 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Geology Forum » The 1~10% hollow moon / Brad Guth... |
|
Page 1 of 5 Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Next |
|
| Author |
Message |
| BradGuth... |
 Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 3:39 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Because that unusual moon of ours wasn’t traditionally compressed into
a ball via gravity and thereby made solid and progressively more dense
to its very core, is perhaps what made the first dozen (US and USSR)
probes of orbital, impactors and hard landers somewhat trial and
error, or rather continually off-course and sort of hit and miss.
Now, I wouldn’t go so far as to suggest that our Selene/moon was ever
something artificially created, however the idea of there being a
significant portion (>1%) as hollow seems to fit the best available
science rather nicely, if not conservatively.
http://keelynet.com/unclass/luna.htm
“Lunar probes from both the United States and the Soviet Union were
more succesful after this. This cannot most likely be attributed to
some sudden advance in the quality of the hardware or telemetry
methods of both space programs, whereas it is much more likely to be a
result of recalculation of the lunar gravitational gradient.“
“The lunar orbiting space missions demonstrated even more evidence
that the moon might not be a solid homogenous rock throughout it's
volume.“
If there was ever anything watery/brine, mud like fluid or compressed
gaseous about the interior of that physically dark orb of such thick
crust that’s populated by such unusual surface mascons, whereas having
been existing within such a vacuum and having been so nicely freeze
dried by night and obviously illuminated and thus roasted to death by
day would have likely sucked her dry and evaporated anything that
wasn’t 100% sealed off by solid basalt or the likes of crystal
fortified geode pockets.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geode
http://www.whitebearenergies.net/crystals/cave.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/787776.stm
http://www.crystalinks.com/mexicocrystals.html
Such 100% sealed geode pockets or voids of once hosting fluids or
compressed gasses could still to some extent exist, but other than
discovered via random dumb luck we’ll likely need 3D seismic mapping
in order to find them. However, existing orbital science plus laser
and radar altimeter data that should be 100% public accessible, will
have by now indirectly mapped our Selene/moon semi-hollow interior to
within a resolution >10 km (possibly as good as 1 km resolution might
be interpreted).
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 3:48 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jul 30, 6:39 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote:fa8b7f77bf]Because that unusual moon of ours wasn’t traditionally compressed into
a ball via gravity and thereby made solid and progressively more dense
to its very core, is perhaps what made the first dozen (US and USSR)
probes of orbital, impactors and hard landers somewhat trial and
error, or rather continually off-course and sort of hit and miss.
Now, I wouldn’t go so far as to suggest that our Selene/moon was ever
something artificially created, however the idea of there being a
significant portion (>1%) as hollow seems to fit the best available
science rather nicely, if not conservatively.
http://keelynet.com/unclass/luna.htm
“Lunar probes from both the United States and the Soviet Union were
more succesful after this. This cannot most likely be attributed to
some sudden advance in the quality of the hardware or telemetry
methods of both space programs, whereas it is much more likely to be a
result of recalculation of the lunar gravitational gradient.“
“The lunar orbiting space missions demonstrated even more evidence
that the moon might not be a solid homogenous rock throughout it's
volume.“
If there was ever anything watery/brine, mud like fluid or compressed
gaseous about the interior of that physically dark orb of such thick
crust that’s populated by such unusual surface mascons, whereas having
been existing within such a vacuum and having been so nicely freeze
dried by night and obviously illuminated and thus roasted to death by
day would have likely sucked her dry and evaporated anything that
wasn’t 100% sealed off by solid basalt or the likes of crystal
fortified geode pockets.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geode
http://www.whitebearenergies.net/crystals/cave.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/787776.stm
http://www.crystalinks.com/mexicocrystals.html
Such 100% sealed geode pockets or voids of once hosting fluids or
compressed gasses could still to some extent exist, but other than
discovered via random dumb luck we’ll likely need 3D seismic mapping
in order to find them. However, existing orbital science plus laser
and radar altimeter data that should be 100% public accessible, will
have by now indirectly mapped our Selene/moon semi-hollow interior to
within a resolution >10 km (possibly as good as 1 km resolution might
be interpreted).
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
[/quote:fa8b7f77bf]
Hollow moon related and in further support of one orb worth of
interactive gravity keeping another nearby orb of a mostly fluid mass
a little extra physically modulated and thereby kept extra toasty from
the inside out:
If the unusual fluid mascon worth of the Jupiter atmosphere can manage
to keep the innards of the fully tidal locked Io more than smoking hot
and bothered, imagine what our Selene/moon with its far better (moon :
planet) mass ratio and subsequent 2e20 N/sec (55.5e12 kw.hr if you
like) of what its tidal binding force is doing mostly to us.
