 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Astronomy Forum » Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth... |
|
Page 1 of 7 Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Next |
|
| Author |
Message |
| BradGuth... |
 Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 4:17 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jul 6, 7:04 am, "Hagar" <ha... at (no spam) sahm.name> wrote:
[quote:841c7989a4]"BradGuth" <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e424991a-27fa-4ce9-87fd-c239fd96ea4f at (no spam) z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least
according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and
orbital mechanics.
***********************************
GuthBall, I think the doctor slapped you waayyyyy too hard
when you were born. Even evolution in retro-grade couldn't
account for your insanity.
[/quote:841c7989a4]
Thanks for that topic unrelated data, as I'm sure your rabbi would
approve.
Apparently the regular laws of Newtonian physics do not apply to your
closed mindset.
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Hagar... |
| Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:04 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"BradGuth" <bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e424991a-27fa-4ce9-87fd-c239fd96ea4f at (no spam) z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least
according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and
orbital mechanics.
***********************************
GuthBall, I think the doctor slapped you waayyyyy too hard
when you were born. Even evolution in retro-grade couldn't
account for your insanity. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Saul Levy... |
| Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:13 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
The doc also slapped the WRONG END, Hagar! lmfjao!
Maybe on purpose?
Saul Levy
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 07:04:34 -0700, "Hagar" <hagen at (no spam) sahm.name> wrote:
[quote:1cfe688320]"BradGuth" <bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e424991a-27fa-4ce9-87fd-c239fd96ea4f at (no spam) z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least
according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and
orbital mechanics.
***********************************
GuthBall, I think the doctor slapped you waayyyyy too hard
when you were born. Even evolution in retro-grade couldn't
account for your insanity.[/quote:1cfe688320] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Saul Levy... |
| Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:24 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Hagar has NO rabbi, GOOFBALL! lmfjao!
Neither do I!
Saul Levy
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 07:17:08 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth <bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com>
wrote:
[quote:be261fda01]On Jul 6, 7:04 am, "Hagar" <ha... at (no spam) sahm.name> wrote:
"BradGuth" <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e424991a-27fa-4ce9-87fd-c239fd96ea4f at (no spam) z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least
according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and
orbital mechanics.
***********************************
GuthBall, I think the doctor slapped you waayyyyy too hard
when you were born. Even evolution in retro-grade couldn't
account for your insanity.
Thanks for that topic unrelated data, as I'm sure your rabbi would
approve.
Apparently the regular laws of Newtonian physics do not apply to your
closed mindset.
~ BG[/quote:be261fda01] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Saul Levy... |
| Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:26 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
What other galaxy was that, GOOFBALL? lmfjao!
We NEED TO KNOW!
Your INSANITY IS GROWING!
Saul Levy
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 06:55:31 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth <bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com>
wrote:
[quote:219b4faf47]Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least
according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and
orbital mechanics.
In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media
has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius
star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and
extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from
our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial
illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth.
~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet”[/quote:219b4faf47] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Hagar... |
| Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:59 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"BradGuth" <bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:cbad0611-8813-4e32-aee9-712919534cb0 at (no spam) m3g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 6, 6:55 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote:5ead5e6089]Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least
according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and
orbital mechanics.
[/quote:5ead5e6089]
< snip usual GuthBall frothing >
[quote:5ead5e6089]As I've said often before, you do not have to take my word on this,
[/quote:5ead5e6089]
GuthBall, no matter how many time you have recited your usual and
unintelligible gibberish, it remains just that: the rantings of a total
loon. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 3:12 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jul 9, 6:06 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote:e150e1bc2e]In order to put this tidal radius grip or Newtonian binding force of
well established orbital mechanics into proper context, that which an
average bloke can understand, it’s always good to draw upon whatever
we objectively know and collectively accept as being the case.
