Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Science Forum Index  »  Geology - Earthquakes Forum  »  12:18...
Page 6 of 6    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Author Message
Weatherlawyer...
Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 10:55 pm
Guest
On 14 May, 21:28, Weatherlawyer <Weatherlaw... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:
Quote:

Prezzie for you:

There is an high leaving the United States at the moment over the
Carolinas/Florida:

http://weather.unisys.com/images/sat_sfc_map_loop.html

This will produce a 6.5 I think at the Andrianof Islands chain
somewhere on this arc:

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/recenteqsww/Maps/10/180_50.php

6 to 6.5 M. probably. And it will occur at something like 90 degrees
from where it hits the steep slope I believe. I don't know if Rat
Island is more likely in that case but it's going to be in that area.

Ah well, back to the drawing board with that one.
Dawlish...
Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 11:05 pm
Guest
On May 17, 9:55 am, Weatherlawyer <Weatherlaw... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
On 14 May, 21:28, Weatherlawyer <Weatherlaw... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:







Prezzie for you:

There is an high leaving the United States at the moment over the
Carolinas/Florida:

http://weather.unisys.com/images/sat_sfc_map_loop.html

This will produce a 6.5 I think at the Andrianof Islands chain
somewhere on this arc:

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/recenteqsww/Maps/10/180_50.php

6 to 6.5 M. probably. And it will occur at something like 90 degrees
from where it hits the steep slope I believe. I don't know if Rat
Island is more likely in that case but it's going to be in that area.

Ah well, back to the drawing board with that one.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Are you giving up with this one? So soon?
Weatherlawyer...
Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 10:58 pm
Guest
On May 15, 10:24 am, Weatherlawyer <Weatherlaw... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:
Quote:

There is a sort of universality of design in the material universe.
Like with an atom you get the little bits floating around the big bit
and the whole is infinitesimal compared to the nothingnesses
connecting them. And that pales into its own oblivion when compared to
the absolute nothingnesses between atoms.

Well imagine the "bits that float around the big bits" are the two
highs straddling the USA at the moment. And the "bigger bits" are the
planet, as in this example North America.

Logically you might suspect that the reaction to these things is a
mirror effect in the largest bits. And ths may be seismic in nature?
Why not.

There is certainly that coincident I pointed out elsewhere about the
lapse rate in the appearance of mag 5 and greater quakes being related
to strong winds.

There seems to be something going on along those lines at the moment
with Halong.

I don't claim to know how or why, yet. Perhaps Dawlish with his huge
brain, can oblige us with something useful at long last?

Or am I mistaking oral cavitation for cranial capacity?
Dawlish...
Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 11:19 pm
Guest
On May 18, 9:58 am, Weatherlawyer <Weatherlaw... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
On May 15, 10:24 am, Weatherlawyer <Weatherlaw... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:



There is a sort of universality of design in the material universe.
Like with an atom you get the little bits floating around the big bit
and the whole is infinitesimal compared to the nothingnesses
connecting them. And that pales into its own oblivion when compared to
the absolute nothingnesses between atoms.

Well imagine the "bits that float around the big bits" are the two
highs straddling the USA at the moment. And the "bigger bits" are the
planet, as in this example North America.

Logically you might suspect that the reaction to these things is a
mirror effect in the largest bits. And ths may be seismic in nature?
Why not.

There is certainly that coincident I pointed out elsewhere about the
lapse rate in the appearance of mag 5 and greater quakes being related
to strong winds.

There seems to be something going on along those lines at the moment
with Halong.

I don't claim to know how or why, yet. Perhaps Dawlish with his huge
brain, can oblige us with something useful at long last?

Or am I mistaking oral cavitation for cranial capacity?

If you've given up, that's 0/4 since April 24th. 0%. Not looking good.
Prove to me this works and I'll take an interest, as many others
would.
Weatherlawyer...
Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 12:31 am
Guest
On May 18, 10:19 am, Dawlish <pjg... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:
Quote:

If you've given up, that's 0/4 since April 24th. 0%. Not looking good.
Prove to me this works and I'll take an interest, as many others
would.

No thanks. The alternative is a much better offer. Or are you so dense
you can't tell I am taking the piss?
...
Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 1:41 am
Guest
On 18 May, 11:31, Weatherlawyer <Weatherlaw... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
On May 18, 10:19 am, Dawlish <pjg... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:



If you've given up, that's 0/4 since April 24th. 0%. Not looking good.
Prove to me this works and I'll take an interest, as many others
would.

