 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Astrology Forum » Ed Wollmann is breaking the law as we speak... |
|
Page 8 of 9 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Next |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Matt... |
 Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 4:41 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Edmond Wollmann wrote:
[quote]WindsorFox<[SS]> wrote:
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
"WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.fox.usenet at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in
news:hc1dpb$5ig$1 at (no spam) posting2.glorb.com:
Chris wrote:
And maybe even sanction the plaintiff for even filing the thing.
It appears that Mr. Willyman has difficulties remembering where he
lives, let alone which planet he is on.
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/Failed_PO_Box.html
Gee, and he's so certain that he is right and everyone else is
wrong about his DMCA complaint you'd think he'd want to make real sure
everyone had the right address.
Watch Pantyhead blame it on the spinics at the US Post Office.
I wonder if Ed realizes that "spinic" is not a word?
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.astrology/msg/1a5561f1fd7392a8?hl=en&&q=What+is+a+spinic
[/quote]
Pointing to yourself as the authority for the origin of the term is
pathetic, but typical for someone as self-deluded as you are.
Someone recently called you a "doucheweasel". At least that word is used
by other people. Plus, it fits you perfectly. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Matt... |
| Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 4:42 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Edmond Wollmann wrote:
[quote]WindsorFox<[SS]> wrote:
Edmond Wollmann wrote:
I saw no copy right symbols on that page at all, how about you drop
the petty insults and be specific?
For being so ignorant, you sure are condescending.
You certainly are obnoxious for someone who is wrong most of the time.
Name one time I was wrong.
[/quote]
You just sent a fucked-up DMCA notice that failed to specify what was
violating your questionable "copyrights", and failed to provide a valid
return address, you moron. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Matt... |
| Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 4:43 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Edmond Wollmann wrote:
[quote]alt.astrology.metapsych removed.
Your client continues to post
[/quote]
Oh, shut your complaining little piehole, you ratbag.
[quote]
On Oct 20, 6:22 pm, Edmond Wollmann <arcturian... at (no spam) earthlink.net
wrote:
Chris Krolczyk wrote:
Now *this* is a URL you can respect:
Articles and educaSLAP!
Remember the definition of insanity as
doing the same thing over and over again
and expecting a different result?
Well, guess what, Edmo. By those standards,
you should be off drooling in a padded
cell since reposting a series of links
most people won't even bother to click
on, much less *read*, is exactly that.[/quote] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Matt... |
| Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 4:44 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Edmond Wollmann wrote:
[quote]James W Anderson wrote:
Clearly something is off-base regarding claiming Usenet posts.
Usenet is a discussion forum, and you can expect things to go wherever
from there, and one essentially waives claim to copyright original
material he or she writes on Usenet simply by the act of posting.
Other copyrighted material from sources not of the poster's writing,
such as excerpts from news stories, books, etc., can be noted as
copyrighted and where possible an attribution to the original source
should be made, but all else is public domain. I've never heard of a
suit over a routine Usenet post, and most judges would throw it out
before it even got in front of a jury.
And maybe even sanction the plaintiff for even filing the thing.
You guys should
[/quote]
laugh at your retarded attempts to make hay of this situation. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Anonymous... |
| Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 5:28 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
In article <hc2uei$qho$1 at (no spam) blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo at (no spam) petitmorte.net> wrote:
[quote]
Dave U. Random <anonymous at (no spam) anonymitaet-im-inter.net> wrote in
news:a1154b41a6b4eedb160db2e4795f417c at (no spam) anonymitaet-im-inter.net:
In article <4AE4C705.3AB2 at (no spam) earthlink.net
Edmond Wollmann <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote:
WindsorFox<[SS]> wrote:
Chris wrote:
"James W Anderson" <jander7 at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6c148a6e-9e0b-40b9-8800-ca1d425d6bec at (no spam) g1g2000pra.googlegroups.
com...
Clearly something is off-base regarding claiming Usenet posts.
Usenet is a discussion forum, and you can expect things to go
wherever from there, and one essentially waives claim to
copyright original material he or she writes on Usenet simply by
the act of posting.
Other copyrighted material from sources not of the poster's
writing, such as excerpts from news stories, books, etc., can be
noted as copyrighted and where possible an attribution to the
original source should be made, but all else is public domain.
I've never heard of a suit over a routine Usenet post, and most
judges would throw it out before it even got in front of a jury.
And maybe even sanction the plaintiff for even filing the thing.
It appears that Mr. Willyman has difficulties remembering where
he lives, let alone which planet he is on.
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/Failed_PO_Box.html
Gee, and he's so certain that he is right and everyone else is
wrong about his DMCA complaint you'd think he'd want to make real
sure everyone had the right address.
Why don't you spam my email again sonny?
Request for abundance noted and approved.
I'll see if the ABUNDANCE Lady feels like it.
