 |
|
| Science Forum Index » Electronics Forum » Si-diodes in Second World War radar & Communication... |
|
Page 7 of 8 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Next |
|
| Author |
Message |
| ingvald44... |
 Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 6:40 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Martin H. Eastburn wrote:
[quote:f1d0a09c04]But theory and Science knows more than you. Much more
was known long before as the bomb was known before they
figured how to make one.
Martin
ingvald44 wrote:
Martin H. Eastburn wrote:
I know for a fact the B36 and 52 were tube models.
Later when the 52 got cruse missiles - anything goes. It had to.
I trained the designers of the F-111 and prior to it, they
made B52's. I took them from R/C/Tubes to Solid state and digital.
Op amp as well.
Bikini wasn't the first bomb and Electronics was in tubes then.
Computers were tube as well.
Until Starfish Prime July 62 EMP was not appreciated as being as
destructive as it is. It was at 248 miles up. Ground burst and
other atmospheric detonations do not create EMP.
Eric
What?[/quote:f1d0a09c04] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Rich Grise... |
| Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 10:26 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
[quote:a28d3b9862]On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:48:07 -0500, John Fields
BTW, how tall are you?
About 5'6". I met John at one of those trade shows in LA, and got about[/quote:a28d3b9862]
a half-dozen of his refrigerator magnet logo thingies. Apparently I voided
the warranty when I stuck them to my file cabinet. ;-)
He's adorable, like a friendly leprechaun. :-)
His face wouldn't frighten children the way yours and mine do. ;-D
Hope This Helps!
Rich |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| John Fields... |
| Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 11:07 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:29:43 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin at (no spam) highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
[quote:8d1d1f45b5]On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 06:43:28 -0500, John Fields
jfields at (no spam) austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:01:30 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin at (no spam) highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:56:03 -0500, John Fields
jfields at (no spam) austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 11:10:02 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin at (no spam) highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:48:07 -0500, John Fields
jfields at (no spam) austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:19:19 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin at (no spam) highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:23:41 -0500, John Fields
jfields at (no spam) austininstruments.com> wrote:
What are you doing, working towards a degree in social work?
---
No, but I think it's kinda like Jim said in that we all have an
obligation to make tomorrow better than today, and you seem to think
that making that happen would involve killing off everyone who disagrees
with you and can post proof positive that you're wrong.
Relax: you're quite safe.
---
That's kind of ambiguous, but since I've proved you wrong before, I
guess you're talking about the killing thing, in which case why should I
worry???
BTW, how tall are you?
JF
Not tall, not short... close to 1.0 SPunits, or roughly 0.9 PHs. Just
about right for the business I'm in and the women I like.
But, given the choice, I'd rather be a bantam rooster than two big old
hens.
---
Hmm...
"Which is why you remind me so much of Miss Denton, my matronly 6th
grade teacher."
"I'd rather be a bantam rooster than two big old hens."
Interesting how you try to belittle your opponents by feminizing them,
and it sure speaks volumes about how you think of women...
I love women, in all sorts of ways.
---
So say tou, and yet you try to use the image of them as being inferior
to further your own ends?
You're babbling again. I made no negative comments about women, and I
have no ends other than to share knowledge and amuse myself.
I do think that barnyard roosters and hens are both silly animals, but
that you and JT act more like hens.
---
All my best friends and all of my
business partners have been women. All of my wives, daughters, and
sisters, come to think of it.
---
Your father and mother too, no doubt.
Well, I guess then, you're just one of the girls.
Now who is debasing women?
San Francisco, is it?
What a surprise...
---
But if critters peck like hens and cluck like hens, they're probably
hens.
---
Or a farmer with a big knife.
---
Anyway, 6' 160 pounds is hardly a "big old hen".
Stewer.
---
Thinking of something to eat, are you???
No, I just had breakfast with my beautiful, smart, skinny wife. Now
I'm thinking about electronics [1]. You should try it some time, and
take your mind off gossiping and clucking and various fantasies about
other peoples' personal lives.
[/quote:8d1d1f45b5]
---
PKB, methinks.
What you should try sometime is growing up and owning up to a mistake
like a man instead of always starting a childish row to divert attention
away from the fact that you made a mistake.
JF |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| John Fields... |
| Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 11:13 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:26:25 GMT, Rich Grise <richgrise at (no spam) example.net>
wrote:
[quote:70360bce5b]On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:48:07 -0500, John Fields
BTW, how tall are you?
