 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Astrology Forum » What is Self-Empowerment and Integrity?... |
|
Page 4 of 5 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Next |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Edmond Wollmann... |
 Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 11:17 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Bob Officer wrote:
[quote:3cbdae4692]
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 20:45:54 -0700, in alt.astrology, Edmond Wollmann
arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote:
abuser:
http://www.astroconsulting.com/FAQs/fraud_and_abuse.htm
point:
Edmond is a self-procliamed counselor. The state has no formal
recognition of his so called professional status.
Professional Member of AFA that's all I need to be an astrological
counselor.
Not in New Mexico, Edmond. you should keep track of the laws.
California doesn't recognized the AFA which is not a professional
licensing body recognized by any state authority.
The state has no requirement for astrology you idiot. I am a
professional astrological counselor ALL OVER THE WORLD. I have the only
license I need for California. GET A FUCKING CLUE old fart.
I don't NEED any. Why don't you STFU and do something ablout it if you
think you're right?
What makes you think someone hasn't already done so?
[/quote:3cbdae4692]
Because I have been counseling with astrology for 30 years and am ready
to retire for christs sake. Are you really this stupid?
[quote:3cbdae4692]The only professional status Edmond has ever held in the State of
California was that of real estate sales person. That license was
suspended and then revoked for cause, IIRC. The State board will have
those details.
Nope, that licensed expired because I quit. Where's your evidence liar
boi?
I suspect the actual suspension documents from the Board. They are
public records.
I NEVER HAD MY LICESNSE SUSPENDED YOU FUCKING HARDHEAD.
[/quote:3cbdae4692]
I simply let my real estate license expire in 1988, because I didn't
want to be limited by it anymore.
--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Edmond Wollmann... |
| Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 11:17 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Edmond Wollmann... |
| Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 11:17 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
WindsorFox<[SS]> wrote:
[quote:4cd48d3d8c]
Hercules wrote:
On Sep 22, 3:31 pm, "WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.fox.use... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
The Sun wrote:
And you should know full well after all these years that is NOT
going to happen. If they are actually abusing something, then they will
be removed by their provider.
Somebody emailed her and harassed her using ewollm... at (no spam) aol.com, that
doesn't mean they actually HAD an account at AOL, comprende?
Appearently, the same person who was posting to usenet using
ewollm... at (no spam) aol.com but posting it through a remailer:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.astrology/msg/8fad72754d79d30d
IS the same person who has been taunting her at her so-called
blogspot.
First, don't even try to pretend that you think you know more about
how the Internet works than myself or most anyone else here. That is all
beside the point IF you have police reports and IF there is an active
investigation you should not be replying to ANY of the shit disturbers
on Usenet. Even less so responding with replies about said cases.
But the plantiff IS replying and still lying on her blog, therefore I
will refute all of her bullshit, if she can't refrain why should I
she's even denigrating my son for christs sake. All he did was come to
hold the camera and videotape her insanity.
And I believe even Gregory Hall would tell you that you're a fool
to do so.
If the provider does not remove them then
they are not breaking the providers rules and their is nothing you can
do about that. Either you change or you keep the status quo. If someone
stole your identity, ie: have used your legal information and SSN to
open loans and accounts and/or steal money, then that is a criminal
matter and you should as I said earlier STFU on Usenet and file police
According to Ms Merrill herself she was using my SSN and DL to do a
credit report on me, which is illegal, I do them all the time and I
know.
No it's not, and if it were you just admited to doing something illegal.
YES IT IS, you're not as smart as you think you are, when I do credit
reports on people it is because they have paid for it and signed a
paper saying I could access their reports. Now YOU stop acting like
you're smarter than me, cause you aint. I saved Ms Merrills boasting
on her blog about getting my report without my permission and worse
yet, she misrepresented it. There is no hope for her now, I saved all
her arrogant blather and lies and she will pay. I never did anything
to this idiot. I STILL haven't put anything up about her, although I
could fill the library of congress with her illegal and defamatory
attacks on me.
It has nothing to do with intelligence, it has to do with knowing
what is or is not illegal in a particular place.
[/quote:4cd48d3d8c]
Exactly, so don't be so sure when you AIN'T. Your just like the person
suing me, talking shit with no evidence or facts and trying to say I am
the one without any. We'll see about that.
