|
Science Forum Index » Math - Symbolic Forum » Riccati, The Key Formula To The Universe...
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| ... |
 Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 8:22 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Dear Newsgroup:
http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?threadID=1739373&tstart=0
It is difficult to imagine that a simple formula like Riccati
differential equation (RDE):
dx/dt+x^2=g(t)
will represent the sole mathematical formula of the universe.
Yes, all majestic edifice of mathematics can indeed be reduced to a
RDE (or many of them).
Sounds like impossible to visualize.
But this is result of my 25 years extensive research experiences,
after Cambridge graduation.
That is more than 5 times of time required from B.Sc. to Ph.D. degrees
(5 years average), bearing in mind my intuition in the subject is
about 10 times more than those of academics in top schools.
They are conventional researchers within mainstream research, some
practicing obsolete mathematical sciences.
Let us look at the Math-chart again (as enclosed).
1-I have declared that polynomials are included in RDE.
Not only we systematically extract solving polynomials to Riccati, but
also general polynomial can be included in a RDE, with the residue
having solutions according to ODE or PDE existence theorems for
systems of differential equations.
Indeed many developments and applications demonstrate that.
2- linear differential equations of higher order of variable
coefficients (LDE).
In fact once we have a general polynomial, a LDE can be constructed
based on it.
Also we can see on my classical solving equations, I imbed a RDE
within a LDE and then manipulate the result to solve
The Riccati.
One can say there is a kind of inverse relations happening here.
3- Non-linear differential equations are similarly imbedded within a
higher order LDE, or systems.
The solving will apply to systems of algebraic equations as well.
4-Integrals are special part of a RDE anyway. But manipulating whole
system around RDE will as well solve many integrals particularly
Elliptic.
5-Numerical applications are direct applications of results obtained
with many solved parametric algebraic equations or differential
equations, as well as difference equations.
All I see the Math-Chart is correct and you need to have 5 years of
international research to experience personally this new world of math
computations.
I will renew the offer after each five years!
Well, all this means that, once you start your research here, there is
no way out of RDE.
About other algebraic branches in mathematics, eventually they will be
out of business or have a very small influence on the subject.
Dr.M.Basti
PS: It seems Google will not transfer files with attachments, from
Math Forum sites. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Vladimir Bondarenko... |
| Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 8:32 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
It is difficult to imagine that a simple formula like Riccati
differential equation 2 (RDE2):
dx/dt+x^3=g(t)
will represent the sole mathematical formula of the universe.
Yes, all majestic edifice of mathematics can indeed be reduced to a
RDE2 (or many of them). |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Vladimir Bondarenko... |
| Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 8:32 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
It is difficult to imagine that a simple formula like Riccati
differential equation 3 (RDE3):
dx/dt+x^4=g(t)
will represent the sole mathematical formula of the universe.
Yes, all majestic edifice of mathematics can indeed be reduced to a
RDE3 (or many of them). |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Vladimir Bondarenko... |
| Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 8:33 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
It is difficult to imagine that a simple formula like Riccati
differential equation 4 (RDE4):
dx/dt+x^5=g(t)
will represent the sole mathematical formula of the universe.
Yes, all majestic edifice of mathematics can indeed be reduced to a
RDE4 (or many of them). |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Jim... |
| Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 8:56 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Wed, 07 May 2008 11:22:14 -0700, Basti05b:
Quote: But this is result of my 25 years extensive research experiences, after
Cambridge graduation.
That is more than 5 times of time required from B.Sc. to Ph.D. degrees
(5 years average), bearing in mind my intuition in the subject is about
10 times more than those of academics in top schools.
Since I'm travelling a lot for many, many kilometers we should all agree
I'm a better driver than Michael Schumacker and Valentino Rossi put
together. Cool. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| ... |
| Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 9:08 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Dear Newsgroup:
They need to carefully look at my Math-Chart.
You will notice that Linear and Non-Linear differential equations of
any order (variable) are included in Riccati.
The argument is based on existence theorems on ODE and PDE
Confirming the situation.
Indeed, based on these understanding new developments will be
initiated; in fact the new math is based on it.
By the way differential equations of the type:
dx/dt=sum (Ai(t)*x^i,i=0..n)
are all the first order representative of a general polynomial, which
is included in Riccati. For example a polynomial of degree 6 has also
a ODE of this form:
dx/dt = A5(t)*x^5+A4(t)*x^4+A3(t)*x^3+A2(t)*x^2+A1(t)*x+A0(t).
Indeed once a polynomial solved in Riccati as their source then we can
easily handle above types of non-linear polynomials.
I have also many classes of solved first order differential equations
of above types in my collection.
Dr.M.Basti |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Mehran Basti... |
| Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 9:44 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Dear Newsgroup:
I have to mention that other forms of ODE (not Riccati), will not be suitable for developments.
What I mean, one may find a trick to solve a special type, but the right one i.e. Riccati, will present a class type developments along with a class type applications.
Indeed within a powerful mathematical chemistry of Riccati, we will approach new understanding of the universe.
The Riccati solving will provide a basis for structuring other unsolved problems, with some kind of transformations TO REACH THEM. And with a focus in solving problems.
We need to recursively solve problems , one by one (although as a class).
Obviously the theory is totally in its infancy.
Dr.M.Basti |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Vladimir Bondarenko... |
| Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 7:53 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| ... |
| Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 9:43 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Vladimir Bondarenko wrote:
Quote: http://groups.google.com/group/sci.math.symbolic/browse_thread/thread/546ab560347dafb7?hl=en#
I am glad that all of them on the list want to ignore me.
I hope you; your gang and all in that list will go away from my
postings.
But there is again possibility, under circumstances, like before; you
may get orders to write on their behalf (since they may become nervous
and experience deep anger).
Keep out. Keep out.
Dr.M.Basti |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Vladimir Bondarenko... |
| Posted: Thu May 08, 2008 4:37 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| ... |
| Posted: Thu May 08, 2008 10:39 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Dear Newsgroup:
I have to clarify that most of my arguments are based of existence
theorems of ODE and PDE for systems of ODE ,PDE and algebraic
equations.
Once the method is applied, they all confirm that they are indeed
linked with the Riccati.
Then only massive systematic practical and concrete applications prove
the claim.
Indeed, this is the only way; we can really get to know the complexity
of the universe.
The other equations (as a base) will simply not working.
Dr.M.Basti |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Vladimir Bondarenko... |
| Posted: Thu May 08, 2008 11:12 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
