 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Astronomy Forum » Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth... |
|
Page 3 of 7 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Next |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Saul Levy... |
 Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 8:51 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Didn't we see this WORTHLESS TRASH before, GOOFYSHIT? lmfjao!
Yes we have.
Henry's an IDIOT!
GOOFYSHIT is an IDIOT!
Once an IDIOT, always an IDIOT!
Saul Levy
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:54:21 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth
<bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote:5b5660a0cb]Cosmological Ice Ages (by Henry Kroll)
The example ratio of 8.3e7:1 is how much greater our solar system
remains via Newtonian force, as having been attracted to the existing
Sirius star/solar system, than otherwise associated with 2005-VX3
being the item (damocloid/asteroid) of 112 km diameter that’s forever
attracted to our sun. This Sirius:XV3 ratio of 8.3e7:1 is just
another Newtonian matter of objective and peer accepted fact that you
and others can take to the bank (unless it’s a kosher bank, in which
case you're not allowed to deposit anything that’s not of their
mainstream faith-based approval, because according to their long
standing policy and subsequent rules applied to everyone else, Eden/
Earth is always alone and supposedly all there is for accommodating
any complex biodiversity, and everything about our environment is
strictly terrestrial and somehow having nothing whatsoever to do with
human or external factors because, apparently their Eden/Earth has
been given unlimited and renewable resources of everything we need as
is, except for an inflated price).
Gravity Force of Attraction (orbital tidal radius)
http://www.1728.com/gravity.htm
http://www.wsanford.com/~wsanford/calculators/gravity-calculator.html
Individual mass and velocity are of course significant and the most
dominate of trajectory factors, and then it gets especially complex
whenever there's more than two given bodies of mass to consider that
are each in proper motion to one another. This however doesn't
exclude our interacting with the Sirius star system, or otherwise
obfuscate/exclude what the weak force of gravity and the subsequent
laws of Newtonian orbital mechanics has to say.
~ BG[/quote:5b5660a0cb] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| American... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 4:58 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 17, 1:48 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote:dc0b84a053]On Oct 15, 6:54 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Sep 21, 7:02 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Aug 24, 11:07 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Now we have a new and improved gauntlet of a topic/author taboo and/or
banishment enforced policy, or rather media infowar tactic, even if it
means forcing mainstream to ignore any fix to our badly GW traumatized
environment and of its unique biodiversity we call Eden/Earth, or
merely on behalf of improving it’s use of government and our limited
resources. The biggest forbidden topics have to do with discussing
other forms of off-world intelligent life, because such isn’t supposed
to exist unless it’s of a subhuman Zionist/Jewish species that we get
to dominate and profit from. (isn't that special)
All we seem to get nowadays is the usual Republican Zionist Nazi
replies of change nothing and otherwise do nothing, because apparently
nothing is bad with the way everything is, and besides nothing
seriously bad is ever going to happen, and even if it should we mere
humans couldn't have done anything positive or constructive for the
better.
In other Usenet/newsgroup words of cult/cabal wisdom; Change nothing,
revise nothing and above all do nothing about learning, exploring,
researching or forbid any public sharing of whatever knowledge,
because we (those in charge) supposedly like everything exactly as it
is.
~ BG
On Jul 6, 6:55 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least
according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and
orbital mechanics.
In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media
has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius
star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and
extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from
our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial
illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth.
First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very
least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy
star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown
away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our
existing solar system wasn't any too far away. Others might go so far
as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million,
while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5
million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller
galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. In any case, that must have
been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of
this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly
nowhere to be found.
In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system
wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal
radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least
subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily
dominated by the Sirius star/solar system.
Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions
isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big
Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest.
Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone)
http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/localgroup/localgroup.html
The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored)
http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/area/index.cfm?fareaid=20
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html
Local galactic motion simulation:
"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B.
Nordström et al.
http://www.aanda.org/content/view/71/42/lang,en
According to several physics and astronomy kinds of observationology
science (deductive interpretation of eye-candy plus other peer
replicated research), our Milky Way is made up of at least two
galactic units, with more of the same on their blue-shifted way
towards encountering us (namely Andromeda). Seems hardly fair
considering that everything was supposedly created via one singular
Big Bang, not to mention that hundreds to perhaps thousands of
galaxies seem rather nicely headed into the Great Attractor (including
us) for their final demise and/or rebirth.
Don’t forget to appreciate those Hubble, KECK and multiple other
archives (including those of what FAS has compiled) depicting
“colliding galaxies”, as well as soon to become ESA color/hue enhanced
and expanded upon via a trio of their impressive orbital
observatories, not to mention whatever the renewed and improved Hubble
plus our next generation of orbital observatories should further
document. It may even become hard to find galaxies as massive as ours
and Andromeda that are entirely original without their having grown
via mergers.
Where's our TRACEe3 and the all-knowing expertise from FAS, telling us
whatever they seem to know best or at least suspect is most likely?
Surely these brown-nosed clowns of mostly pretend Atheists, as well as
republican faith-based bigots and typically closed mindsets of our
Usenet/newsgroup cabal that are enforcing their mainstream status quo
(much like my personal rabbi shadow tries to do), are hopefully not
representing or otherwise speaking on behalf of our FAS.
~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet”
Even though gravity is an extremely weak force, when there's enough
matter associated with a given star/solar system to place an affect
another nearby star/solar system, and it's especially so if such mass
is as nearby as our solar system and Sirius as already heading
elliptically towards one another, as is the case with us and Sirius.
Cosmological Ice Ages (by Henry Kroll)
The example ratio of 8.3e7:1 is how much greater our solar system
remains via Newtonian force, as having been attracted to the existing
Sirius star/solar system, than otherwise associated with 2005-VX3
being the item (damocloid/asteroid) of 112 km diameter that’s forever
attracted to our sun. This Sirius:XV3 ratio of 8.3e7:1 is just
another Newtonian matter of objective and peer accepted fact that you
and others can take to the bank (unless it’s a kosher bank, in which
case you're not allowed to deposit anything that’s not of their
mainstream faith-based approval, because according to their long
standing policy and subsequent rules applied to everyone else, Eden/
Earth is always alone and supposedly all there is for accommodating
any complex biodiversity, and everything about our environment is
strictly terrestrial and somehow having nothing whatsoever to do with
human or external factors because, apparently their Eden/Earth has
been given unlimited and renewable resources of everything we need as
is, except for an inflated price).
Gravity Force of Attraction (orbital tidal radius)
http://www.1728.com/gravity.htm
http://www.wsanford.com/~wsanford/calculators/gravity-calculator.html
Individual mass and velocity are of course significant and the most
dominate of trajectory factors, and then it gets especially complex
whenever there's more than two given bodies of mass to consider that
are each in proper motion to one another. This however doesn't
exclude our interacting with the Sirius star system, or otherwise
obfuscate/exclude what the weak force of gravity and the subsequent
laws of Newtonian orbital mechanics has to say.