About 5'6". I met John at one of those trade shows in LA, and got about
a half-dozen of his refrigerator magnet logo thingies. Apparently I voided
the warranty when I stuck them to my file cabinet. ;-)
He's adorable, like a friendly leprechaun. :-)
His face wouldn't frighten children the way yours and mine do. ;-D
Hope This Helps!
Rich
[/quote:70360bce5b]
---
Yeah, it does.
Thanks! :-)
JF |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| John Larkin... |
| Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 11:50 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:07:43 -0500, John Fields
<jfields at (no spam) austininstruments.com> wrote:
[quote:c17b16c077]On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:29:43 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin at (no spam) highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 06:43:28 -0500, John Fields
jfields at (no spam) austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:01:30 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin at (no spam) highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:56:03 -0500, John Fields
jfields at (no spam) austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 11:10:02 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin at (no spam) highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:48:07 -0500, John Fields
jfields at (no spam) austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:19:19 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin at (no spam) highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:23:41 -0500, John Fields
jfields at (no spam) austininstruments.com> wrote:
What are you doing, working towards a degree in social work?
---
No, but I think it's kinda like Jim said in that we all have an
obligation to make tomorrow better than today, and you seem to think
that making that happen would involve killing off everyone who disagrees
with you and can post proof positive that you're wrong.
Relax: you're quite safe.
---
That's kind of ambiguous, but since I've proved you wrong before, I
guess you're talking about the killing thing, in which case why should I
worry???
BTW, how tall are you?
JF
Not tall, not short... close to 1.0 SPunits, or roughly 0.9 PHs. Just
about right for the business I'm in and the women I like.
But, given the choice, I'd rather be a bantam rooster than two big old
hens.
---
Hmm...
"Which is why you remind me so much of Miss Denton, my matronly 6th
grade teacher."
"I'd rather be a bantam rooster than two big old hens."
Interesting how you try to belittle your opponents by feminizing them,
and it sure speaks volumes about how you think of women...
I love women, in all sorts of ways.
---
So say tou, and yet you try to use the image of them as being inferior
to further your own ends?
You're babbling again. I made no negative comments about women, and I
have no ends other than to share knowledge and amuse myself.
I do think that barnyard roosters and hens are both silly animals, but
that you and JT act more like hens.
---
All my best friends and all of my
business partners have been women. All of my wives, daughters, and
sisters, come to think of it.
---
Your father and mother too, no doubt.
Well, I guess then, you're just one of the girls.
Now who is debasing women?
San Francisco, is it?
What a surprise...
---
But if critters peck like hens and cluck like hens, they're probably
hens.
---
Or a farmer with a big knife.
---
Anyway, 6' 160 pounds is hardly a "big old hen".
Stewer.
---
Thinking of something to eat, are you???
No, I just had breakfast with my beautiful, smart, skinny wife. Now
I'm thinking about electronics [1]. You should try it some time, and
take your mind off gossiping and clucking and various fantasies about
other peoples' personal lives.
---
PKB, methinks.
What you should try sometime is growing up and owning up to a mistake
like a man instead of always starting a childish row to divert attention
away from the fact that you made a mistake.
JF
[/quote:c17b16c077]
Which mistake are you referring to?
Do you keep a scrapbook of my mistakes? I'm flattered.
John |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Spehro Pefhany... |
| Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 12:25 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:26:25 GMT, Rich Grise <richgrise at (no spam) example.net>
wrote:
[quote:f00b181565]On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:48:07 -0500, John Fields
BTW, how tall are you?
About 5'6". I met John at one of those trade shows in LA, and got about
a half-dozen of his refrigerator magnet logo thingies. Apparently I voided
the warranty when I stuck them to my file cabinet. ;-)
He's adorable, like a friendly leprechaun. :-)
His face wouldn't frighten children the way yours and mine do. ;-D
Hope This Helps!
Rich
[/quote:f00b181565]
http://tinyurl.com/kpt97p |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| John Fields... |
| Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 1:08 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:50:44 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin at (no spam) highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
[quote:6b46b043c1]On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:07:43 -0500, John Fields
jfields at (no spam) austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:29:43 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin at (no spam) highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 06:43:28 -0500, John Fields
jfields at (no spam) austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:01:30 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin at (no spam) highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:56:03 -0500, John Fields
jfields at (no spam) austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 11:10:02 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin at (no spam) highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:48:07 -0500, John Fields
jfields at (no spam) austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:19:19 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin at (no spam) highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:23:41 -0500, John Fields
jfields at (no spam) austininstruments.com> wrote:
What are you doing, working towards a degree in social work?
