| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Medicine - Transcription Forum » OT - Gas Tax Holiday...
Page 2 of 3 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 Next
|
| Author |
Message |
| Gisele... |
Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 8:13 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
I heard a professor of economics interviewed on Fresh Air a few weeks
ago, sorry I can't remember his name. He talked about how banks of
deposit like we all use, where we put our savings and checks, are highly
regulated by the government. Investment banks such as Bear Stearns,
however, are regulated less so, and they have been even less regulated
under the Republicans, so that a lot of wild and hairy financial deals
have been made in the past seven years, and the results of that are
being seen today. To blame this on Obama is the laugh of the day.
Gisele
--
Gisele
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gisele's Profile: http://www.scribera.org/forum/member.php?userid=317
View this thread: http://www.scribera.org/forum/showthread.php?t=6681 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Jeannie... |
Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 9:05 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Marsha <mas at (no spam) xeb.net> wrote in news:g00biv$enb$1 at (no spam) news.datemas.de:
Quote: You might want to read that again, Jeannie. I said "helping" to create,
not "sole reason."
sole reason, helping to contribute, whatever you want to call it, I think
it's a long-shot blaming Obama for it. This has been a problem that's been
brewing for YEARS!!! Let's just hope that you aren't unfortunate enough to
lose your job and your medical insurance and have to have your property
foreclosed on and then...gasp....you might be really thankful he encouraged
lenders to give people another chanc. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Jeannie... |
Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 9:07 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Marsha <mas at (no spam) xeb.net> wrote in news:g00d5j$enb$2 at (no spam) news.datemas.de:
Quote: Read again, Anne. No one is laying the blame solely on Obama. I said
he is part of the reason. The Community Reinvestment Act is something
Obama supported and was part of - an act that forced banks to make loans
to people who were poor credit risks, mostly minorities. Of course, the
other part of the problem is stupid people who went way in over their
heads because they had to "keep up with the Joneses" and now want to
blame someone else and want the government to bail them out. Either
way, this mess could all have been prevented with common sense,
something that seems to be sorely lacking these days.
And yet I don't know any of those people who are being foreclosed on,
having cars repossessed, etc. - the people I see it happening to around
here are those who lived within their means all their lives and lost their
jobs and medical insurance. It only takes one small thing like that to
make you a credit risk. You should consider yourself blessed that it
hasn't happened to you instead of placing any of the blame on the "poor
credit risk people" or those who helped them get a second chance. Do you
have any statistics to back up your allegations or is it just your opinion? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Jeannie... |
Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 9:07 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Neal" <nealbrown1 at (no spam) msn.com> wrote in
news:68hsq7F2t7d5jU1 at (no spam) mid.individual.net:
Quote: Let's see now. Obama was born 8/4/61. The Community Reinvestment Act
was enacted in 1977. Obama would have been about 16 at that time.
Now please explain how he is part of the reason.
ROFL!! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Jeannie... |
Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 9:08 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Gisele <Gisele.3959y8 at (no spam) no-mx.forums.yourdomain.com.au> wrote in
news:Gisele.3959y8 at (no spam) no-mx.forums.yourdomain.com.au:
Quote: To blame this on Obama is the laugh of the day.
But very typical of the one doing the blaming, huh? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Anne V.... |
Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 9:11 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
I guess the predatory lending that we've all heard so much about is a fairy
tale, too, right?
Anne
"Marsha" <mas at (no spam) xeb.net> wrote in message news:g00d5j$enb$2 at (no spam) news.datemas.de...
Quote: Read again, Anne. No one is laying the blame solely on Obama. I said he
is part of the reason. The Community Reinvestment Act is something Obama
supported and was part of - an act that forced banks to make loans to
people who were poor credit risks, mostly minorities. Of course, the
other part of the problem is stupid people who went way in over their
heads because they had to "keep up with the Joneses" and now want to blame
someone else and want the government to bail them out. Either way, this
mess could all have been prevented with common sense, something that seems
to be sorely lacking these days.