How many planets like Venus did Sirius B originally have?
~ BG- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
[/quote:dc0b84a053]
Correct me if I'm wrong, but according to the legend of the Dogon,
given by Dr. Louis Turi:
http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2006/03/21
The "planetary" star system isn't quite identified as being that of
Sirius B, but I am inclined to believe that perhaps, according to
story given by:
http://www.sirianrevelations.net/star_a_b.shtml
"Although the scientific community has not confirmed the existence
of Sirius C, the Dogon knew of it by the name, Enome Ya, and they
described it too as revolving around Sirius A.
Of the planets that orbited Anu, one did not achieve ascension when
the star, which remains in the fourth dimension, did not: that planet
is Nebiru, the home of the Annunaki.
Nebiru was flung out of Sirius, was captured by our sun, and
ricocheted back to Sirius and it is to this day caught between the
two star systems, on an elliptical journey that takes approximately
3,600 years to complete."
American |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| American... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 6:58 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 17, 12:20 pm, Saul Levy <saulle... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
[quote:ec840fc806]Nibiru DOESN'T EVEN EXIST, YOU BRAIN-DEAD JACKASS! lmfjao!
Au contrare, this is not the only single link that alludes to the[/quote:ec840fc806]
existence of Niburu. The fact that it is talked about sooooooo much
doesn't necessarily disqualify it as existing now, does it?
You are completely closed shut when it comes to even imagining the
possibilities - Zechariah Sitchin has mentioned it several times in
his writings - there must be hundreds of inscriptions on both
architecture, cylinder seals, and writings, so I gues that... it...
really.... doesn't... exist... after... all
YEAH RRRRRIIIIIIIGGGGGGHHHHHHTTTTTTTT
[quote:ec840fc806]GOOFBALL is an INSANE FUCKTARD, so what does that MAKE YOU?
4th DIMENSION?
You wouldn't know the meaning of the fourth dimension if it smiled and[/quote:ec840fc806]
laughed at you, freak...
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfmoms/detail?entry_id=49631&tsp=1
[quote:ec840fc806]BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
An orbit that LONG is IMPOSSIBLE anyway! VERY subject to DISRUPTION.
[/quote:ec840fc806]
PROVE IT, you blathering know-it-all...
[quote:ec840fc806]You BELIEVE ANYTHING on Hoax to Hoax? NOW that's REALLY STUPID!
Actually, not everything...[/quote:ec840fc806]
[quote:ec840fc806]BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Your second link claims Sirius B was first seen 50 years ago. 1862
was the actual year. Doesn't lead ANYONE to BELIEVE ANY of the
in the FIRST LINK.
So what if there's just a smidgen of disinformation - IT'S STILL[/quote:ec840fc806]
EXISTS
[quote:ec840fc806]I bet YOU can't SUBTRACT EITHER...
1 - i = ???[/quote:ec840fc806]
Right, it can't be done...
[quote:ec840fc806]If you KNOW ANYTHING AT ALL, YOU AREN'T SHOWING IT!
Exactly right. There is at least 60% of the unconscious mind which[/quote:ec840fc806]
hasn't been deciphered yet. Are you insinuating that dark mass is seen
under the eyelids?
> Saul Levy |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Saul Levy... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 10:20 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Nibiru DOESN'T EVEN EXIST, YOU BRAIN-DEAD JACKASS! lmfjao!
GOOFBALL is an INSANE FUCKTARD, so what does that MAKE YOU?
4th DIMENSION?
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
An orbit that LONG is IMPOSSIBLE anyway! VERY subject to DISRUPTION.
You BELIEVE ANYTHING on Hoax to Hoax? NOW that's REALLY STUPID!
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Your second link claims Sirius B was first seen 50 years ago. 1862
was the actual year. Doesn't lead ANYONE to BELIEVE ANY of the SHIT
in the FIRST LINK.
I bet YOU can't SUBTRACT EITHER...
If you KNOW ANYTHING AT ALL, YOU AREN'T SHOWING IT!
Saul Levy
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 07:58:51 -0700 (PDT), American
<samuelransom at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
[quote:985e5c5230]Correct me if I'm wrong, but according to the legend of the Dogon,
given by Dr. Louis Turi:
http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2006/03/21
The "planetary" star system isn't quite identified as being that of
Sirius B, but I am inclined to believe that perhaps, according to
story given by:
http://www.sirianrevelations.net/star_a_b.shtml
"Although the scientific community has not confirmed the existence
of Sirius C, the Dogon knew of it by the name, Enome Ya, and they
described it too as revolving around Sirius A.
Of the planets that orbited Anu, one did not achieve ascension when
the star, which remains in the fourth dimension, did not: that planet
is Nebiru, the home of the Annunaki.
Nebiru was flung out of Sirius, was captured by our sun, and
ricocheted back to Sirius and it is to this day caught between the
two star systems, on an elliptical journey that takes approximately
3,600 years to complete."
American[/quote:985e5c5230] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 11:16 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Do those laws of physics really function differently while on the
moon? (according to our Apollo missions, apparently so) As perhaps
otherwise something like the newish planet of Venus and even our
physically dark Selene/moon that may have belonged to Sirius B, with
conceivably our Venus having been what those Dogon implied as Sirius C
was perhaps not actually that of any third star, and otherwise the
remaining Sirius star system wobble being caused by whatever Sirius D
of <.057 Ms (roughly 60 Mj) represents their true origin of where the
geologically newish Venus and our Selene/moon came from either Sirius
B or conceivably Sirius D that may have been a third star. At this
juncture we simply have too many unknowns and little if any talent or
resources focused upon the nearby Sirius star/solar system, so for the
moment there’s no objective proof-positive either way.
http://www.icr.org/article/3394/
“Using experimentally-determined diffusion coefficients for hydration
of olivine, water diffusion profiles were calculated for all three
crystallographic axes of an olivine grain at a temperature of
1245±45ºC for various durations, with an initial water content of ~312
weight parts per million (wt ppm) and a final water content of 0 wt
ppm at its rim. Thus it was possible to approximate the ascent rate of
the mantle xenoliths and, by extension, their host basalt. The
calculated ascent rates ranged from 1.9 hours at 1290ºC to 3.4 hours
at 1245ºC and 6.3 hours at 1200ºC. Furthermore, FTIR analyses across
cracks in the olivine grains did not exhibit any perturbations of the
hydrogen profiles, so hydrogen diffusion from the grain rims occurred
predominantly prior to the cracking of the grains near the earth's
surface or after the eruption of the host basalt. Therefore, these
mantle xenoliths must have reached the earth's surface in a matter of
only several hours.”
What part of zero ppm (“water content of 0 wt ppm at its rim”) do we
still not fully understand, and try to remember that this crystal dry
lunar environment is offering a near ideal vacuum, and even originally
its surface shouldn’t have offered at most more then 0.1 bar unless it
was covered in a thick layer of ice (as otherwise it’s not exactly
solid or much less liquid h2o friendly).