---
No, but I think it's kinda like Jim said in that we all have an
obligation to make tomorrow better than today, and you seem to think
that making that happen would involve killing off everyone who disagrees
with you and can post proof positive that you're wrong.
Relax: you're quite safe.
---
That's kind of ambiguous, but since I've proved you wrong before, I
guess you're talking about the killing thing, in which case why should I
worry???
BTW, how tall are you?
JF
Not tall, not short... close to 1.0 SPunits, or roughly 0.9 PHs. Just
about right for the business I'm in and the women I like.
But, given the choice, I'd rather be a bantam rooster than two big old
hens.
---
Hmm...
"Which is why you remind me so much of Miss Denton, my matronly 6th
grade teacher."
"I'd rather be a bantam rooster than two big old hens."
Interesting how you try to belittle your opponents by feminizing them,
and it sure speaks volumes about how you think of women...
I love women, in all sorts of ways.
---
So say tou, and yet you try to use the image of them as being inferior
to further your own ends?
You're babbling again. I made no negative comments about women, and I
have no ends other than to share knowledge and amuse myself.
I do think that barnyard roosters and hens are both silly animals, but
that you and JT act more like hens.
---
All my best friends and all of my
business partners have been women. All of my wives, daughters, and
sisters, come to think of it.
---
Your father and mother too, no doubt.
Well, I guess then, you're just one of the girls.
Now who is debasing women?
San Francisco, is it?
What a surprise...
---
But if critters peck like hens and cluck like hens, they're probably
hens.
---
Or a farmer with a big knife.
---
Anyway, 6' 160 pounds is hardly a "big old hen".
Stewer.
---
Thinking of something to eat, are you???
No, I just had breakfast with my beautiful, smart, skinny wife. Now
I'm thinking about electronics [1]. You should try it some time, and
take your mind off gossiping and clucking and various fantasies about
other peoples' personal lives.
---
PKB, methinks.
What you should try sometime is growing up and owning up to a mistake
like a man instead of always starting a childish row to divert attention
away from the fact that you made a mistake.
JF
Which mistake are you referring to?
[/quote:6b46b043c1]
---
I'm not talking about any particular mistake, I'm talking about all the
silly little diversions and the dance you do when you're confronted with
the _fact_ that you made a mistake and you don't want to own up to it.
---
[quote:6b46b043c1]Do you keep a scrapbook of my mistakes?
[/quote:6b46b043c1]
---
You flatter yourself.
Certainly not, but I have a memory.
---
[quote:6b46b043c1]I'm flattered.
[/quote:6b46b043c1]
---
Don't be, there's to be flattered about.
JF |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| John Fields... |
| Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 1:11 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:23:31 -0700, Jim Thompson
<To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon at (no spam) My-Web-Site.com> wrote:
[quote:ff294e4aa0]On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:13:32 -0500, John Fields
jfields at (no spam) austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:26:25 GMT, Rich Grise <richgrise at (no spam) example.net
wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:48:07 -0500, John Fields
BTW, how tall are you?
About 5'6". I met John at one of those trade shows in LA, and got about
a half-dozen of his refrigerator magnet logo thingies. Apparently I voided
the warranty when I stuck them to my file cabinet. ;-)
He's adorable, like a friendly leprechaun. :-)
His face wouldn't frighten children the way yours and mine do. ;-D
Hope This Helps!
Rich
---
Yeah, it does.
Thanks! :-)
JF
Around Christmas time, in the grocery store, little kids point at me
and say, "Ho! Ho! Ho!" 
[/quote:ff294e4aa0]
---
I usually get incredulous looks and some little kid saying: "Mommy,
look, it's Santa!"
JF |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| John Larkin... |
| Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 1:27 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:08:14 -0500, John Fields
<jfields at (no spam) austininstruments.com> wrote:
[quote:9e0b01717d]On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:50:44 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin at (no spam) highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:07:43 -0500, John Fields
jfields at (no spam) austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:29:43 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin at (no spam) highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 06:43:28 -0500, John Fields
jfields at (no spam) austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:01:30 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin at (no spam) highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:56:03 -0500, John Fields
jfields at (no spam) austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 11:10:02 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin at (no spam) highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:48:07 -0500, John Fields
jfields at (no spam) austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:19:19 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin at (no spam) highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:23:41 -0500, John Fields
jfields at (no spam) austininstruments.com> wrote:
What are you doing, working towards a degree in social work?
---
No, but I think it's kinda like Jim said in that we all have an
obligation to make tomorrow better than today, and you seem to think
that making that happen would involve killing off everyone who disagrees
with you and can post proof positive that you're wrong.
