| |
 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Astrology Forum » What is Self-Empowerment and Integrity?... |
|
Page 3 of 5 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Next |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Sofa King... |
 Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:20 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Seth wrote:
[quote:8c098a2d1a]In article
10a66a38-48e1-4e3f-8fbf-b72184f69ba5 at (no spam) h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
Hercules <wollm002 at (no spam) csusm.edu> wrote:
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/
Wasn't someone recently asking about sock-puppet accounts used by
Wollmann?
Seth
[/quote:8c098a2d1a]
isn't the point of a sockpuppet to hide your identity?
sorry. was that over your head? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Sofa King... |
| Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:57 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Dave U. Random wrote:
[quote:63bff6fab8]In article <4AB98491.7DD7 at (no spam) earthlink.net
Edmond Wollmann <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote:
Whining noted and flushed.
[/quote:63bff6fab8]
flushing noted and laughed at. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Seth... |
| Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 1:47 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
In article <3218602.Jijq0nJUde at (no spam) 127.0.0.1>, Sofa King <root at (no spam) 127.0.0.1> wrote:
[quote:b16a61f3b5]Seth wrote:
In article
10a66a38-48e1-4e3f-8fbf-b72184f69ba5 at (no spam) h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
Hercules <wollm002 at (no spam) csusm.edu> wrote:
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/
Wasn't someone recently asking about sock-puppet accounts used by
Wollmann?
isn't the point of a sockpuppet to hide your identity?
[/quote:b16a61f3b5]
You think Wollman is smart enough to remember to remove his sig every
time he uses a sock-puppet account?
Seth |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Dave C. Random... |
| Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 3:54 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
In article <1303389.KNZlblEpTo at (no spam) 127.0.0.1>
Sofa King <root at (no spam) 127.0.0.1> wrote:
[quote:332ed55914]
Dave U. Random wrote:
In article <4AB98491.7DD7 at (no spam) earthlink.net
Edmond Wollmann <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote:
Whining noted and flushed.
flushing noted and laughed at.
[/quote:332ed55914]
Kook felching noted, and vomited at. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Sofa King... |
| Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 10:38 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Dave C. Random wrote:
[quote:09d497466c]In article <1303389.KNZlblEpTo at (no spam) 127.0.0.1
Sofa King <root at (no spam) 127.0.0.1> wrote:
Dave U. Random wrote:
In article <4AB98491.7DD7 at (no spam) earthlink.net
Edmond Wollmann <arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote:
Whining noted and flushed.
flushing noted and laughed at.
Kook felching noted, and vomited at.
[/quote:09d497466c]
shit and vomit filling your cranium leaking out in the form of speech...
noted. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Sofa King... |
| Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 10:42 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Seth wrote:
[quote:9a37f9bc58]In article <3218602.Jijq0nJUde at (no spam) 127.0.0.1>, Sofa King <root at (no spam) 127.0.0.1
wrote:
Seth wrote:
In article
10a66a38-48e1-4e3f-8fbf-b72184f69ba5 at (no spam) h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
Hercules <wollm002 at (no spam) csusm.edu> wrote:
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/
Wasn't someone recently asking about sock-puppet accounts used by
Wollmann?
isn't the point of a sockpuppet to hide your identity?
You think Wollman is smart enough to remember to remove his sig every
time he uses a sock-puppet account?
you think that someone using a different nym to post as none other than[/quote:9a37f9bc58]
themselves is a "sockpuppet"? perhaps you need to consider the definition
of the word "sock puppet". show me some instances of ed tricking you into
thinking that a nym he was using was someone else and not ed and then i'll
not think that you are a dumbshit. don't forget... you claim that there
are "accounts" (plural), so find at least two or your claim is false. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| ... |
| Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 1:42 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Sofa King wrote:
[quote:09683692d1]Seth wrote:
In article <3218602.Jijq0nJUde at (no spam) 127.0.0.1>, Sofa King <root at (no spam) 127.0.0.1
wrote:
Seth wrote:
In article
10a66a38-48e1-4e3f-8fbf-b72184f69ba5 at (no spam) h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
Hercules <wollm002 at (no spam) csusm.edu> wrote:
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
?2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/
Wasn't someone recently asking about sock-puppet accounts used by
Wollmann?
isn't the point of a sockpuppet to hide your identity?