Marsha/Ohio
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Phyllis Nilsson... |
Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 10:06 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
You're right. Common sense seems to be lacking in some people when it comes
to buying a house. We bought a house we could afford on one paycheck even
though we were both working. When Bror became ill, we still managed, and
before I was a subject of the "let's downsize" mentality, our house was paid
for. Our cars are paid for and we have no debt. We just didn't buy what we
couldn't afford, and we still don't.
However, only one of our children has followed suit. His house is paid for,
his truck is paid for, and he also has no debt (age 51). He recently told
me how wonderful it feels to know debt isn't going to kick him in the teeth.
Our next expenditure is our funerals (grave lots are paid for) and we have
over half enough to prepay them for both of us. If neither of us dies
before next year, we'll be able to prepay them entirely. Thinking ahead is
a prerequisite to staying debt-free.
"Marsha" <mas at (no spam) xeb.net> wrote in message news:g00d5j$enb$2 at (no spam) news.datemas.de...
Quote:
Of course, the > other part of the problem is stupid people who went way
in over their
Quote: heads because they had to "keep up with the Joneses" and now want to blame
someone else and want the government to bail them out. Either way, this
mess could all have been prevented with common sense, something that seems
to be sorely lacking these days.
Marsha/Ohio
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Phyllis Nilsson... |
Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 10:22 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
There are people here who are in foreclosure who are still working and still
have medical insurance. They got 1st mortgages, 2nd mortgages when the
"assessment value" went up, and some even have home equity loans as well.
There was a couple on tv who, on a combined income of $35,000 a year, were
given a 90% mortgage on a house costing $240,000. That doesn't make sense.
Some houses are now worth less than ownders paid for them and instead of
sticking it out and paying their debt, they're letting the houses go back to
the bank. There are a lot of reasons for losing one's house, but if one
buys what one can afford and saves for the future, the money would be there
when the job is gone.
When I was laid off from the hospital I transcribed at home and paid $616 a
month for my health insurance . . . just for me, no husband, no family was
on that policy. Both of us lost our jobs and both of us are terminally ill.
Our medications alone cost nearly $4,000 per year out of our pocket, and
there is nothing there that we can do without; no allergy meds, no
incontinence meds, no ED meds, no Botox, no nothin' except what it takes to
keep us alive.
We aren't special and we know it. If people with good jobs would buy only
what they can afford, there would be a lot fewer forclosures.
"Jeannie" <jwilson421 at (no spam) comcastspamkills.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9A9966B26E467jwilson421comcastnet at (no spam) 216.196.97.136...
This has been a problem that's been brewing for YEARS!!! Let's just hope
that you aren't unfortunate enough to
Quote: lose your job and your medical insurance and have to have your property
foreclosed on and then...gasp....you might be really thankful he
encouraged
lenders to give people another chanc. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Barbara Carlson... |
Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 10:59 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Phyllis, and I'm not saying this to criticize, because what you have done is
the smart thing. We also bought a house we could afford, and we have no
mortgage. However our property taxes have gone from I think it was $1,900
the first year to over $11,000 currently, and our insurance from a little
over $2,000 to $9,000. All the planning and frugality didn't foresee that
much change. We both have enough insurance to cover our burial. Houses can
and will be foreclosed if you don't keep the taxes paid, so being mortgage
free is not always the answer.
Barb C.
"Phyllis Nilsson" <phyllisnilsson at (no spam) buckeye-express.com> wrote in message
news:8eOdnYATv5b79bnVnZ2dnUVZ_t2inZ2d at (no spam) buckeye-express.com...
Quote: You're right. Common sense seems to be lacking in some people when it
comes to buying a house. We bought a house we could afford on one
paycheck even though we were both working. When Bror became ill, we still
managed, and before I was a subject of the "let's downsize" mentality, our
house was paid for. Our cars are paid for and we have no debt. We just
didn't buy what we couldn't afford, and we still don't.