--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Sofa King... |
| Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 11:45 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
CFA wrote:
[quote:1a3fea6e19]Sofa King wrote:
CFA wrote:
Sofa King wrote:
Seth wrote:
In article <3218602.Jijq0nJUde at (no spam) 127.0.0.1>, Sofa King <root at (no spam) 127.0.0.1
wrote:
Seth wrote:
In article
10a66a38-48e1-4e3f-8fbf-b72184f69ba5 at (no spam) h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
Hercules <wollm002 at (no spam) csusm.edu> wrote:
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
?2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/
Wasn't someone recently asking about sock-puppet accounts used by
Wollmann?
isn't the point of a sockpuppet to hide your identity?
You think Wollman is smart enough to remember to remove his sig every
time he uses a sock-puppet account?
you think that someone using a different nym to post as none other than
themselves is a "sockpuppet"? perhaps you need to consider the
definition
of the word "sock puppet". show me some instances of ed tricking you
into thinking that a nym he was using was someone else and not ed and
then i'll
not think that you are a dumbshit. don't forget... you claim that there
are "accounts" (plural), so find at least two or your claim is false.
I wouldn't call it "ed tricking you into thinking that a nym he was
using was someone else and not ed", but here they are, regardless:
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/edaddresses.html
Sock puppets:
Edmond Wollmann 34 zeus150000 at (no spam) aol.com
(admitted, Sep 7th 1997)
Edmond Wollmann 35 hoovamoon at (no spam) aol.com
Edmond Wollmann 36 Al Simak"The Lofty One" alsimak at (no spam) pacbell.net
Edmond Wollmann 37 alsimak at (no spam) some.net
(admitted, Nov 6th, 1997)
Edmond Wollmann 38 archimeden at (no spam) aol.com
(Spammed and was canceled and account was terminated )
Edmond Wollmann 39 dogday at (no spam) afternoon.com
(posted some phony net abuse complaints on n.a.n-a.u.)
Edmond Wollmann 40 fred at (no spam) flinstone.com
Edmond Wollmann 41 rasputin at (no spam) hellfire.com
Edmond Wollmann 42 Arcturian libra at (no spam) 24.com
Edmond Wollmann 43 Tom Slick tom at (no spam) indy.com
344D2B1E.1816 at (no spam) indy.com> (from sdsu)
Edmond Wollmann 44 Bradd Pitt hunk at (no spam) hollywood.com
344504EF.1349 at (no spam) hollywood.com> (from sdsu)
Edmond Wollmann 45 George george at (no spam) jungle.com
3454F8B4.106D at (no spam) jungle.com> (from sdsu)
And let's not forget when he forged 33 "arcturian at (no spam) earthlink.net" into
his "set followups to poster" and thereby inconvenienced the REAL
"arcturian at (no spam) earthlink.net", Jerry Burton.
Ken
and you've linked these to an IP or MAC address right?
all you have is a list of nyms that could have been created by absolutely
anybody, including those on the side wanting to make ed look like a
sockpuppeteer. at best you have circumstantial evidence that no court
would admit without undeniable proof that edmo was on the other end of the
audit trail. at worst, well...
This isn't a court of law.
[/quote:1a3fea6e19]
obviously. if it were a court of law a judge would have had the bailiff run
you out long ago.
[quote:1a3fea6e19]I pointed out some pretty good
'circumstantial evidence', but you'll believe what you want to
believe.
Ken
[/quote:1a3fea6e19]
i don't typically "believe" circumstantial evidence because i don't like to
find out i'm WRONG. i suppose you just must not mind being wrong a lot. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Sofa King... |
| Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 1:17 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
WindsorFox wrote:
[quote:273673589b]Sofa King wrote:
and you've linked these to an IP or MAC address right?
all you have is a list of nyms that could have been created by absolutely
anybody, including those on the side wanting to make ed look like a
sockpuppeteer. at best you have circumstantial evidence that no court
would admit without undeniable proof that edmo was on the other end of
the
audit trail. at worst, well...
You care about this way too much.
is that your best guess, Kreskin?[/quote:273673589b] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| The Chief Instigator... |
| Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 8:55 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:17:26 -0700, Edmond Wollmann <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote:
[quote:e04cab7225]Sofa King wrote:
Seth wrote:
In article <3218602.Jijq0nJUde at (no spam) 127.0.0.1>, Sofa King <root at (no spam) 127.0.0.1
wrote:
Seth wrote:
In article
10a66a38-48e1-4e3f-8fbf-b72184f69ba5 at (no spam) h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
Hercules <wollm002 at (no spam) csusm.edu> wrote:
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
? 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/
Wasn't someone recently asking about sock-puppet accounts used by
Wollmann?
isn't the point of a sockpuppet to hide your identity?