You think Wollman is smart enough to remember to remove his sig every
time he uses a sock-puppet account?
you think that someone using a different nym to post as none other than
themselves is a "sockpuppet"? perhaps you need to consider the definition
of the word "sock puppet". show me some instances of ed tricking you into
thinking that a nym he was using was someone else and not ed and then i'll
not think that you are a dumbshit. don't forget... you claim that there
are "accounts" (plural), so find at least two or your claim is false.
[/quote:09683692d1]
I wouldn't call it "ed tricking you into thinking that a nym he was
using was someone else and not ed", but here they are, regardless:
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/edaddresses.html
Sock puppets:
Edmond Wollmann 34 zeus150000 at (no spam) aol.com
(admitted, Sep 7th 1997)
Edmond Wollmann 35 hoovamoon at (no spam) aol.com
Edmond Wollmann 36 Al Simak"The Lofty One" alsimak at (no spam) pacbell.net
Edmond Wollmann 37 alsimak at (no spam) some.net
(admitted, Nov 6th, 1997)
Edmond Wollmann 38 archimeden at (no spam) aol.com
(Spammed and was canceled and account was terminated )
Edmond Wollmann 39 dogday at (no spam) afternoon.com
(posted some phony net abuse complaints on n.a.n-a.u.)
Edmond Wollmann 40 fred at (no spam) flinstone.com
Edmond Wollmann 41 rasputin at (no spam) hellfire.com
Edmond Wollmann 42 Arcturian libra at (no spam) 24.com
Edmond Wollmann 43 Tom Slick tom at (no spam) indy.com
<344D2B1E.1816 at (no spam) indy.com> (from sdsu)
Edmond Wollmann 44 Bradd Pitt hunk at (no spam) hollywood.com
<344504EF.1349 at (no spam) hollywood.com> (from sdsu)
Edmond Wollmann 45 George george at (no spam) jungle.com
<3454F8B4.106D at (no spam) jungle.com> (from sdsu)
And let's not forget when he forged 33 "arcturian at (no spam) earthlink.net" into
his "set followups to poster" and thereby inconvenienced the REAL
"arcturian at (no spam) earthlink.net", Jerry Burton.
Ken
--
cfa at alt dot net |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| The True Edmond Wollmann... |
| Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 2:14 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sep 23, 4:32 pm, "WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.fox.use... at (no spam) gmail.com>
wrote:
[quote:3b57e2394f]Sofa King wrote:
and you've linked these to an IP or MAC address right?
all you have is a list of nyms that could have been created by absolutely
anybody, including those on the side wanting to make ed look like a
sockpuppeteer. at best you have circumstantial evidence that no court
would admit without undeniable proof that edmo was on the other end of the
audit trail. at worst, well...
You care about this way too much.
[/quote:3b57e2394f]
However, he is correct, listing a bunch of emails you think are mine
and then saying I was using them as sockpuppettry is pure idiocy. I
did not use a sig in 1994, and I am sure there are posts where I might
have forgotten to identify myself clearly assuming everbody (who I was
talking to) knew who I was. But this in no way makes me a liar or
sockpuppeteer or what have you. I believe by 1998 I was always using a
sig because of all the assholes trying to pretend they were me. I
believe I argued about this once with Tony Sidaway and did post from
my AOL account under a different name with no sig. I asked my father
to post something (when he was alive) so I could show Sidaway that his
confidence about who was posting what even if it came from the same
computer and account, was not necessarily certain. It had to do with
my dads birthday and a fake place of birth. It was a post by my father
from my account, so technically it was not a sockpuppet, it was
actually him not me, but they believed it was me and so I proved my
point. But that is the only time I remember seriously having something
posted from my account that was SUPPOSED to look like me but wasn't or
vice versa. All the rest of the time it was me whether a clear
identification was attached to it or not and no intention of otherwise
was intended. A Sockpuppet is when you post to PURPOSELY make it look
like it is someone else. I never do that, there are plenty of people
who do that for me and no use in confusing people anymore than they
already are. SMBTech.com is JUST A FUCKING PAGE that one of the
assholes I defeated in argument and fought with at SDSU, put up
because of his ego deflation, it has very few facts from what I have
seen, although I never really read it through because I know the
author's motive and mental state and that makes it irrelevant to me
and my world.