If there’s any surface basalt as loose rock and dust that contains
water, unless it were otherwise deposited by meteors and comets, as
such would tend to impose and/or reinforce my ongoing interpretation
that our Selene/moon was once upon a time covered by a very thick
layer of ice. As otherwise there shouldn’t but few if any ppm worth
of water to behold unless going deep, because the element or molecule
water needs pressure in order to coexist within basalt, and
unfortunately the one common thing our Selene/moon doesn’t offer is
pressure. So, unless we’re talking about going several km deep into
that thick and robust crust, there’s not going to bel all that much
h2o to behold.
If our moon were made extensively of Earth, then it’s crust and
surface of lose rock and dust should be similar in measurable ways to
that of terrestrial basalts.
http://bulletin.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/abstract/85/9/1485
“Chlorine, Sulfur, and Water in Magmas and Oceans”
However, it seems our currently naked Selene/moon is one of
considerable sodium and otherwise saturated and/or deposited in many
other unusually dark and heavy elements, including UV reactive
minerals, as well as those even heavier elements of radioactive and
their unavoidable secondary isotopes.
So, where’s the other 99.9% of our spendy LRO and LCROSS science that
obviously does not necessarily support our previous Apollo science or
mission physics?
Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet”
On Oct 15, 6:54 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote:9d2df68bdb]On Sep 21, 7:02 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Aug 24, 11:07 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Now we have a new and improved gauntlet of a topic/author taboo and/or
banishment enforced policy, or rather media infowar tactic, even if it
means forcing mainstream to ignore any fix to our badly GW traumatized
environment and of its unique biodiversity we call Eden/Earth, or
merely on behalf of improving it’s use of government and our limited
resources. The biggest forbidden topics have to do with discussing
other forms of off-world intelligent life, because such isn’t supposed
to exist unless it’s of a subhuman Zionist/Jewish species that we get
to dominate and profit from. (isn't that special)
All we seem to get nowadays is the usual Republican Zionist Nazi
replies of change nothing and otherwise do nothing, because apparently
nothing is bad with the way everything is, and besides nothing
seriously bad is ever going to happen, and even if it should we mere
humans couldn't have done anything positive or constructive for the
better.
In other Usenet/newsgroup words of cult/cabal wisdom; Change nothing,
revise nothing and above all do nothing about learning, exploring,
researching or forbid any public sharing of whatever knowledge,
because we (those in charge) supposedly like everything exactly as it
is.
~ BG
On Jul 6, 6:55 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least
according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and
orbital mechanics.
In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media
has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius
star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and
extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from
our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial
illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth.
First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very
least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy
star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown
away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our
existing solar system wasn't any too far away. Others might go so far
as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million,
while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5
million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller
galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. In any case, that must have
been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of
this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly
nowhere to be found.
In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system
wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal
radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least
subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily
dominated by the Sirius star/solar system.
Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions
isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big
Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest.
Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone)
http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/localgroup/localgroup.html
The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored)
http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/area/index.cfm?fareaid=20
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html
Local galactic motion simulation:
"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B.
Nordström et al.
http://www.aanda.org/content/view/71/42/lang,en
According to several physics and astronomy kinds of observationology
science (deductive interpretation of eye-candy plus other peer
replicated research), our Milky Way is made up of at least two
galactic units, with more of the same on their blue-shifted way
towards encountering us (namely Andromeda). Seems hardly fair
considering that everything was supposedly created via one singular
Big Bang, not to mention that hundreds to perhaps thousands of
galaxies seem rather nicely headed into the Great Attractor (including
us) for their final demise and/or rebirth.
Don’t forget to appreciate those Hubble, KECK and multiple other
archives (including those of what FAS has compiled) depicting
“colliding galaxies”, as well as soon to become ESA color/hue enhanced
and expanded upon via a trio of their impressive orbital
observatories, not to mention whatever the renewed and improved Hubble
plus our next generation of orbital observatories should further
document. It may even become hard to find galaxies as massive as ours
and Andromeda that are entirely original without their having grown
via mergers.
Where's our TRACEe3 and the all-knowing expertise from FAS, telling us
whatever they seem to know best or at least suspect is most likely?
Surely these brown-nosed clowns of mostly pretend Atheists, as well as
republican faith-based bigots and typically closed mindsets of our
Usenet/newsgroup cabal that are enforcing their mainstream status quo
(much like my personal rabbi shadow tries to do), are hopefully not
representing or otherwise speaking on behalf of our FAS.
~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet”
Even though gravity is an extremely weak force, when there's enough
matter associated with a given star/solar system to place an affect
another nearby star/solar system, and it's especially so if such mass
is as nearby as our solar system and Sirius as already heading
elliptically towards one another, as is the case with us and Sirius.
Cosmological Ice Ages (by Henry Kroll)
The example ratio of 8.3e7:1 is how much greater our solar system
remains via Newtonian force, as having been attracted to the existing
Sirius star/solar system, than otherwise associated with 2005-VX3
being the item (damocloid/asteroid) of 112 km diameter that’s forever
attracted to our sun. This Sirius:XV3 ratio of 8.3e7:1 is just
another Newtonian matter of objective and peer accepted fact that you
and others can take to the bank (unless it’s a kosher bank, in which
case you're not allowed to deposit anything that’s not of their
mainstream faith-based approval, because according to their long
standing policy and subsequent rules applied to everyone else, Eden/
Earth is always alone and supposedly all there is for accommodating
any complex biodiversity, and everything about our environment is
strictly terrestrial and somehow having nothing whatsoever to do with
human or external factors because, apparently their Eden/Earth has
been given unlimited and renewable resources of everything we need as
is, except for an inflated price).
Gravity Force of Attraction (orbital tidal radius)
http://www.1728.com/gravity.htm
http://www.wsanford.com/~wsanford/calculators/gravity-calculator.html
Individual mass and velocity are of course significant and the most
dominate of the trajectory factors, and then it gets especially complex
whenever there's more than two given bodies of mass to consider that
are each in proper motion to one another. This however doesn't
exclude our interacting with the Sirius star system, or otherwise
obfuscate/exclude what the weak force of gravity and the subsequent
laws of Newtonian orbital mechanics has to say.
[/quote:9d2df68bdb]
There's no possibly way we're not dominated by what the nearby and
still extremely vibrant Sirius star/solar system represents, much less
of what it used to represent before having lost so much of its
original mass, and before then of what the molecular cloud of <12.5e6
Ms represented.
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 11:20 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 17, 9:58 am, American <samuelran... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
[quote:9266000557]On Oct 17, 12:20 pm, Saul Levy <saulle... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:> Nibiru DOESN'T EVEN EXIST, YOU BRAIN-DEAD JACKASS! lmfjao!
Au contrare, this is not the only single link that alludes to the
existence of Niburu. The fact that it is talked about sooooooo much
doesn't necessarily disqualify it as existing now, does it?