TNOs like Sedna, multiple thousands of SDOs and even a few of the
larger OCOs (Ort Cloud Objects) are no longer hard to find within the
radii of our vast Oort cloud that’s reaching way the hell out there at
the tidal radii of <3e16 meters, and isn’t exactly going anywhere
either, all because of the weak binding Newtonian force of gravity
(“the Sun's orb of physical, gravitational, or dynamical influence”).
http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/astro/tnoslist.html
Considering that we're still managing to hold onto Sedna;
current (solar system) ~ Sedna/aphelion gravitational attraction:
2.02e30 and 4.7e21 kg at 1.459e14 m = 2.975e13 N
Whereas instead Sirius has apparently been holding onto us;
current (solar system) ~ Sirius gravitational force of attraction:
2.02e30 and 6.9615e30 kg at 8.1365e16 m = 1.417e17 N
Now try to imagine whatever else the Sirius star/solar system of 3.5
solar masses is quite capable of its gravitational force holding onto,
not to mention as of prior to Sirius B having lost so much of it’s
mass by having been such a red supergiant and becoming a white dwarf,
and of not too long before then of whatever the original molecular
cloud of <1.25e7 solar masses had to offer (even at 500 ly it’s still
a worthy pull or attractive force of 1.528e20 N).
As is, that 1.417e17 N worth of the Sirius tidal radii holding force
represents a 4763:1 greater grip than we have on Sedna. Of course you
can always trust the mainstream obfuscation from our resident
newsgroup rabbi, or you can always do the math yourself, or perhaps
simply use one of the following:
Gravity Force of Attraction (orbital tidal radius force)
http://www.1728.com/gravity.htm
http://www.wsanford.com/~wsanford/calculators/gravity-calculator.html
Not to further nitpick, however there’s 2005-VX3 / damocloid(asteroid)
of 112 km diameter and perhaps worth at most 1.47e18 kg that’s hanging
all the way out to 2275.5 AU (3.404e14 m) that’s worth merely 1.709e9
N, and even it’s not going away from our solar system tidal radius.
That’s representing a Sirius/XV3 ratio of nearly 83e6:1 greater tidal
radii hold on us, not to mention that we seem to be headed back
towards Sirius at 7.6 km/s and unavoidably accelerating as an
elliptical Newtonian trek should.
In other words, we unavoidably became a Newtonian orbiting part or
member of that same Sirius molecular cloud, and having remained
associated with the Sirius star/solar system ever since. The 99.999%
remains of that original molecular cloud which gave birth to Sirius is
however nowhere in sight, which is rather odd in that our observing
instruments having imaged the cosmic remains of similar and/or far
less robust clouds at millions of light years away, suggesting that
the Sirius B helium flashover may have actually been more like a
sustained nova or possibly that of a supernovae which directly
affected our terrestrial environment, as likely having triggered our
final ice age thaw and most recent genetic mutations.
As I've said often before, you do not have to take my word on this,
because the laws of physics and the unavoidable Newtonian binding
force of gravity are entirely in charge of this one. Only a religious
skewed faith-based nutcase that systematically excludes such matters
of fact can manage to keep a straight face, as they publicly obfuscate
and otherwise remain in such perpetual denial, somewhat like a Pope in
denial of what their supposed Christian faith once did to those nice
Cathars (and yet how is it that mainstream religion and their devout
minions are never responsible for anything bad or unjust happening?).
[/quote:e150e1bc2e]
This isn’t even hocus-pocus rocket science, instead it’s just plain
old Newtonian physics that a dysfunctional 5th grader should
understand.
As is, the 1.417e17 N worth of the Sirius tidal radii holding force
represents a 4763:1 greater grip than we have on Sedna. Of course you
can always trust the mainstream obfuscation and perpetual denial from
our resident newsgroup rabbi, or you can always do the math yourself,
or perhaps simply use either one of the following:
Gravity Force of Attraction (orbital tidal radius force)
http://www.1728.com/gravity.htm
http://www.wsanford.com/~wsanford/calculators/gravity-calculator.html
Not to further nitpick, however there’s 2005-VX3 / damocloid(asteroid)
of 112 km diameter and perhaps worth at most 1.47e18 kg that’s hanging
all the way out to 2275.5 AU (3.404e14 m) that’s worth merely 1.709e9
N, and even it’s not going away from our solar system tidal radius.
