 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Astrology Forum » Ed Wollmann is breaking the law as we speak... |
|
Page 6 of 9 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Next |
|
| Author |
Message |
| James W Anderson... |
Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 12:53 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Nomen Nescio... |
Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:46 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| EHWollmann... |
Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 6:07 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 23, 3:53 pm, James Walter Anderson <jand... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:
[quote]This discussion was found in alt.astrology, and comes up presently
when one searches generically for NANAE in Google Groups.
The links do not work properly unless you manually put them in,
deja.com still works but it will redirect you to the same post in
Google Groups anyway.
[/quote]
No one paid attention to it the first time except for a certain
batshit person.
[quote]I also believe the 'accreditations' at the end of his posts are also
fake. Anyone know aboutt those, including the 'SAN' number?
[/quote]
Irrelevant. Has nothing to do with me retaining copyrights.
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
The SUN http://www.edmondwollmann.com/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| James W Anderson... |
Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 7:44 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Clearly something is off-base regarding claiming Usenet posts.
Usenet is a discussion forum, and you can expect things to go wherever
from there, and one essentially waives claim to copyright original
material he or she writes on Usenet simply by the act of posting.
Other copyrighted material from sources not of the poster's writing,
such as excerpts from news stories, books, etc., can be noted as
copyrighted and where possible an attribution to the original source
should be made, but all else is public domain. I've never heard of a
suit over a routine Usenet post, and most judges would throw it out
before it even got in front of a jury.
And maybe even sanction the plaintiff for even filing the thing. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Chris... |
Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 10:46 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"James W Anderson" <jander7 at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:d6b8b2d2-c3ef-42d1-9916-a93fc80cdee6 at (no spam) z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
[quote]This discussion was found in alt.astrology, and comes up presently
when one searches generically for NANAE in Google Groups.
The links do not work properly unless you manually put them in,
deja.com still works but it will redirect you to the same post in
Google Groups anyway.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.astrology/browse_thread/thread/2f77ba1ed4ea6441/3ee6dbe5dd8f0374?q=news.admin.net-abuse.email#3ee6dbe5dd8f0374
I also believe the 'accreditations' at the end of his posts are also
fake. Anyone know aboutt those, including the 'SAN' number?
[/quote]
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/
Mr. Sillyman is sending DMCA notices to all and sundry because he is
claiming copyright on his Usenet postings. Including other peoples replies
to his postings. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Werewolfy... |
Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 4:28 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 24 Oct, 06:44, James W Anderson <jand... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:
[quote]Clearly something is off-base regarding claiming Usenet posts.
Usenet is a discussion forum, and you can expect things to go wherever
from there, and one essentially waives claim to copyright original
material he or she writes on Usenet simply by the act of posting.
Other copyrighted material from sources not of the poster's writing,
such as excerpts from news stories, books, etc., can be noted as
copyrighted and where possible an attribution to the original source
should be made, but all else is public domain. �I've never heard of a
suit over a routine Usenet post, and most judges would throw it out
before it even got in front of a jury.
And maybe even sanction the plaintiff for even filing the thing.
[/quote]
Good old Ed He sent this to me today; Whay a lovely Astrologer he is.
Oh my, such pretty oredictions. how very frightening.
Fucking lunatic..should be in an asylum.
EHWollmann View profile
Newsgroups: alt.astrology.marketplace, alt.apocalypse, alt.divination,
alt.prophecies.nostradamus, alt.astrology
From: "EHWollmann" <arcturian... at (no spam) earthlink.net>
"He won't stupid, you will die ahead of him because your time is
approaching quicker than you know, the first sign you shall see will
be in 12 days from now, +/- 3 days. I was watching this coming event
for a long time too, so the tolerance is not a big number if you
compare to a decade of waiting to see your punishment's calendar. Most
thief's are in USA what do you know dummy? You are one of them, so
shut the fuck up." |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| WindsorFo... |
Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 4:47 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
EHWollmann wrote:
[quote]On Oct 22, 3:20 am, The Peeler <peeling... at (no spam) sick.admin> wrote:
At least it was original, that's about it though. If I were 10 I'd
still be better than you....
What an absolute kook! Declares its own reply as "original"! Not that I'm a
bit be surprised.
No, I called your reply original, yet it was still meaningless,
douchebag.
I really see now that your chronic self-delusions keep getting in the way of
your communications, Windbag. As I said before: you are in desperate need
of some introspection (or just grow older or stop gaming).
--
Too full of himself, no room for a brain
Gaming, hmmmm, that sounds like Geoff. Why would he keep arguing for
example on the DMCA issue when he is clearly wrong, and then act as if
he isn't and continue to attack me? Can he really keep emailing me
crap unsolicited? I have asked him to stop and he continues while he
tries to tell me I am not doing the right things. What ever happened
to just being honest?
