 10:20 am
|
|