However, only one of our children has followed suit. His house is paid
for, his truck is paid for, and he also has no debt (age 51). He recently
told me how wonderful it feels to know debt isn't going to kick him in the
teeth.
Our next expenditure is our funerals (grave lots are paid for) and we have
over half enough to prepay them for both of us. If neither of us dies
before next year, we'll be able to prepay them entirely. Thinking ahead
is a prerequisite to staying debt-free.
"Marsha" <mas at (no spam) xeb.net> wrote in message
news:g00d5j$enb$2 at (no spam) news.datemas.de...
Of course, the > other part of the problem is stupid people who went way
in over their
heads because they had to "keep up with the Joneses" and now want to
blame someone else and want the government to bail them out. Either way,
this mess could all have been prevented with common sense, something that
seems to be sorely lacking these days.
Marsha/Ohio
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Anne V.... |
Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 11:12 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
You're exactly right, Barb. Not only that, not everyone was fortunate
enough to be able to have their mortgages paid off before the "downsizing
mentality" kicked into gear. What then?
I, too, commend Phyllis on her financial prudence. I agree that there's an
awful lot of irresponsibility out there these days, but there are also a lot
of people out there who have made what they expected to be genuinely smart
financial moves and then had the bottom drop out from under them. They must
cringe every time someone goes on about people slacking on their
responsibilities!
Personally, I've decided that the American dream of being a homeowner is
highly overrated, for me at least. I'm content with renting and having a
landlord to call when the plumbing leaks! <G>
Anne
"Barbara Carlson" <bbcarlson at (no spam) snappydsl.net> wrote in message
news:f7ednfU13cSf67nVnZ2dnUVZ_jqdnZ2d at (no spam) tampabaydsl.com...
Quote: Phyllis, and I'm not saying this to criticize, because what you have done
is the smart thing. We also bought a house we could afford, and we have
no mortgage. However our property taxes have gone from I think it was
$1,900 the first year to over $11,000 currently, and our insurance from a
little over $2,000 to $9,000. All the planning and frugality didn't
foresee that much change. We both have enough insurance to cover our
burial. Houses can and will be foreclosed if you don't keep the taxes
paid, so being mortgage free is not always the answer.
Barb C.
"Phyllis Nilsson" <phyllisnilsson at (no spam) buckeye-express.com> wrote in message
news:8eOdnYATv5b79bnVnZ2dnUVZ_t2inZ2d at (no spam) buckeye-express.com...
You're right. Common sense seems to be lacking in some people when it
comes to buying a house. We bought a house we could afford on one
paycheck even though we were both working. When Bror became ill, we
still managed, and before I was a subject of the "let's downsize"
mentality, our house was paid for. Our cars are paid for and we have no
debt. We just didn't buy what we couldn't afford, and we still don't.
However, only one of our children has followed suit. His house is paid
for, his truck is paid for, and he also has no debt (age 51). He
recently told me how wonderful it feels to know debt isn't going to kick
him in the teeth.
Our next expenditure is our funerals (grave lots are paid for) and we
have over half enough to prepay them for both of us. If neither of us
dies before next year, we'll be able to prepay them entirely. Thinking
ahead is a prerequisite to staying debt-free.
"Marsha" <mas at (no spam) xeb.net> wrote in message
news:g00d5j$enb$2 at (no spam) news.datemas.de...
Of course, the > other part of the problem is stupid people who went way
in over their
heads because they had to "keep up with the Joneses" and now want to
blame someone else and want the government to bail them out. Either
way, this mess could all have been prevented with common sense,
something that seems to be sorely lacking these days.
Marsha/Ohio
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Phyllis Nilsson... |
Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 11:52 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
You're absolutely right. No one can prepare for the eventuality of a city,
town, or village taxing people to the brink of foreclosure. It doesn't help
that the housing market is what it is at the moment either, making the
selling of land and/or house extremely difficult. It is a terrible
situation and a shame that something cannot be done to the "powers that be"
to make them justify every single increase they've made over the last 20
years. Taxes are supposed to represent fair market value, not how much it
takes to allow those in authority to continue making bad fiscal decisions
with taxpayer money. I sincerely hope they cut the value substantially. I
hate to see anyone lose the home they planned to live in forever.