You are completely closed shut when it comes to even imagining the
possibilities - Zechariah Sitchin has mentioned it several times in
his writings - there must be hundreds of inscriptions on both
architecture, cylinder seals, and writings, so I gues that... it...
really.... doesn't... exist... after... all
YEAH RRRRRIIIIIIIGGGGGGHHHHHHTTTTTTTT
GOOFBALL is an INSANE FUCKTARD, so what does that MAKE YOU?
4th DIMENSION?
You wouldn't know the meaning of the fourth dimension if it smiled and
laughed at you, freak...
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfmoms/detail?entry_id=49631&tsp=1
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
An orbit that LONG is IMPOSSIBLE anyway! VERY subject to DISRUPTION.
PROVE IT, you blathering know-it-all...
You BELIEVE ANYTHING on Hoax to Hoax? NOW that's REALLY STUPID!
Actually, not everything...
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Your second link claims Sirius B was first seen 50 years ago. 1862
was the actual year. Doesn't lead ANYONE to BELIEVE ANY of the
in the FIRST LINK.
So what if there's just a smidgen of disinformation - IT'S STILL
EXISTS
I bet YOU can't SUBTRACT EITHER...
1 - i = ???
Right, it can't be done...
If you KNOW ANYTHING AT ALL, YOU AREN'T SHOWING IT!
Exactly right. There is at least 60% of the unconscious mind which
hasn't been deciphered yet. Are you insinuating that dark mass is seen
under the eyelids?
Saul Levy
[/quote:9266000557]
The kosher closed mindset of Rabbi Saul, that speaks officially on
behalf of all Zionist Jews, is what we call a faith-based lost cause.
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 11:32 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 17, 7:58 am, American <samuelran... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
[quote:5787dfb266]On Oct 17, 1:48 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 15, 6:54 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Sep 21, 7:02 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Aug 24, 11:07 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Now we have a new and improved gauntlet of a topic/author taboo and/or
banishment enforced policy, or rather media infowar tactic, even if it
means forcing mainstream to ignore any fix to our badly GW traumatized
environment and of its unique biodiversity we call Eden/Earth, or
merely on behalf of improving it’s use of government and our limited
resources. The biggest forbidden topics have to do with discussing
other forms of off-world intelligent life, because such isn’t supposed
to exist unless it’s of a subhuman Zionist/Jewish species that we get
to dominate and profit from. (isn't that special)
All we seem to get nowadays is the usual Republican Zionist Nazi
replies of change nothing and otherwise do nothing, because apparently
nothing is bad with the way everything is, and besides nothing
seriously bad is ever going to happen, and even if it should we mere
humans couldn't have done anything positive or constructive for the
better.
In other Usenet/newsgroup words of cult/cabal wisdom; Change nothing,
revise nothing and above all do nothing about learning, exploring,
researching or forbid any public sharing of whatever knowledge,
because we (those in charge) supposedly like everything exactly as it
is.
~ BG
On Jul 6, 6:55 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least
according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and
orbital mechanics.
In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media
has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius
star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and
extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from
our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial
illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth.
First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very
least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy
star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown
away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our
existing solar system wasn't any too far away. Others might go so far
as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million,
while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5
million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller
galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. In any case, that must have
been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of
this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly
nowhere to be found.
In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system
wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal
radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least
subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily
dominated by the Sirius star/solar system.
Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions
isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big
Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest.
Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone)
http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/localgroup/localgroup.html
The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored)
http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/area/index.cfm?fareaid=20
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html
Local galactic motion simulation:
"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B.
Nordström et al.
http://www.aanda.org/content/view/71/42/lang,en
According to several physics and astronomy kinds of observationology
science (deductive interpretation of eye-candy plus other peer
replicated research), our Milky Way is made up of at least two
galactic units, with more of the same on their blue-shifted way
towards encountering us (namely Andromeda). Seems hardly fair
considering that everything was supposedly created via one singular
Big Bang, not to mention that hundreds to perhaps thousands of
galaxies seem rather nicely headed into the Great Attractor (including
us) for their final demise and/or rebirth.
Don’t forget to appreciate those Hubble, KECK and multiple other
archives (including those of what FAS has compiled) depicting
“colliding galaxies”, as well as soon to become ESA color/hue enhanced
and expanded upon via a trio of their impressive orbital
observatories, not to mention whatever the renewed and improved Hubble
plus our next generation of orbital observatories should further
document. It may even become hard to find galaxies as massive as ours
and Andromeda that are entirely original without their having grown
via mergers.
Where's our TRACEe3 and the all-knowing expertise from FAS, telling us
whatever they seem to know best or at least suspect is most likely?
Surely these brown-nosed clowns of mostly pretend Atheists, as well as
republican faith-based bigots and typically closed mindsets of our
Usenet/newsgroup cabal that are enforcing their mainstream status quo
(much like my personal rabbi shadow tries to do), are hopefully not
representing or otherwise speaking on behalf of our FAS.
~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet”
Even though gravity is an extremely weak force, when there's enough
matter associated with a given star/solar system to place an affect
another nearby star/solar system, and it's especially so if such mass
is as nearby as our solar system and Sirius as already heading
elliptically towards one another, as is the case with us and Sirius..
Cosmological Ice Ages (by Henry Kroll)
The example ratio of 8.3e7:1 is how much greater our solar system
remains via Newtonian force, as having been attracted to the existing
Sirius star/solar system, than otherwise associated with 2005-VX3
being the item (damocloid/asteroid) of 112 km diameter that’s forever
attracted to our sun. This Sirius:XV3 ratio of 8.3e7:1 is just
another Newtonian matter of objective and peer accepted fact that you
and others can take to the bank (unless it’s a kosher bank, in which
case you're not allowed to deposit anything that’s not of their
mainstream faith-based approval, because according to their long
standing policy and subsequent rules applied to everyone else, Eden/
Earth is always alone and supposedly all there is for accommodating
any complex biodiversity, and everything about our environment is
strictly terrestrial and somehow having nothing whatsoever to do with
human or external factors because, apparently their Eden/Earth has
been given unlimited and renewable resources of everything we need as
is, except for an inflated price).
Gravity Force of Attraction (orbital tidal radius)
http://www.1728.com/gravity.htm
http://www.wsanford.com/~wsanford/calculators/gravity-calculator.html
Individual mass and velocity are of course significant and the most
dominate of trajectory factors, and then it gets especially complex
whenever there's more than two given bodies of mass to consider that
are each in proper motion to one another. This however doesn't
exclude our interacting with the Sirius star system, or otherwise
obfuscate/exclude what the weak force of gravity and the subsequent
laws of Newtonian orbital mechanics has to say.
How many planets like Venus did Sirius B originally have?
