Main Page | Report this Page
Science Forum Index  »  Astrology Forum  »  Ed Wollmann is breaking the law as we speak...
Page 7 of 9    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

Ed Wollmann is breaking the law as we speak...

Author Message
Dave U. Random...
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 12:54 pm
Guest
In article <4AE4C705.3AB2 at (no spam) earthlink.net>
Edmond Wollmann <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote:
[quote]
WindsorFox<[SS]> wrote:

Chris wrote:
"James W Anderson" <jander7 at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6c148a6e-9e0b-40b9-8800-ca1d425d6bec at (no spam) g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
Clearly something is off-base regarding claiming Usenet posts.

Usenet is a discussion forum, and you can expect things to go wherever
from there, and one essentially waives claim to copyright original
material he or she writes on Usenet simply by the act of posting.

Other copyrighted material from sources not of the poster's writing,
such as excerpts from news stories, books, etc., can be noted as
copyrighted and where possible an attribution to the original source
should be made, but all else is public domain. I've never heard of a
suit over a routine Usenet post, and most judges would throw it out
before it even got in front of a jury.

And maybe even sanction the plaintiff for even filing the thing.




It appears that Mr. Willyman has difficulties remembering where he
lives, let alone which planet he is on.
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/Failed_PO_Box.html



Gee, and he's so certain that he is right and everyone else is
wrong about his DMCA complaint you'd think he'd want to make real sure
everyone had the right address.

Why don't you spam my email again sonny?
[/quote]
Request for abundance noted and approved.
 
Dave U. Random...
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 1:35 pm
Guest
In article <4AE4C6E5.6B8A at (no spam) earthlink.net>
Edmond Wollmann <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote:
[quote]
You are a liar, I hardly answer emails sent to me by people I accept
emails from (clients, inquiries, friends etc.)
[/quote]
That's easy when you have no clients or friends, asshole.
 
Anonymous...
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 2:57 pm
Guest
In article <4AE4C6F3.4412 at (no spam) earthlink.net>
Edmond Wollmann <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote:
[quote]
alt.astrology.metapsych removed.
[/quote]
Restored!!1!!

[quote]
Your client continues to post
[/quote]
And you continue to whine about it like the spanked bitch that you are!
 
Cujo DeSockpuppet...
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 3:36 pm
Guest
Dave U. Random <anonymous at (no spam) anonymitaet-im-inter.net> wrote in
news:a1154b41a6b4eedb160db2e4795f417c at (no spam) anonymitaet-im-inter.net:

[quote]In article <4AE4C705.3AB2 at (no spam) earthlink.net
Edmond Wollmann <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote:

WindsorFox<[SS]> wrote:

Chris wrote:
"James W Anderson" <jander7 at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6c148a6e-9e0b-40b9-8800-ca1d425d6bec at (no spam) g1g2000pra.googlegroups.
com...
Clearly something is off-base regarding claiming Usenet posts.

Usenet is a discussion forum, and you can expect things to go
wherever from there, and one essentially waives claim to
copyright original material he or she writes on Usenet simply by
the act of posting.

Other copyrighted material from sources not of the poster's
writing, such as excerpts from news stories, books, etc., can be
noted as copyrighted and where possible an attribution to the
original source should be made, but all else is public domain.
I've never heard of a suit over a routine Usenet post, and most
judges would throw it out before it even got in front of a jury.

And maybe even sanction the plaintiff for even filing the thing.




It appears that Mr. Willyman has difficulties remembering where
he lives, let alone which planet he is on.
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/Failed_PO_Box.html



Gee, and he's so certain that he is right and everyone else is
wrong about his DMCA complaint you'd think he'd want to make real
sure everyone had the right address.

Why don't you spam my email again sonny?

Request for abundance noted and approved.
[/quote]
I'll see if the ABUNDANCE Lady feels like it.

--
Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*,
alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy
Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S
award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse
Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895.
"I WILL GO IN PERSON AND TAKE ALL LEGAL, ETHICAL, AND MATERIAL ACTION I
CAN" -Edmo finally right, but not in the way he expected ....
 
Cujo DeSockpuppet...
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 3:37 pm
Guest
Edmond Wollmann <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote in
news:4AE4C6F3.4412 at (no spam) earthlink.net:

[quote]alt.astrology.metapsych removed.
[/quote]
Replaced...

[quote]Your client continues to post
[/quote]
and Pantyhead is powerless to stop it. Sucks to be you!!!1!!!