You think Wollman is smart enough to remember to remove his sig every
time he uses a sock-puppet account?
you think that someone using a different nym to post as none other than
themselves is a "sockpuppet"? perhaps you need to consider the
definition of the word "sock puppet". show me some instances of ed
tricking you into thinking that a nym he was using was someone else and
not ed and then i'll not think that you are a dumbshit. don't forget...
you claim that there are "accounts" (plural), so find at least two or
your claim is false.
So the person who p;osted that's real name is seth?
[/quote:e04cab7225]
What is self-empowerment and integrity?
Two qualities that Pantyhead Wollmann will never possess.
--
Patrick L. "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick at (no spam) io.com) Houston, Texas
www.io.com/~patrick/aeros.php (TCI's 2008-09 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Manitoba 3, Houston 1 (May 25: Moose advance, 4-2)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 2 at Manitoba, 7:35 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Anonymous Remailer... |
| Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:09 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
In article <4ABD35FF.2426 at (no spam) earthlink.net>
Edmond Wollmann <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote:
[quote:e92dcd772a]
cmer2222 with no identity information wrote:
[/quote:e92dcd772a]
Damn you're pathetic! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Mirror Mirror... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 8:24 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 21 Sep 2009, Edmond Wollmann <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> posted some
news:4AB7AC91.6573 at (no spam) earthlink.net:
[quote:e5191ab7ca]
The only person who falsely did so was an kdiot by the name of
anonym at (no spam) pacbell.net--that's right folks an ANONYMOUS abuser.
[/quote:e5191ab7ca]
You said you knew who anonym was, therefore he's not anonymous.
You seem to make a habit of misconstruing events. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Seth... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 12:28 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
In article <2191794.NBI9BOAs4j at (no spam) 127.0.0.1>, Sofa King <root at (no spam) 127.0.0.1> wrote:
[quote:d6bfd19b52]Seth wrote:
In article <3218602.Jijq0nJUde at (no spam) 127.0.0.1>, Sofa King <root at (no spam) 127.0.0.1
wrote:
isn't the point of a sockpuppet to hide your identity?
You think Wollman is smart enough to remember to remove his sig every
time he uses a sock-puppet account?
you think that someone using a different nym to post as none other than
themselves is a "sockpuppet"?
[/quote:d6bfd19b52]
No, I think someone posting from a different account, where he used to
claim he was somebody else, but forgetting to remove his .sig this one
time is evidence of *incompetent sockpuppetry* which is precisely what
I'd expect of Wollman.
Seth |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| EHWollmann... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 3:38 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 17, 3:28 pm, se... at (no spam) panix.com (Seth) wrote:
[quote:dbf3960fc0]In article <2191794.NBI9BOA... at (no spam) 127.0.0.1>, Sofa King <r... at (no spam) 127.0.0.1> wrote:
Seth wrote:
In article <3218602.Jijq0nJ... at (no spam) 127.0.0.1>, Sofa King <r... at (no spam) 127.0.0.1
wrote:
isn't the point of a sockpuppet to hide your identity?
You think Wollman is smart enough to remember to remove his sig every
time he uses a sock-puppet account?
you think that someone using a different nym to post as none other than
themselves is a "sockpuppet"?
No, I think someone posting from a different account, where he used to
claim he was somebody else, but forgetting to remove his .sig this one
time is evidence of *incompetent sockpuppetry* which is precisely what
I'd expect of Wollman.
Seth
[/quote:dbf3960fc0]
And you have no evidence of such a thing that is not manufactured.
That is not what you "expect" because you know I am smarter than you
will ever be, that is what you hope to SPIN because you are
disingenous, a liar and a spinic and find pleasure in denigrating
others.
Integrity is recognizing that you are as powerful as you need to be to
create whatever you desire in your reality without having to hurt or
malign yourself or anyone else in order to do so. Because you do not
believe this IS reality, you create the negative one instead.