~ BG- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Correct me if I'm wrong, but according to the legend of the Dogon,
given by Dr. Louis Turi:
http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2006/03/21
The "planetary" star system isn't quite identified as being that of
Sirius B, but I am inclined to believe that perhaps, according to
story given by:
http://www.sirianrevelations.net/star_a_b.shtml
"Although the scientific community has not confirmed the existence
of Sirius C, the Dogon knew of it by the name, Enome Ya, and they
described it too as revolving around Sirius A.
Of the planets that orbited Anu, one did not achieve ascension when
the star, which remains in the fourth dimension, did not: that planet
is Nebiru, the home of the Annunaki.
Nebiru was flung out of Sirius, was captured by our sun, and
ricocheted back to Sirius and it is to this day caught between the
two star systems, on an elliptical journey that takes approximately
3,600 years to complete."
American
[/quote:5787dfb266]
There is a Sirius C, or possibly it's Sirius D because Sirius C turned
out as becoming our planet Venus. Whatever is causing the wobble from
a 0.057 Ms item is still invisible to most astronomy instruments. It
could even turn out being a small neutron star or possibly a black
hole, although brown-dwarf or extremely large planet seems more
likely.
Rogue or elliptical trekking items between our sun and Sirius should
also be within the cards of what's technically possible, although the
much greater combined Sirius mass will always dominate.
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Saul Levy... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 4:49 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
SEEING IS BELIEVING, YOU MORON! lmfjao!
You can't even THINK so who should believe anything you post?
Ah, ANOTHER INSANELY STUPID MORON, that's who!
Will you START CLAIMING TO HAVE SEEN Nibiru which you can't even spell
without my help? Hide that mistake all you want. WE SAW IT!
Your DARK MASS came from a OUTHOUSE SOMEWHERE!
Sitchen is a FOOL much like you are! His ERRORS in translation are
WELL KNOWN! His INTERPRETATIONS ARE DEAD WRONG!
That LEAVES NOTHING WORTH MENTIONING!
You lack ANY GOOD ARGUMENTS much like Mark Earnest.
Saul Levy
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 09:58:35 -0700 (PDT), American
<samuelransom at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
[quote:d4d3db03f9]On Oct 17, 12:20 pm, Saul Levy <saulle... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
Nibiru DOESN'T EVEN EXIST, YOU BRAIN-DEAD JACKASS! lmfjao!
Au contrare, this is not the only single link that alludes to the
existence of Niburu. The fact that it is talked about sooooooo much
doesn't necessarily disqualify it as existing now, does it?
You are completely closed shut when it comes to even imagining the
possibilities - Zechariah Sitchin has mentioned it several times in
his writings - there must be hundreds of inscriptions on both
architecture, cylinder seals, and writings, so I gues that... it...
really.... doesn't... exist... after... all
YEAH RRRRRIIIIIIIGGGGGGHHHHHHTTTTTTTT
GOOFBALL is an INSANE FUCKTARD, so what does that MAKE YOU?
4th DIMENSION?
You wouldn't know the meaning of the fourth dimension if it smiled and
laughed at you, freak...
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfmoms/detail?entry_id=49631&tsp=1
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
An orbit that LONG is IMPOSSIBLE anyway! VERY subject to DISRUPTION.
PROVE IT, you blathering know-it-all...
You BELIEVE ANYTHING on Hoax to Hoax? NOW that's REALLY STUPID!
Actually, not everything...
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Your second link claims Sirius B was first seen 50 years ago. 1862
was the actual year. Doesn't lead ANYONE to BELIEVE ANY of the
in the FIRST LINK.
So what if there's just a smidgen of disinformation - IT'S STILL
EXISTS
I bet YOU can't SUBTRACT EITHER...
1 - i = ???
Right, it can't be done...
If you KNOW ANYTHING AT ALL, YOU AREN'T SHOWING IT!
Exactly right. There is at least 60% of the unconscious mind which
hasn't been deciphered yet. Are you insinuating that dark mass is seen
under the eyelids?
Saul Levy[/quote:d4d3db03f9] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Nightcrawler... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 5:52 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Hey, I read some Sumer crap on a stone tablet, and that makes it
factual. All also read some Joo crap on a tablet...
"Saul Levy" <saullevy1 at (no spam) cox.net> wrote in message news:qeikd5d5a1d0qo1qaauertah9e4bblgnev at (no spam) 4ax.com...
[quote:fe3f79f2bf]SEEING IS BELIEVING, YOU MORON! lmfjao!
You can't even THINK so who should believe anything you post?
Ah, ANOTHER INSANELY STUPID MORON, that's who!
Will you START CLAIMING TO HAVE SEEN Nibiru which you can't even spell
without my help? Hide that mistake all you want. WE SAW IT!
Your DARK MASS came from a OUTHOUSE SOMEWHERE!
Sitchen is a FOOL much like you are! His ERRORS in translation are
WELL KNOWN! His INTERPRETATIONS ARE DEAD WRONG!
That LEAVES NOTHING WORTH MENTIONING!
You lack ANY GOOD ARGUMENTS much like Mark Earnest.
Saul Levy
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 09:58:35 -0700 (PDT), American
samuelransom at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
On Oct 17, 12:20 pm, Saul Levy <saulle... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
Nibiru DOESN'T EVEN EXIST, YOU BRAIN-DEAD JACKASS! lmfjao!
Au contrare, this is not the only single link that alludes to the
existence of Niburu. The fact that it is talked about sooooooo much
doesn't necessarily disqualify it as existing now, does it?
You are completely closed shut when it comes to even imagining the
possibilities - Zechariah Sitchin has mentioned it several times in
his writings - there must be hundreds of inscriptions on both
architecture, cylinder seals, and writings, so I gues that... it...
really.... doesn't... exist... after... all
YEAH RRRRRIIIIIIIGGGGGGHHHHHHTTTTTTTT
GOOFBALL is an INSANE FUCKTARD, so what does that MAKE YOU?
4th DIMENSION?
You wouldn't know the meaning of the fourth dimension if it smiled and
laughed at you, freak...
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfmoms/detail?entry_id=49631&tsp=1
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
An orbit that LONG is IMPOSSIBLE anyway! VERY subject to DISRUPTION.
PROVE IT, you blathering know-it-all...
You BELIEVE ANYTHING on Hoax to Hoax? NOW that's REALLY STUPID!
Actually, not everything...
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Your second link claims Sirius B was first seen 50 years ago. 1862
was the actual year. Doesn't lead ANYONE to BELIEVE ANY of the
in the FIRST LINK.
So what if there's just a smidgen of disinformation - IT'S STILL
EXISTS
I bet YOU can't SUBTRACT EITHER...
1 - i = ???
Right, it can't be done...
If you KNOW ANYTHING AT ALL, YOU AREN'T SHOWING IT!
Exactly right. There is at least 60% of the unconscious mind which
hasn't been deciphered yet. Are you insinuating that dark mass is seen
under the eyelids?
