I've never had a drive fail in this way before, problems usually being motor
or bearing related. Anyone else had it ?

"Arfa Daily" <arfa.daily at (no spam) ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:0wdck.11601$jB5.5703 at (no spam) newsfe05.ams2...
Here's one I've never had before. Earlier this week, my wife informed me
that a business-related CD ROM that she uses regularly on my machine, was
failing to read. She was right. Further investigation revealed that the
machine, a Dell, could no longer see my 250GB data drive either. This
drive
is a Seagate, and was replaced probably a little over a year ago, because
its predecessor, which had been in there a long time, had begun dying
with
nasty noises and erratic reads. Both the CD ROM drive and the Seagate,
are
on IDE channel 1, in cable select format.

My first suspicion was that something had happened to the mother board's
IDE
driver IC, but the Windoze diagnostic said that it was ok. Further checks
disconnecting stuff, showed the problem to be the Seagate drive that was
hanging up the channel 1 IDE bus. As soon as it was disconnected, the CD
ROM
drive came back on line.

I got a new 320GB drive from Maplin's for 49 quid (how good a deal is
that
?) and was able to restore its contents from the external backup drive
that
I have, and which does a backup automatically every night.

I've never had a drive fail in this way before, problems usually being
motor
or bearing related. Anyone else had it ?

Arfa


I've never had one lock up the IDE bus like that, but I have had the drive
electronics fail many times. What kind of drive was it? I used to have
particularly bad luck with western digital caviar series but that was a
long time ago. .

Mike

It didn't hang Windoze as was suggested by Franc. It just hung the IDE 1
channel permanently. Windoze could not see either device on that channel,
but otherwise, worked normally. As soon as the Seagate was unplugged from
the bus cable, the other device on that channel - a CD ROM drive - became
visible again. New drive installed on the same cable, works just fine, as
the Seagate did before this failure.

Now, slight change of tack. Can anyone see anything 'odd' about this
post or the copy of it, (header, body, routing, whatever) compared to
any of my previous or current posts ?

On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 01:43:03 +0100, Arfa Daily wrote:

Now, slight change of tack. Can anyone see anything 'odd' about this
post or the copy of it, (header, body, routing, whatever) compared to
any of my previous or current posts ?

Path:
feeder.news-service.com!ramfeed1.eweka.nl!eweka.nl!hq-usenetpeers.eweka.nl!
69.16.177.246.MISMATCH!cyclone03.ams!news.ams.newshosting.com!npeersf02.ams!
newsfe16.ams2.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail


That's a pretty long path just to get here.

Here's one I've never had before. Earlier this week, my wife informed me