Fortunately for me, people can simply look at my work and the ones who
subcribe to your negative reality (the ones that aren't a part of my
belief system) might possibly buy your nonsense, but the ones who are
positive (and possess a brain) will laugh at your assumption that they
would be stupid enough to ever buy it.
"You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the
people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of
the time. Abraham Lincoln, (attributed)16th president of US (1809 -
1865)
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Nomen Nescio... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 4:22 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
In article <2f6d2836-8fa6-4770-857f-c04cf607cd93 at (no spam) z2g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
EHWollmann <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote:
[quote:a2b2b13c69]
And you have no evidence of such a thing that is not manufactured.
That is not what you "expect" because you know I am smarter than you
[/quote:a2b2b13c69]
You're not smarter than a pet rock, delusionboi.
http://www.smbtech.com/ed |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| WindsorFo... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 4:55 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Seth wrote:
[quote:622835dd39]In article <2191794.NBI9BOAs4j at (no spam) 127.0.0.1>, Sofa King <root at (no spam) 127.0.0.1> wrote:
Seth wrote:
In article <3218602.Jijq0nJUde at (no spam) 127.0.0.1>, Sofa King <root at (no spam) 127.0.0.1
wrote:
isn't the point of a sockpuppet to hide your identity?
You think Wollman is smart enough to remember to remove his sig every
time he uses a sock-puppet account?
you think that someone using a different nym to post as none other than
themselves is a "sockpuppet"?
No, I think someone posting from a different account, where he used to
claim he was somebody else, but forgetting to remove his .sig this one
time is evidence of *incompetent sockpuppetry* which is precisely what
I'd expect of Wollman.
Seth
[/quote:622835dd39]
LOL the IS factor...
--
"You may have noticed that I continue to use the term
'open-carry' rather than "OC" This is avoid confusion
with Oleoresin Capsicum, a Latin term meaning 'Give me
some water, bitch. This sh*t is melting my eyeballs.'" - dawg23 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Cujo DeSockpuppet... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 6:14 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
EHWollmann <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote in
news:2f6d2836-8fa6-4770-857f-c04cf607cd93 at (no spam) z2g2000yqm.googlegroups.com:
[quote:158ca07b1d]On Oct 17, 3:28 pm, se... at (no spam) panix.com (Seth) wrote:
In article <2191794.NBI9BOA... at (no spam) 127.0.0.1>, Sofa King
<r... at (no spam) 127.0.0.1
wrote:
Seth wrote:
In article <3218602.Jijq0nJ... at (no spam) 127.0.0.1>, Sofa King
<r... at (no spam) 127.0.0.1
wrote:
isn't the point of a sockpuppet to hide your identity?
You think Wollman is smart enough to remember to remove his sig
every time he uses a sock-puppet account?
you think that someone using a different nym to post as none other
than themselves is a "sockpuppet"?
No, I think someone posting from a different account, where he used
to claim he was somebody else, but forgetting to remove his .sig this
one time is evidence of *incompetent sockpuppetry* which is precisely
what I'd expect of Wollman.
Seth
And you have no evidence of such a thing that is not manufactured.
[/quote:158ca07b1d]
Coming from a kook who has yet to come up with evidence of a DMCA
violation after emailing and whining all over Usenet about it for 11
years, I'd say you'd be wise to just run away now. You'll do it soon
enough. But since you're the biggest kook on Usenet, I expect you'll dig
a deepr hole first.
[quote:158ca07b1d]That is not what you "expect" because you know I am smarter than you
will ever be, that is what you hope to SPIN because you are
disingenous, a liar and a spinic and find pleasure in denigrating
others.
[/quote:158ca07b1d]
My cats are smarter than you. They've learned not to mess with things
that bite back. I'm really surprised you're not dead. Well, your brain is
already there and judging from what I've heard there are a few other
parts that are dead, just do everyone a favor and croak.
[quote:158ca07b1d]Integrity is recognizing that you are as powerful as you need to be to
create whatever you desire in your reality without having to hurt or
malign yourself or anyone else in order to do so.
[/quote:158ca07b1d]
That explains why you're powerless and have zero integrity or
credibility.
[quote:158ca07b1d]Because you do not
believe this IS reality, you create the negative one instead.
