Environmental activist groups such as Greenpeace have consistently opposed
similar technologies, such as carbon capture and sequestration, because they
do not address what they see as the root of the problem, says the Heartland
Institute.

Environmental activist groups such as Greenpeace have consistently
opposed
similar technologies, such as carbon capture and sequestration, because
they
do not address what they see as the root of the problem, says the
Heartland
Institute.

There is only so much money in the GW pie, the scientists hoping to
take the money by some hokey scheme will have to fight Greenpeace et
al for the money!

from CO2 is the most dangerous thing , to exposing their Communist agenda
of anti Capitalism of banning anything that makes the world economy grow
and improves the quality of life for the world's people.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/2061358/'CO2-scrubberandrsquo-could-help-slow-global-warming.html
A new machine designed to "suck" carbon dioxide from the air could help in
the fight to save the world from climate change, according to physicists.

from CO2 is the most dangerous thing , to exposing their Communist agenda of
anti Capitalism of banning anything that makes the world economy grow and
improves the quality of life for the world's people.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/2061358/'CO2-scrubberandrsquo-could-help-slow-global-warming.html
A new machine designed to "suck" carbon dioxide from the air could help in the
fight to save the world from climate change, according to physicists.

A group of scientists are devising a 'CO2 scrubber' which they claim will
capture one tonne of CO2 from the air every day, about the same per passenger
as a flight from London to New York, reducing the warming effect of greenhouse
gases produced each year.

Although the idea has been mooted as a possible weapon in the battle against
climate change, it falls far short of a quick fix solution.

The 'scrubber' devices - small enough to fit inside a shipping container -
would need to be produced in their millions to soak up human carbon emissions,
and the CO2 trapped would still need to be disposed of.

The prototype will cost about £100,000 and take about two years to construct
at a laboratory in Tucson, Arizona.

Environmentalists may warn that so-called technological solutions to global
warming undermine attempts to promote greener lifestyles and industries.

Physicist Klaus Lackner, of New York's Columbia University, who led the U.S.
team behind the invention, said the CO2 scrubber offered more hope than
current efforts to cut carbon emissions by reducing fossil fuel use.

"I'd rather have a technology that allows us to use fossil fuels without
destroying the planet, because people are going to use them anyway" he said.

Professor Lackner said carbon dioxide could be removed from the atmosphere by
absorbing it in various chemical filters and a newly discovered property of
absorbent plastic sheets - which are routinely used to purify water - would be
used to used to clean those filters of CO2 so they can then be reused to carry
on the job.

The captured carbon dioxide could then be pumped into greenhouses to boost
plant growth.

Climate experts have reported that CO2 levels in the atmosphere are now 40%
higher than before the industrial revolution and "scrubbing" the carbon from
the air is seen as one of the greatest challenges in climate science. Sir
Richard Branson has promised £12.6m to anyone who succeeds.




ENVIRONMENTALISTS OPPOSE NEW CO2 SCRUBBER IDEA
ncpa.org ^ | July 23, 2008

Posted on Wednesday, July 23, 2008 11:58:33 AM by InvisibleChurch

Scientists at Columbia University are developing a carbon dioxide (CO2)
scrubber device that removes one ton of CO2 from the air every day, says the
Heartland Institute.

While some see the scrubber as an efficient and economical way to reduce
atmospheric carbon dioxide, many environmentalists oppose the technology
because it allows people to use fossil fuels and emit carbon in the first
place.

According to Columbia University physicist Klaus Lackner, who is leading the
research team:

Producing a large number of CO2 scrubbers can keep to a minimum any rise in
atmospheric CO2 without the economically painful elimination of inexpensive
energy sources. This technology would allow people to use fossil fuels, which
they will be using anyway, without destroying the planet. Environmental
activist groups such as Greenpeace have consistently opposed similar
technologies, such as carbon capture and sequestration, because they do not
address what they see as the root of the problem, says the Heartland
Institute.

"This is just one more piece of evidence that environmentalists aren't
concerned about solving a problem," said Sterling Burnett, a senior fellow
with the National Center for Policy Analysis. "Every problem, as they see it,
is one way to restrict people's lifestyles, and if you come up with a
technological fix that can solve a problem but doesn't require sacrifice and
lets us go about our business the way we were before, they're not happy about
it, even if it solves the problem."

Source: Krystle Russin, "Environmentalists Oppose New CO2 Scrubber Idea,"
Heartland Institute, August 1, 2008.

from CO2 is the most dangerous thing , to exposing their Communist agenda
of anti Capitalism of banning anything that makes the world economy grow
and
improves the quality of life for the world's people.



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/2061358/'CO2-scrubberandrsquo-could-help-slow-global-warming.html
A new machine designed to "suck" carbon dioxide from the air could help in
the fight to save the world from climate change, according to physicists.