[/quote]
All hail the abundance lady!!1!! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| WindsorFo... |
| Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 6:58 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Edmond Wollmann wrote:
[quote]WindsorFox<[SS]> wrote:
Edmond Wollmann wrote:
I saw no copy right symbols on that page at all, how about you drop
the petty insults and be specific?
For being so ignorant, you sure are condescending.
You certainly are obnoxious for someone who is wrong most of the time.
Name one time I was wrong.
[/quote]
When you referred to me as "Geoff," when you claimed copy right
infringement on the smb page. That's only two from memory, I feel
certain someone could find more by delving into what you've posted.
--
..
Well, it was important enough for several folks to
comment on. Fortunately, they were not burdened
by Microsoft shitware which fails to properly
implement a decade-old standard. - Sam |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| WindsorFo... |
| Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 6:58 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Edmond Wollmann wrote:
[quote]WindsorFox<[SS]> wrote:
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
"WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.fox.usenet at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in
news:hc1dpb$5ig$1 at (no spam) posting2.glorb.com:
Chris wrote:
And maybe even sanction the plaintiff for even filing the thing.
It appears that Mr. Willyman has difficulties remembering where he
lives, let alone which planet he is on.
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/Failed_PO_Box.html
Gee, and he's so certain that he is right and everyone else is
wrong about his DMCA complaint you'd think he'd want to make real sure
everyone had the right address.
Watch Pantyhead blame it on the spinics at the US Post Office.
I wonder if Ed realizes that "spinic" is not a word?
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.astrology/msg/1a5561f1fd7392a8?hl=en&&q=What+is+a+spinic
[/quote]
The fact that *you* made the word up is mostly what drives my
opinion that it is not a real word. That and the fact that only you use
it and it is in no dictionary that I consulted.
--
..
Well, it was important enough for several folks to
comment on. Fortunately, they were not burdened
by Microsoft shitware which fails to properly
implement a decade-old standard. - Sam |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| WindsorFo... |
| Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 7:00 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Edmond Wollmann wrote:
[quote]WindsorFox<[SS]> wrote:
Chris wrote:
"James W Anderson" <jander7 at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6c148a6e-9e0b-40b9-8800-ca1d425d6bec at (no spam) g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
Clearly something is off-base regarding claiming Usenet posts.
Usenet is a discussion forum, and you can expect things to go wherever
from there, and one essentially waives claim to copyright original
material he or she writes on Usenet simply by the act of posting.
Other copyrighted material from sources not of the poster's writing,
such as excerpts from news stories, books, etc., can be noted as
copyrighted and where possible an attribution to the original source
should be made, but all else is public domain. I've never heard of a
suit over a routine Usenet post, and most judges would throw it out
before it even got in front of a jury.
And maybe even sanction the plaintiff for even filing the thing.
It appears that Mr. Willyman has difficulties remembering where he
lives, let alone which planet he is on.
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/Failed_PO_Box.html
Gee, and he's so certain that he is right and everyone else is
wrong about his DMCA complaint you'd think he'd want to make real sure
everyone had the right address.
Why don't you spam my email again sonny?
[/quote]
I've never sent any spam. I have nothing to send that is either bulk
or commercial.
--
..
Well, it was important enough for several folks to
comment on. Fortunately, they were not burdened
by Microsoft shitware which fails to properly
implement a decade-old standard. - Sam |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| WindsorFo... |
| Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 7:02 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Edmond Wollmann wrote:
[quote]James W Anderson wrote:
Clearly something is off-base regarding claiming Usenet posts.
Usenet is a discussion forum, and you can expect things to go wherever
from there, and one essentially waives claim to copyright original
material he or she writes on Usenet simply by the act of posting.
Other copyrighted material from sources not of the poster's writing,
such as excerpts from news stories, books, etc., can be noted as
copyrighted and where possible an attribution to the original source
should be made, but all else is public domain. I've never heard of a
suit over a routine Usenet post, and most judges would throw it out
before it even got in front of a jury.
And maybe even sanction the plaintiff for even filing the thing.
You guys should learn to open your mouth only when I can't make a fool
out of you, which would be always.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=myths+about+copyright&aq=0&oq=Myths+about+cop&aqi=g1g-m2
[/quote]
That's a Google search. Why don't you post a specific link that you
feel backs up your opinion.
--
..
Well, it was important enough for several folks to
comment on. Fortunately, they were not burdened
by Microsoft shitware which fails to properly
implement a decade-old standard. - Sam |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| The Chief Instigator... |
| Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:16 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:45:23 -0700, Edmond Wollmann <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote:
[quote]alt.astrology.metapsych removed.
Your client continues to post off topic and in violation of this charter
only to defame, harass and denigrate me and my companies. Please take
action.
