 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Astronomy Forum » Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth... |
|
Page 2 of 7 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Next |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Saul Levy... |
 Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 12:16 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Enough with Sirius, GOOFBRAINHEAD! lmfjao!
NOTHING WILL HAPPEN!
Saul Levy
On Sun, 12 Jul 2009 18:40:15 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth
<bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote:49115ab620]I'm asking nicely; how can the Newtonian physics laws of gravity be
conditional?
How can those Newtonian laws and those of orbital mechanics which
apply for Sedna and the likes of 2005-VX3, and yet not apply for that
of Sirius and our solar system?
Do the electrons of stars or similar charged bodies repel that much?
~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet”[/quote:49115ab620] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Saul Levy... |
| Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 4:37 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
You can't even SEE the LINES, GOOFBALL! lmfjao!
It's called SCIENCE, FOOL!
Saul Levy
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 02:46:01 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth
<bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote:f8de2d93cb]Obviously our local environment and of course that of our sun would
have been affected by the excess of whatever the Sirius molecular
cloud had to offer, not to mention that of it's terrific original
mass.
And btw; don't let the gauntlet of these Usenet/newsgroup bogeyman
and faith-based pretenders and mainstream pranksters keep us from the
task of deductively and otherwise independently thinking for
ourselves, because now and then it’s perfectly OK to color outside the
lines.
~ BG[/quote:f8de2d93cb] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Saul Levy... |
| Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 11:53 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Blah, blah, blah, GOOFBALL! lmfjao!
It's also the SECOND REPEAT!
Saul Levy
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 06:16:45 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth
<bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote:3cdf248e67]On Jul 21, 2:46 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 15, 10:33 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 6, 6:55 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least
according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and
orbital mechanics.
~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet”
What would have happened within our solar system and the environment
of Eden/Earth as we passed through any remaining portion of the same
molecular cloud of <1.25e7 solar masses, as what had just given birth
to those nearby Sirius stars and such having taken at least ten
millions to a hundred some odd million years in order to create?
So once again, instead of progress we have this thing of ignoring and/
or obfuscating in behalf of whatever is technically doable and
banishing those with nothing but good intentions, and otherwise we
have this other lemming genetic disorder and subsequent obsession of
no longer deductively thinking for ourselves. No wonder this nation
has been going nowhere.
~ BG[/quote:3cdf248e67] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Saul Levy... |
| Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 12:55 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
NO EVIDENCE COMES TO MIND, GOOFBALL! lmfjao!
VILLAGE IDIOT that you are!
Saul Levy
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:36:44 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth <bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com>
wrote:
[quote:71b3b75d83]So, what's insurmountable or unusual about Sirius holding onto us?
~ BG[/quote:71b3b75d83] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Saul Levy... |
| Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:15 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
It had NOTHING to do with SIRIUS, GOOFBALLBRAINDEADVILLAGEIDIOT!
lmfjao!
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Saul Levy
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 18:26:33 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth <bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com>
wrote:
[quote:c4daedb131]As I've pointed out multiple times and having given you folks the
necessary tools and internet links, whereas you merely need to do the
math in order to ponder and figure out how unavoidably influenced our
solar system has been, as dominated by the much greater mass of the
relatively nearby Sirius star/solar system, and especially while it
was a red supermassive influence, and of greater mass yet as of before
then (not to mention the original molecular cloud of <12.5e6 Ms).
Oops, 250~275 million years ago; what exactly happened on Earth, and
then again more recently?
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”[/quote:c4daedb131] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Saul Levy... |
| Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 10:50 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
AhmadineJIHAD is very close to a modern Hitler, GOOFBALL! lmfjao!
I'm sure you love him too!
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Saul Levy
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 12:44:19 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth <bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com>
wrote:
[quote:1e54c30eda]Interesting, to see how deathly frightened so many folks are these
days. It's almost as though Hitler was still alive and kicking at
those willing to do the math, and otherwise willing to use a deductive
method of connecting the dots. Forbid any free thoughts of revising
history or the scientific record in order to reflect the best
available truths, because you'll only lose your job and benefits, as
such would even scare the Pope to death.
~ BG[/quote:1e54c30eda] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 1:43 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sep 9, 4:20 pm, American <samuelran... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
[quote:d381af8d35]
I'll take any blockhead with just a whit of common sense and a few
dollars to spare, to at least get the ball rolling on a few new ideas
- perhaps something larger than HO scale would suffice - at least to
demonstrate the whole concept of electrogravitic propulsion.