A group of scientists are devising a 'CO2 scrubber' which they claim will
capture one tonne of CO2 from the air every day, about the same per
passenger as a flight from London to New York, reducing the warming effect
of greenhouse gases produced each year.

Although the idea has been mooted as a possible weapon in the battle
against
climate change, it falls far short of a quick fix solution.

The 'scrubber' devices - small enough to fit inside a shipping container -
would need to be produced in their millions to soak up human carbon
emissions, and the CO2 trapped would still need to be disposed of.

The prototype will cost about £100,000 and take about two years to
construct
at a laboratory in Tucson, Arizona.

Environmentalists may warn that so-called technological solutions to
global
warming undermine attempts to promote greener lifestyles and industries.

Physicist Klaus Lackner, of New York's Columbia University, who led the
U.S.
team behind the invention, said the CO2 scrubber offered more hope than
current efforts to cut carbon emissions by reducing fossil fuel use.

"I'd rather have a technology that allows us to use fossil fuels without
destroying the planet, because people are going to use them anyway" he
said.

Professor Lackner said carbon dioxide could be removed from the atmosphere
by absorbing it in various chemical filters and a newly discovered
property
of absorbent plastic sheets - which are routinely used to purify water -
would be used to used to clean those filters of CO2 so they can then be
reused to carry on the job.

The captured carbon dioxide could then be pumped into greenhouses to boost
plant growth.

Climate experts have reported that CO2 levels in the atmosphere are now
40%
higher than before the industrial revolution and "scrubbing" the carbon
from
the air is seen as one of the greatest challenges in climate science. Sir
Richard Branson has promised £12.6m to anyone who succeeds.




ENVIRONMENTALISTS OPPOSE NEW CO2 SCRUBBER IDEA
ncpa.org ^ | July 23, 2008

Posted on Wednesday, July 23, 2008 11:58:33 AM by InvisibleChurch

Scientists at Columbia University are developing a carbon dioxide (CO2)
scrubber device that removes one ton of CO2 from the air every day, says
the
Heartland Institute.

While some see the scrubber as an efficient and economical way to reduce
atmospheric carbon dioxide, many environmentalists oppose the technology
because it allows people to use fossil fuels and emit carbon in the first
place.

According to Columbia University physicist Klaus Lackner, who is leading
the
research team:

Producing a large number of CO2 scrubbers can keep to a minimum any rise
in
atmospheric CO2 without the economically painful elimination of
inexpensive
energy sources. This technology would allow people to use fossil fuels,
which they will be using anyway, without destroying the planet.
Environmental activist groups such as Greenpeace have consistently opposed
similar technologies, such as carbon capture and sequestration, because
they
do not address what they see as the root of the problem, says the
Heartland
Institute.

"This is just one more piece of evidence that environmentalists aren't
concerned about solving a problem," said Sterling Burnett, a senior fellow
with the National Center for Policy Analysis. "Every problem, as they see
it, is one way to restrict people's lifestyles, and if you come up with a
technological fix that can solve a problem but doesn't require sacrifice
and
lets us go about our business the way we were before, they're not happy
about it, even if it solves the problem."

Source: Krystle Russin, "Environmentalists Oppose New CO2 Scrubber Idea,"
Heartland Institute, August 1, 2008.

For text:

Environmental activist groups such as Greenpeace have consistently opposed
similar technologies, such as carbon capture and sequestration, because they
do not address what they see as the root of the problem, says the Heartland
Institute.

There is only so much money in the GW pie,

the scientists hoping to
take the money by some hokey scheme will have to fight Greenpeace et
al for the money!

"Feces bomb Throwing Democrap Protester" <Feces eating & throwing
Democrap at (no spam) democrap.org> wrote in message
news:wK2dnT7vzq7XDhXVnZ2dnUVZ_oHinZ2d at (no spam) comcast.com...
from CO2 is the most dangerous thing , to exposing their Communist
agenda of anti Capitalism of banning anything that makes the world
economy grow and improves the quality of life for the world's people.

Could you rephrase that in English?


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/2061358/'CO2-scrubberandrsquo-could-help-slow-global-warming.html
A new machine designed to "suck" carbon dioxide from the air could
help in the fight to save the world from climate change, according to
physicists.

Excellent.

"Feces bomb Throwing Democrap Protester" <Feces eating & throwing
Democrap at (no spam)
democrap.org> wrote in message
news:wK2dnT7vzq7XDhXVnZ2dnUVZ_oHinZ2d at (no spam) comcast.com...
from CO2 is the most dangerous thing , to exposing their Communist
agenda
of anti Capitalism of banning anything that makes the world economy
grow
and
improves the quality of life for the world's people.



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/2061358/'CO2-scrubberandrsquo-could-help-slow-global-warming.html
A new machine designed to "suck" carbon dioxide from the air could
help in
the fight to save the world from climate change, according to
physicists.