“Io is a truly nightmarish hell of a moon and has about several
hundred volcanoes. It is the second hottest object in the Solar System
after the Sun and as an added bonus, the sulphuric lava is hundreds of
degrees hotter than the lava on Earth.”
“The force behind Io's phenomenal heat is the gravity of Jupiter and
the other large moons. This heats up the interior of Io and causes
rock to liquify.”
In exchange for having been keeping Eden/Earth physically modulated
and thus extra hot, there’s a darn good chance this companion/binary
planet Selene/moon of ours has become semi-hollow (mostly under/within
its extremely robust far-side interior), whereas it’s worth
considering that perhaps <10% hollow shouldn’t be all that unexpected.
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 7:13 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jul 31, 7:29 am, "Hagar" <ha... at (no spam) sahm.name> wrote:
[quote:3051b003d1]"BradGuth" <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:3ea7f198-1cec-4074-b093-529c3055f01a at (no spam) i8g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
Here’s yet another edited food for thought topic, about our local
planetoid Selene/moon that has a little something hollow to say about
itself;
************************************
Say GuthBall, you could run all the needed calculations using your
head as a model. It is 1 - 10% hollow. Now apply all the parameters,
perform your calculations and then multiply the result by the Moon/your head
ratio. I bet the result is "Zero" every time.
[/quote:3051b003d1]
A dysfunctional 5th grader could have offered a better reply to this
topic. Are you suggesting that you're not even that good?
Earth is perhaps 0.1% hollow, and if Yellowstone blows its lid is
exactly what could easily exceed that mark.
Removing all fluids of water, brines, muds, oil and gasses from within
Earth is what I'm talking about, whereas our Selene/moon should be at
least somewhat similar if not a whole lot more so hollow because of
it's unusually thick and extra dense crust that's surrounding the
relatively low mass interior, that's on average 5 fold greater than
Earth has to work with. For all we know <10% of the lunar mass is
represented by that robust crust and surface deposits.
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Hagar... |
| Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 8:29 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"BradGuth" <bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:3ea7f198-1cec-4074-b093-529c3055f01a at (no spam) i8g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
Here’s yet another edited food for thought topic, about our local
planetoid Selene/moon that has a little something hollow to say about
itself;
************************************
Say GuthBall, you could run all the needed calculations using your
head as a model. It is 1 - 10% hollow. Now apply all the parameters,
perform your calculations and then multiply the result by the Moon/your head
ratio. I bet the result is "Zero" every time. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 11:56 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jul 30, 6:48 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote:63951b0ca5]On Jul 30, 6:39 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Because that unusual moon of ours wasn’t traditionally compressed into
a ball via gravity and thereby made solid and progressively more dense
to its very core, is perhaps what made the first dozen (US and USSR)
probes of orbital, impactors and hard landers somewhat trial and
error, or rather continually off-course and sort of hit and miss.
Now, I wouldn’t go so far as to suggest that our Selene/moon was ever
something artificially created, however the idea of there being a
significant portion (>1%) as hollow seems to fit the best available
science rather nicely, if not conservatively.
http://keelynet.com/unclass/luna.htm
“Lunar probes from both the United States and the Soviet Union were
more succesful after this. This cannot most likely be attributed to
some sudden advance in the quality of the hardware or telemetry
methods of both space programs, whereas it is much more likely to be a
result of recalculation of the lunar gravitational gradient.“
“The lunar orbiting space missions demonstrated even more evidence
that the moon might not be a solid homogenous rock throughout it's
volume.“
If there was ever anything watery/brine, mud like fluid or compressed
gaseous about the interior of that physically dark orb of such thick
crust that’s populated by such unusual surface mascons, whereas having
been existing within such a vacuum and having been so nicely freeze
dried by night and obviously illuminated and thus roasted to death by
day would have likely sucked her dry and evaporated anything that
wasn’t 100% sealed off by solid basalt or the likes of crystal
fortified geode pockets.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geode
http://www.whitebearenergies.net/crystals/cave.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/787776.stm
http://www.crystalinks.com/mexicocrystals.html
Such 100% sealed geode pockets or voids of once hosting fluids or
compressed gasses could still to some extent exist, but other than
discovered via random dumb luck we’ll likely need 3D seismic mapping
in order to find them. However, existing orbital science plus laser
and radar altimeter data that should be 100% public accessible, will
have by now indirectly mapped our Selene/moon semi-hollow interior to
within a resolution >10 km (possibly as good as 1 km resolution might
be interpreted).
