 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Geology - Earthquakes Forum » very unusual couple of earthquakes!... |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| alexis Sagredo... |
Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 2:08 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Hi all! Some healthy problems and some future exposè on the 9+
prediction, was the cause of my absence in the Group.
But I can say you that we had a very unusual case , perhaps the only
in the history. Two 6+in a lapse of 47 secondes, but in a distance
over 4000 Km! It was 28th August, Banda Sea, a 6.8 and N. Quinghai in
China, a 6.2!!
Somebody knows something similar?
Alexis. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Mr. Rambone... |
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:31 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Yes. Yesterday a 7.0 and a 7.4 within 1 mile of each other south of
Sumatra. Distance is in the eye of the beholder. Where do you draw the
line? One mile or one thousand miles?
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 17:08:07 -0700 (PDT), alexis Sagredo
<betterapproach at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote:02174b50c3]Hi all! Some healthy problems and some future exposè on the 9+
prediction, was the cause of my absence in the Group.
But I can say you that we had a very unusual case , perhaps the only
in the history. Two 6+in a lapse of 47 secondes, but in a distance
over 4000 Km! It was 28th August, Banda Sea, a 6.8 and N. Quinghai in
China, a 6.2!!
Somebody knows something similar?
Alexis.[/quote:02174b50c3] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| alexis Sagredo... |
Posted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 10:49 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sep 5, 2:16 pm, "Mike Williams" <miklw... at (no spam) charter.net> wrote:
[quote:4c4001d2c4]"Mr. Rambone" <RealD... at (no spam) AOL.Com> wrote in message
news:06ov95p0iq3bgjcf30lkvnejgo09isdkpe at (no spam) 4ax.com...
Yes. Yesterday a 7.0 and a 7.4 within 1 mile of each other south of
Sumatra. Distance is in the eye of the beholder. Where do you draw the
line? One mile or one thousand miles?
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 17:08:07 -0700 (PDT), alexis Sagredo
betterappro... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all! Some healthy problems and some future exposè on the 9+
prediction, was the cause of my absence in the Group.
But I can say you that we had a very unusual case , perhaps the only
in the history. Two 6+in a lapse of 47 secondes, but in a distance
over 4000 Km! It was 28th August, Banda Sea, a 6.8 and N. Quinghai in
China, a 6.2!!
Somebody knows something similar?
Alexis.
Were it not virtually certain that the quakes 4000 km apart were unrelated
causally, that case would be of significant interest. Whereas the two quakes
you cite not so much. It's not necessary to draw a line.
Mike Williams
Arroyo Grande, CA U.S.
[/quote:4c4001d2c4]
Thanks, Mike.
I had study during last recent weeks, the events over 6 in Magn.
from '85. It seems to me that is more than "a coincidence".
In some days may I explain something about the Predictions of 9+ . For
the Planet, in a very short window time it is easy...But the site...
Alexis |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Mike Williams... |
Posted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 12:13 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
[quote:618f1e1a3f]Hi all! Some healthy problems and some future exposè on the 9+
prediction, was the cause of my absence in the Group.
But I can say you that we had a very unusual case , perhaps the only
in the history. Two 6+in a lapse of 47 secondes, but in a distance
over 4000 Km! It was 28th August, Banda Sea, a 6.8 and N. Quinghai in
China, a 6.2!!
Somebody knows something similar?
Alexis.
[/quote:618f1e1a3f]
Coincidence. The fastest seismic waves travel at below 14 km/sec,
corresponding to at most 650 km in the allotted 47 seconds. I'm no expert on
dynamic stress propagation, but am quite sure it's even slower - so there's
no way the second earthquake knew about the first.
Mike Williams
Arroyo Grande, CA U.S. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Mike Williams... |
Posted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 12:16 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Mr. Rambone" <RealDeal at (no spam) AOL.Com> wrote in message
news:06ov95p0iq3bgjcf30lkvnejgo09isdkpe at (no spam) 4ax.com...
[quote:318c6f84d5]Yes. Yesterday a 7.0 and a 7.4 within 1 mile of each other south of
Sumatra. Distance is in the eye of the beholder. Where do you draw the
line? One mile or one thousand miles?
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 17:08:07 -0700 (PDT), alexis Sagredo
betterapproach at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all! Some healthy problems and some future exposè on the 9+
prediction, was the cause of my absence in the Group.
But I can say you that we had a very unusual case , perhaps the only
in the history. Two 6+in a lapse of 47 secondes, but in a distance
over 4000 Km! It was 28th August, Banda Sea, a 6.8 and N. Quinghai in
China, a 6.2!!
Somebody knows something similar?
Alexis.
[/quote:318c6f84d5]
Were it not virtually certain that the quakes 4000 km apart were unrelated
causally, that case would be of significant interest. Whereas the two quakes
you cite not so much. It's not necessary to draw a line.
Mike Williams
Arroyo Grande, CA U.S. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Weatherlawyer... |
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2009 2:50 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 5 Sep, 19:13, "Mike Williams" <miklw... at (no spam) charter.net> wrote:
[quote:6b50769a73]Hi all! Some healthy problems and some future exposè on the 9+
prediction, was the cause of my absence in the Group.
But I can say you that we had a very unusual case , perhaps the only
in the history. Two 6+in a lapse of 47 secondes, but in a distance
over 4000 Km! It was 28th August, Banda Sea, a 6.8 and N. Quinghai in
China, a 6.2!!
Somebody knows something similar?
Alexis.
Coincidence. The fastest seismic waves travel at below 14 km/sec,
corresponding to at most 650 km in the allotted 47 seconds. I'm no expert on
dynamic stress propagation, but am quite sure it's even slower - so there's
no way the second earthquake knew about the first.
[/quote:6b50769a73]
Unless the seismism is rectified in some way as when a storm blows
apart in its death throes.
Seismic waves by definition, move at the speed of sound. Thus they are
held up or progressed more easily depending on the matter they are
propagating through.
And of course at intervals to do with harmonics, they disappear or
increase in magnitude.
All schoolboy/girl stuff. Schoolborg? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Mon Nov 30, 2009 3:30 pm
|
|