[/quote]
Sounds like Who? He who keeps arguing? If you mean me, I havn't. I
told you that you filed a false and malformed notice and that you don't
have a snowballs chance in hell and you insisted not, at which point I
said please let us know how that works out, especially if you have to
get xs4all to remove something. I stick by it, I think you'll waste a
lot of money and get zero out of it, but please; do let us know how that
all works out. I did NOT attack you. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| WindsorFo... |
Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 4:48 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
The Peeler wrote:
[quote]On Oct 22, 3:20 am, The Peeler <peeling... at (no spam) sick.admin> wrote:
At least it was original, that's about it though. If I were 10 I'd
still be better than you....
What an absolute kook! Declares its own reply as "original"! Not that I'm a
bit be surprised.
No, I called your reply original, yet it was still meaningless,
douchebag.
I really see now that your chronic self-delusions keep getting in the way of
your communications, Windbag. As I said before: you are in desperate need
of some introspection (or just grow older or stop gaming).
--
Too full of himself, no room for a brain
Gaming, hmmmm, that sounds like Geoff. Why would he keep arguing for
example on the DMCA issue when he is clearly wrong, and then act as if
he isn't and continue to attack me? Can he really keep emailing me
crap unsolicited? I have asked him to stop and he continues while he
tries to tell me I am not doing the right things. What ever happened
to just being honest?
Winbag is just a....
[/quote]
<SLAP>
STFU douchebag. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| The Peeler... |
Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:14 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
[quote]The Peeler wrote:
On Oct 22, 3:20 am, The Peeler <peeling... at (no spam) sick.admin> wrote:
At least it was original, that's about it though. If I were 10 I'd
still be better than you....
What an absolute kook! Declares its own reply as "original"! Not that I'm a
bit be surprised.
No, I called your reply original, yet it was still meaningless,
douchebag.
I really see now that your chronic self-delusions keep getting in the way of
your communications, Windbag. As I said before: you are in desperate need
of some introspection (or just grow older or stop gaming).
--
Too full of himself, no room for a brain
Gaming, hmmmm, that sounds like Geoff. Why would he keep arguing for
example on the DMCA issue when he is clearly wrong, and then act as if
he isn't and continue to attack me? Can he really keep emailing me
crap unsolicited? I have asked him to stop and he continues while he
tries to tell me I am not doing the right things. What ever happened
to just being honest?
Winbag is just a....
SLAP
STFU douchebag.
[/quote]
Boy, you really are a laugh!
--
An arrow flies like time, Banana Boy flies like a fruit |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Cujo DeSockpuppet... |
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 2:42 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.fox.usenet at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in
news:hc1dpb$5ig$1 at (no spam) posting2.glorb.com:
[quote]Chris wrote:
"James W Anderson" <jander7 at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6c148a6e-9e0b-40b9-8800-ca1d425d6bec at (no spam) g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com.
..
Clearly something is off-base regarding claiming Usenet posts.
Usenet is a discussion forum, and you can expect things to go
wherever from there, and one essentially waives claim to copyright
original material he or she writes on Usenet simply by the act of
posting.
Other copyrighted material from sources not of the poster's writing,
such as excerpts from news stories, books, etc., can be noted as
copyrighted and where possible an attribution to the original source
should be made, but all else is public domain. I've never heard of
a suit over a routine Usenet post, and most judges would throw it
out before it even got in front of a jury.
And maybe even sanction the plaintiff for even filing the thing.
It appears that Mr. Willyman has difficulties remembering where he
lives, let alone which planet he is on.
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/Failed_PO_Box.html
Gee, and he's so certain that he is right and everyone else is
wrong about his DMCA complaint you'd think he'd want to make real sure
everyone had the right address.
[/quote]
Watch Pantyhead blame it on the spinics at the US Post Office.
--
Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*,
alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy
Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S
award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse
Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895.
"The point punk, is that abusers like you will soon be removed
completely from the internet and placed in custody for your criminal
activities." - Wollmann fucks up yet another prediction. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Chris... |
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 3:08 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"James W Anderson" <jander7 at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6c148a6e-9e0b-40b9-8800-ca1d425d6bec at (no spam) g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
[quote]Clearly something is off-base regarding claiming Usenet posts.
Usenet is a discussion forum, and you can expect things to go wherever
from there, and one essentially waives claim to copyright original
material he or she writes on Usenet simply by the act of posting.
Other copyrighted material from sources not of the poster's writing,
such as excerpts from news stories, books, etc., can be noted as
copyrighted and where possible an attribution to the original source
should be made, but all else is public domain. I've never heard of a
suit over a routine Usenet post, and most judges would throw it out
before it even got in front of a jury.
And maybe even sanction the plaintiff for even filing the thing.
[/quote]
It appears that Mr. Willyman has difficulties remembering where he lives,
let alone which planet he is on.
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/Failed_PO_Box.html
--
Cult leader Pyotr Kuznetsov became depressed after his prophesy about the
world ending in May 2008, that he tried to commit suicide by hitting himself
on the head with a log. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| WindsorFo... |
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 5:45 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Chris wrote:
[quote]"James W Anderson" <jander7 at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6c148a6e-9e0b-40b9-8800-ca1d425d6bec at (no spam) g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
Clearly something is off-base regarding claiming Usenet posts.