If you wait too long than somebody - perhaps an Iraqi, or even Afghan,
Iranian or Venezuelan (oops) might supplant your idea - particularly
when there are just so many channels that it takes to get an idea
patented and/or approved by the ruling establishment.
Of course I'm exaggerating a bit on the ethnicity of those interested,
but it's just the politics of some very useful ideas that are left
hanging - one shouldn't have to always be looking behind themselves as
well as covering their tracks so much when the name of the inventor's
game should've been "yankee ingenuity". You can't tell me that the
world has been asleep for so long that only "exported" American
ingenuity makes the difference here.
American
[/quote:d381af8d35]
What has any of this got to do with the Sirius star/solar system?
"Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable"
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Saul Levy... |
| Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 1:09 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
You sound just like GOOFBALL! lmfjao!
NOT A GOOD THING AT ALL!
Saul Levy
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 16:20:32 -0700 (PDT), American
<samuelransom at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
[quote:c154e8e046]I'll take any blockhead with just a whit of common sense and a few
dollars to spare, to at least get the ball rolling on a few new ideas
- perhaps something larger than HO scale would suffice - at least to
demonstrate the whole concept of electrogravitic propulsion.
If you wait too long than somebody - perhaps an Iraqi, or even Afghan,
Iranian or Venezuelan (oops) might supplant your idea - particularly
when there are just so many channels that it takes to get an idea
patented and/or approved by the ruling establishment.
Of course I'm exaggerating a bit on the ethnicity of those interested,
but it's just the politics of some very useful ideas that are left
hanging - one shouldn't have to always be looking behind themselves as
well as covering their tracks so much when the name of the inventor's
game should've been "yankee ingenuity". You can't tell me that the
world has been asleep for so long that only "exported" American
ingenuity makes the difference here.
American[/quote:c154e8e046] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Saul Levy... |
| Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:38 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Still NO EVIDENCE for that, GOOFYBRAINS! lmfjao!
Saul Levy
On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 21:22:56 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth <bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com>
wrote:
[quote:297fd08e04]As I've pointed out and given you the necessary tools, you merely need
to do the math in order to ponder and figure out how unavoidably
influenced our solar system has been, by the much greater mass of the
relatively nearby Sirius star/solar system.
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”[/quote:297fd08e04] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:38 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sep 30, 10:03 am, American <samuelran... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
[quote:9f6225d5d1]On Sep 30, 9:31 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
The ratio of 8.3e7:1 is how much greater our solar system remains
attracted to the existing Sirius star/solar system, than 2005-VX3 /
damocloid (asteroid) of 112 km diameter is attracted to our sun. This
Sirius:XV3 ratio of 8.3e7:1 is just another Newtonian matter of fact
that you can take to the bank.
The Cosmological Ice Ages (by Henry Kroll) are most likely still in
charge of what drives the global environment, as least to a much
greater extent than given credit by those of us in charge of what the
general public ever gets to learn about.
~ BG- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
So by focusing the attention that others reading your
posts are supposed to do in stressing the importance of
the Sirus (NOT Sirius) star system, I am supposed to
conclude that there is some kind of special revelation
in accomodating the Sirus star system as (any race of
believers in particular?) as special, especially when the
state-controlled media propagandistic tendency is supposed
to be "Run for cover - the polar ice caps are melting!"
[/quote:9f6225d5d1]
All I'm suggesting at this point is that our solar system and the
terrestrial environment that's currently thawing us out is linked by
tidal gravity forces and UV illumination to the relatively massive
Sirius/Sirus star system, and otherwise affected by the 2e20N/sec of
tidal foeces associated with holding onto that physically dark moon of
ours.
There's a slim chance that Earth ever belonged to Sirius B, though a
much greater odds of our moon/Selene and the planet Venus were once
part of that Sirius B solar system.
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Saul Levy... |
| Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 4:34 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
You're INSANE, MORON! lmfjao!
Saul Levy
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:38:56 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth
<bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote:4ae0b7a49b]All I'm suggesting at this point is that our solar system and the
terrestrial environment that's currently thawing us out is linked by
tidal gravity forces and UV illumination to the relatively massive
Sirius/Sirus star system, and otherwise affected by the 2e20N/sec of
tidal foeces associated with holding onto that physically dark moon of
ours.
There's a slim chance that Earth ever belonged to Sirius B, though a
much greater odds of our moon/Selene and the planet Venus were once
part of that Sirius B solar system.