No thanks. The alternative is a much better offer. Or are you so dense
you can't tell I am taking the piss?

Nice try, but if you really are taking the piss then why do you get so
upset when people take the piss out of you?

Surely, you are not going to add hypocrite to your personal image?
Dawlish...
Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 4:44 am
Guest
On May 18, 12:41 pm, crazyh0r... at (no spam) hotmail.com wrote:
Quote:
On 18 May, 11:31, Weatherlawyer <Weatherlaw... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:

On May 18, 10:19 am, Dawlish <pjg... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:

If you've given up, that's 0/4 since April 24th. 0%. Not looking good.
Prove to me this works and I'll take an interest, as many others
would.

No thanks. The alternative is a much better offer. Or are you so dense
you can't tell I am taking the piss?

Nice try, but if you really are taking the piss then why do you get so
upset when people take the piss out of you?

Surely, you are not going to add hypocrite to your personal image?

I've just noticed the re-titling of this thread! I'm flattered. TY. It
looks so much better than 12.18! Now I know you are worried that your
theories may be exposed by this monitoring.

*>))
Dawlish...
Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 12:42 pm
Guest
On May 5, 11:06 pm, Weatherlawyer <Weatherlaw... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
On May 5, 10:00 pm, Weatherlawyer <Weatherlaw... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:





5th to 12th May 12:18

This spell is the only one I have covered that is near it and it has a
certain resonance:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.geo.earthquakes/browse_frm/thread/....

Spells at twelve and 6 o'clock tend to produce low overcast even misty
weather in Britain. Of course with a Cat 4 running elsewhere things
are going to be different for a while,  perhaps we could knock 3 hours
off it?

09:18. Something unstable and given to thunder. And in the USA more
tornadic stuff. Looks like a continuum from the folowing, all the more
so ifthe storm moderates and we have a spell more akin to 10:18 or
whatever:

When a flaccid set up pertains in the North Atlantic and the Lows
don't behave the way that they are supposed to, expect:

"The population of Chaiten in Chile has been evacuated after a volcano
began to erupt, covering the town in ash.

The volcano spewed ash and caused tremors in the region on Friday,
forcing water supplies to be cut off, the authorities said.

By Sunday the town, about 1,300km from Santiago, the capital, was
covered in ash.

It is the volcano's first eruption in at least 2,000 years, according
to Sernageomin, a government mining and geology agency, and caused the
Patagonian town of nearly 4,500 people to be emptied.

Many evacuees travelled by boat to Chiloe Island to the north and
Puerto Montt on the mainland."

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/F7930EFB-6587-476A-BFB8-2765B0....

An interesting Low in the North Atlantic this. It wouldn't surprise me
if it continued all through the next spell too.

This morning a Cat 4 tropical storm appeared over Japan. No warnings
from any agency I saw.

Anyway the sun's coming out again after some drizzle yesterday. That
Low after being stationary over the other side of the Mid Atlantic
Ridge for a week moved quickly at the end of the last spell to Britain
and with this spell has returned to the west it is now 35 degrees west
and apparently filling.

Which could mean another eruption and then it will probably move
quickly west again. Wednesday looks favourite:http://www.westwind.ch/?link=ukmb,http://www2.wetter3.de/Fax/,.gif,br...

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.talk.weather/browse_frm/thread/67a...

Though why it should moderate in 60 minute intervals is beyond me. Not
that I am stating it as an axiom. Just a rule of thumb until brighter
light is shone on the subject.

12, 9, 6 and 3 o'clock spells bode well for North Atlantic hurricanes
too. I forgot to mention that but then it is already written in the
annals of the great Weatherlawyer and further discourse is mere
repetition to my fans and other followers.

Here is an extract that might be worth watching for:

7       Mar     17:14   This and the one following are the same spell except by
half an our. Quarter each side of the hour. Unstable and tending
toward anticyclonic
14      Mar     10:46   5 and 11 of the clock. And all's well unless there is a
super-cyclone. Who can say?

21      Mar     18:40   Another unstable spell and this one tending to wet.
(Seven o'clock.)

29      Mar     21:47   10 o'clock. An awkward bugger.
6       Apr     03:55   4 o'clock and the same as the previous one. (Whatever that
might be.)

12      Apr     18:32    Troughs and cols maybe ridges. Another unstable spell.

20      Apr     10:25   And a repeat to within 40 minutes of the spell for the
29th March. How close that is I can not say.

28      Apr     14*:12  This one is similar to the spell we have now at the
beginning of March.

5       May     12:18   And this, not unlike the one for the 12th April. And here
we are already.

12      May     03:47   This is one similar to the spell for 6th April.

20      May     02*:11  This one too is similar to the spell we have now at the
beginning of March.
28      May     02*:57  And this one more likely a thundery spell, though not
that dissimilar to the preceding.

And now we begin the Atlantic hurricane season.

3       Jun     19:23   This should install one. Quite a corker of a spell for it
too.

10      Jun     15:04   Whilst this is an anticyclonic as is the following one.
18      Jun     17:30   So no hurricanes here unless...

26      Jun     12:10   Hurricane maybe. Not too bad a one though.
3       Jul     02*:19  Maybe this one too. Except for that proclivity for
Anticyclones on the US east coast.
10      Jul     04:35

18      Jul     07:59   I think this will be an hurricane spell but perhaps not
for the North Atlantic.
25      Jul     18:42   This one is though.

1       Aug     10:13   This one is one for the North pacific I imagine.
8       Aug     20*:20  I should be able to tell by this date just exactly what
to expect from these. So that will be something.

16      Aug     21:16   Thundery if a little too unstable for most tastes.

23      Aug     23:50   As for the 26th June.

30      Aug     19:58   And here is an 8 o'clock one. This should have had an
asterisk.
7       Sept    14*:04  After all this one did!

15      Sept    09:13   More sound of the fury signifying nothing?

22      Sept    05:04   And a summer break. Cold and sunny? In September?

29      Sept    08*:12  There are a ot of these about this year, are there not?

7       Oct     09:04   And more than a smattering of thunder spells too.

14      Oct     20*:03  Is this the last one of the season?
21      Oct     11:55 and       28th Oct        23:14   Or these two.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

OK, I'll save that set of forecasts and return to it when needed. Good
luck.
Dawlish...
Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 12:57 pm
Guest
On May 5, 11:06 pm, Weatherlawyer <Weatherlaw... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
On May 5, 10:00 pm, Weatherlawyer <Weatherlaw... at (no spam) hotmail.com> wrote:





5th to 12th May 12:18

This spell is the only one I have covered that is near it and it has a
certain resonance:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.geo.earthquakes/browse_frm/thread/....

Spells at twelve and 6 o'clock tend to produce low overcast even misty
weather in Britain. Of course with a Cat 4 running elsewhere things
are going to be different for a while,  perhaps we could knock 3 hours
off it?

09:18. Something unstable and given to thunder. And in the USA more
tornadic stuff. Looks like a continuum from the folowing, all the more
so ifthe storm moderates and we have a spell more akin to 10:18 or
whatever:

When a flaccid set up pertains in the North Atlantic and the Lows
don't behave the way that they are supposed to, expect:

"The population of Chaiten in Chile has been evacuated after a volcano
began to erupt, covering the town in ash.

The volcano spewed ash and caused tremors in the region on Friday,
forcing water supplies to be cut off, the authorities said.

By Sunday the town, about 1,300km from Santiago, the capital, was
covered in ash.

It is the volcano's first eruption in at least 2,000 years, according
to Sernageomin, a government mining and geology agency, and caused the
Patagonian town of nearly 4,500 people to be emptied.

Many evacuees travelled by boat to Chiloe Island to the north and
Puerto Montt on the mainland."

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/F7930EFB-6587-476A-BFB8-2765B0....

An interesting Low in the North Atlantic this. It wouldn't surprise me
if it continued all through the next spell too.

This morning a Cat 4 tropical storm appeared over Japan. No warnings
from any agency I saw.

Anyway the sun's coming out again after some drizzle yesterday. That
Low after being stationary over the other side of the Mid Atlantic
Ridge for a week moved quickly at the end of the last spell to Britain
and with this spell has returned to the west it is now 35 degrees west
and apparently filling.

Which could mean another eruption and then it will probably move
quickly west again. Wednesday looks favourite:http://www.westwind.ch/?link=ukmb,http://www2.wetter3.de/Fax/,.gif,br...

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.talk.weather/browse_frm/thread/67a...

Though why it should moderate in 60 minute intervals is beyond me. Not
that I am stating it as an axiom. Just a rule of thumb until brighter
light is shone on the subject.

12, 9, 6 and 3 o'clock spells bode well for North Atlantic hurricanes
too. I forgot to mention that but then it is already written in the
annals of the great Weatherlawyer and further discourse is mere
repetition to my fans and other followers.

Here is an extract that might be worth watching for:

7       Mar     17:14   This and the one following are the same spell except by
half an our. Quarter each side of the hour. Unstable and tending
toward anticyclonic
14      Mar     10:46   5 and 11 of the clock. And all's well unless there is a
super-cyclone. Who can say?

21      Mar     18:40   Another unstable spell and this one tending to wet.
(Seven o'clock.)

29      Mar     21:47   10 o'clock. An awkward bugger.
6       Apr     03:55   4 o'clock and the same as the previous one. (Whatever that
might be.)

12      Apr     18:32    Troughs and cols maybe ridges. Another unstable spell.

20      Apr     10:25   And a repeat to within 40 minutes of the spell for the
29th March. How close that is I can not say.

28      Apr     14*:12  This one is similar to the spell we have now at the
beginning of March.

5       May     12:18   And this, not unlike the one for the 12th April. And here
we are already.

12      May     03:47   This is one similar to the spell for 6th April.

20      May     02*:11  This one too is similar to the spell we have now at the
beginning of March.
28      May     02*:57  And this one more likely a thundery spell, though not
that dissimilar to the preceding.

And now we begin the Atlantic hurricane season.

3       Jun     19:23   This should install one. Quite a corker of a spell for it
too.

10      Jun     15:04   Whilst this is an anticyclonic as is the following one.
18      Jun     17:30   So no hurricanes here unless...

26      Jun     12:10   Hurricane maybe. Not too bad a one though.
3       Jul     02*:19  Maybe this one too. Except for that proclivity for
Anticyclones on the US east coast.
10      Jul     04:35

18      Jul     07:59   I think this will be an hurricane spell but perhaps not
for the North Atlantic.
25      Jul     18:42   This one is though.

1       Aug     10:13   This one is one for the North pacific I imagine.
8       Aug     20*:20  I should be able to tell by this date just exactly what
to expect from these. So that will be something.

16      Aug     21:16   Thundery if a little too unstable for most tastes.

23      Aug     23:50   As for the 26th June.

30      Aug     19:58   And here is an 8 o'clock one. This should have had an
asterisk.
7       Sept    14*:04  After all this one did!

15      Sept    09:13   More sound of the fury signifying nothing?

22      Sept    05:04   And a summer break. Cold and sunny? In September?

29      Sept    08*:12  There are a ot of these about this year, are there not?

7       Oct     09:04   And more than a smattering of thunder spells too.

14      Oct     20*:03  Is this the last one of the season?
21      Oct     11:55 and       28th Oct        23:14   Or these two.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Theonly elements of sense from this are:

Quote:
3 Jun 19:23 This should install one. Quite a corker of a spell for it
too. so, The atlantic hurricane season will start on 3rd June, with "a corker", which I take to be a strong hurricane. Well, the Hurricane season begins on June 1st, so I suppose that isn't a bad guess. Mind you, the first hurricane in the Atlantic, last year, was on May 9th. None this year so far.

18 Jun 17:30 So no hurricanes here unless... Unless what? Unless there isn't one?

26 Jun 12:10 Hurricane maybe. Not too bad a one though. Maybe a hurricane and not too bad a one? So if there isn't one, you'll be OK, yah?

18 Jul 07:59 I think this will be an hurricane spell but perhaps not
for the North Atlantic. So, anywhere else in the world? but it is only a "perhaps".

1 Aug 10:13 This one is one for the North pacific I imagine. OK a prediction, I think!


Quote:
16 Aug 21:16 Thundery if a little too unstable for most tastes. There's a prediction.

22 Sept 05:04 And a summer break. Cold and sunny? In September? Another UK (I think) weather prediction.

The rest of it is unintelligable. I think these are predictions, If
they are not, pray tell, W.
 
Page 6 of 6    Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6   All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Thu Dec 04, 2008 10:22 pm