That’s representing a Sirius/XV3 ratio of nearly 83e6:1 greater tidal
radii hold on us, not to mention that we seem to be headed back
towards Sirius at 7.6 km/s and unavoidably accelerating as an
elliptical Newtonian trek should.
The Sirius star/solar system as having recently evolved from scratch
as of supposedly 200<300 million years ago, and then only most
recently its Sirius B having gone soft/slow nova as it converted
itself from the original 8.5 solar mass into a red supergiant worth
perhaps as much as 5.7 (> 5.3) solar masses, as having that impressive
1000 fold radii, finally got itself down to the helium flashover phase
of suddenly becoming a white dwarf within perhaps as recently as a few
million years ago. In other words, having been close enough as to
creating a living hell on Earth with a second sun until after the red
supergiant and final helium flashover demise of becoming the nearly
invisible white dwarf. The original Sirius B luminosity was likely
worth 10,000 times brighter than our sun, and perhaps the combined
luminosity of Sirius ABC was likely worth 20,000 times brighter than
our sun. However, since so much of its spectrum was UV would mean
that the energy received from the Sirius star/solar system was
actually worth something considerably greater to that of our mostly
wet and growing environment of that era.
The original location of Sirius and especially that of its terrific
molecular cloud of perhaps 1.25e6 solar masses (1.25e5<1.25e7) is
still not objectively known (almost as though it materialized out of
nowhere and just as suddenly vanished), nor has whatever previous
proper motions of either us or the remainder of that molecular cloud
been plotted or ever so much as virtually identified via supercomputer
simulations. We have obviously lost any observable track of such
remainders of that terrific molecular cloud, because of the Sirius B
helium flashover having apparently so extensively blown it all away,
and somehow supposedly not having affected us.
Perhaps the public funded mainstream mindset of astrophysics and
related science simply doesn’t want the rest of us village idiots to
know exactly whatever such a nearby star/solar system as Sirius could
have come from, or having done to us.
It takes a fairly substantial ratio of mostly hydrogen and some helium
consumption, plus a staggering CME loss of roughly causing a third of
its original stellar mass to go away, before a star becomes a worthy
full blown red giant or supergiant, thereby making the red supergiant
of Betelgeuse originally worth an impressive 30+ solar masses.
http://blogs.nature.com/news/thegreatbeyond/2009/06/betelgeuse_about_to_blow.html
Yes indeed, perhaps Betelgeuse should eventually blow our socks off
with one hell of a nova or possibly supernovae climax as it becomes a
fairly substantial white dwarf or possibly turns itself into a neutron
star, and rather soon if there's an ongoing shrinkage of 1%/year for
the past 15 years (actually its helium flashover into becoming a white
dwarf or that of a neutron star has already taken place as of more
than 550 years ago, because it’s 600 light years away from us).
Here’s my further revised/edited version of stellar timelines that’ll
offer some alternative interpretation as to the recent birth and rapid
evolution of the Sirius star/solar system, and of this process most
likely having impacted our relatively nearby and passive solar system.
Our sun that supposedly took 100 million years in order to assemble
itself, consumes or burns its way through 4.28e9 kg/sec of mostly
hydrogen (or rather its more like burning through plus otherwise
having been CME tossing away <3e12 kg/sec, and perhaps even <4e12 kg/
sec if it were taking less than 9 billion years of its stellar
evolution to becoming a white dwarf). Supposedly within another 4.5
billion years our sun will have noticeably expanded into a red giant,
and otherwise by at most 7.5 billion from now it should have become a
full blown red giant of at least 250 radii before the exact same kind
of measurable shrinkage and helium flashover phase into becoming a
white dwarf of perhaps not larger than Mars.