~ BG[/quote:4ae0b7a49b] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Saul Levy... |
| Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 4:45 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
You're INSANE, MORON? lmfjao!
Saul Levy
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:54:15 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth
<bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote:ef1e8fdb3e]On Sep 21, 7:02 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Even though gravity is an extremely weak force, when there's enough
matter associated with a given star/solar system to affect another
nearby star/solar system, and it's especially so if such mass is already
heading towards one another, as is the case with us and Sirius.
It seems our weak force of gravity attraction to the Sirius star/solar
system is obviously so much greater than say icy Sedna, and yet others
here insist that we're not in the least bit gravity tidal associated
to that impressive star system. What gives?
~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet”[/quote:ef1e8fdb3e] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:06 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sep 30, 10:03 am, American <samuelran... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
[quote:99a9419f8b]On Sep 30, 9:31 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
The ratio of 8.3e7:1 is how much greater our solar system remains
attracted to the existing Sirius star/solar system, than 2005-VX3 /
damocloid (asteroid) of 112 km diameter is attracted to our sun. This
Sirius:XV3 ratio of 8.3e7:1 is just another Newtonian matter of fact
that you can take to the bank.
The Cosmological Ice Ages (by Henry Kroll) are most likely still in
charge of what drives the global environment, as least to a much
greater extent than given credit by those of us in charge of what the
general public ever gets to learn about.
~ BG- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
So by focusing the attention that others reading your
posts are supposed to do in stressing the importance of
the Sirus (NOT Sirius) star system, I am supposed to
conclude that there is some kind of special revelation
in accomodating the Sirus star system as (any race of
believers in particular?) as special, especially when the
state-controlled media propagandistic tendency is supposed
to be "Run for cover - the polar ice caps are melting!"
That's just a ruse for suppressing and/or counterfeiting
what those who wish to control the WORLD are expecting
EVERYONE on the planet to accept as THEIR promise to
THEIR slaves - a COMPLETE IMITATION of the promise of
Abraham - and NOT through the authentic promise that
Yahwah gave to His servants via Abraham - It's called
the Abramic Covenant (to anyone that still believes that
our Enlil-type God actually has a Name).
[/quote:99a9419f8b]
All that I'm suggesting at this point is that our solar system and the
frail terrestrial environment that's currently thawing us out remains
linked by tidal gravity forces and UV illumination to the relatively
massive Sirius/Sirus star system, and otherwise we're unavoidably
affected by the 2e20N/sec of tidal forces associated with holding onto
that physically dark moon of ours.
There's a slim chance that Earth ever belonged to Sirius B, though we
have a much greater odds of our moon/Selene and the planet Venus were
once part of that Sirius B solar system.
As further proof that I'm more often right than not, just look at my
kosher shadows of rabbi Saul and his lovechild Hagar. As why
otherwise would they be trying so hard at applying their Zionist/Nazi
methods of topic/author stalking and bashings upon anyone that doesn't
agree with their version of the Old Testament and their subsequent
unpoliced faith-based policies.?
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 3:54 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sep 21, 7:02 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote:4ef0179527]On Aug 24, 11:07 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Now we have a new and improved gauntlet of a topic/author taboo and/or
banishment enforced policy, or rather media infowar tactic, even if it
means forcing mainstream to ignore any fix to our badly GW traumatized
environment and of its unique biodiversity we call Eden/Earth, or
merely on behalf of improving it’s use of government and our limited
resources. The biggest forbidden topics have to do with discussing
other forms of off-world intelligent life, because such isn’t supposed
to exist unless it’s of a subhuman Zionist/Jewish species that we get
to dominate and profit from. (isn't that special)
All we seem to get nowadays is the usual Republican Zionist Nazi
replies of change nothing and otherwise do nothing, because apparently
nothing is bad with the way everything is, and besides nothing
seriously bad is ever going to happen, and even if it should we mere
humans couldn't have done anything positive or constructive for the
better.
In other Usenet/newsgroup words of cult/cabal wisdom; Change nothing,
revise nothing and above all do nothing about learning, exploring,
researching or forbid any public sharing of whatever knowledge,
because we (those in charge) supposedly like everything exactly as it
is.
~ BG
On Jul 6, 6:55 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least
according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and
orbital mechanics.
In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media
has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius
star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and
extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from
our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial
illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth.