Usenet is a discussion forum, and you can expect things to go wherever
from there, and one essentially waives claim to copyright original
material he or she writes on Usenet simply by the act of posting.
Other copyrighted material from sources not of the poster's writing,
such as excerpts from news stories, books, etc., can be noted as
copyrighted and where possible an attribution to the original source
should be made, but all else is public domain. I've never heard of a
suit over a routine Usenet post, and most judges would throw it out
before it even got in front of a jury.
And maybe even sanction the plaintiff for even filing the thing.
It appears that Mr. Willyman has difficulties remembering where he
lives, let alone which planet he is on.
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/Failed_PO_Box.html
[/quote]
Gee, and he's so certain that he is right and everyone else is
wrong about his DMCA complaint you'd think he'd want to make real sure
everyone had the right address. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Cujo DeSockpuppet... |
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 5:56 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.fox.usenet at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in
news:hc1lg8$63j$2 at (no spam) posting2.glorb.com:
[quote]Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
"WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.fox.usenet at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in
news:hc1dpb$5ig$1 at (no spam) posting2.glorb.com:
Chris wrote:
And maybe even sanction the plaintiff for even filing the thing.
It appears that Mr. Willyman has difficulties remembering where he
lives, let alone which planet he is on.
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/Failed_PO_Box.html
Gee, and he's so certain that he is right and everyone else is
wrong about his DMCA complaint you'd think he'd want to make real
sure everyone had the right address.
Watch Pantyhead blame it on the spinics at the US Post Office.
I wonder if Ed realizes that "spinic" is not a word?
[/quote]
I'll have to resurrect the Edlish dictionary. Here's part of the entry:
Spinic: Anyone who refuses to kiss his ass
Here's the rest.
Edlish (what Ed says) English (what Ed means)
AA Degree: GED
Abuse: Responding to his posts
Art: Plagiarism
Articles: Screed
Bitch: A woman who wants her money back
Blending: Plagiarism
Borrow: Steal
Castle: A trailer in the desert
Clients: Marks and rubes
Complaining: Powerless whining
Con-artist: Anyone successful or with a real income
Copyright violation: Responding to his posts
Counseling: Cold Reading
Counselor: Unlicensed quack
Defamation: Pointing out his lies and mistakes
Enlightenment: Confusion
Falconry: Wildlife molestation
Finished my degrees: Got kicked out of school without any diplomas
Flooding: Others posting on topic material
Girlfriend: Meal ticket
Gratuity Food stamps:
Harassment: Replying to his posts
Hat: Panties
Higher vibrational level: I'm drunk again
Hitler: A great guy
I'm young: I'm older than dirt, bald and butt ugly
Independence: Mooching off his relatives
Interpret: Steal others work and mangle it
Lawsuits: Empty threats
Leaving forever: I'll be back in a minute
Logical arguments: Incoherent, plagiarized screed
Love: Exploitation
Moving to New Mexico: Running from the law
My businesses: His scams
Orion: A star
Powerful arguments: Incoherent babbling
Published author: Illiterate kook
Shopping: Dumpster diving
Spinic: Anyone who refuses to kiss his ass
Stalking: Replying to his posts
Success: Failure
It was only a traffic ticket: It was really a criminal conviction and
probation
Virility: Impotence
Undefeated: I'm in denial
Unmoderated: Moderated
We create our own reality: It's my friend's fault I killed him
Here's the old site:
http://web.archive.org/web/20030207231956/kook-watch.net/Ed/edlish.html
My updated one was pulled as part of a troll and never put pack up.
--
Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*,
alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy
Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S
award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse
Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895.
"I DEMAND ACTION AND I DEMAND IT NOW!!!!! DO YOU UNDERSTAND ME????? I
WANT THIS CRIMINAL IN JAIL. NOW." --Ed Wollmann, in one of his deluded
trances wherein he fancies himself some powerful dictator instead of the
dust-farting pipsqueak he actually is. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| WindsorFo... |
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 7:57 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
[quote]"WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.fox.usenet at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in
news:hc1dpb$5ig$1 at (no spam) posting2.glorb.com:
Chris wrote:
And maybe even sanction the plaintiff for even filing the thing.
It appears that Mr. Willyman has difficulties remembering where he
lives, let alone which planet he is on.
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/Failed_PO_Box.html
Gee, and he's so certain that he is right and everyone else is
wrong about his DMCA complaint you'd think he'd want to make real sure
everyone had the right address.
Watch Pantyhead blame it on the spinics at the US Post Office.
[/quote]
I wonder if Ed realizes that "spinic" is not a word? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Dave U. Random... |
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 12:24 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
In article <4AE4C6E8.7277 at (no spam) earthlink.net>
Edmond Wollmann <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote:
[quote]
Why do you frauds have to lie every four words or so?
[/quote]
Why do you have to whine in every post you make, wanker?
http://www.smbtech.com/ed |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:42 pm
|
|