--
Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*,
alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy
Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S
award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse
Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895.
"The dump is a good place too." -Edmond Wollmann, keeping his options
open for a future place for storing his unsold books.
 
Edmond Wollmann...
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 3:45 pm
Guest
Werewolfy wrote:
[quote]
On 24 Oct, 06:44, James W Anderson <jand... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:
Clearly something is off-base regarding claiming Usenet posts.

Usenet is a discussion forum, and you can expect things to go wherever
from there, and one essentially waives claim to copyright original
material he or she writes on Usenet simply by the act of posting.

Other copyrighted material from sources not of the poster's writing,
such as excerpts from news stories, books, etc., can be noted as
copyrighted and where possible an attribution to the original source
should be made, but all else is public domain. �I've never heard of a
suit over a routine Usenet post, and most judges would throw it out
before it even got in front of a jury.

And maybe even sanction the plaintiff for even filing the thing.

Good old Ed He sent this to me today; Whay a lovely Astrologer he is.
Oh my, such pretty oredictions. how very frightening.
Fucking lunatic..should be in an asylum.
[/quote]
You are a liar, I hardly answer emails sent to me by people I accept
emails from (clients, inquiries, friends etc.), let alone emailing
people I don't know, that's why Merrill has NO case.
--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/
 
Edmond Wollmann...
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 3:45 pm
Guest
Chris wrote:
[quote]
"James W Anderson" <jander7 at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:d6b8b2d2-c3ef-42d1-9916-a93fc80cdee6 at (no spam) z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
This discussion was found in alt.astrology, and comes up presently
when one searches generically for NANAE in Google Groups.

The links do not work properly unless you manually put them in,
deja.com still works but it will redirect you to the same post in
Google Groups anyway.
[/quote]
http://www.astroconsulting.com/FAQs/fraud_and_abuse.htm

[quote]I also believe the 'accreditations' at the end of his posts are also
fake. Anyone know aboutt those, including the 'SAN' number?
[/quote]
You don't even know what it is for.

[quote]Mr. Sillyman is sending DMCA notices to all and sundry because he is
claiming copyright on his Usenet postings. Including other peoples replies
to his postings.
[/quote]
No, please show me where I was claiming copyright on OTHER peoples
posted material. Why do you frauds have to lie every four words or so?
--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/
 
Edmond Wollmann...
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 3:45 pm
Guest
WindsorFox<[SS]> wrote:
[quote]
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
"WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.fox.usenet at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in
news:hc1dpb$5ig$1 at (no spam) posting2.glorb.com:

Chris wrote:
And maybe even sanction the plaintiff for even filing the thing.



It appears that Mr. Willyman has difficulties remembering where he
lives, let alone which planet he is on.
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/Failed_PO_Box.html
Gee, and he's so certain that he is right and everyone else is
wrong about his DMCA complaint you'd think he'd want to make real sure
everyone had the right address.

Watch Pantyhead blame it on the spinics at the US Post Office.


I wonder if Ed realizes that "spinic" is not a word?
[/quote]
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.astrology/msg/1a5561f1fd7392a8?hl=en&&q=What+is+a+spinic

--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/
 
Edmond Wollmann...
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 3:45 pm
Guest
WindsorFox<[SS]> wrote:
[quote]
Edmond Wollmann wrote:
I saw no copy right symbols on that page at all, how about you drop
the petty insults and be specific?

For being so ignorant, you sure are condescending.

You certainly are obnoxious for someone who is wrong most of the time.
[/quote]
Name one time I was wrong.
--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/
 
Edmond Wollmann...
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 3:45 pm
Guest
alt.astrology.metapsych removed.

Your client continues to post off topic and in violation of this charter
only to defame, harass and denigrate me and my companies. Please take
action.
Thanks

http://www.astroconsulting.com/FAQs/charter.htm

Chris Krolczyk wrote:
[quote]
On Oct 20, 6:22 pm, Edmond Wollmann <arcturian... at (no spam) earthlink.net
wrote:
Chris Krolczyk wrote:

Now *this* is a URL you can respect:

Articles and educaSLAP!

Remember the definition of insanity as
doing the same thing over and over again
and expecting a different result?
[/quote]
Right. Like you spinics harassing and defaming me for 12 years.