First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very
least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy
star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown
away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our
existing solar system wasn't any too far away. Others might go so far
as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million,
while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5
million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller
galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. In any case, that must have
been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of
this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly
nowhere to be found.
In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system
wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal
radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least
subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily
dominated by the Sirius star/solar system.
Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions
isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big
Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest.
Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone)
http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/localgroup/localgroup.html
The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored)
http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/area/index.cfm?fareaid=20
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html
Local galactic motion simulation:
"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B.
Nordström et al.
http://www.aanda.org/content/view/71/42/lang,en
According to several physics and astronomy kinds of observationology
science (deductive interpretation of eye-candy plus other peer
replicated research), our Milky Way is made up of at least two
galactic units, with more of the same on their blue-shifted way
towards encountering us (namely Andromeda). Seems hardly fair
considering that everything was supposedly created via one singular
Big Bang, not to mention that hundreds to perhaps thousands of
galaxies seem rather nicely headed into the Great Attractor (including
us) for their final demise and/or rebirth.
Don’t forget to appreciate those Hubble, KECK and multiple other
archives (including those of what FAS has compiled) depicting
“colliding galaxies”, as well as soon to become ESA color/hue enhanced
and expanded upon via a trio of their impressive orbital
observatories, not to mention whatever the renewed and improved Hubble
plus our next generation of orbital observatories should further
document. It may even become hard to find galaxies as massive as ours
and Andromeda that are entirely original without their having grown
via mergers.
Where's our TRACEe3 and the all-knowing expertise from FAS, telling us
whatever they seem to know best or at least suspect is most likely?
Surely these brown-nosed clowns of mostly pretend Atheists, as well as
republican faith-based bigots and typically closed mindsets of our
Usenet/newsgroup cabal that are enforcing their mainstream status quo
(much like my personal rabbi shadow tries to do), are hopefully not
representing or otherwise speaking on behalf of our FAS.
~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet”
Even though gravity is an extremely weak force, when there's enough
matter associated with a given star/solar system to place an affect
another nearby star/solar system, and it's especially so if such mass
is as nearby as our solar system and Sirius as already heading
elliptically towards one another, as is the case with us and Sirius.
[/quote:4ef0179527]
Cosmological Ice Ages (by Henry Kroll)
The example ratio of 8.3e7:1 is how much greater our solar system
remains via Newtonian force, as having been attracted to the existing
Sirius star/solar system, than otherwise associated with 2005-VX3
being the item (damocloid/asteroid) of 112 km diameter that’s forever
attracted to our sun. This Sirius:XV3 ratio of 8.3e7:1 is just
another Newtonian matter of objective and peer accepted fact that you
and others can take to the bank (unless it’s a kosher bank, in which
case you're not allowed to deposit anything that’s not of their
mainstream faith-based approval, because according to their long
standing policy and subsequent rules applied to everyone else, Eden/
Earth is always alone and supposedly all there is for accommodating
any complex biodiversity, and everything about our environment is
strictly terrestrial and somehow having nothing whatsoever to do with
human or external factors because, apparently their Eden/Earth has
been given unlimited and renewable resources of everything we need as
is, except for an inflated price).
Gravity Force of Attraction (orbital tidal radius)
http://www.1728.com/gravity.htm
http://www.wsanford.com/~wsanford/calculators/gravity-calculator.html
Individual mass and velocity are of course significant and the most
dominate of trajectory factors, and then it gets especially complex
whenever there's more than two given bodies of mass to consider that
are each in proper motion to one another. This however doesn't
exclude our interacting with the Sirius star system, or otherwise
obfuscate/exclude what the weak force of gravity and the subsequent
laws of Newtonian orbital mechanics has to say.
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 7:48 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 15, 6:54 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote:1e76bfa1c8]On Sep 21, 7:02 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
On Aug 24, 11:07 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Now we have a new and improved gauntlet of a topic/author taboo and/or
banishment enforced policy, or rather media infowar tactic, even if it
means forcing mainstream to ignore any fix to our badly GW traumatized
environment and of its unique biodiversity we call Eden/Earth, or
merely on behalf of improving it’s use of government and our limited
resources. The biggest forbidden topics have to do with discussing
other forms of off-world intelligent life, because such isn’t supposed
to exist unless it’s of a subhuman Zionist/Jewish species that we get
to dominate and profit from. (isn't that special)
All we seem to get nowadays is the usual Republican Zionist Nazi
replies of change nothing and otherwise do nothing, because apparently
nothing is bad with the way everything is, and besides nothing
seriously bad is ever going to happen, and even if it should we mere
humans couldn't have done anything positive or constructive for the
better.