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
Hollow moon related and in further support of one orb worth of
interactive gravity keeping another nearby orb of a mostly fluid mass
a little extra physically modulated and thereby kept extra toasty from
the inside out:
If the unusual fluid mascon worth of the Jupiter atmosphere can manage
to keep the innards of the fully tidal locked Io more than smoking hot
and bothered, imagine what our Selene/moon with its far better (moon :
planet) mass ratio and subsequent 2e20 N/sec (55.5e12 kw.hr if you
like) of what its tidal binding force is doing mostly to us.
“Io is a truly nightmarish hell of a moon and has about several
hundred volcanoes. It is the second hottest object in the Solar System
after the Sun and as an added bonus, the sulphuric lava is hundreds of
degrees hotter than the lava on Earth.”
“The force behind Io's phenomenal heat is the gravity of Jupiter and
the other large moons. This heats up the interior of Io and causes
rock to liquify.”
In exchange for having been keeping Eden/Earth physically modulated
and thus extra hot, there’s a darn good chance this companion/binary
planet Selene/moon of ours has become semi-hollow (mostly under/within
its extremely robust far-side interior), whereas it’s worth
considering that perhaps <10% hollow shouldn’t be all that unexpected.
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
[/quote:63951b0ca5]
I’ve recently had to exclude using this hot link / Sakib Rasool
http://f r e e w e b s.com/starsurf/jupiter.htm
Because whenever included it caused my topic or whatever reply to be
rejected. Did something about this Starsurfing from downunder, Asia
or middle Eastern manage to break wind, or what?
This seems entirely odd, because this one of Jupiter and other pages
are truly quite informative, and credit is always given as to the
original source of context. Even the page of hot links are as equally
informative, decently entertaining and exceptionally harmless. So,
what the hell gives?
http://rtoddking.com/chinawin2009_hb_if.htm
http://rtoddking.com/chinawin2009_hb_sf.htm
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BCC Meteorites... |
| Posted: Thu Aug 06, 2009 11:53 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Listen here you freak. There is not one scintilla of evidence the Moon
is one percent or any percent hollow. Yes it has lots of depressions
and even canyons but these are not hollow in any sense of the word.
You are having a conversation with yourself and please come to your
senses. What do you know about compression and gravity? How do you
know it was not compressed as a result of gravity? It was a
combination of gravity, internal geological processes and the fact
that outer space has 12-14 atmospheres of vacuum pressure. Do you
understand what that means. You have no clue how the Moon formed and
you are trying to complicate a simple process, like a few scientists
still to this day advance the unlikely notion that the Moon was a
remnant of a collision with a solid mars sized body. The evidence does
not show that nor is the Moon hollow in any sense of the word. You're
complicating simple matters and getting lost in the translation. Take
a vacation.
Cordially,
S. Ray DeRusse
www.bccmeteorites.com
On Jul 30, 8:39 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote:02900c7ff3]Because that unusual moon of ours wasn’t traditionally compressed into
a ball via gravity and thereby made solid and progressively more dense
to its very core, is perhaps what made the first dozen (US and USSR)
probes of orbital, impactors and hard landers somewhat trial and
error, or rather continually off-course and sort of hit and miss.
Now, I wouldn’t go so far as to suggest that our Selene/moon was ever
something artificially created, however the idea of there being a
significant portion (>1%) as hollow seems to fit the best available
science rather nicely, if not conservatively.
http://keelynet.com/unclass/luna.htm
“Lunar probes from both the United States and the Soviet Union were
more succesful after this. This cannot most likely be attributed to
some sudden advance in the quality of the hardware or telemetry
methods of both space programs, whereas it is much more likely to be a
result of recalculation of the lunar gravitational gradient.“
“The lunar orbiting space missions demonstrated even more evidence
that the moon might not be a solid homogenous rock throughout it's
volume.“
If there was ever anything watery/brine, mud like fluid or compressed
gaseous about the interior of that physically dark orb of such thick
crust that’s populated by such unusual surface mascons, whereas having
been existing within such a vacuum and having been so nicely freeze
dried by night and obviously illuminated and thus roasted to death by
day would have likely sucked her dry and evaporated anything that
wasn’t 100% sealed off by solid basalt or the likes of crystal
fortified geode pockets.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geode
http://www.whitebearenergies.net/crystals/cave.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/787776.stm
http://www.crystalinks.com/mexicocrystals.html
Such 100% sealed geode pockets or voids of once hosting fluids or
compressed gasses could still to some extent exist, but other than
discovered via random dumb luck we’ll likely need 3D seismic mapping
in order to find them. However, existing orbital science plus laser
and radar altimeter data that should be 100% public accessible, will
have by now indirectly mapped our Selene/moon semi-hollow interior to
within a resolution >10 km (possibly as good as 1 km resolution might
be interpreted).