On the other hand, the original Sirius B of <8.5 solar masses had an
extremely short timeline up until reaching its most recent white dwarf
phase, as having obtained this status at roughly 500 times faster
stellar evolution than our sun reaching it’s white dwarf phase within
roughly 12e9 years (in other words, at merely 4.28e9 kg/sec our sun is
almost never going to die off unless something extremely large smacks
into it). On the other nearby stellar hand, Sirius B may have evolved
itself within as little as 150 million years, before having become the
white dwarf as of something less than 64 million years ago. However,
Sirius C could have also played an important roll at the same time or
before Sirius B evolved into the white dwarf. Perhaps the last thing
anyone within mainstream science wants any of us to have is that
TRACEe3 taking a much higher resolved look-see.
Sirius B had to burn through its fuel and otherwise toss mass away at
<1.6e16 kg/sec, perhaps an average mass reduction rate of <4e15 kg/
sec.
In other words, having to consume roughly 8+ times as much mass in as
little as 1/60th the time is what has to represent an extremely
vibrant stellar neighbor (as a nearly exploding or slow nova kind of
highly terrestrial UV illuminating star), especially along with the
original of Sirius A at perhaps 3+ solar mass and Sirius C at whatever
it started out as perhaps worth <1 solar mass, all together
representing one heck of a great deal of stellar mass consuming and
CMEs tossing sufficient stellar volumes of mostly hydrogen, helium
plus a few other heavier plasma elements as representing considerable
mass leaving that vibrant star system, and wasn’t any too far away
from us.
Now that’s a seriously hot kind of active star system that’s sharing
loads of substantial hard-X-rays and gamma, taking place at perhaps
less than 10 light years from us, while the red supergiant phase and
its helium flashover (aka slow nova) into becoming the little white
dwarf happening even closer to us, and perhaps closer yet if there’s
any barycenter orbital considerations due to the original molecular
cloud of 1.2e6 or greater solar masses that obviously had to exist as
of 250~350 million years ago.
Our Earth and moon are also in the process of each losing mass, and at
the very least we are losing a combined 1e3 kg/sec in addition to the
3e12 kg/sec that our sun is losing. Given the persistent 350~450 km/s
of solar wind that’s gently pushing upon us (not to mention the added
force of halo CMEs), is suggesting it’s most likely this gradual
ongoing loss of such mass and its worth of gravity is what’s causing
the majority of our orbital recession (under 15 cm/year) away from the
sun. This could actually become a good thing, especially if we could
somehow manage to artificially cause Earth and our moon combined to
lose <1e4 kg/sec, while our sun keeps getting more into the IR
spectrum that’ll eventually become an inflated red giant of <250 times
radii, along with fluctuations and the increased loss of mass reaching
its highly charged plasma out nearly to the Mars radii, means that
Earth needs to get as far away form our sun as possible, and the
sooner the better. By then, we’d actually be a whole lot better off
as a moon of Saturn or Jupiter.
Nothing all that much to worry about: (as long as our fading
geomagnetic force doesn’t entirely fail us)
http://spaceweather.gmu.edu/index_files/cme.jpg
http://users.aber.ac.uk/azb/images/lasco-c2-cme.jpg
http://www.astronomycast.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/cme.jpg
http://soho.nascom.nasa.gov/gallery/images/large/suncombo1_prev.jpg
http://ct.gsfc.nasa.gov/insights/vol13/tele.htm
Btw; Sirius C could have been the original big one of <10 solar
masses, and Sirius A has most likely gone through nearly 30% of it’s
original mass and is about to become an impressive red supergiant of
its very own once exceeding a mass reduction of 33% via consumption
and CME losses, of especially accelerated stellar evolution with a
nearby Sirius B sucking the hydrogen life out of Sirius A, as such
isn’t exactly retarding this process. Fortunately, Sirius A is not
going to become nearly as red supergiant as Sirius B, however the
helium flashover phase (at a forth the Sirius B mass) may happen a
whole lot closer to us, as we’re being pulled along our elliptical
Newtonian trek towards Sirius at 7.6 km/s and accelerating.
