Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Energy - Hydrogen Forum  »  Stanley Meyer's water auto [1980]...
Page 11 of 11    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11
Author Message
Bill Ward...
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 6:50 pm
Guest
On Sat, 31 May 2008 17:30:04 -0500, AZ Nomad wrote:

Quote:
On Sat, 31 May 2008 14:37:51 -0700, Don Lancaster <don at (no spam) tinaja.com> wrote:
AZ Nomad wrote:
On Sat, 31 May 2008 14:08:35 -0400, Spaceman
spaceman at (no spam) yourclockmalfunctioned.duh> wrote:

gdewilde at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c218e5f8-304e-4182-96eb-730f434e30fc at (no spam) x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On May 31, 3:37 am, "Spaceman" <space... at (no spam) yourclockmalfunctioned.duh
wrote:
and that makes me know you speak of bullshit only. You must work for
an oil company.

Hello James,

Yes, you are correct.

Corporate Fascism is totally un-cool.

Hi there!
It is really sad, the group fighting this has the same mentality of
the group of people that were saying stuff like "The Wright Brothers?
They are crazy, don't listen to them" They want to make a heavier than
air machine fly without a balloon? what morons!
It just will not work, it violates laws of phycis. and on and on....

Then shut the fuck up and build some experements. You'll quickly learn
that trading 100HP for 2HP won't keep a car in motion.


The beauty of the scientific method is that it TOTALLY ELIMINATES the
need for utterly pointless experiments.

http://www.tinaja.com/whtnu08.asp

spacedmon is too stupid to read a textbook of any kind. The only way he
could ever get a clue is after he has pissed away a few tens of thousands
of dollars.

However, he's too lazy to do that either. He'd just rather whine about
it.

I think he's just yanking your chain for his own amusement. Nobody could
be that stupid and still remember to breathe.
Eeyore...
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 8:32 pm
Guest
Spaceman wrote:

Quote:
You must be an oil guy.

You must have less than half a 'brain'.

Graham
Eeyore...
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 8:35 pm
Guest
Spaceman wrote:

Quote:
What if I told you I could make a 60 % efficiency rated ICE?.
Smile

You'd be wrong again.

Very large marine diesels can approach or achieve ~ 50% though. Of course, their
operating temperatures are much lower than small ICEs resulting in less wate
heat energy.

Graham
Eeyore...
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 8:35 pm
Guest
Bill Ward wrote:

Quote:
I think he's just yanking your chain for his own amusement. Nobody could
be that stupid and still remember to breathe.

Bush doesn't seem to need a breathing tube.

Graham
Spaceman...
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 8:38 pm
Guest
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4841FCCD.27C8350E at (no spam) hotmail.com...
Quote:


Spaceman wrote:

What if I told you I could make a 60 % efficiency rated ICE?.
:)

You'd be wrong again.

Very large marine diesels can approach or achieve ~ 50% though. Of course,
their
operating temperatures are much lower than small ICEs resulting in less
wate
heat energy.

I can get lower operating temps and 60% minimum
Smile
You can be a fart and think not.
I don't care.
LOL

--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman
El Enrrabadore-mor...
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 9:34 pm
Guest
"Spaceman" <spaceman at (no spam) yourclockmalfunctioned.duh> escreveu na mensagem
news:sL-dnUFHaN9LANzVnZ2dnUVZ_jOdnZ2d at (no spam) comcast.com...

Quote:
History repeats itself in many ways.

Not about conservation on energy.
(Your free energy "invention" doesn't work and in
this thread you're speeding to much on fields where
you obviously have no clue).
gdewilde at (no spam) gmail.com...
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 4:47 pm
Guest
On May 31, 11:36 pm, Don Lancaster <d... at (no spam) tinaja.com> wrote:
Quote:
Electrolysis is TOTALLY current driven.
As GUARANTEED by Faraday's law of electrolysis.

Faraday mesured, he didn't gurantee you anything.

HA! the idea.... priceless....

Mesuring Don.

You know?

Hahahahaha

Wroem wroem....

http://nl.youtube.com/watch?v=2FA9wiMkXwE
YouTube - Waterauto
gdewilde at (no spam) gmail.com...
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 5:46 pm
Guest
On May 22, 8:32 am, Don Lancaster <d... at (no spam) tinaja.com> wrote:
Quote:
Researching the facts on Meyer can be outrageously expensive.

I was quoted $19,000.00 for transcribing the court transcripts off the
original tapes by their county recorder's office.

It is curious that nobody has yet shown enough interest in the Meyer
trial to find out what the Meyer trial was all about. Any transcripts,
of course, would be step 0001-A of any appeal.


His was the first trial with the recording equipment switched off.

On the next one they added powder to his cell with everyone looking?

hahaha?

Quote:
The useful thing about Meyer is that it caused a greater truth to emerge:

Because of the staggering loss of exergy, electrolysis in any way,
shape, or form for bulk hydrogen energy from high value sources (such as
wind, pv, or grid) is GUARANTEED to flat out not happen.

Thus, even trying to convert high value electricity into hydrogen gas
for bulk energy is utterly, laughingly, and totally pointless.


The useful applications are obvious, 95% oxygen with 5% hydrogen
explodes, common gas does not explode as it comes in 66% / 33% ratio.

Just electrolyse it in the normal way then mix it with the normal
fuel. Specially old vehicles can have greatly increased mileage and
super clean exhaust. The new cars have either a computer that helps or
one that screws up the effect. Of course I have nothing more to show
for it then some thousands of youtube videos. Most see improvements.
I'm sure some exaggerate. But then there are still plenty of people
who do not earn a cent sharing their information and claim to share it
because it is worth it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=miwbvsya3Ek&hl=en
 
Page 11 of 11    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11   All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Mon Oct 13, 2008 2:43 am