Rick Lazzarini actaully emailed the judicial reveiw board at SDSU and
tried to get me suspended because I made some off hand remark about
him, that failed and I went on to graduate with no problems. They did
this when I was working on my second degree, having actaully already
completed my psychology degree with honors, it was only while getting
my studio art degree that these assholes tried all sorts of shit to
get me in trouble. So when they say they are just joking and teasing
they are full of shit, they have gone RL on me for 12 years.
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Bob Officer... |
| Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 2:38 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 20:45:54 -0700, in alt.astrology, Edmond Wollmann
<arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote:
[quote:6530346430]Bob Officer the fraud stalker listed in Petes lawsuit wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 13:59:52 -0700 (PDT), in alt.astrology, The Sun
arcturianone at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote:
On Sep 20, 1:16 pm, Bob Officer <boboffic... at (no spam) 127.0.0.7> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 09:54:07 -0700 (PDT), in alt.astrology, cmer2222
Point, Bob Officer is listed in the first lawsuit listed here as an
abuser:
http://www.astroconsulting.com/FAQs/fraud_and_abuse.htm
point:
Edmond is a self-procliamed counselor. The state has no formal
recognition of his so called professional status.
Professional Member of AFA that's all I need to be an astrological
counselor.
Not in New Mexico, Edmond. you should keep track of the laws.
California doesn't recognized the AFA which is not a professional
licensing body recognized by any state authority.
The state has no requirement for astrology you idiot. I am a
professional astrological counselor ALL OVER THE WORLD. I have the only
license I need for California. GET A FUCKING CLUE old fart.
[/quote:6530346430]
in New Mexico all counselors, no matter what prefix or suffix they
append need to be both licensed and registered by the state. In
California all counselors with considering any Prefix or suffix you
want to append to the word counselor, must be registered with the
State.
I have a clue, do you?
All to often the State department of consumer affairs have found
unscrupulous people practicing as psychological counselors and
psychologist with out any qualifications. Several years ago the State
passed a law allowing the State's Department of Consumers Affairs
regular all Non-board certified counselors. (that would be you,
Edmond, since you are not a board certified counselor, and have no
qualifications to practice psychologic based anything.)
[quote:6530346430]
The department of consumer fraud in California says you have no
lawful right to offer for fee or free any type of counseling service,
either as the owner/operator of the counseling service or as a
technician for any licensed counseling service. The fact you use an
undefined qualifier doesn't stop the point you are not license to
provide any counseling at all.
I don't NEED any. Why don't you STFU and do something ablout it if you
think you're right?
[/quote:6530346430]
What makes you think someone hasn't already done so?
[quote:6530346430]The only professional status Edmond has ever held in the State of
California was that of real estate sales person. That license was
suspended and then revoked for cause, IIRC. The State board will have
those details.
Nope, that licensed expired because I quit. Where's your evidence liar
boi?
I suspect the actual suspension documents from the Board. They are
public records.
I NEVER HAD MY LICESNSE SUSPENDED YOU FUCKING HARDHEAD.
In New Mexico his claim to be a counselor is felony. New Mexico
requires all Counselors no matter what prefix or suffix qualifier
they try use, to be licensed by the state.
Nope, I am an astrological counselor all over the world.
Only in your mind, Edmond.
[/quote:6530346430]
--
Ak'toh'di |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| ... |
| Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 3:30 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Sofa King wrote:
[quote:22f7631690]CFA wrote:
Sofa King wrote:
Seth wrote:
In article <3218602.Jijq0nJUde at (no spam) 127.0.0.1>, Sofa King <root at (no spam) 127.0.0.1
wrote:
Seth wrote:
In article
10a66a38-48e1-4e3f-8fbf-b72184f69ba5 at (no spam) h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
Hercules <wollm002 at (no spam) csusm.edu> wrote:
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
?2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/
Wasn't someone recently asking about sock-puppet accounts used by
Wollmann?
isn't the point of a sockpuppet to hide your identity?
You think Wollman is smart enough to remember to remove his sig every
time he uses a sock-puppet account?
you think that someone using a different nym to post as none other than
themselves is a "sockpuppet"? perhaps you need to consider the definition
of the word "sock puppet". show me some instances of ed tricking you into
thinking that a nym he was using was someone else and not ed and then i'll
not think that you are a dumbshit. don't forget... you claim that there
are "accounts" (plural), so find at least two or your claim is false.