Saul Levy[/quote:fe3f79f2bf] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 5:55 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 17, 4:52 pm, "Nightcrawler" <Dirtyde... at (no spam) dirtcheap.net> wrote:
[quote:e29d97a24e]Hey, I read some Sumer crap on a stone tablet, and that makes it
factual. All also read some Joo crap on a tablet...
"Saul Levy" <saulle... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote in messagenews:qeikd5d5a1d0qo1qaauertah9e4bblgnev at (no spam) 4ax.com...
SEEING IS BELIEVING, YOU MORON! lmfjao!
You can't even THINK so who should believe anything you post?
Ah, ANOTHER INSANELY STUPID MORON, that's who!
Will you START CLAIMING TO HAVE SEEN Nibiru which you can't even spell
without my help? Hide that mistake all you want. WE SAW IT!
Your DARK MASS came from a OUTHOUSE SOMEWHERE!
Sitchen is a FOOL much like you are! His ERRORS in translation are
WELL KNOWN! His INTERPRETATIONS ARE DEAD WRONG!
That LEAVES NOTHING WORTH MENTIONING!
You lack ANY GOOD ARGUMENTS much like Mark Earnest.
Saul Levy
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 09:58:35 -0700 (PDT), American
samuelran... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
On Oct 17, 12:20 pm, Saul Levy <saulle... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
Nibiru DOESN'T EVEN EXIST, YOU BRAIN-DEAD JACKASS! lmfjao!
Au contrare, this is not the only single link that alludes to the
existence of Niburu. The fact that it is talked about sooooooo much
doesn't necessarily disqualify it as existing now, does it?
You are completely closed shut when it comes to even imagining the
possibilities - Zechariah Sitchin has mentioned it several times in
his writings - there must be hundreds of inscriptions on both
architecture, cylinder seals, and writings, so I gues that... it...
really.... doesn't... exist... after... all
YEAH RRRRRIIIIIIIGGGGGGHHHHHHTTTTTTTT
GOOFBALL is an INSANE FUCKTARD, so what does that MAKE YOU?
4th DIMENSION?
You wouldn't know the meaning of the fourth dimension if it smiled and
laughed at you, freak...
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfmoms/detail?entry_id=49631&tsp=1
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
An orbit that LONG is IMPOSSIBLE anyway! VERY subject to DISRUPTION.
PROVE IT, you blathering know-it-all...
You BELIEVE ANYTHING on Hoax to Hoax? NOW that's REALLY STUPID!
Actually, not everything...
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Your second link claims Sirius B was first seen 50 years ago. 1862
was the actual year. Doesn't lead ANYONE to BELIEVE ANY of the
in the FIRST LINK.
So what if there's just a smidgen of disinformation - IT'S STILL
EXISTS
I bet YOU can't SUBTRACT EITHER...
1 - i = ???
Right, it can't be done...
If you KNOW ANYTHING AT ALL, YOU AREN'T SHOWING IT!
Exactly right. There is at least 60% of the unconscious mind which
hasn't been deciphered yet. Are you insinuating that dark mass is seen
under the eyelids?
Saul Levy
[/quote:e29d97a24e]
Like most kosher parrots, rabbi Saul can't read.
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 4:28 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| American... |
| Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:21 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 17, 6:49 pm, Saul Levy <saulle... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
[quote:de59eecf25]SEEING IS BELIEVING, YOU MORON! lmfjao!
You can't even THINK so who should believe anything you post?
Ah, ANOTHER INSANELY STUPID MORON, that's who!
Will you START CLAIMING TO HAVE SEEN Nibiru which you can't even spell
without my help? Hide that mistake all you want. WE SAW IT!
Your DARK MASS came from a OUTHOUSE SOMEWHERE!
Sitchen is a FOOL much like you are! His ERRORS in translation are
WELL KNOWN! His INTERPRETATIONS ARE DEAD WRONG!
That LEAVES NOTHING WORTH MENTIONING!
You lack ANY GOOD ARGUMENTS much like Mark Earnest.
Saul Levy
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 09:58:35 -0700 (PDT), American
samuelran... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
On Oct 17, 12:20 pm, Saul Levy <saulle... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
Nibiru DOESN'T EVEN EXIST, YOU BRAIN-DEAD JACKASS! lmfjao!
Au contrare, this is not the only single link that alludes to the
existence of Niburu. The fact that it is talked about sooooooo much
doesn't necessarily disqualify it as existing now, does it?
You are completely closed shut when it comes to even imagining the
possibilities - Zechariah Sitchin has mentioned it several times in
his writings - there must be hundreds of inscriptions on both
architecture, cylinder seals, and writings, so I gues that... it...
really.... doesn't... exist... after... all
YEAH RRRRRIIIIIIIGGGGGGHHHHHHTTTTTTTT
GOOFBALL is an INSANE FUCKTARD, so what does that MAKE YOU?
4th DIMENSION?
You wouldn't know the meaning of the fourth dimension if it smiled and
laughed at you, freak...
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfmoms/detail?entry_id=49631&tsp=1
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
An orbit that LONG is IMPOSSIBLE anyway! VERY subject to DISRUPTION..
PROVE IT, you blathering know-it-all...
You BELIEVE ANYTHING on Hoax to Hoax? NOW that's REALLY STUPID!
Actually, not everything...
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Your second link claims Sirius B was first seen 50 years ago. 1862
was the actual year. Doesn't lead ANYONE to BELIEVE ANY of the
in the FIRST LINK.
So what if there's just a smidgen of disinformation - IT'S STILL
EXISTS
I bet YOU can't SUBTRACT EITHER...
1 - i = ???
Right, it can't be done...
If you KNOW ANYTHING AT ALL, YOU AREN'T SHOWING IT!
Exactly right. There is at least 60% of the unconscious mind which
hasn't been deciphered yet. Are you insinuating that dark mass is seen
under the eyelids?
Saul Levy- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
[/quote:de59eecf25]
Here is your fallacious statement:
Nibiru ("Crossing") doesn't exist.
Sitchin has seen a 4,500 year oldSumerian drawing from which the
planet "Nibiru" received its name. The symbol is the CROSS.
Some of the text in the Sumer ruins:
When I approached earth
there was much flooding.
When I approached its green meadows,
heaps and mounds were piled up at my command.
I built my house in a pure place...
My house - its shade stretches over the Snake Marsh.
"The text then proceeds to describe Ea's efforts to build
extraordinary waterworks in the marshlands at the head of the Persian
Gulf: He surveyed the marshlands, cut canals for drainage and water
control, built dykes, dug ditches, and built structures of bricks
moulded from the local clays."
- The Wars of Gods and Men, Z. Sitchin, The Earth Chronicles, p.77,78
These artifacts, among hundreds, if not THOUSANDS of inscriptions,
have already been discovered, deciphered, and peiced together in one
of the greatest stories ever told about the TRUE origin of humanity on
earth.
You contend that "Nibiru" never existed.
Therefore you are either terribly ignorant or lying on purpose in
order to propel an agenda that is based on lies.