Of course, within the next few thousand years there’ll also be
considerably less terrestrial geomagnetic sustained magnetosphere, and
otherwise insufficient energy resources for Eden/Earth to sustain much
other than robust bugs, microbes and spores of whatever we’d once had
been. That kind of human genetic progression is actually a very
insignificant cosmic amount of time (having existed as an intelligent
species within less than 0.1% of Eden thus far, and only formally
educated in physics and science within the last 0.0001%) , especially
special terminal considering that we’re also headed into the Great
Attractor, plus way before then getting nailed by the Andromeda
galaxy, so not to worry about such matters is best, even though
advancing technology could help salvage our otherwise certain demise.
Too bad the previous million years of terrestrial human life had been
so utterly wasted, as otherwise perhaps we’ll have better luck next
time unless some faith-based cults and their cabals have other
intentions.
~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet" |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 3:19 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jul 6, 9:59 am, "Hagar" <ha... at (no spam) sahm.name> wrote:
[quote:bc092b7100]"BradGuth" <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:cbad0611-8813-4e32-aee9-712919534cb0 at (no spam) m3g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 6, 6:55 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least
according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and
orbital mechanics.
snip usual GuthBall frothing
As I've said often before, you do not have to take my word on this,
GuthBall, no matter how many time you have recited your usual and
unintelligible gibberish, it remains just that: the rantings of a total
loon.
[/quote:bc092b7100]
In that case, perhaps you and rabbi Saul should get a room.
It seems now even Newtonian physics and your own peer accepted science
is off-limits with you crazy kosher guys.
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Saul Levy... |
| Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 12:11 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
What a MORON you are, GOOFBALL! lmfjao!
Saul Levy
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 05:55:24 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth <bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com>
wrote:
[quote:d0efd87389]On Jul 9, 5:46 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
In spite of all the usual naysayers, Sirius and our solar system are
clearly inseparable, at least according to the regular laws of
physics, Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics.
[/quote:d0efd87389]
[quote:d0efd87389]However, it’s pretty much all nothing but another mainstream infowar,
of media damage-control by way of a mainstream tactical disinformation
gauntlet of carefully orchestrated lies, deceptions and systematic
obfuscation is what it’s apparently all about. When I’ve merely
expected of others to share information and to otherwise
constructively ponder and contribute to this topic and many similar
ones before, all we ever got at best was a stone cold shoulder, and
otherwise mostly negativity and banishment, as well as from a certain
racist and kosher bigotry spouting potty-mouth rabbi none the less.
However, the laws of physics are seldom if ever politically correct or
otherwise faith-based, and as such they simply do not lie, and even
the best available science doesn’t support many of those established
mainstream notions of excluding anything and everything that rocks a
given faith-based boat.
~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet”[/quote:d0efd87389] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Saul Levy... |
| Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 12:14 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Hagar and I are certainly NOT kosher, GOOFBALL! lmfjao!
We would have a GREAT TIME together POURING OUT RIDICULE ABOUT YOU!
The SUPREME VILLAGE IDIOT!
Thanks for the suggestion!
Saul Levy
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 06:19:05 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth <bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com>
wrote:
[quote:257669d838]On Jul 6, 9:59 am, "Hagar" <ha... at (no spam) sahm.name> wrote:
"BradGuth" <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:cbad0611-8813-4e32-aee9-712919534cb0 at (no spam) m3g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 6, 6:55 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least
according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and
orbital mechanics.
snip usual GuthBall frothing
As I've said often before, you do not have to take my word on this,
GuthBall, no matter how many time you have recited your usual and
unintelligible gibberish, it remains just that: the rantings of a total
loon.