"Barbara Carlson" <bbcarlson at (no spam) snappydsl.net> wrote in message
news:f7ednfU13cSf67nVnZ2dnUVZ_jqdnZ2d at (no spam) tampabaydsl.com...
Quote: Phyllis, and I'm not saying this to criticize, because what you have done
is the smart thing. We also bought a house we could afford, and we have
no mortgage. However our property taxes have gone from I think it was
$1,900 the first year to over $11,000 currently, and our insurance from a
little over $2,000 to $9,000. All the planning and frugality didn't
foresee that much change. We both have enough insurance to cover our
burial. Houses can and will be foreclosed if you don't keep the taxes
paid, so being mortgage free is not always the answer. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Judity... |
Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 2:17 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
((Easy! The ring! <gdarfc>))
Let's see, Kathy, if I can translate gdarfc: Groaning dramatically and
regurgitating frozen cucumbers.
Am I close?
Judity |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Kathycarp... |
Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 7:01 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Easy! The ring! <gdarfc>
--
Kathy
www.ambergriscaye.com/villadelsol
"Judity" <Judity01 at (no spam) aol.com> wrote in message
news:7ae04354-dd29-406c-80d2-413a3856c1f3 at (no spam) j33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
Quote: ((We just didn't buy what we
couldn't afford, and we still don't. ))
Phyllis, I've lived that way all during my working career, and it was
difficult at times. That habit has stayed with me into my retirement
years where my income is very much less. The only thing I splurge now
on is cat food since they deserve the best I can give them.
I still remember lusting over a gorgeous ring with a lavender jade
center stone surrounded by diamond and amethyst gems. I saw this in a
jewelry store window display almost 20 years ago. The first time I
saw it, the sun was shining on the ring, making the entire ring glow.
Every day after that, once I saw the price tag of $2,000, I'd go by
the jewelry store and just stand by the window dreaming of owning that
ring.
Let's see! Ring---cats, pretty ring---purring cats. Which gives me
more enjoyment?
Judity |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Jeannie... |
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 8:02 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Phyllis Nilsson" <phyllisnilsson at (no spam) buckeye-express.com> wrote in
news:7a2dnTfvIqnb8bnVnZ2dnUVZ_rjinZ2d at (no spam) buckeye-express.com:
Quote: There are a lot of reasons for losing one's house, but if one
buys what one can afford and saves for the future, the money would be
there when the job is gone.
Again...you are being very judgemental. How do you know that these people
in foreclosure didn't buy what they could afford and save for the future?
The future could be now for them, Phyllis. Like I said, karma sucks and
let's just hope that it doesn't come back around to bite those who are so
critical of others, assuming that they have have done better than the rest. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Jeannie... |
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 8:04 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Phyllis Nilsson" <phyllisnilsson at (no spam) buckeye-express.com> wrote in
news:8eOdnYATv5b79bnVnZ2dnUVZ_t2inZ2d at (no spam) buckeye-express.com:
Quote: You're right. Common sense seems to be lacking in some people when it
comes to buying a house. We bought a house we could afford on one
paycheck even though we were both working. When Bror became ill, we
still managed, and before I was a subject of the "let's downsize"
mentality, our house was paid for. Our cars are paid for and we have
no debt. We just didn't buy what we couldn't afford, and we still
don't.
and there are MANY people here who have property that is PAID FOR and they
are losing it but not becuase they are irresponsible or didn't live within
their means. They saved for their future and now their property taxes cost
more than they can afford. These people planned for their future and
worked damned hard to be debt free yet they still are losing their property
because they cannot afford the property taxes. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Page 2 of 3 Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 Next
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Mon Oct 13, 2008 5:36 pm
|
|