America |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| American... |
| Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:38 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 18, 3:21 pm, American <samuelran... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
[quote:187ec48662]On Oct 17, 6:49 pm, Saul Levy <saulle... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
SEEING IS BELIEVING, YOU MORON! lmfjao!
You can't even THINK so who should believe anything you post?
Ah, ANOTHER INSANELY STUPID MORON, that's who!
Will you START CLAIMING TO HAVE SEEN Nibiru which you can't even spell
without my help? Hide that mistake all you want. WE SAW IT!
Your DARK MASS came from a OUTHOUSE SOMEWHERE!
Sitchen is a FOOL much like you are! His ERRORS in translation are
WELL KNOWN! His INTERPRETATIONS ARE DEAD WRONG!
That LEAVES NOTHING WORTH MENTIONING!
You lack ANY GOOD ARGUMENTS much like Mark Earnest.
Saul Levy
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 09:58:35 -0700 (PDT), American
samuelran... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
On Oct 17, 12:20 pm, Saul Levy <saulle... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
Nibiru DOESN'T EVEN EXIST, YOU BRAIN-DEAD JACKASS! lmfjao!
Au contrare, this is not the only single link that alludes to the
existence of Niburu. The fact that it is talked about sooooooo much
doesn't necessarily disqualify it as existing now, does it?
You are completely closed shut when it comes to even imagining the
possibilities - Zechariah Sitchin has mentioned it several times in
his writings - there must be hundreds of inscriptions on both
architecture, cylinder seals, and writings, so I gues that... it...
really.... doesn't... exist... after... all
YEAH RRRRRIIIIIIIGGGGGGHHHHHHTTTTTTTT
GOOFBALL is an INSANE FUCKTARD, so what does that MAKE YOU?
4th DIMENSION?
You wouldn't know the meaning of the fourth dimension if it smiled and
laughed at you, freak...
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfmoms/detail?entry_id=49631&tsp=1
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
An orbit that LONG is IMPOSSIBLE anyway! VERY subject to DISRUPTION.
PROVE IT, you blathering know-it-all...
You BELIEVE ANYTHING on Hoax to Hoax? NOW that's REALLY STUPID!
Actually, not everything...
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Your second link claims Sirius B was first seen 50 years ago. 1862
was the actual year. Doesn't lead ANYONE to BELIEVE ANY of the
in the FIRST LINK.
So what if there's just a smidgen of disinformation - IT'S STILL
EXISTS
I bet YOU can't SUBTRACT EITHER...
1 - i = ???
Right, it can't be done...
If you KNOW ANYTHING AT ALL, YOU AREN'T SHOWING IT!
Exactly right. There is at least 60% of the unconscious mind which
hasn't been deciphered yet. Are you insinuating that dark mass is seen
under the eyelids?
Saul Levy- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Here is your fallacious statement:
Nibiru ("Crossing") doesn't exist.
Sitchin has seen a 4,500 year oldSumerian drawing from which the
planet "Nibiru" received its name. The symbol is the CROSS.
Some of the text in the Sumer ruins:
When I approached earth
there was much flooding.
When I approached its green meadows,
heaps and mounds were piled up at my command.
I built my house in a pure place...
My house - its shade stretches over the Snake Marsh.
"The text then proceeds to describe Ea's efforts to build
extraordinary waterworks in the marshlands at the head of the Persian
Gulf: He surveyed the marshlands, cut canals for drainage and water
control, built dykes, dug ditches, and built structures of bricks
moulded from the local clays."
- The Wars of Gods and Men, Z. Sitchin, The Earth Chronicles, p.77,78
These artifacts, among hundreds, if not THOUSANDS of inscriptions,
have already been discovered, deciphered, and peiced together in one
of the greatest stories ever told about the TRUE origin of humanity on
earth.
You contend that "Nibiru" never existed.
Therefore you are either terribly ignorant or lying on purpose in
order to propel an agenda that is based on lies.
America- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
[/quote:187ec48662]
What did Ezekiel see when he arrived in Jerusalem during the
Babylonian occupation approx. 593 B.C.?
"Yahweh sees us no more,
Yahweh has left the Earth!"
- Ezekiel 8:12; 9:9
This coincides with the tablet VAT 7847 confirmed by Sitchin:
"Roaring the gods, flying,
from the lands will go away,
from the people they will be separated.
The people with the gods' abodes leave in ruins.
Compassion and well-being will cease.
Enlil, in anger, will lift himself off."
Saul Levy, you seem a bit angry.
Saul Levy, you must think of yourself as God.
American |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Saul Levy... |
| Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 5:41 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Learn to READ, JACKASS! lmfjao!
Sitchen's translations are BULLSHIT! He's a FRAUD!
Let's see: 2009-1862 is WHAT?
You don't know, do you? Figure it out, IDIOT! It's NOT 50.
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
1-i is just that. I've taken math, FOOL! Is i too hard for you?
You provide me with TONS of LAUGHS! Keep it up!
Saul Levy
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 12:21:33 -0700 (PDT), American
<samuelransom at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
[quote:09d0f3b685]On Oct 17, 6:49 pm, Saul Levy <saulle... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
SEEING IS BELIEVING, YOU MORON! lmfjao!
You can't even THINK so who should believe anything you post?
Ah, ANOTHER INSANELY STUPID MORON, that's who!
Will you START CLAIMING TO HAVE SEEN Nibiru which you can't even spell
without my help? Hide that mistake all you want. WE SAW IT!
Your DARK MASS came from a OUTHOUSE SOMEWHERE!
Sitchen is a FOOL much like you are! His ERRORS in translation are
WELL KNOWN! His INTERPRETATIONS ARE DEAD WRONG!
That LEAVES NOTHING WORTH MENTIONING!
You lack ANY GOOD ARGUMENTS much like Mark Earnest.
Saul Levy
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 09:58:35 -0700 (PDT), American
samuelran... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
On Oct 17, 12:20 pm, Saul Levy <saulle... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
Nibiru DOESN'T EVEN EXIST, YOU BRAIN-DEAD JACKASS! lmfjao!
Au contrare, this is not the only single link that alludes to the
existence of Niburu. The fact that it is talked about sooooooo much
doesn't necessarily disqualify it as existing now, does it?
You are completely closed shut when it comes to even imagining the
possibilities - Zechariah Sitchin has mentioned it several times in
his writings - there must be hundreds of inscriptions on both
architecture, cylinder seals, and writings, so I gues that... it...
really.... doesn't... exist... after... all
YEAH RRRRRIIIIIIIGGGGGGHHHHHHTTTTTTTT
GOOFBALL is an INSANE FUCKTARD, so what does that MAKE YOU?
4th DIMENSION?
You wouldn't know the meaning of the fourth dimension if it smiled and
laughed at you, freak...
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfmoms/detail?entry_id=49631&tsp=1
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
An orbit that LONG is IMPOSSIBLE anyway! VERY subject to DISRUPTION.