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”[/quote:02900c7ff3] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Thu Aug 06, 2009 2:15 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Aug 6, 2:53 pm, BCC Meteorites <s... at (no spam) aceweb.com> wrote:
[quote:81239dd56c]Listen here you freak. There is not one scintilla of evidence the Moon
is one percent or any percent hollow. Yes it has lots of depressions
and even canyons but these are not hollow in any sense of the word.
You are having a conversation with yourself and please come to your
senses. What do you know about compression and gravity? How do you
know it was not compressed as a result of gravity? It was a
combination of gravity, internal geological processes and the fact
that outer space has 12-14 atmospheres of vacuum pressure. Do you
understand what that means. You have no clue how the Moon formed and
you are trying to complicate a simple process, like a few scientists
still to this day advance the unlikely notion that the Moon was a
remnant of a collision with a solid mars sized body. The evidence does
not show that nor is the Moon hollow in any sense of the word. You're
complicating simple matters and getting lost in the translation. Take
a vacation.
Cordially,
S. Ray DeRussewww.bccmeteorites.com
On Jul 30, 8:39 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Because that unusual moon of ours wasn’t traditionally compressed into
a ball via gravity and thereby made solid and progressively more dense
to its very core, is perhaps what made the first dozen (US and USSR)
probes of orbital, impactors and hard landers somewhat trial and
error, or rather continually off-course and sort of hit and miss.
Now, I wouldn’t go so far as to suggest that our Selene/moon was ever
something artificially created, however the idea of there being a
significant portion (>1%) as hollow seems to fit the best available
science rather nicely, if not conservatively.
http://keelynet.com/unclass/luna.htm
“Lunar probes from both the United States and the Soviet Union were
more succesful after this. This cannot most likely be attributed to
some sudden advance in the quality of the hardware or telemetry
methods of both space programs, whereas it is much more likely to be a
result of recalculation of the lunar gravitational gradient.“
“The lunar orbiting space missions demonstrated even more evidence
that the moon might not be a solid homogenous rock throughout it's
volume.“
If there was ever anything watery/brine, mud like fluid or compressed
gaseous about the interior of that physically dark orb of such thick
crust that’s populated by such unusual surface mascons, whereas having
been existing within such a vacuum and having been so nicely freeze
dried by night and obviously illuminated and thus roasted to death by
day would have likely sucked her dry and evaporated anything that
wasn’t 100% sealed off by solid basalt or the likes of crystal
fortified geode pockets.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geode
http://www.whitebearenergies.net/crystals/cave.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/787776.stm
http://www.crystalinks.com/mexicocrystals.html
Such 100% sealed geode pockets or voids of once hosting fluids or
compressed gasses could still to some extent exist, but other than
discovered via random dumb luck we’ll likely need 3D seismic mapping
in order to find them. However, existing orbital science plus laser
and radar altimeter data that should be 100% public accessible, will
have by now indirectly mapped our Selene/moon semi-hollow interior to
within a resolution >10 km (possibly as good as 1 km resolution might
be interpreted).
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
[/quote:81239dd56c]
Your subjective and lack of any deductive interpretation is noted, as
is your dumbfounded mindset.
Apparently 0.1% of the public funded science is good enough for the
likes of yourself, whereas I'd like to review the other 99.9% that
we've paid for.
It's because of silly brown-nosed folks like yourself that LUNAR-A
never got deployed, and other highly economical surface probe
deployments never took place. It's also because of you that what
little science data we have is either extensively inaccessible, lost
or destroyed.
Do you have seismic 3D mapping of our moon's interior, or are you just
blowing it out your naysay ass?
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Fri Aug 07, 2009 2:55 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Aug 6, 2:53 pm, BCC Meteorites <s... at (no spam) aceweb.com> wrote:
[quote:19259919cc]Listen here you freak. There is not one scintilla of evidence the Moon
is one percent or any percent hollow. Yes it has lots of depressions
and even canyons but these are not hollow in any sense of the word.
