| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Physics - Research Forum » Calculate the Fermi energy...
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| drk... |
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 1:01 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Quote: From college textbooks, to calculate the Fermi energy, you need to
know the electron density and the (effective) mass.
But what if I only have a bandstructure - the Fermi level is always
set at zero eV in these images.
How do I extract the Fermi energy from a bandstructure with for
example one parabolic band. (Do I have to set the energy of the band
minimum at zero, making the Fermi energy >0? - Or is this too simple?)
And what about having a bandstructure with two parabolic bands with
different band minima.
If the above procedure is correct, then the electrons in the two bands
have different Fermi energies. Is that correct? (Because the band
minima are not at the same energy.)
Thanks! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Igor Khavkine... |
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 10:27 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On May 29, 7:01 pm, drk <driekoff... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
Quote: From college textbooks, to calculate the Fermi energy, you need to
know the electron density and the (effective) mass.
But what if I only have a bandstructure - the Fermi level is always
set at zero eV in these images.
How do I extract the Fermi energy from a bandstructure with for
example one parabolic band. (Do I have to set the energy of the band
minimum at zero, making the Fermi energy >0? - Or is this too simple?)
Just by looking at the structure of the conduction band E(p), with no
extra information, it's impossible to determine the Fermi energy. The
Fermi energy will be roughly equal to the energy needed to add an
extra electron to the material (typically on the order of a few eV).
Equivalently, if you know the Fermi velocity v_F (which can be related
to the drift velocity), you'll get the Fermi energy as
E_F = m v_F^2/2, where m is the true mass of the electron.
The reason that the band structure alone is not sufficient is that the
absolute electron energy E_a and momentum p_a are related by the
following expression
E_a = E_0 + E(p_a - p_0),
where E_0 and p_0 are some constants. E_0 is the absolute energy level
of the bottom of the conduction band and p_0 is typically some
integral multiple of the size of the reciprocal lattice unit cell.
Exercise: explain why.
Your only hope is that for some value of p, the band structure
reproduces the free electron dispersion relation E_a ~ p_a^2/2m. Then
the band electron velocity, v = dE/dp should be close to the free
electron velocity and the absolute energy given by
E_a = m v^2/2 = m (dE/dp)^2/2. However, this cannot happen when p
is close to a minimum or maximum of E(p), where the deviation from
the free electron dispersion relation is greatest.
Quote: And what about having a bandstructure with two parabolic bands with
different band minima.
If the above procedure is correct, then the electrons in the two bands
have different Fermi energies. Is that correct? (Because the band
minima are not at the same energy.)
You can apply here the same reasoning as above, but you need to be
very careful about picking the value of p at which to calculate the
electron velocity. Again, it would be better to have some independent
data from which the Fermi level could be determined independently.
Hope this helps.
Igor |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| William R. Frensley... |
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 6:32 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
drk wrote:
Quote: From college textbooks, to calculate the Fermi energy, you need to
know the electron density and the (effective) mass.
But what if I only have a bandstructure - the Fermi level is always
set at zero eV in these images.
I think you may be misinterpreting some other feature as the Fermi
level. The thing to remember about band structures is that no theory
gives you an absolute energy scale. (Getting such information requires
a theory of the surface, and surface physics demonstrates very clearly
that this value can be changed by surface treatments.)
Quote: How do I extract the Fermi energy from a bandstructure with for
example one parabolic band. (Do I have to set the energy of the band
minimum at zero, making the Fermi energy >0? - Or is this too simple?)
The most general expression for the "Fermi energy" (the term is usually
used by the metal physics community to refer to the solution at T=0,
and usually with an implicit assumption that the energy of the bottom
of the band structure is known) is that E_F which satisfies:
\int_{-\infty}^{E_F} D(E) dE = n,
where n is the electron density and D(E) is the density of states. The
band structure determines the density of states. A somewhat useful
expression for the density of states is
D(E) = 1/(4\pi^3) dV/dE,
where V is the volume of k-space enclosed by a constant energy surface
at the energy E.
The reason for the -\infty lower limit to the integral is that I am
very carefully hiding the question of the energy scale in the D(E),
which will, of course, be zero below the band minimum. For a simple
parabolic band D(E) = \sqrt{2m^3(E-Emin)}/(\pi^2\hbar^3) .
