|
Science Forum Index » Energy - Hydrogen Forum » energy need to produce one litre of hydrogen?...
Page 4 of 6 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next
|
| Author |
Message |
| Eeyore... |
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 12:31 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Charlie E." wrote:
Quote: And finally, when cruising down the freeway, the gas engine can engage
purely, as this is the most efficient operating regime...
You reckon ? !!!!
Graham |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Eeyore... |
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 12:34 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Spaceman wrote:
Quote: Eeyore wrote:
hhc314 at (no spam) yahoo.com wrote:
Graham, would you explain the difference in configurations between a
"parallel" and a "series" hybrid? You have me confused here, every
though I am familiar with the difference between large UPS systems
where their is a considerable difference between a parallel and a
series configuration. Still, these have an external energy source, so
how does this operate in a vehicle lacking an external energy source?
Serious question. Please answer the question, and not simply link to
a website.
Pretty simple.
In a parallel hydrid the wheels are driven by both the ICE and the
electric motor when full power is needed through some combining
gearbox or whatever.
In a series hybrid the wheels are driven by electric motors only.
When the battery gets low, the ICE turns on to recharge it but has no
physical connection to the wheels.
I hate to say this but I must.
..
Perfect explanation Eeyore.
You're very welcome. It left out all the fiddly details but I always reckon
simple initial answers are the best ones.
Graham |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Eeyore... |
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 12:47 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
DB wrote:
Quote: Spaceman wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
hhc314 at (no spam) yahoo.com wrote:
Graham, would you explain the difference in configurations between a
"parallel" and a "series" hybrid? You have me confused here, every
though I am familiar with the difference between large UPS systems
where their is a considerable difference between a parallel and a
series configuration. Still, these have an external energy source, so
how does this operate in a vehicle lacking an external energy source?
Serious question. Please answer the question, and not simply link to
a website.
Pretty simple.
In a parallel hydrid the wheels are driven by both the ICE and the
electric motor when full power is needed through some combining
gearbox or whatever.
In a series hybrid the wheels are driven by electric motors only.
When the battery gets low, the ICE turns on to recharge it but has no
physical connection to the wheels.
I hate to say this but I must.
..
Perfect explanation Eeyore.
(I'm not responding to spacebrains.)
But what the explanation lacks is that the electrical source of power
has to be fully optimized at acceleration. Not so in the case of a
parallel hybrid. When you share resources you actually reduce
infrastructure. And that is why they make them.
But you add that combining gearbox (yet you STILL need the big alternator),
so it's more complex. And AIUI, the ICE tends to run more often since the
electric motors aren't up to the job alone.
Quote: If the series is really way ahead, someone needs to cite a study.
It would be a very interesting study no doubt. The fact the GM and their
European subsidiary Opel have gone the series route must have been based a
damn good reason you'd have thought. To me, instinctively it just 'feels
right' but WTH.
Graham |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Don Lancaster... |
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:03 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Eeyore wrote:
Quote:
Spaceman wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
hhc314 at (no spam) yahoo.com wrote:
Graham, would you explain the difference in configurations between a
"parallel" and a "series" hybrid? You have me confused here, every
though I am familiar with the difference between large UPS systems
where their is a considerable difference between a parallel and a
series configuration. Still, these have an external energy source, so
how does this operate in a vehicle lacking an external energy source?
Serious question. Please answer the question, and not simply link to
a website.
Pretty simple.
In a parallel hydrid the wheels are driven by both the ICE and the
electric motor when full power is needed through some combining
gearbox or whatever.
In a series hybrid the wheels are driven by electric motors only.
When the battery gets low, the ICE turns on to recharge it but has no
physical connection to the wheels.
I hate to say this but I must.
..
Perfect explanation Eeyore.
:)
You're very welcome. It left out all the fiddly details but I always reckon
simple initial answers are the best ones.
Graham
First, you have to recognize the difference between "hunker" and "mosey".