[/quote:158ca07b1d]
Your "positive" reality is that you invited yourself to PF Chang's for a
lunch, threatened to bring a police escort, later threatened to drag
someone to jail "by force, if necessary" via an illegal citizens arrest
that you justified because you claimed you swore out a warrant on the
person[1] and yet despite all that never showed at Chang's. That sounds
like a great reality! That you'd pick such a reality explains why you're
such a complete loser.
[quote:158ca07b1d]Fortunately for me, people can simply look at my work and the ones who
subcribe to your negative reality (the ones that aren't a part of my
belief system) might possibly buy your nonsense, but the ones who are
positive (and possess a brain) will laugh at your assumption that they
would be stupid enough to ever buy it.
[/quote:158ca07b1d]
Got any of those people around to post? Or is this another of the
"lurkers that support me in email" claims we've all had many chances to
laugh at before, Pantyhead?
[quote:158ca07b1d]"You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the
people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of
the time. Abraham Lincoln, (attributed)16th president of US (1809 -
1865)
[/quote:158ca07b1d]
But when you're Edmo, the most deluded kook on Usenet, you can fool
yourself all of the time. - Cujo, OOoKaT.
[1] No such warrant ever existed, Edmo lied.
--
Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*,
alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy
Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S
award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse
Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895.
"Don't preach to a master psychologist about projection, simpleton."
- Ed "I have no degrees" Wollmann on another flight of fancy. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Stolen Sockpuppet... |
| Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 4:13 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
In article <2f6d2836-8fa6-4770-857f-
c04cf607cd93 at (no spam) z2g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
EHWollmann <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote:
[quote:70ae122727]
On Oct 17, 3:28 pm, se... at (no spam) panix.com (Seth) wrote:
In article <2191794.NBI9BOA... at (no spam) 127.0.0.1>, Sofa King <r... at (no spam) 127.0.0.1
wrote:
Seth wrote:
In article <3218602.Jijq0nJ... at (no spam) 127.0.0.1>, Sofa King <r... at (no spam) 127.0.0.
1
wrote:
isn't the point of a sockpuppet to hide your identity?
You think Wollman is smart enough to remember to remove his sig every
time he uses a sock-puppet account?
you think that someone using a different nym to post as none other than
themselves is a "sockpuppet"?
No, I think someone posting from a different account, where he used to
claim he was somebody else, but forgetting to remove his .sig this one
time is evidence of *incompetent sockpuppetry* which is precisely what
I'd expect of Wollman.
Seth
And you have no evidence of such a thing that is not manufactured.
That is not what you "expect" because you know I am smarter than you
will ever be,
[/quote:70ae122727]
Don't break an arm stroking that ego... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| The True Edmond Wollmann... |
| Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 7:51 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 18, 3:13 am, "Stolen Sockpuppet" <arcturiam... at (no spam) earthlink.net>
wrote:
[quote:e2f03e2ca0]In article <2f6d2836-8fa6-4770-857f-
c04cf607c... at (no spam) z2g2000yqm.googlegroups.com
EHWollmann <arcturian... at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote:
On Oct 17, 3:28 pm, se... at (no spam) panix.com (Seth) wrote:
In article <2191794.NBI9BOA... at (no spam) 127.0.0.1>, Sofa King <r... at (no spam) 127.0.0..1
wrote:
Seth wrote:
In article <3218602.Jijq0nJ... at (no spam) 127.0.0.1>, Sofa King <r... at (no spam) 127.0.0.
1
wrote:
isn't the point of a sockpuppet to hide your identity?
You think Wollman is smart enough to remember to remove his sig every
time he uses a sock-puppet account?
you think that someone using a different nym to post as none other than
themselves is a "sockpuppet"?
No, I think someone posting from a different account, where he used to
claim he was somebody else, but forgetting to remove his .sig this one
time is evidence of *incompetent sockpuppetry* which is precisely what
I'd expect of Wollman.
Seth
And you have no evidence of such a thing that is not manufactured.
That is not what you "expect" because you know I am smarter than you
will ever be,
Don't break an arm stroking that ego...
[/quote:e2f03e2ca0]
If you had no ego (or issue with this), this would not have caught
your attention in the first place, nor would it have phased you. I
have stated over and over that I know that I know nothing and that,
whatever I do know is insignificant in the scheme of things.
"No one can make you feel inferior without your consent." Eleanor
Roosevelt.
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
The SUN http://www.edmondwollmann.com/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Tue Dec 08, 2009 6:59 pm
|
|