You are having a conversation with yourself and please come to your
senses. What do you know about compression and gravity? How do you
know it was not compressed as a result of gravity? It was a
combination of gravity, internal geological processes and the fact
that outer space has 12-14 atmospheres of vacuum pressure. Do you
understand what that means. You have no clue how the Moon formed and
you are trying to complicate a simple process, like a few scientists
still to this day advance the unlikely notion that the Moon was a
remnant of a collision with a solid mars sized body. The evidence does
not show that nor is the Moon hollow in any sense of the word. You're
complicating simple matters and getting lost in the translation. Take
a vacation.
Cordially,
S. Ray DeRussewww.bccmeteorites.com
On Jul 30, 8:39 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Because that unusual moon of ours wasn’t traditionally compressed into
a ball via gravity and thereby made solid and progressively more dense
to its very core, is perhaps what made the first dozen (US and USSR)
probes of orbital, impactors and hard landers somewhat trial and
error, or rather continually off-course and sort of hit and miss.
Now, I wouldn’t go so far as to suggest that our Selene/moon was ever
something artificially created, however the idea of there being a
significant portion (>1%) as hollow seems to fit the best available
science rather nicely, if not conservatively.
http://keelynet.com/unclass/luna.htm
“Lunar probes from both the United States and the Soviet Union were
more succesful after this. This cannot most likely be attributed to
some sudden advance in the quality of the hardware or telemetry
methods of both space programs, whereas it is much more likely to be a
result of recalculation of the lunar gravitational gradient.“
“The lunar orbiting space missions demonstrated even more evidence
that the moon might not be a solid homogenous rock throughout it's
volume.“
If there was ever anything watery/brine, mud like fluid or compressed
gaseous about the interior of that physically dark orb of such thick
crust that’s populated by such unusual surface mascons, whereas having
been existing within such a vacuum and having been so nicely freeze
dried by night and obviously illuminated and thus roasted to death by
day would have likely sucked her dry and evaporated anything that
wasn’t 100% sealed off by solid basalt or the likes of crystal
fortified geode pockets.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geode
http://www.whitebearenergies.net/crystals/cave.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/787776.stm
http://www.crystalinks.com/mexicocrystals.html
Such 100% sealed geode pockets or voids of once hosting fluids or
compressed gasses could still to some extent exist, but other than
discovered via random dumb luck we’ll likely need 3D seismic mapping
in order to find them. However, existing orbital science plus laser
and radar altimeter data that should be 100% public accessible, will
have by now indirectly mapped our Selene/moon semi-hollow interior to
within a resolution >10 km (possibly as good as 1 km resolution might
be interpreted).
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
[/quote:19259919cc]
Where is your objective science that's suggesting our Selene/moon is
traditionally solid to its core?
The lunar surface is by far the most mascon populated surface
discovered to date. If it were as uniformly compression solid and so
otherwise nicely solidified as you say, then why were the first dozen
US/USSR missions so dismal?
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 3:54 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Aug 13, 3:58 pm, "hanson" <han... at (no spam) quick.net> wrote:
[quote:4d6f94cb43]------- WHOAAAAahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ----------
On Aug 13, 12:54 pm, "BradGuth" <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:> On Aug 13, 12:41 pm, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Aug 13, 7:56 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Aug 12, 11:14 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 28, 5:16 pm, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com
... was profusely talking to himself, for weeks, about the same
thing.... thru the remaining 10% of his cavitated hollow teeth
which turned him into a raving lunatic and so he wrote:
Brad wrote:
If only I had some teeth would be an improvement, ....,
but of course that never happened.
hanson wrote:
Brad, you poor sod, when and if Obama care will happen &
you will get some dentures then your Selenic nightmares
will end. Keep the faith, baby, as long as it's not faith-based.
Brad Guth before improvement <http://tinyurl.com/plgvt9
Brad Guth after improvement <http://tinyurl.com/qfh8s5
Thansk for the laugh guy... ahahahaha... ahahahanson
[/quote:4d6f94cb43]
Your intellectual fornication is noted, and republican none the less.
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| hanson... |
| Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 4:58 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
------- WHOAAAAahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ----------
[quote:748398011c]
On Aug 13, 12:54 pm, "BradGuth" <bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Aug 13, 12:41 pm, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Aug 13, 7:56 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Aug 12, 11:14 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 28, 5:16 pm, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com
.... was profusely talking to himself, for weeks, about the same[/quote:748398011c]
thing.... thru the remaining 10% of his cavitated hollow teeth
which turned him into a raving lunatic and so he wrote:
[quote:748398011c]
Brad wrote:[/quote:748398011c]
If only I had some teeth would be an improvement, ....,
but of course that never happened.