Path:

border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!r36g2000vbn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From:
Chris Krolczyk <arfiend2009 at (no spam) gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet, alt.astrology,
alt.astrology.metapsych, alt.usenet.kooks
Subject:
Re: Ed Wollmann is breaking wind as we speak
Date:
Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:11:15 -0700 (PDT)
Organization:
http://groups.google.com
Lines:
30
Message-ID:

<55d0a0e9-a165-4f29-b975-f5d07ecadcd2 at (no spam) r36g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
References:
<20090922190536.413521A797A at (no spam) www.ecn.org>
<ha2c0q$pbv$00$1 at (no spam) news.t-online.com>
<4ac4f09a$0$2485$db0fefd9 at (no spam) news.zen.co.uk>
<2d688178-2219-4465-8cd4-5c044cb4fd95 at (no spam) g31g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
<4ac8fc61$0$2534$da0feed9 at (no spam) news.zen.co.uk>
<cd6190d3-ee92-468f-ac31-6ede0acf09d3 at (no spam) p36g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>

<71b2f858ce09ee7528dd01aad156406a at (no spam) remailer.gabrix.ath.cx>
<4ACB7BA1.55D9 at (no spam) earthlink.net>
<hag2no$4tb$1 at (no spam) freespeech.eternal-september.org>
<4ACC10F5.2DAD at (no spam) earthlink.net> <hahc9u$8ls$1 at (no spam) aioe.org>
<4ACCC5EB.22FB at (no spam) earthlink.net>
<haitga$2cg$1 at (no spam) posting2.glorb.com> <4AD3F155.5C7E at (no spam) earthlink.net>
<hb35ld$uni$1 at (no spam) posting2.glorb.com>
<4AD54A80.21E0 at (no spam) earthlink.net>

<604ff6c8d4d18fa9f33d0e441749da56 at (no spam) anonymitaet-im-inter.net>
<4ADE43CF.43BD at (no spam) earthlink.net>

<4756027b-5390-4532-9e3c-13f9c63a4a45 at (no spam) m13g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>
<4ADE464A.12F7 at (no spam) earthlink.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host:
66.99.13.226
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace:
posting.google.com 1256083875 546 127.0.0.1 (21 Oct
2009 00:11:15 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
groups-abuse at (no spam) google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date:
Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:11:15 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To:
groups-abuse at (no spam) google.com
Injection-Info:
r36g2000vbn.googlegroups.com;
posting-host=66.99.13.226;
posting-account=88715AkAAACVUpD4QNOsF3pvQ3B-Onel
User-Agent:
G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090605 SeaMonkey/1.1.17,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Bytes:
2858
Xref:
number.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.usenet.kooks:1945878
alt.astrology.metapsych:232379 alt.astrology:682643
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet:756900


On Oct 20, 6:22 pm, Edmond Wollmann <arcturian... at (no spam) earthlink.net>
wrote:
[quote]Chris Krolczyk wrote:

Now *this* is a URL you can respect:

Articles and educaSLAP!
[/quote]
Remember the definition of insanity as
doing the same thing over and over again
and expecting a different result?

Well, guess what, Edmo. By those standards,
you should be off drooling in a padded
cell since reposting a series of links
most people won't even bother to click
on, much less *read*, is exactly that.
--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/
 
Edmond Wollmann...
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 3:45 pm
Guest
James W Anderson wrote:
[quote]
Clearly something is off-base regarding claiming Usenet posts.

Usenet is a discussion forum, and you can expect things to go wherever
from there, and one essentially waives claim to copyright original
material he or she writes on Usenet simply by the act of posting.

Other copyrighted material from sources not of the poster's writing,
such as excerpts from news stories, books, etc., can be noted as
copyrighted and where possible an attribution to the original source
should be made, but all else is public domain. I've never heard of a
suit over a routine Usenet post, and most judges would throw it out
before it even got in front of a jury.

And maybe even sanction the plaintiff for even filing the thing.
[/quote]
You guys should learn to open your mouth only when I can't make a fool
out of you, which would be always.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=myths+about+copyright&aq=0&oq=Myths+about+cop&aqi=g1g-m2

--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/
 
Edmond Wollmann...
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 3:45 pm
Guest
WindsorFox<[SS]> wrote:
[quote]
Chris wrote:
"James W Anderson" <jander7 at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6c148a6e-9e0b-40b9-8800-ca1d425d6bec at (no spam) g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
Clearly something is off-base regarding claiming Usenet posts.

Usenet is a discussion forum, and you can expect things to go wherever
from there, and one essentially waives claim to copyright original
material he or she writes on Usenet simply by the act of posting.

Other copyrighted material from sources not of the poster's writing,
such as excerpts from news stories, books, etc., can be noted as
copyrighted and where possible an attribution to the original source
should be made, but all else is public domain. I've never heard of a
suit over a routine Usenet post, and most judges would throw it out
before it even got in front of a jury.