The term "Fermi level" is more often used in semiconductor physics and
is (a) understood to be very sensitive to details of the sample, and
(b) taken at finite temperature. In this context, the general implicit
expression will be:
\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} D(E) f((E-E_F)/kT) dE = n,
where now f is the Fermi-Dirac distribution function. The reason why
the Fermi level in semiconductors is so sensitive is that D(E) becomes
negligible over a finite energy range (the band gap), leading to an
ill-conditioned implicit problem.
But, from another point of view, the Fermi level in a semiconductor
is very well defined if there is an ohmic contact to that sample which
is connected to external circuit node. Then E_F = -q V where q is the
elementary charge and V is the node voltage. The thing that needs to
be calculated is how the band structure has arranged itself with
respect to this known energy! (The failure to appreciate this point
causes no end of confusion for students and instructors in semiconductor
device courses.)
Quote: And what about having a bandstructure with two parabolic bands with
different band minima.
If the above procedure is correct, then the electrons in the two bands
have different Fermi energies. Is that correct? (Because the band
minima are not at the same energy.)
No, there is only one Fermi energy, but two bands make two contributions
to the density of states. The key thing to understand is that one
always has to "solve" for the Fermi energy (or level). Any
"evaluation" of a closed-form expression is an approximation that is
limited to some particular case.
- Bill Frensley |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| drk... |
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 5:07 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Thanks to both of you!
Igor: with true mass you mean 9.1E-31, and not the effective mass in
the material?
Thanks again!
On May 31, 12:32 am, "William R. Frensley" <frens... at (no spam) utdallas.edu>
wrote:
Quote: drk wrote:
From college textbooks, to calculate the Fermi energy, you need to
know the electron density and the (effective) mass.
But what if I only have a bandstructure - the Fermi level is always
set at zero eV in these images.
I think you may be misinterpreting some other feature as the Fermi
level. The thing to remember about band structures is that no theory
gives you an absolute energy scale. (Getting such information requires
a theory of the surface, and surface physics demonstrates very clearly
that this value can be changed by surface treatments.)
How do I extract the Fermi energy from a bandstructure with for
example one parabolic band. (Do I have to set the energy of the band
minimum at zero, making the Fermi energy >0? - Or is this too simple?)
The most general expression for the "Fermi energy" (the term is usually
used by the metal physics community to refer to the solution at T=0,
and usually with an implicit assumption that the energy of the bottom
of the band structure is known) is that E_F which satisfies:
\int_{-\infty}^{E_F} D(E) dE = n,
where n is the electron density and D(E) is the density of states. The
band structure determines the density of states. A somewhat useful
expression for the density of states is
D(E) = 1/(4\pi^3) dV/dE,
where V is the volume of k-space enclosed by a constant energy surface
at the energy E.
The reason for the -\infty lower limit to the integral is that I am
very carefully hiding the question of the energy scale in the D(E),
which will, of course, be zero below the band minimum. For a simple
parabolic band D(E) = \sqrt{2m^3(E-Emin)}/(\pi^2\hbar^3) .
The term "Fermi level" is more often used in semiconductor physics and
is (a) understood to be very sensitive to details of the sample, and
(b) taken at finite temperature. In this context, the general implicit
expression will be:
\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} D(E) f((E-E_F)/kT) dE = n,
where now f is the Fermi-Dirac distribution function. The reason why
the Fermi level in semiconductors is so sensitive is that D(E) becomes
negligible over a finite energy range (the band gap), leading to an
ill-conditioned implicit problem.
But, from another point of view, the Fermi level in a semiconductor
is very well defined if there is an ohmic contact to that sample which
is connected to external circuit node. Then E_F = -q V where q is the
elementary charge and V is the node voltage. The thing that needs to
be calculated is how the band structure has arranged itself with
respect to this known energy! (The failure to appreciate this point
causes no end of confusion for students and instructors in semiconductor
device courses.)
And what about having a bandstructure with two parabolic bands with
different band minima.
If the above procedure is correct, then the electrons in the two bands
have different Fermi energies. Is that correct? (Because the band
minima are not at the same energy.)
No, there is only one Fermi energy, but two bands make two contributions
to the density of states. The key thing to understand is that one
always has to "solve" for the Fermi energy (or level). Any
"evaluation" of a closed-form expression is an approximation that is
limited to some particular case.
- Bill Frensley |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Fri Aug 29, 2008 9:09 pm
|
|