Relax: you're quite safe.
---
That's kind of ambiguous, but since I've proved you wrong before, I
guess you're talking about the killing thing, in which case why should I
worry???
BTW, how tall are you?
JF
Not tall, not short... close to 1.0 SPunits, or roughly 0.9 PHs. Just
about right for the business I'm in and the women I like.
But, given the choice, I'd rather be a bantam rooster than two big old
hens.
---
Hmm...
"Which is why you remind me so much of Miss Denton, my matronly 6th
grade teacher."
"I'd rather be a bantam rooster than two big old hens."
Interesting how you try to belittle your opponents by feminizing them,
and it sure speaks volumes about how you think of women...
I love women, in all sorts of ways.
---
So say tou, and yet you try to use the image of them as being inferior
to further your own ends?
You're babbling again. I made no negative comments about women, and I
have no ends other than to share knowledge and amuse myself.
I do think that barnyard roosters and hens are both silly animals, but
that you and JT act more like hens.
---
All my best friends and all of my
business partners have been women. All of my wives, daughters, and
sisters, come to think of it.
---
Your father and mother too, no doubt.
Well, I guess then, you're just one of the girls.
Now who is debasing women?
San Francisco, is it?
What a surprise...
---
But if critters peck like hens and cluck like hens, they're probably
hens.
---
Or a farmer with a big knife.
---
Anyway, 6' 160 pounds is hardly a "big old hen".
Stewer.
---
Thinking of something to eat, are you???
No, I just had breakfast with my beautiful, smart, skinny wife. Now
I'm thinking about electronics [1]. You should try it some time, and
take your mind off gossiping and clucking and various fantasies about
other peoples' personal lives.
---
PKB, methinks.
What you should try sometime is growing up and owning up to a mistake
like a man instead of always starting a childish row to divert attention
away from the fact that you made a mistake.
JF
Which mistake are you referring to?
---
I'm not talking about any particular mistake, I'm talking about all the
silly little diversions and the dance you do when you're confronted with
the _fact_ that you made a mistake and you don't want to own up to it.
---
Do you keep a scrapbook of my mistakes?
---
You flatter yourself.
Certainly not, but I have a memory.
---
I'm flattered.
---
Don't be, there's to be flattered about.
JF
[/quote:9e0b01717d]
You *really* need a life.
John |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| John Fields... |
| Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:50 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
[quote:85fc1c4052]On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:50:44 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin at (no spam) highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:07:43 -0500, John Fields
jfields at (no spam) austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:29:43 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin at (no spam) highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
All my best friends and all of my
business partners have been women. All of my wives, daughters, and
sisters, come to think of it.
---
Your father and mother too, no doubt.
Well, I guess then, you're just one of the girls.
Now who is debasing women?
[/quote:85fc1c4052]
---
Certainly not I.
I'm being sarcastically critical of _you_ by implying that, since one is
known by the company one keeps, your admitted preference for _totally_
female "peers" kind of puts you in that camp.
JF |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| John Larkin... |
| Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:30 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:50:41 -0500, John Fields
<jfields at (no spam) austininstruments.com> wrote:
[quote:0c9d2b0587]
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:50:44 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin at (no spam) highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:07:43 -0500, John Fields
jfields at (no spam) austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:29:43 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin at (no spam) highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
All my best friends and all of my
business partners have been women. All of my wives, daughters, and
sisters, come to think of it.
---
Your father and mother too, no doubt.
Well, I guess then, you're just one of the girls.
Now who is debasing women?
---
Certainly not I.
I'm being sarcastically critical of _you_ by implying that, since one is
known by the company one keeps, your admitted preference for _totally_
female "peers" kind of puts you in that camp.
JF
[/quote:0c9d2b0587]
You are really losing it. Back off, count to ten, press reset, and try
to start thinking again.
I genuinely like and enormously respect women, and would rather, all
other things being equal, spend time with women than with men. But
I've never met a female circuit designer (lots of programmers,
scientists, managers, just no real circuit designers) so I do that
with guys.
So how does a preference for women friends put me "in the camp" of
people who debase women?
A lot of guys really don't like women. They want them, need them, but
don't like them. How do you rate in that respect? I've noticed that
this group seems to pile onto any woman who dares to post here, and
you tend to be part of the gang.
John |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| John Larkin... |
| Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 7:27 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:26:25 GMT, Rich Grise <richgrise at (no spam) example.net>
wrote:
[quote:be005548de]On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:48:07 -0500, John Fields
BTW, how tall are you?