A group of scientists are devising a 'CO2 scrubber' which they claim
will
capture one tonne of CO2 from the air every day, about the same per
passenger as a flight from London to New York, reducing the warming
effect
of greenhouse gases produced each year.

Although the idea has been mooted as a possible weapon in the battle
against
climate change, it falls far short of a quick fix solution.

The 'scrubber' devices - small enough to fit inside a shipping
container -
would need to be produced in their millions to soak up human carbon
emissions, and the CO2 trapped would still need to be disposed of.

The prototype will cost about £100,000 and take about two years to
construct
at a laboratory in Tucson, Arizona.

Environmentalists may warn that so-called technological solutions to
global
warming undermine attempts to promote greener lifestyles and
industries.

Physicist Klaus Lackner, of New York's Columbia University, who led
the
U.S.
team behind the invention, said the CO2 scrubber offered more hope
than
current efforts to cut carbon emissions by reducing fossil fuel use.

"I'd rather have a technology that allows us to use fossil fuels
without
destroying the planet, because people are going to use them anyway"
he
said.

Professor Lackner said carbon dioxide could be removed from the
atmosphere
by absorbing it in various chemical filters and a newly discovered
property
of absorbent plastic sheets - which are routinely used to purify
water -
would be used to used to clean those filters of CO2 so they can then
be
reused to carry on the job.

The captured carbon dioxide could then be pumped into greenhouses to
boost
plant growth.

Climate experts have reported that CO2 levels in the atmosphere are
now
40%
higher than before the industrial revolution and "scrubbing" the
carbon
from
the air is seen as one of the greatest challenges in climate science.
Sir
Richard Branson has promised £12.6m to anyone who succeeds.




ENVIRONMENTALISTS OPPOSE NEW CO2 SCRUBBER IDEA
ncpa.org ^ | July 23, 2008

Posted on Wednesday, July 23, 2008 11:58:33 AM by InvisibleChurch

Scientists at Columbia University are developing a carbon dioxide
(CO2)
scrubber device that removes one ton of CO2 from the air every day,
says
the
Heartland Institute.

While some see the scrubber as an efficient and economical way to
reduce
atmospheric carbon dioxide, many environmentalists oppose the
technology
because it allows people to use fossil fuels and emit carbon in the
first
place.

According to Columbia University physicist Klaus Lackner, who is
leading
the
research team:

Producing a large number of CO2 scrubbers can keep to a minimum any
rise
in
atmospheric CO2 without the economically painful elimination of
inexpensive
energy sources. This technology would allow people to use fossil
fuels,
which they will be using anyway, without destroying the planet.
Environmental activist groups such as Greenpeace have consistently
opposed
similar technologies, such as carbon capture and sequestration,
because
they
do not address what they see as the root of the problem, says the
Heartland
Institute.

"This is just one more piece of evidence that environmentalists
aren't
concerned about solving a problem," said Sterling Burnett, a senior
fellow
with the National Center for Policy Analysis. "Every problem, as they
see
it, is one way to restrict people's lifestyles, and if you come up
with a
technological fix that can solve a problem but doesn't require
sacrifice
and
lets us go about our business the way we were before, they're not
happy
about it, even if it solves the problem."

Source: Krystle Russin, "Environmentalists Oppose New CO2 Scrubber
Idea,"
Heartland Institute, August 1, 2008.

For text:


. But act fast, as the climate change "window of
opportunity" is closing.

"ZB0N0" <ZB0N0 at (no spam) w00w00.com> wrote in message
news:488923b0 at (no spam) dnews.tpgi.com.au...

"Don H" <donlhumphries at (no spam) bigpond.com> wrote in message
news:056ik.22266$IK1.9203 at (no spam) news-server.bigpond.net.au...
"Feces bomb Throwing Democrap Protester" <Feces eating & throwing
Democrap at (no spam)
democrap.org> wrote in message
news:wK2dnT7vzq7XDhXVnZ2dnUVZ_oHinZ2d at (no spam) comcast.com...
from CO2 is the most dangerous thing , to exposing their Communist
agenda
of anti Capitalism of banning anything that makes the world economy
grow
and
improves the quality of life for the world's people.




http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/2061358/'CO2-scrubberandrsquo-could-help-slow-global-warming.html
A new machine designed to "suck" carbon dioxide from the air could
help
in
the fight to save the world from climate change, according to
physicists.

A group of scientists are devising a 'CO2 scrubber' which they claim
will
capture one tonne of CO2 from the air every day, about the same per
passenger as a flight from London to New York, reducing the warming
effect
of greenhouse gases produced each year.

Although the idea has been mooted as a possible weapon in the battle
against
climate change, it falls far short of a quick fix solution.