I wouldn't call it "ed tricking you into thinking that a nym he was
using was someone else and not ed", but here they are, regardless:
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/edaddresses.html
Sock puppets:
Edmond Wollmann 34 zeus150000 at (no spam) aol.com
(admitted, Sep 7th 1997)
Edmond Wollmann 35 hoovamoon at (no spam) aol.com
Edmond Wollmann 36 Al Simak"The Lofty One" alsimak at (no spam) pacbell.net
Edmond Wollmann 37 alsimak at (no spam) some.net
(admitted, Nov 6th, 1997)
Edmond Wollmann 38 archimeden at (no spam) aol.com
(Spammed and was canceled and account was terminated )
Edmond Wollmann 39 dogday at (no spam) afternoon.com
(posted some phony net abuse complaints on n.a.n-a.u.)
Edmond Wollmann 40 fred at (no spam) flinstone.com
Edmond Wollmann 41 rasputin at (no spam) hellfire.com
Edmond Wollmann 42 Arcturian libra at (no spam) 24.com
Edmond Wollmann 43 Tom Slick tom at (no spam) indy.com
344D2B1E.1816 at (no spam) indy.com> (from sdsu)
Edmond Wollmann 44 Bradd Pitt hunk at (no spam) hollywood.com
344504EF.1349 at (no spam) hollywood.com> (from sdsu)
Edmond Wollmann 45 George george at (no spam) jungle.com
3454F8B4.106D at (no spam) jungle.com> (from sdsu)
And let's not forget when he forged 33 "arcturian at (no spam) earthlink.net" into
his "set followups to poster" and thereby inconvenienced the REAL
"arcturian at (no spam) earthlink.net", Jerry Burton.
Ken
and you've linked these to an IP or MAC address right?
all you have is a list of nyms that could have been created by absolutely
anybody, including those on the side wanting to make ed look like a
sockpuppeteer. at best you have circumstantial evidence that no court
would admit without undeniable proof that edmo was on the other end of the
audit trail. at worst, well...
[/quote:22f7631690]
This isn't a court of law. I pointed out some pretty good
'circumstantial evidence', but you'll believe what you want to
believe.
Ken
--
cfa at alt dot net |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Sofa King... |
| Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 3:33 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
CFA wrote:
[quote:ed8af78d34]Sofa King wrote:
Seth wrote:
In article <3218602.Jijq0nJUde at (no spam) 127.0.0.1>, Sofa King <root at (no spam) 127.0.0.1
wrote:
Seth wrote:
In article
10a66a38-48e1-4e3f-8fbf-b72184f69ba5 at (no spam) h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
Hercules <wollm002 at (no spam) csusm.edu> wrote:
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
?2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/
Wasn't someone recently asking about sock-puppet accounts used by
Wollmann?
isn't the point of a sockpuppet to hide your identity?
You think Wollman is smart enough to remember to remove his sig every
time he uses a sock-puppet account?
you think that someone using a different nym to post as none other than
themselves is a "sockpuppet"? perhaps you need to consider the definition
of the word "sock puppet". show me some instances of ed tricking you into
thinking that a nym he was using was someone else and not ed and then i'll
not think that you are a dumbshit. don't forget... you claim that there
are "accounts" (plural), so find at least two or your claim is false.
I wouldn't call it "ed tricking you into thinking that a nym he was
using was someone else and not ed", but here they are, regardless:
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/edaddresses.html
Sock puppets:
Edmond Wollmann 34 zeus150000 at (no spam) aol.com
(admitted, Sep 7th 1997)
Edmond Wollmann 35 hoovamoon at (no spam) aol.com
Edmond Wollmann 36 Al Simak"The Lofty One" alsimak at (no spam) pacbell.net
Edmond Wollmann 37 alsimak at (no spam) some.net
(admitted, Nov 6th, 1997)
Edmond Wollmann 38 archimeden at (no spam) aol.com
(Spammed and was canceled and account was terminated )
Edmond Wollmann 39 dogday at (no spam) afternoon.com
(posted some phony net abuse complaints on n.a.n-a.u.)