And maybe even sanction the plaintiff for even filing the thing.




It appears that Mr. Willyman has difficulties remembering where he
lives, let alone which planet he is on.
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/Failed_PO_Box.html



Gee, and he's so certain that he is right and everyone else is
wrong about his DMCA complaint you'd think he'd want to make real sure
everyone had the right address.
[/quote]
Why don't you spam my email again sonny?
--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/
 
Chris...
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 4:16 pm
Guest
"Edmond Wollmann" <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:4AE4C6E8.7277 at (no spam) earthlink.net...
[quote]Chris wrote:

"James W Anderson" <jander7 at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:d6b8b2d2-c3ef-42d1-9916-a93fc80cdee6 at (no spam) z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
This discussion was found in alt.astrology, and comes up presently
when one searches generically for NANAE in Google Groups.

The links do not work properly unless you manually put them in,
deja.com still works but it will redirect you to the same post in
Google Groups anyway.

http://www.astroconsulting.com/FAQs/fraud_and_abuse.htm

I also believe the 'accreditations' at the end of his posts are also
fake. Anyone know aboutt those, including the 'SAN' number?

You don't even know what it is for.

Mr. Sillyman is sending DMCA notices to all and sundry because he is
claiming copyright on his Usenet postings. Including other peoples
replies
to his postings.

No, please show me where I was claiming copyright on OTHER peoples
posted material. Why do you frauds have to lie every four words or so?

[/quote]
Why don't you put the correct address on your DCMA notice, which you also
agree was badly worded.
Do try to keep up.
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/Failed_PO_Box.html



--
Cult leader Pyotr Kuznetsov became depressed after his prophesy about the
world ending in May 2008, that he tried to commit suicide by hitting himself
on the head with a log.
 
Matt...
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 4:35 pm
Guest
Edmond Wollmann wrote:
[quote]Werewolfy wrote:
On 24 Oct, 06:44, James W Anderson <jand... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:
Clearly something is off-base regarding claiming Usenet posts.

Usenet is a discussion forum, and you can expect things to go wherever
from there, and one essentially waives claim to copyright original
material he or she writes on Usenet simply by the act of posting.

Other copyrighted material from sources not of the poster's writing,
such as excerpts from news stories, books, etc., can be noted as
copyrighted and where possible an attribution to the original source
should be made, but all else is public domain. �I've never heard of a
suit over a routine Usenet post, and most judges would throw it out
before it even got in front of a jury.

And maybe even sanction the plaintiff for even filing the thing.
Good old Ed He sent this to me today; Whay a lovely Astrologer he is.
Oh my, such pretty oredictions. how very frightening.
Fucking lunatic..should be in an asylum.

You are a liar, I hardly answer emails sent to me by people I accept
emails from (clients, inquiries, friends etc.)
[/quote]
Well, no wonder your career is in the shitter, dummy.

Extend that to not answering real mail that you are legally bound to
accept, and then refusing to accept, puts you in violation of Federal
law re: your recent fraudulent DMCA notice issuances.
 
Matt...
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 4:39 pm
Guest
Edmond Wollmann wrote:
[quote]Chris wrote:
"James W Anderson" <jander7 at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:d6b8b2d2-c3ef-42d1-9916-a93fc80cdee6 at (no spam) z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
This discussion was found in alt.astrology, and comes up presently
when one searches generically for NANAE in Google Groups.

The links do not work properly unless you manually put them in,
deja.com still works but it will redirect you to the same post in
Google Groups anyway.

http://www.astroconsulting.com/FAQs/fraud_and_abuse.htm

I also believe the 'accreditations' at the end of his posts are also
fake. Anyone know aboutt those, including the 'SAN' number?

You don't even know what it is for.
[/quote]
Apparently, neither do you, or you wouldn't be slapping it on your inane
Usenet postings.
[quote]
Mr. Sillyman is sending DMCA notices to all and sundry because he is
claiming copyright on his Usenet postings. Including other peoples replies
to his postings.

No, please show me where I was claiming copyright on OTHER peoples
posted material.
[/quote]
I'd point you back to your fraudulent DMCA claim to
http://smbtech.com/ed, in which you claimed that page was copyrighted
material owned by you. In fact, that page ONLY contains material written
by other people, you incredibly stupid pinhead.

[quote]Why do you frauds have to lie every four words or so?
[/quote]
Do you have any idea how jarring your complete ignorance of your
projection is?
 
 
Page 7 of 9    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Nov 29, 2009 11:16 pm