In that case, perhaps you and rabbi Saul should get a room.
It seems now even Newtonian physics and your own peer accepted science
is off-limits with you crazy kosher guys.
~ BG[/quote:257669d838] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 3:39 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Jul 6, 9:59 am, "Hagar" <ha... at (no spam) sahm.name> wrote:
[quote:07817e3dae]"BradGuth" <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:cbad0611-8813-4e32-aee9-712919534cb0 at (no spam) m3g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 6, 6:55 am, BradGuth <bradg... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least
according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and
orbital mechanics.
snip usual GuthBall frothing
As I've said often before, you do not have to take my word on this,
GuthBall, no matter how many time you have recited your usual and
unintelligible gibberish, it remains just that: the rantings of a total
loon.
[/quote:07817e3dae]
In that case, perhaps you and rabbi Saul (aka Art Deco) should get a
room.
It seems now even the most peer reviewed interpretations of Newtonian
physics and your own peer accepted science is suddenly off-limits with
you crazy kosher guys. Local planets, moons and satellites go by
Newtonian physics, but apparently stars and exoplanets by way of your
mindset don't (especially of those we're headed towards don't count).
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| BradGuth... |
| Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 7:07 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
As is, the 1.417e17 N worth of the Sirius tidal radii holding force is
what represents a 4763:1 greater grip than our sun has on Sedna. Of
course you can always trust the mainstream obfuscation and perpetual
denial from our resident newsgroup rabbi, or you can always do the
math yourself, or perhaps simply use either one of the following:
Gravity Force of Attraction (orbital tidal radius force)
http://www.1728.com/gravity.htm
http://www.wsanford.com/~wsanford/calculators/gravity-calculator.html
~ BG |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Saul Levy... |
| Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 12:01 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Sirius is NOT IN ORBIT, GOOFBALLFORBRAINS! lmfjao!
Sedna is. Around the SUN!
4763:1?
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Saul Levy
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:07:28 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth
<bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote:b3230b0fac]As is, the 1.417e17 N worth of the Sirius tidal radii holding force is
what represents a 4763:1 greater grip than our sun has on Sedna. Of
course you can always trust the mainstream obfuscation and perpetual
denial from our resident newsgroup rabbi, or you can always do the
math yourself, or perhaps simply use either one of the following:
Gravity Force of Attraction (orbital tidal radius force)
~ BG[/quote:b3230b0fac] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Saul Levy... |
| Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:39 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
You would repel Sirius all by yourself, GOOFBALL! lmfjao!
These is NO SUCH ORBIT!
Saul Levy
On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 11:42:39 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth
<bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote:8a34c2221d]Other than external sources of gravity yet to be identified, such as
dark cosmic matter and black holes keeping us away from fully
encountering the Sirius star/solar system, is there yet another
mysterious repelling/antigravity force that hasn't been identified?
In order to avoid a full orbit of Sirius, would not the interstellar
fields of electrostatic and/or magnetic forces have to become that of
repulsion?
~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet”[/quote:8a34c2221d] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Saul Levy... |
| Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 12:58 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
That NEVER HAPPENED, GOOFBALL! lmfjao!
Not a SINGLE PARTICLE from SIRIUS EVER MADE IT TO OUR SOLAR SYSTEM.
Saul Levy
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:33:44 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth
<bradguth at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
[quote:6ae3d34d5b]What would have happened within our solar system and the environment
of Eden/Earth as we passed through any remaining portion of the same
molecular cloud of <1.25e7 solar masses, as what had just given birth
to those nearby Sirius stars and such having taken at least ten
millions to a hundred some odd million years in order to create?
~ BG[/quote:6ae3d34d5b] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Nov 29, 2009 7:38 pm
|
|