Edmond Wollmann 40 fred at (no spam) flinstone.com
Edmond Wollmann 41 rasputin at (no spam) hellfire.com
Edmond Wollmann 42 Arcturian libra at (no spam) 24.com
Edmond Wollmann 43 Tom Slick tom at (no spam) indy.com
344D2B1E.1816 at (no spam) indy.com> (from sdsu)
Edmond Wollmann 44 Bradd Pitt hunk at (no spam) hollywood.com
344504EF.1349 at (no spam) hollywood.com> (from sdsu)
Edmond Wollmann 45 George george at (no spam) jungle.com
3454F8B4.106D at (no spam) jungle.com> (from sdsu)
And let's not forget when he forged 33 "arcturian at (no spam) earthlink.net" into
his "set followups to poster" and thereby inconvenienced the REAL
"arcturian at (no spam) earthlink.net", Jerry Burton.
Ken
[/quote:ed8af78d34]
and you've linked these to an IP or MAC address right?
all you have is a list of nyms that could have been created by absolutely
anybody, including those on the side wanting to make ed look like a
sockpuppeteer. at best you have circumstantial evidence that no court
would admit without undeniable proof that edmo was on the other end of the
audit trail. at worst, well... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| WindsorFo... |
| Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 5:29 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Hercules wrote:
[quote:7794822cb3]On Sep 22, 3:31 pm, "WindsorFox<[SS]>" <windsor.fox.use... at (no spam) gmail.com
wrote:
The Sun wrote:
And you should know full well after all these years that is NOT
going to happen. If they are actually abusing something, then they will
be removed by their provider.
Somebody emailed her and harassed her using ewollm... at (no spam) aol.com, that
doesn't mean they actually HAD an account at AOL, comprende?
Appearently, the same person who was posting to usenet using
ewollm... at (no spam) aol.com but posting it through a remailer:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.astrology/msg/8fad72754d79d30d
IS the same person who has been taunting her at her so-called
blogspot.
First, don't even try to pretend that you think you know more about
how the Internet works than myself or most anyone else here. That is all
beside the point IF you have police reports and IF there is an active
investigation you should not be replying to ANY of the shit disturbers
on Usenet. Even less so responding with replies about said cases.
But the plantiff IS replying and still lying on her blog, therefore I
will refute all of her bullshit, if she can't refrain why should I
she's even denigrating my son for christs sake. All he did was come to
hold the camera and videotape her insanity.
[/quote:7794822cb3]
And I believe even Gregory Hall would tell you that you're a fool
to do so.
[quote:7794822cb3]
If the provider does not remove them then
they are not breaking the providers rules and their is nothing you can
do about that. Either you change or you keep the status quo. If someone
stole your identity, ie: have used your legal information and SSN to
open loans and accounts and/or steal money, then that is a criminal
matter and you should as I said earlier STFU on Usenet and file police
According to Ms Merrill herself she was using my SSN and DL to do a
credit report on me, which is illegal, I do them all the time and I
know.
No it's not, and if it were you just admited to doing something illegal.
YES IT IS, you're not as smart as you think you are, when I do credit
reports on people it is because they have paid for it and signed a
paper saying I could access their reports. Now YOU stop acting like
you're smarter than me, cause you aint. I saved Ms Merrills boasting
on her blog about getting my report without my permission and worse
yet, she misrepresented it. There is no hope for her now, I saved all
her arrogant blather and lies and she will pay. I never did anything
to this idiot. I STILL haven't put anything up about her, although I
could fill the library of congress with her illegal and defamatory
attacks on me.
[/quote:7794822cb3]
It has nothing to do with intelligence, it has to do with knowing
what is or is not illegal in a particular place.
--
"You may have noticed that I continue to use the term
'open-carry' rather than "OC" This is avoid confusion
with Oleoresin Capsicum, a Latin term meaning 'Give me
some water, bitch. This sh*t is melting my eyeballs.'" - dawg23 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| WindsorFo... |
| Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 5:32 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Sofa King wrote:
[quote:845d6a3bd1]and you've linked these to an IP or MAC address right?
all you have is a list of nyms that could have been created by absolutely
anybody, including those on the side wanting to make ed look like a
sockpuppeteer. at best you have circumstantial evidence that no court
would admit without undeniable proof that edmo was on the other end of the
audit trail. at worst, well...
[/quote:845d6a3bd1]
You care about this way too much.