[quote:748398011c]
hanson wrote:[/quote:748398011c]
Brad, you poor sod, when and if Obama care will happen &
you will get some dentures then your Selenic nightmares
will end. Keep the faith, baby, as long as it's not faith-based.
Brad Guth before improvement <http://tinyurl.com/plgvt9>
Brad Guth after improvement <http://tinyurl.com/qfh8s5>
[quote:748398011c]
Thansk for the laugh guy... ahahahaha... ahahahanson[/quote:748398011c] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| hanson... |
| Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:59 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
-------- WOAAAAHahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ----------
<http://tinyurl.com/o59txw > |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| hanson... |
| Posted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 6:57 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
-------- WOAAAAHahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ----------
Brad Guth wrote: Brad_Guth wrote: Brad.Guth wrote: BradGuth wrote:
BG / “Guth Usenet: "BradGuth" <bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com>, the Faith-
based Pinko-Green Narcissist and L1 Fanatic wants to be on top
of the "stack" and burn brightly: -- <http://tinyurl.com/o59txw > --
ahahahaha...
[quote:8d67864f7f]
Brad wrote:[/quote:8d67864f7f]
If only I had some teeth would be an improvement, ....,
but of course that never happened.
[quote:8d67864f7f]
Brad Guth before improvement <http://tinyurl.com/plgvt9[/quote:8d67864f7f]
Brad Guth after improvement <http://tinyurl.com/qfh8s5> |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 5:49 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Aug 14, 2:59 pm, "hanson" <han... at (no spam) quick.net> wrote:
[quote:418efac5e8]-------- WOAAAAHahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ----------
http://tinyurl.com/o59txw
[/quote:418efac5e8]
As per usual, it seems lord, spook/mole "hanson" has absolutely
nothing topic constructive to offer. But then what should a
dysfunctional 4th grader and eventual adult pervert have to offer?
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 2:45 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Aug 16, 2:21 pm, "hanson" <han... at (no spam) quick.net> wrote:
[quote:fced5db405]hanson wrote:
Brad, I'm sorry that I forget to give you credit for the most profound
statement that you ever uttered in your obese narcissism. See ###:::...
Brad Guth wrote: Brad_Guth wrote: Brad.Guth wrote: BradGuth wrote:
BG / “Guth Usenet: "BradGuth" <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com>, the Faith-
based Pinko-Green Narcissist and L1 Fanatic wants to be on top
of the "stack" and burn brightly: -- <http://tinyurl.com/o59txw> --
ahahahaha...
Brad wrote:
###::: I, Brad Guth, do have important things to share:
If only I had some teeth would be an improvement, ....,
but of course that never happened.
Brad Guth before improvement <http://tinyurl.com/plgvt9
Brad Guth after improvement <http://tinyurl.com/qfh8s5
WOAAAAHahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ahahaha.. ahahanson
[/quote:fced5db405]
And the retro grade mindset of a slime-mold called hanson continues to
amaze the world with how little worth it is being of that introverted
species (of no spine and no exoskeleton shell).
What would happen if the hanson slime-mold were converted into a
synfuel? (could we even get a BTU/kg?)
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| hanson... |
| Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 3:21 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
hanson wrote:
Brad, I'm sorry that I forget to give you credit for the most profound
statement that you ever uttered in your obese narcissism. See ###:::...
[quote:b04718c5d4]
Brad Guth wrote: Brad_Guth wrote: Brad.Guth wrote: BradGuth wrote:[/quote:b04718c5d4]
BG / “Guth Usenet: "BradGuth" <bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com>, the Faith-
based Pinko-Green Narcissist and L1 Fanatic wants to be on top
of the "stack" and burn brightly: -- <http://tinyurl.com/o59txw > --
ahahahaha...
[quote:b04718c5d4]
Brad wrote:[/quote:b04718c5d4]
###::: I, Brad Guth, do have important things to share:
If only I had some teeth would be an improvement, ....,
but of course that never happened.
[quote:b04718c5d4]
Brad Guth before improvement <http://tinyurl.com/plgvt9[/quote:b04718c5d4]
Brad Guth after improvement <http://tinyurl.com/qfh8s5>
[quote:b04718c5d4]
[/quote:b04718c5d4]
WOAAAAHahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ahahaha.. ahahanson |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:25 am
|
|