The 'scrubber' devices - small enough to fit inside a shipping
container -
would need to be produced in their millions to soak up human carbon
emissions, and the CO2 trapped would still need to be disposed of.

The prototype will cost about £100,000 and take about two years to
construct
at a laboratory in Tucson, Arizona.

Environmentalists may warn that so-called technological solutions to
global
warming undermine attempts to promote greener lifestyles and
industries.

Physicist Klaus Lackner, of New York's Columbia University, who led
the
U.S.
team behind the invention, said the CO2 scrubber offered more hope
than
current efforts to cut carbon emissions by reducing fossil fuel use.

"I'd rather have a technology that allows us to use fossil fuels
without
destroying the planet, because people are going to use them anyway" he
said.

Professor Lackner said carbon dioxide could be removed from the
atmosphere
by absorbing it in various chemical filters and a newly discovered
property
of absorbent plastic sheets - which are routinely used to purify
water -
would be used to used to clean those filters of CO2 so they can then
be
reused to carry on the job.

The captured carbon dioxide could then be pumped into greenhouses to
boost
plant growth.

Climate experts have reported that CO2 levels in the atmosphere are
now
40%
higher than before the industrial revolution and "scrubbing" the
carbon
from
the air is seen as one of the greatest challenges in climate science.
Sir
Richard Branson has promised £12.6m to anyone who succeeds.




ENVIRONMENTALISTS OPPOSE NEW CO2 SCRUBBER IDEA
ncpa.org ^ | July 23, 2008

Posted on Wednesday, July 23, 2008 11:58:33 AM by InvisibleChurch

Scientists at Columbia University are developing a carbon dioxide
(CO2)
scrubber device that removes one ton of CO2 from the air every day,
says
the
Heartland Institute.

While some see the scrubber as an efficient and economical way to
reduce
atmospheric carbon dioxide, many environmentalists oppose the
technology
because it allows people to use fossil fuels and emit carbon in the
first
place.

According to Columbia University physicist Klaus Lackner, who is
leading
the
research team:

Producing a large number of CO2 scrubbers can keep to a minimum any
rise
in
atmospheric CO2 without the economically painful elimination of
inexpensive
energy sources. This technology would allow people to use fossil
fuels,
which they will be using anyway, without destroying the planet.
Environmental activist groups such as Greenpeace have consistently
opposed
similar technologies, such as carbon capture and sequestration,
because
they
do not address what they see as the root of the problem, says the
Heartland
Institute.

"This is just one more piece of evidence that environmentalists aren't
concerned about solving a problem," said Sterling Burnett, a senior
fellow
with the National Center for Policy Analysis. "Every problem, as they
see
it, is one way to restrict people's lifestyles, and if you come up
with
a
technological fix that can solve a problem but doesn't require
sacrifice
and
lets us go about our business the way we were before, they're not
happy
about it, even if it solves the problem."

Source: Krystle Russin, "Environmentalists Oppose New CO2 Scrubber
Idea,"
Heartland Institute, August 1, 2008.

For text:


. But act fast, as the climate change "window of
opportunity" is closing.

GARBAGE!!
The climate change is all in your fevered pinhead!

The usual lying k00kspew. lol


# "Garbage" is an apt word, under the circumstances.

"Feces bomb Throwing Democrap Protester" <Feces eating & throwing Democrap
at (no spam)
democrap.org> wrote in message
news:wK2dnT7vzq7XDhXVnZ2dnUVZ_oHinZ2d at (no spam) comcast.com...
from CO2 is the most dangerous thing , to exposing their Communist
agenda
snip
For text:


# What is the chimney problem?
A chimney discharges smoke, steam, gas, etc, into the atmosphere,
instead of recycling it.
We don't allow raw sewage discharge into the ocean,

so why let chimneys
shit into the atmosphere?
The scrubber idea sounds sensible, and should be tried.
If all chimney waste products can be recycled, then "clean coal" has
arrived, and - no problem.

From that, I gather that I should have remembered ice has weight.
While the water it melts into, doesn't.

From that, I gather that I should have remembered ice has weight.
While the water it melts into, doesn't.

Environmental activist groups such as Greenpeace have consistently opposed
similar technologies, such as carbon capture and sequestration, because they
do not address what they see as the root of the problem, says the Heartland
Institute.

SOURCE CHECK: "The Heartland Institute."

"This is just one more piece of evidence that environmentalists aren't
concerned about solving a problem," said Sterling Burnett, a senior fellow
with the National Center for Policy Analysis. "Every problem, as they see
it, is one way to restrict people's lifestyles, and if you come up with a
technological fix that can solve a problem but doesn't require sacrifice and
lets us go about our business the way we were before, they're not happy
about it, even if it solves the problem."

SOURCE CHECK: "the National Center for Policy Analysis."