In other Usenet/newsgroup words of cult/cabal wisdom; Change nothing,
revise nothing and above all do nothing about learning, exploring,
researching or forbid any public sharing of whatever knowledge,
because we (those in charge) supposedly like everything exactly as it
is.
~ BG
On Jul 6, 6:55 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least
according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and
orbital mechanics.
In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media
has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius
star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and
extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from
our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial
illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth.
First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very
least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy
star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown
away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our
existing solar system wasn't any too far away. Others might go so far
as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million,
while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5
million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller
galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. In any case, that must have
been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of
this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly
nowhere to be found.
In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system
wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal
radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least
subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily
dominated by the Sirius star/solar system.
Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions
isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big
Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest.
Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone)
http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/localgroup/localgroup.html
The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored)
http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/area/index.cfm?fareaid=20
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html
Local galactic motion simulation:
"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B.
Nordström et al.
http://www.aanda.org/content/view/71/42/lang,en
According to several physics and astronomy kinds of observationology
science (deductive interpretation of eye-candy plus other peer
replicated research), our Milky Way is made up of at least two
galactic units, with more of the same on their blue-shifted way
towards encountering us (namely Andromeda). Seems hardly fair
considering that everything was supposedly created via one singular
Big Bang, not to mention that hundreds to perhaps thousands of
galaxies seem rather nicely headed into the Great Attractor (including
us) for their final demise and/or rebirth.
Don’t forget to appreciate those Hubble, KECK and multiple other
archives (including those of what FAS has compiled) depicting
“colliding galaxies”, as well as soon to become ESA color/hue enhanced
and expanded upon via a trio of their impressive orbital
observatories, not to mention whatever the renewed and improved Hubble
plus our next generation of orbital observatories should further
document. It may even become hard to find galaxies as massive as ours
and Andromeda that are entirely original without their having grown
via mergers.
Where's our TRACEe3 and the all-knowing expertise from FAS, telling us
whatever they seem to know best or at least suspect is most likely?
Surely these brown-nosed clowns of mostly pretend Atheists, as well as
republican faith-based bigots and typically closed mindsets of our
Usenet/newsgroup cabal that are enforcing their mainstream status quo
(much like my personal rabbi shadow tries to do), are hopefully not
representing or otherwise speaking on behalf of our FAS.
~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet”
Even though gravity is an extremely weak force, when there's enough
matter associated with a given star/solar system to place an affect
another nearby star/solar system, and it's especially so if such mass
is as nearby as our solar system and Sirius as already heading
elliptically towards one another, as is the case with us and Sirius.
Cosmological Ice Ages (by Henry Kroll)
The example ratio of 8.3e7:1 is how much greater our solar system
remains via Newtonian force, as having been attracted to the existing
Sirius star/solar system, than otherwise associated with 2005-VX3
being the item (damocloid/asteroid) of 112 km diameter that’s forever
attracted to our sun. This Sirius:XV3 ratio of 8.3e7:1 is just
another Newtonian matter of objective and peer accepted fact that you
and others can take to the bank (unless it’s a kosher bank, in which
case you're not allowed to deposit anything that’s not of their
mainstream faith-based approval, because according to their long
standing policy and subsequent rules applied to everyone else, Eden/
Earth is always alone and supposedly all there is for accommodating
any complex biodiversity, and everything about our environment is
strictly terrestrial and somehow having nothing whatsoever to do with
human or external factors because, apparently their Eden/Earth has
been given unlimited and renewable resources of everything we need as
is, except for an inflated price).
Gravity Force of Attraction (orbital tidal radius)
http://www.1728.com/gravity.htm
http://www.wsanford.com/~wsanford/calculators/gravity-calculator.html
Individual mass and velocity are of course significant and the most
dominate of trajectory factors, and then it gets especially complex
whenever there's more than two given bodies of mass to consider that
are each in proper motion to one another. This however doesn't
exclude our interacting with the Sirius star system, or otherwise
obfuscate/exclude what the weak force of gravity and the subsequent
laws of Newtonian orbital mechanics has to say.
[/quote:1e76bfa1c8]
How many planets like Venus did Sirius B originally have?
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Wed Dec 09, 2009 6:18 am
|
|