--
"You may have noticed that I continue to use the term
'open-carry' rather than "OC" This is avoid confusion
with Oleoresin Capsicum, a Latin term meaning 'Give me
some water, bitch. This sh*t is melting my eyeballs.'" - dawg23 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Edmond Wollmann... |
| Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 11:17 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Sofa King wrote:
[quote:c0c4c05e7e]
Seth wrote:
In article <3218602.Jijq0nJUde at (no spam) 127.0.0.1>, Sofa King <root at (no spam) 127.0.0.1
wrote:
Seth wrote:
In article
10a66a38-48e1-4e3f-8fbf-b72184f69ba5 at (no spam) h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
Hercules <wollm002 at (no spam) csusm.edu> wrote:
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/
Wasn't someone recently asking about sock-puppet accounts used by
Wollmann?
isn't the point of a sockpuppet to hide your identity?
You think Wollman is smart enough to remember to remove his sig every
time he uses a sock-puppet account?
you think that someone using a different nym to post as none other than
themselves is a "sockpuppet"? perhaps you need to consider the definition
of the word "sock puppet". show me some instances of ed tricking you into
thinking that a nym he was using was someone else and not ed and then i'll
not think that you are a dumbshit. don't forget... you claim that there
are "accounts" (plural), so find at least two or your claim is false.
[/quote:c0c4c05e7e]
So the person who p;osted that's real name is seth?
--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Edmond Wollmann... |
| Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 11:17 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
CFA wrote:
[quote:98b99e55c1]
Sofa King wrote:
Seth wrote:
In article <3218602.Jijq0nJUde at (no spam) 127.0.0.1>, Sofa King <root at (no spam) 127.0.0.1
wrote:
Seth wrote:
In article
10a66a38-48e1-4e3f-8fbf-b72184f69ba5 at (no spam) h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
Hercules <wollm002 at (no spam) csusm.edu> wrote:
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
?2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/
Wasn't someone recently asking about sock-puppet accounts used by
Wollmann?
isn't the point of a sockpuppet to hide your identity?
You think Wollman is smart enough to remember to remove his sig every
time he uses a sock-puppet account?
you think that someone using a different nym to post as none other than
themselves is a "sockpuppet"? perhaps you need to consider the definition
of the word "sock puppet". show me some instances of ed tricking you into
thinking that a nym he was using was someone else and not ed and then i'll
not think that you are a dumbshit. don't forget... you claim that there
are "accounts" (plural), so find at least two or your claim is false.
I wouldn't call it "ed tricking you into thinking that a nym he was
using was someone else and not ed", but here they are, regardless:
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/edaddresses.html
Sock puppets:
Edmond Wollmann 34 zeus150000 at (no spam) aol.com
(admitted, Sep 7th 1997)
Edmond Wollmann 35 hoovamoon at (no spam) aol.com
Edmond Wollmann 36 Al Simak"The Lofty One" alsimak at (no spam) pacbell.net
Edmond Wollmann 37 alsimak at (no spam) some.net
(admitted, Nov 6th, 1997)
Edmond Wollmann 38 archimeden at (no spam) aol.com
(Spammed and was canceled and account was terminated )
Edmond Wollmann 39 dogday at (no spam) afternoon.com
(posted some phony net abuse complaints on n.a.n-a.u.)
Edmond Wollmann 40 fred at (no spam) flinstone.com
Edmond Wollmann 41 rasputin at (no spam) hellfire.com
Edmond Wollmann 42 Arcturian libra at (no spam) 24.com
Edmond Wollmann 43 Tom Slick tom at (no spam) indy.com
344D2B1E.1816 at (no spam) indy.com> (from sdsu)
Edmond Wollmann 44 Bradd Pitt hunk at (no spam) hollywood.com
344504EF.1349 at (no spam) hollywood.com> (from sdsu)
Edmond Wollmann 45 George george at (no spam) jungle.com
3454F8B4.106D at (no spam) jungle.com> (from sdsu)
[/quote:98b99e55c1]
You have any proof besides a list of screenames?
[quote:98b99e55c1]And let's not forget when he forged 33 "arcturian at (no spam) earthlink.net" into
his "set followups to poster" and thereby inconvenienced the REAL
"arcturian at (no spam) earthlink.net", Jerry Burton.
[/quote:98b99e55c1]
I didn't know there actually was that email address and was trying to
foil spammers, do you always judge others so harshly while doing shit
worse than them? Why are you trying to help my legal opponent Ken? Your
a fucking liar and she's a fucking liar. Would you like to be subpoenaed
and you can come and try your shit in person under oath. Ken just sided
with abusers because he wanted to be on what he believed would be the
winning side because he's a fucking coward and whimp. Bad choice Kenny.
--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Nov 22, 2009 1:30 am
|
|