PROVE IT, you blathering know-it-all...
You BELIEVE ANYTHING on Hoax to Hoax? NOW that's REALLY STUPID!
Actually, not everything...
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Your second link claims Sirius B was first seen 50 years ago. 1862
was the actual year. Doesn't lead ANYONE to BELIEVE ANY of the
in the FIRST LINK.
So what if there's just a smidgen of disinformation - IT'S STILL
EXISTS
I bet YOU can't SUBTRACT EITHER...
1 - i = ???
Right, it can't be done...
If you KNOW ANYTHING AT ALL, YOU AREN'T SHOWING IT!
Exactly right. There is at least 60% of the unconscious mind which
hasn't been deciphered yet. Are you insinuating that dark mass is seen
under the eyelids?
Saul Levy- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Here is your fallacious statement:
Nibiru ("Crossing") doesn't exist.
Sitchin has seen a 4,500 year oldSumerian drawing from which the
planet "Nibiru" received its name. The symbol is the CROSS.
Some of the text in the Sumer ruins:
When I approached earth
there was much flooding.
When I approached its green meadows,
heaps and mounds were piled up at my command.
I built my house in a pure place...
My house - its shade stretches over the Snake Marsh.
"The text then proceeds to describe Ea's efforts to build
extraordinary waterworks in the marshlands at the head of the Persian
Gulf: He surveyed the marshlands, cut canals for drainage and water
control, built dykes, dug ditches, and built structures of bricks
moulded from the local clays."
- The Wars of Gods and Men, Z. Sitchin, The Earth Chronicles, p.77,78
These artifacts, among hundreds, if not THOUSANDS of inscriptions,
have already been discovered, deciphered, and peiced together in one
of the greatest stories ever told about the TRUE origin of humanity on
earth.
You contend that "Nibiru" never existed.
Therefore you are either terribly ignorant or lying on purpose in
order to propel an agenda that is based on lies.
America[/quote:09d0f3b685] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Saul Levy... |
| Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 5:44 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Shove that TABLET UP YOUR ASS, MORON! lmfjao!
You provide NOTHING FOR AN ARGUMENT. You are another SIMPLE WACKO
NUTJOB who BELIEVES ANYTHING YOU READ!
Really STUPID of you!
Saul Levy
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 12:38:48 -0700 (PDT), American
<samuelransom at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
[quote:d90bef6eaa]On Oct 18, 3:21 pm, American <samuelran... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
On Oct 17, 6:49 pm, Saul Levy <saulle... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
SEEING IS BELIEVING, YOU MORON! lmfjao!
You can't even THINK so who should believe anything you post?
Ah, ANOTHER INSANELY STUPID MORON, that's who!
Will you START CLAIMING TO HAVE SEEN Nibiru which you can't even spell
without my help? Hide that mistake all you want. WE SAW IT!
Your DARK MASS came from a OUTHOUSE SOMEWHERE!
Sitchen is a FOOL much like you are! His ERRORS in translation are
WELL KNOWN! His INTERPRETATIONS ARE DEAD WRONG!
That LEAVES NOTHING WORTH MENTIONING!
You lack ANY GOOD ARGUMENTS much like Mark Earnest.
Saul Levy
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 09:58:35 -0700 (PDT), American
samuelran... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
On Oct 17, 12:20 pm, Saul Levy <saulle... at (no spam) cox.net> wrote:
Nibiru DOESN'T EVEN EXIST, YOU BRAIN-DEAD JACKASS! lmfjao!
Au contrare, this is not the only single link that alludes to the
existence of Niburu. The fact that it is talked about sooooooo much
doesn't necessarily disqualify it as existing now, does it?
You are completely closed shut when it comes to even imagining the
possibilities - Zechariah Sitchin has mentioned it several times in
his writings - there must be hundreds of inscriptions on both
architecture, cylinder seals, and writings, so I gues that... it...
really.... doesn't... exist... after... all
YEAH RRRRRIIIIIIIGGGGGGHHHHHHTTTTTTTT
GOOFBALL is an INSANE FUCKTARD, so what does that MAKE YOU?
4th DIMENSION?
You wouldn't know the meaning of the fourth dimension if it smiled and
laughed at you, freak...
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfmoms/detail?entry_id=49631&tsp=1
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
An orbit that LONG is IMPOSSIBLE anyway! VERY subject to DISRUPTION.
PROVE IT, you blathering know-it-all...
You BELIEVE ANYTHING on Hoax to Hoax? NOW that's REALLY STUPID!
Actually, not everything...
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Your second link claims Sirius B was first seen 50 years ago. 1862
was the actual year. Doesn't lead ANYONE to BELIEVE ANY of the
in the FIRST LINK.
So what if there's just a smidgen of disinformation - IT'S STILL
EXISTS
I bet YOU can't SUBTRACT EITHER...
1 - i = ???
Right, it can't be done...
If you KNOW ANYTHING AT ALL, YOU AREN'T SHOWING IT!
Exactly right. There is at least 60% of the unconscious mind which
hasn't been deciphered yet. Are you insinuating that dark mass is seen
under the eyelids?
Saul Levy- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Here is your fallacious statement:
Nibiru ("Crossing") doesn't exist.
Sitchin has seen a 4,500 year oldSumerian drawing from which the
planet "Nibiru" received its name. The symbol is the CROSS.
Some of the text in the Sumer ruins:
When I approached earth
there was much flooding.
When I approached its green meadows,
heaps and mounds were piled up at my command.
I built my house in a pure place...
My house - its shade stretches over the Snake Marsh.
"The text then proceeds to describe Ea's efforts to build
extraordinary waterworks in the marshlands at the head of the Persian
Gulf: He surveyed the marshlands, cut canals for drainage and water
control, built dykes, dug ditches, and built structures of bricks
moulded from the local clays."
- The Wars of Gods and Men, Z. Sitchin, The Earth Chronicles, p.77,78
These artifacts, among hundreds, if not THOUSANDS of inscriptions,
have already been discovered, deciphered, and peiced together in one
of the greatest stories ever told about the TRUE origin of humanity on
earth.
You contend that "Nibiru" never existed.
Therefore you are either terribly ignorant or lying on purpose in
order to propel an agenda that is based on lies.
America- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
What did Ezekiel see when he arrived in Jerusalem during the
Babylonian occupation approx. 593 B.C.?
"Yahweh sees us no more,
Yahweh has left the Earth!"
- Ezekiel 8:12; 9:9
This coincides with the tablet VAT 7847 confirmed by Sitchin:
"Roaring the gods, flying,
from the lands will go away,
from the people they will be separated.
The people with the gods' abodes leave in ruins.
Compassion and well-being will cease.
Enlil, in anger, will lift himself off."
Saul Levy, you seem a bit angry.
Saul Levy, you must think of yourself as God.
American
[/quote:d90bef6eaa] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Nov 29, 2009 11:18 pm
|
|