--
Many thanks,
Don Lancaster voice phone: (928)428-4073
Synergetics 3860 West First Street Box 809 Thatcher, AZ 85552
rss: http://www.tinaja.com/whtnu.xml email: don at (no spam) tinaja.com
Please visit my GURU's LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Eeyore... |
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 5:32 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Don Lancaster wrote:
Quote: Eeyore wrote:
Spaceman wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
hhc314 at (no spam) yahoo.com wrote:
Graham, would you explain the difference in configurations between a
"parallel" and a "series" hybrid? You have me confused here, every
though I am familiar with the difference between large UPS systems
where their is a considerable difference between a parallel and a
series configuration. Still, these have an external energy source, so
how does this operate in a vehicle lacking an external energy source?
Serious question. Please answer the question, and not simply link to
a website.
Pretty simple.
In a parallel hydrid the wheels are driven by both the ICE and the
electric motor when full power is needed through some combining
gearbox or whatever.
In a series hybrid the wheels are driven by electric motors only.
When the battery gets low, the ICE turns on to recharge it but has no
physical connection to the wheels.
I hate to say this but I must.
..
Perfect explanation Eeyore.
:)
You're very welcome. It left out all the fiddly details but I always reckon
simple initial answers are the best ones.
Graham
First, you have to recognize the difference between "hunker" and "mosey".
I regret I do not understand those terms.
Graham |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Spaceman... |
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 5:33 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Eeyore wrote:
Quote: Spaceman wrote:
Show the math that proves removing hp from an engine
can produce more energy than what was taken out.
It doesn't.
So a hybrid should not even be worth it then.
Again, you are not an engineer at all and proving it more
with each post now.
:)
Quote: (In short show how a hybrid does what you say can not be done
with a hydrogen creation process.)
That's not what a hybrid does.
Actually it is, you just can't admit it because then you
would have to re-think the hydrogen hybrid thoughts.
:)
--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Eeyore... |
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 5:34 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Spaceman wrote:
Quote: Eeyore wrote:
Spaceman wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Spaceman wrote:
dennis at (no spam) home wrote:
You show me a system that defies the math.
Hybrids already do it.
WRONG !
They take away hp and create hp from
such.
WRONG !
BIZZARELY WRONG.
So electric motors and the batteries that run them don't produce hp also?
You are the bizzarely wrong in that fact.
You like to prove you are not an actual enginneer
as many times a day as possible huh?
It's the regime in which they are operated that creates extra efficiency,
i.e. by being clever in their use. ICEs and electric motors operate at
different relative efficiencies in different modes. of operation.
Graham |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| dennis at (no spam) home... |
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 5:36 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Spaceman" <spaceman at (no spam) yourclockmalfunctioned.duh> wrote in message
news:gpudnSl-veFSOfPVnZ2dnUVZ_t7inZ2d at (no spam) comcast.com...
Quote: dennis at (no spam) home wrote:
"Spaceman" <spaceman at (no spam) yourclockmalfunctioned.duh> wrote in message
news:CYidnUEwYpdyA_PVnZ2dnUVZ_rrinZ2d at (no spam) comcast.com...
dennis at (no spam) home wrote:
Its your limit, show me anything maths and physics can't explain
that you can.
Oh no back to your stupid arguments again.
Show the math that proves removing hp from an engine
can produce more energy than what was taken out.
(In short show how a hybrid does what you say can not be done
with a hydrogen creation process.)
:)
I explained it before now you show the math.
:)
I explained it before, you fail to understand.
You have done no such thing.
You have only insulted upon insult and nothing more yet.
When you design a system that doesn't only use the petrol engine to
provide the motive power and add in the same elements as a hybrid
come back and talk about it.
Don't think you have a hybrid just because you put hydrogen and
petrol in the engine.
PS it still wont work even though a hybrid might.
I suggest you learn what a hybrid is.
LOL
I know plenty about hybrids, I also know
your thoughts on HP loss are proven wrong by hybrids.
Only in your mind.
Not in mine or any other physicist.
You just can't get it.
There is no relationship to how a hybrid works and what you want to do.
If you think there is then it is you that is wrong.
I suggest you learn what a hybrid is. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Eeyore... |
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 5:37 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"dennis at (no spam) home" wrote:
Quote: I suggest you learn what a hybrid is.
He seems to have some mixed up ideas about this.
Graham |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| dennis at (no spam) home... |
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 5:45 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:486EA60C.9C580E5D at (no spam) hotmail.com...
Quote:
"dennis at (no spam) home" wrote:
I suggest you learn what a hybrid is.
He seems to have some mixed up ideas about this.