Thanks
http://www.astroconsulting.com/FAQs/charter.htm
Chris Krolczyk wrote:
On Oct 20, 6:22 pm, Edmond Wollmann <arcturian... at (no spam) earthlink.net
wrote:
Chris Krolczyk wrote:
Now *this* is a URL you can respect:
Articles and educaSLAP!
Remember the definition of insanity as
doing the same thing over and over again
and expecting a different result?
Right. Like you spinics harassing and defaming me for 12 years.
[/quote]
If you want to see who's "defaming" you, Pantyhead, you need but a mirror.
--
Patrick L. "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick at (no spam) io.com) Houston, Texas
www.io.com/~patrick/aeros.php (TCI's 2008-09 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Houston 2, San Antonio 0 (October 25)
NEXT GAME: Tuesday, October 27 vs. Hamilton, 3:05 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| chris... |
| Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:54 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 26, 12:58 pm, "WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.fox.use... at (no spam) gmail.com>
wrote:
[quote]Edmond Wollmann wrote:
WindsorFox<[SS]> wrote:
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
"WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.fox.use... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in
news:hc1dpb$5ig$1 at (no spam) posting2.glorb.com:
Chris wrote:
And maybe even sanction the plaintiff for even filing the thing.
It appears that Mr. Willyman has difficulties remembering where he
lives, let alone which planet he is on.
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/Failed_PO_Box.html
Gee, and he's so certain that he is right and everyone else is
wrong about his DMCA complaint you'd think he'd want to make real sure
everyone had the right address.
Watch Pantyhead blame it on the spinics at the US Post Office.
I wonder if Ed realizes that "spinic" is not a word?
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.astrology/msg/1a5561f1fd7392a8?hl=....
The fact that *you* made the word up is mostly what drives my
opinion that it is not a real word. That and the fact that only you use
it and it is in no dictionary that I consulted.
[/quote]
I hope Mr, Sulkymann realizes that he hasn't got a copy right mark to
use on his made up word.
http://www.profilecanada.com/companydetail.cfm?company=140013_Spinic_Manufacturing_Co_Ltd_Guelph_ON |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Plonkite... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 11:37 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 25, 2:45 pm, Edmond Wollmann <arcturian... at (no spam) earthlink.net>
wrote:
[quote]You guys should learn to open your mouth only when I can't make a fool
out of you, which would be always.
[/quote]
You always can't make a fool out of them? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Cujo DeSockpuppet... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 3:02 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Matt <mattb at (no spam) private-info.org> wrote in
news:j1KGm.22677$7Y2.4333 at (no spam) newsfe27.ams2:
[quote]Plonkite wrote:
On Oct 25, 2:45 pm, Edmond Wollmann <arcturian... at (no spam) earthlink.net
wrote:
You guys should learn to open your mouth only when I can't make a
fool out of you, which would be always.
You always can't make a fool out of them?
That is correct:, Ed can NEVER make a fool of anyone else, as he
himself admits there. He's usually being incoherent and making himself
the fool!
[/quote]
That's only if "usually" is defined as 99.9999999999% of the time. You
never have to worry about Old Pantyhead outsmarting anyone.
--
Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*,
alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy
Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S
award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse
Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895.
"I wrote a REFERENCED researched book, that names everyone who's
ideas are integrated within it. Soon my warchest will be large ebough to
to sue the fuck out of you for your lible and defamation, and when that
days comes you can be sure I will publish IT everywhere as well." - Edmo |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Seth... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 4:10 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
In article <hcg2bo$mo1$1 at (no spam) blackhelicopter.databasix.com>,
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo at (no spam) petitmorte.net> wrote:
[quote]Matt <mattb at (no spam) private-info.org> wrote in
news:j1KGm.22677$7Y2.4333 at (no spam) newsfe27.ams2:
Plonkite wrote:
On Oct 25, 2:45 pm, Edmond Wollmann <arcturian... at (no spam) earthlink.net
wrote:
You guys should learn to open your mouth only when I can't make a
fool out of you, which would be always.
You always can't make a fool out of them?
That is correct:, Ed can NEVER make a fool of anyone else, as he
himself admits there. He's usually being incoherent and making himself
the fool!
That's only if "usually" is defined as 99.9999999999% of the time. You
never have to worry about Old Pantyhead outsmarting anyone.
[/quote]
Maybe 3% of the time he can outsmart himself. Dunno if you want to
consider him "anyone".
Seth |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Matt... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 4:46 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Plonkite wrote:
[quote]On Oct 25, 2:45 pm, Edmond Wollmann <arcturian... at (no spam) earthlink.net
wrote:
You guys should learn to open your mouth only when I can't make a fool
out of you, which would be always.
You always can't make a fool out of them?
[/quote]
That is correct:, Ed can NEVER make a fool of anyone else, as he himself
admits there. He's usually being incoherent and making himself the fool! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Dec 06, 2009 1:05 pm
|
|