About 5'6".
[/quote:be005548de]
5'7.5". Maybe hard to estimate from your extreme elevation.
I met John at one of those trade shows in LA, and got about
[quote:be005548de]a half-dozen of his refrigerator magnet logo thingies. Apparently I voided
the warranty when I stuck them to my file cabinet.
[/quote:be005548de]
Your file cabinet has a warranty?
[quote:be005548de]
He's adorable, like a friendly leprechaun. :-)
His face wouldn't frighten children the way yours and mine do. ;-D
[/quote:be005548de]
Kids and dogs and women seem to like me. I work at appearing
innocuous, to make a neutral first impression until I size up a
situation. That seems to work in most business situations.
John |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| John Larkin... |
| Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:49 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:20:01 -0500, John Fields
<jfields at (no spam) austininstruments.com> wrote:
[quote:062e651bc4]On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:50:44 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin at (no spam) highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:07:43 -0500, John Fields
jfields at (no spam) austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:29:43 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin at (no spam) highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
I love women, in all sorts of ways.
---
So say tou, and yet you try to use the image of them as being inferior
to further your own ends?
You're babbling again. I made no negative comments about women, and I
have no ends other than to share knowledge and amuse myself.
---
By casting aspersions on males and then equating those aspersions to
what you consider to be female "characteristics", you cast aspersions on
women just for being women. Can't you see that?
[/quote:062e651bc4]
Geez, I hope you don't use that sort of logic when you design your 555
circuits.
I prefer broccoli to brussels sprouts, ice cream to tapioca,
picoseconds to milliseconds, women to men. Where are "aspersions" in
any of that? If I have maligned any food products or time units, it
wasn't intentional.
You didn't answer my question about if you actually like women. If you
prefer men, go for it.
John |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Rich Grise... |
| Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 3:14 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:27:25 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
[quote:f7887e7976]On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:26:25 GMT, Rich Grise <richgrise at (no spam) example.net
a half-dozen of his refrigerator magnet logo thingies. Apparently I
voided the warranty when I stuck them to my file cabinet. ;-)
Your file cabinet has a warranty?
[/quote:f7887e7976]
Boy, you don't remember stuff too good, do you? I took a picture of
them stuck to my file cabinet, posted it on a.b.s.e, and you said that
I'd voided the warranty. I asked, "What, by not cutting them in two?"
because you had mentioned being able to separate the saying from the
logo and address & stuff. You said, with much indignation, "They're
_REFRIGERATOR_ magnets!" (I don't remember the exact level of emphasis,
but it _was_ emphasized! )
I can't quote chapter and verse, because google doesn't archive alt.,
which I don't get any more anyway. )-;
;-)
Rich |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| John Fields... |
| Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 3:26 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:49:15 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin at (no spam) highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
[quote:bbc7dce7bc]On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:20:01 -0500, John Fields
jfields at (no spam) austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:50:44 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin at (no spam) highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:07:43 -0500, John Fields
jfields at (no spam) austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:29:43 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin at (no spam) highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
I love women, in all sorts of ways.
---
So say tou, and yet you try to use the image of them as being inferior
to further your own ends?
You're babbling again. I made no negative comments about women, and I
have no ends other than to share knowledge and amuse myself.
---
By casting aspersions on males and then equating those aspersions to
what you consider to be female "characteristics", you cast aspersions on
women just for being women. Can't you see that?
Geez, I hope you don't use that sort of logic when you design your 555
circuits.
[/quote:bbc7dce7bc]
---
Now Bill...
So you _can't_ see it. Figures...
---
[quote:bbc7dce7bc]I prefer broccoli to brussels sprouts, ice cream to tapioca,
picoseconds to milliseconds, women to men. Where are "aspersions" in
any of that? If I have maligned any food products or time units, it
wasn't intentional.
[/quote:bbc7dce7bc]
---
More of the "Larkin shuffle", huh?
Somewhat entertaining in an annoying sort of way...
---
[quote:bbc7dce7bc]You didn't answer my question about if you actually like women.
[/quote:bbc7dce7bc]
---
Show me where it says I have to answer any of your questions, OK?
---
[quote:bbc7dce7bc]If you prefer men, go for it.
[/quote:bbc7dce7bc]
---
If I did, I would, and I certainly wouldn't need permission from you.
Well, I've had about enough of this fol-de-rol; I made my point and you
proved it, so I'll take my leave.
JF |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Mon Dec 07, 2009 3:22 pm
|
|