He hasn't even worked out that they have two or more "engines" in them to
work under different conditions yet.
He may as well say a centurion tank was a hybrid as its engine could run on
petrol, fuel oil or even a coal emulsion. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Don Lancaster... |
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 6:29 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Eeyore wrote:
Quote:
Spaceman wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Spaceman wrote:
dennis at (no spam) home wrote:
That is conservation of energy.
No it isn't its conservation of fuel.
Fuel isn't energy until it's burnt.
You're leaving out the time element. This is critical. Same thing with
energy and power.
I am not leaving out time at all.
The fuel is burned and "more energy than normally produced
by the engine " is taken out to create a hybrid extra mileage.
:)
Which fuel and where's your proof it's more efficient ?
Graham
He may have a point sort, of.
A 5% hydrogn injection into an ICE does in fact improve mileage and
efficiency and pollution, according to credible published papers.
You DO get more performance back for the same total energy input.
But the key gotcha is that any onboard electrolysis method of generating
that hydrogen burns up ridiculously more energy than is delta provided
by the H2 ICE reinjection. And that is BEFORE amortization.
Curiously, there is a "carnot squared" loss associated with running
gasoline through an ICE to generate hydrogen to rerun through the same
ICE. Which in itself is mind boggling.
See http://www.tinaja.com/glib/trashelc.pdf for a detailed analysis.
--
Many thanks,
Don Lancaster voice phone: (928)428-4073
Synergetics 3860 West First Street Box 809 Thatcher, AZ 85552
rss: http://www.tinaja.com/whtnu.xml email: don at (no spam) tinaja.com
Please visit my GURU's LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Spaceman... |
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 6:36 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Eeyore wrote:
Quote: Spaceman wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Spaceman wrote:
dennis at (no spam) home wrote:
That is conservation of energy.
No it isn't its conservation of fuel.
Fuel isn't energy until it's burnt.
You're leaving out the time element. This is critical. Same thing
with energy and power.
I am not leaving out time at all.
The fuel is burned and "more energy than normally produced
by the engine " is taken out to create a hybrid extra mileage.
:)
Which fuel and where's your proof it's more efficient ?
My proof hybrids are more efficient?
Sheesh Eeyore.
you have lost it.
LOL |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Spaceman... |
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 6:48 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Eeyore wrote:
Quote: Spaceman wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Spaceman wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Spaceman wrote:
dennis at (no spam) home wrote:
You show me a system that defies the math.
Hybrids already do it.
WRONG !
They take away hp and create hp from
such.
WRONG !
BIZZARELY WRONG.
So electric motors and the batteries that run them don't produce hp
also? You are the bizzarely wrong in that fact.
You like to prove you are not an actual enginneer
as many times a day as possible huh?
It's the regime in which they are operated that creates extra
efficiency, i.e. by being clever in their use. ICEs and electric
motors operate at different relative efficiencies in different modes.
of operation.
So it is making more hp than was taken out.
You still lose!
HA HA HA HA!
--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Spaceman... |
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 6:52 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
dennis at (no spam) home wrote:
Quote: There is no relationship to how a hybrid works and what you want to
do. If you think there is then it is you that is wrong.
I suggest you learn what a hybrid is.
You simply can't relate things then.
Take out hp and replace hp.
Both the electric hybrid and the hydrogen hybrid are attempting to do
the same thing in defferent ways.
You apparently don't know what relations exist in both.
:)
--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Spaceman... |
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 6:55 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
dennis at (no spam) home wrote:
Quote: "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:486EA60C.9C580E5D at (no spam) hotmail.com...
"dennis at (no spam) home" wrote:
I suggest you learn what a hybrid is.
He seems to have some mixed up ideas about this.
He hasn't even worked out that they have two or more "engines" in
them to work under different conditions yet.
I am using the first hybrid made type.
One single engine with batteries and electric motors added to
the system
You are ignoring that such actually brought about the dual engine
and other types to begin with.
Quote: He may as well say a centurion tank was a hybrid as its engine could
run on petrol, fuel oil or even a coal emulsion.
Nope.
That is not what I talk about as hybrid,
I am talking about an ICE and a sytem that takes power from the
ICE and make it into more power again.
Apparently you don't know what "hybrid" means.
--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |