| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Medicine - Transcription Forum » OT: Eight Belles' death...
Page 1 of 3 Goto page 1, 2, 3 Next
|
| Author |
Message |
| Marsha... |
Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 9:28 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
This absolutely disgusts me:
http://tinyurl.com/64adc3
Especially this part:
"Dutrow was still basking in Big Brown’s victory, well aware that an
injury can strike at any time.
“No matter what happens, you’re always going to see horses break down on
the track,” he said. “That is part of this game. It’s a very sad part of
the game, but you have to go through it."
No, we don't "have to go through it." It's part of the game that humans
invented to put these animals through, and betting, etc. only fuels the
flames. Shame on anyone who supports this bullshit. Horse racing, dog
racing, whatever. These people should be shot on site, or at least they
should be made to go through what the horses or dogs have to go through.
I am so upset right now.
Marsha/Ohio |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Jeannie... |
Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 9:39 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Marsha <mas at (no spam) xeb.net> wrote in news:fvlrbm$d6r$1 at (no spam) news.datemas.de:
Quote: No, we don't "have to go through it." It's part of the game that humans
invented to put these animals through, and betting, etc. only fuels the
flames. Shame on anyone who supports this bullshit. Horse racing, dog
racing, whatever. These people should be shot on site, or at least they
should be made to go through what the horses or dogs have to go through.
I am so upset right now.
If you ask me, it's no different than boxing, extreme cage fighting,
greyhound racing, etc. I do, however, think it is extreme to say that
those people should be shot on site or go through what horses or dogs have
to go through. Yes, it is tragic what happened. Yes, I am a horse lover
beyond comparison. No, I don't believe people who participate or support
it should be shot on site.
Other than that....Did you happen to see the Derby? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Marsha... |
Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 9:52 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Jeannie wrote:
Quote: Marsha <mas at (no spam) xeb.net> wrote in news:fvlrbm$d6r$1 at (no spam) news.datemas.de:
No, we don't "have to go through it." It's part of the game that humans
invented to put these animals through, and betting, etc. only fuels the
flames. Shame on anyone who supports this bullshit. Horse racing, dog
racing, whatever. These people should be shot on site, or at least they
should be made to go through what the horses or dogs have to go through.
I am so upset right now.
If you ask me, it's no different than boxing, extreme cage fighting,
greyhound racing, etc. I do, however, think it is extreme to say that
those people should be shot on site or go through what horses or dogs have
to go through. Yes, it is tragic what happened. Yes, I am a horse lover
beyond comparison. No, I don't believe people who participate or support
it should be shot on site.
Other than that....Did you happen to see the Derby?
Apples to oranges. Boxing and cage fighting are voluntary by both
participants. If two people want to beat each other to death, fine by
me. Horses and dogs for racing are used as pawns by humans for sport
and money. Eight Belles had no idea she was going to break both her
front legs and be put to death, after she was whipped by her jockey to
go faster. If you can't see the difference, I can't help you.
BTW, I never watch horse racing. I don't enjoy seeing animals beat for
human enrichment.
Marsha/Ohio |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Barbara Carlson... |
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 11:34 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Well, I guess this is going to upset a lot of people and you can flame me if
you like.
Olympic athletes go through this, so people are subject to some of the same
rules. Football players go through this. Boxing, wrestling--my gosh what
horrible sports.
There is a lot of cruelty in the racing world, but the truly great ones like
Eight Belles are born and bred to race. The good ones are treated, and
downright pampered, about as well as anyone could be treated. I have owned
a couple of thoroughbreds bought off the track. I won a prize on the Vermont
100-mile trail ride with one of them. They want to run. They want to race.
Eight Belles was second by several lengths in the Derby. She will go down
in history for that accomplishment. Do you think her owners wanted the
accident to happen?
I used to think it was cruel to use sled dogs and that races like the
Iditarod were cruel--until I met a couple of breeders and some of their
dogs, and actually got to do some dog sledding in Alaska. Those dogs LOVE
what they do. The ones left behind are heartbroken. They are clearly
saying, "Take me, take me."
Yes, there is cruelty in horse and dog racing and I abhor it. But there is
cruelty in life. I have seen pieces on TV about the injuries in gymnastics,
what it does for those who are pushed into ballet at a tender age.
I think racing of two-year-olds should be stopped. But I hope Big Brown
finally brings home a Triple Crown, and I will watch it all. I cried when
Eight Belles went down on the track--while pulling up. She didn't want to
stop racing. A filly, second in the Derby. At least her owners did not put
her through what Barbaro went through, only to lose the battle. I saw one
of the Olympic horses break a leg right in front of me at a horse show and
stagger over the finish line in stadium jumping, to WIN. Was the win worth
it? Of course not. If the owners had known what would happen they never
would have let him go into the jump off.
Competition is bred into both man and beast. Whether it is an Olympic Gold
Medal, or the Kentucky Derby it is part of our being, and our heritage.
Barb C.
"Marsha" <mas at (no spam) xeb.net> wrote in message news:fvlrbm$d6r$1 at (no spam) news.datemas.de...
Quote: This absolutely disgusts me:
http://tinyurl.com/64adc3
Especially this part:
"Dutrow was still basking in Big Brown’s victory, well aware that an
injury can strike at any time.
“No matter what happens, you’re always going to see horses break down on
the track,” he said. “That is part of this game. It’s a very sad part of
the game, but you have to go through it."
No, we don't "have to go through it." It's part of the game that humans
invented to put these animals through, and betting, etc. only fuels the
flames. Shame on anyone who supports this bullshit. Horse racing, dog
racing, whatever. These people should be shot on site, or at least they
should be made to go through what the horses or dogs have to go through. I
am so upset right now.
Marsha/Ohio
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| RaeMorrill... |
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 11:39 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
PS the shame is they are saying that this filly didn't have great
breeding for soundness. The winner has such bad feet they are partly
glued together. So my question is why do the race officials even allow
them to run? That's part of the problem right there. He won, so now he
is going to run two more demanding races within a few short period of
time, one of which, IIRC, the Belmont, is a longer race.
--
RaeMorrill
------------------------------------------------------------------------
RaeMorrill's Profile: http://www.scribera.org/forum/member.php?userid=982
View this thread: http://www.scribera.org/forum/showthread.php?t=6668 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Barbara Carlson... |
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 11:47 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Phyllis, I have been a very successful horse breeder for more than 50 years.
Some horses I have bred have been successful in Arabian racing. It is a
FACT that those slender legs are stronger than the heavier legs of a draft
horse. Arabians have the most slender legs of all, and are the freest of
any breed from leg ailments. The reason, those slender legs have greater
density. The heavy bone of a draft horse is more porous, and much more
subject to injury.
So Phyllis every horse breeder who has studied breeding at all and knows the
FACTS, knows that your statement is exactly the opposite of truth.
If the racing of 2-year-olds were stopped there would be far fewer injuries
on the race track. Thoroughbreds are broken to saddle--admittedly by light
riders, as yearlings and raced as 2-year-olds when they are just babies.
The Derby should be for 4-year-olds, not 3, and 2-year-olds should not race
at all. In Arabian racing we do not allow racing of 2-year-olds. Give Big
Brown's owner some credit. He had had only 3 starts before the Derby, and
at least one of those was as a 3-year-old, and the others may have been,
too. I don't follow racing close enough to know.
Barb C.
"Phyllis Nilsson" <phyllisnilsson at (no spam) buckeye-express.com> wrote in message
news:vKydnWlNkvYot4LVnZ2dnUVZ_o6knZ2d at (no spam) buckeye-express.com...
Quote: I agree that the difference is . . . who gets to make the decision. Race
car drivers choose to race. Boxers choose to box. Ball players choose to
play ball. Horses don't choose to race, dogs and cocks don't choose to
fight. Every horse breeder knows that a thoroughbred's legs are too
slender to stay strong forever, and most injuries are to the horses legs.
If the horse knew I wonder if he/she would still want to race. I don't
believe Eight Bells enjoyed racing; I do believe she enjoyed the attention
and love she received from the people who raced her. Big difference to my
mind.
"Marsha" <mas at (no spam) xeb.net> wrote in message
news:fvlsoj$eei$1 at (no spam) news.datemas.de...
Apples to oranges. Boxing and cage fighting are voluntary by both
participants. If two people want to beat each other to death, fine by
me. Horses and dogs for racing are used as pawns by humans for sport and
money. Eight Belles had no idea she was going to break both her front
legs and be put to death, after she was whipped by her jockey to go
faster. If you can't see the difference, I can't help you.
BTW, I never watch horse racing. I don't enjoy seeing animals beat for
human enrichment.
Marsha/Ohio
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| RaeMorrill... |
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 12:08 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
It's very unusual too for a filly to be able to beat the colts. Last
year, a filly won the Belmont. It was almost eerie because that is where
Ruffian is buried and it was run the day the movie about Ruffian came
out. Almost like she was running with her in spirit and helping her win.
--
RaeMorrill
------------------------------------------------------------------------
RaeMorrill's Profile: http://www.scribera.org/forum/member.php?userid=982
View this thread: http://www.scribera.org/forum/showthread.php?t=6668 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Karen C.... |
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 2:23 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"RaeMorrill" <RaeMorrill.38y52g at (no spam) no-mx.forums.yourdomain.com.au>
wrote in message
news:RaeMorrill.38y52g at (no spam) no-mx.forums.yourdomain.com.au...
Quote: So my question is why do the race officials even allow
them to run?
You know the answer to that question. It's all about the
Benjamins.
Karen C. (who lives about 12 miles from Churchill Downs) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Blupencl... |
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 5:12 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Beat that sucker, Jeannie! LOL. J/K. But a little whack with a stick
stick won't kill him. Peggy (Robin's instructor) used to tell Robin
in the ring: "Go to the tree [the sticks were in a wire rack on the
tree] and get a stick and beat that mare!" When Jane heard Peggy yell,
she had an attitude change.
And she was coddled beyond belief, as were all the horses in that barn.
I think the problem with Eight Belles is that she (like all the Derby
horses!) was just too young and too big. I hate that part of racing.
"I don't know about that....when my horse doesn't want to jog anymore,
canter anymore, etc. he just plain refuses."
--
Blupencl
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blupencl's Profile: http://www.scribera.org/forum/member.php?userid=369
View this thread: http://www.scribera.org/forum/showthread.php?t=6668 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Blupencl... |
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 5:19 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
I don't believe it's about the money. If I had a million-dollar race
horse, there is no way I would risk that horse in a race.
Also, from my (kind of limited) point of view, just looking at it from
the eventing/hunter/jumper view:
When it was time for Robin to move up and find a horse, we tried
several. I was very proud because I could spend $2500 on a horse. Pah!
CHicken feed. I was the most pitied creature in Kentucky (we were at a
national show there). By the time I got to $2000, I had vetted and tried
two horses and they didn't pass the soundness examination. I bought Jane
as a huge "bargain" at 4x my "budget" because her owner was going to
college, and because I knew she was sound (she'd been shown from our
barn for two years). They are vetted, vetted, x-rayed, vetted again, eye
examination, x-rays of feet and legs, shoes on and off, it was a huge
ordeal.
I don't know why that filly was out there, but I feel 100% positive
they didn't think there was anything wrong with her that would cause the
accident that happened. No way.
"
PS the shame is they are saying that this filly didn't have great
breeding for soundness. The winner has such bad feet they are partly
glued together. So my question is why do the race officials even allow
them to run? That's part of the problem right there. He won, so now he
is going to run two more demanding races within a few short period of
time, one of which, IIRC, the Belmont, is a longer race. "
--
Blupencl
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blupencl's Profile: http://www.scribera.org/forum/member.php?userid=369
View this thread: http://www.scribera.org/forum/showthread.php?t=6668 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Marsha... |
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 6:27 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Blupencl wrote:
Quote:
I'm not saying it's right or wrong. I'm saying that this PETA bullchit
is a bit over the top.
My opinion has nothing to do with PETA. Horse racing is just plain
wrong, IMO.
Marsha/Ohio |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Phyllis Nilsson... |
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 6:30 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
I heard today that the father and grandfather of Eight Belles were known for
having bad legs, and that breeders should pay more attention to the traits
they are breeding into the horses . . . it isn't just speed. That breeding
is where the money lies so they take big winners even if they are breeding
in traits that should be breeded out.
"RaeMorrill" <RaeMorrill.38y52g at (no spam) no-mx.forums.yourdomain.com.au> wrote in
message news:RaeMorrill.38y52g at (no spam) no-mx.forums.yourdomain.com.au...
Quote:
PS the shame is they are saying that this filly didn't have great
breeding for soundness. The winner has such bad feet they are partly
glued together. So my question is why do the race officials even allow
them to run? That's part of the problem right there. He won, so now he
is going to run two more demanding races within a few short period of
time, one of which, IIRC, the Belmont, is a longer race.
--
RaeMorrill
------------------------------------------------------------------------
RaeMorrill's Profile: http://www.scribera.org/forum/member.php?userid=982
View this thread: http://www.scribera.org/forum/showthread.php?t=6668
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Phyllis Nilsson... |
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 6:32 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Are you saying the horses know the risks involved, because what I was asking
was about the horses, not people.
"Jeannie" <jwilson421 at (no spam) comcastspamkills.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9A957F807C803jwilson421comcastnet at (no spam) 216.196.97.136...
Quote: "Phyllis Nilsson" <phyllisnilsson at (no spam) buckeye-express.com> wrote in
news:vKydnWlNkvYot4LVnZ2dnUVZ_o6knZ2d at (no spam) buckeye-express.com:
If the horse knew I wonder if he/she
would still want to race.
As you stated above, many race care drives choose to race, boxers choose
to bix, ball players choose to play ball, etc. I believe they all know
the risks.
I don't believe Eight Bells enjoyed racing;
I do believe she enjoyed the attention and love she received from the
people who raced her. Big difference to my mind.
How much attention did she get from those who raced her? I haven't heard
that angle of the story yet. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Barbara Carlson... |
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 8:08 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Well, I don't see how you would have a million-dollar race horse if you
never raced it!
As to Big Brown's feet. That is a problem. I commented to my husband after
he won--now everybody will breed to him and then wonder why their horses
have bad feet.
One item I saw on TV today is that 84% of all thoroughbreds trace back to a
great race horse, Native Dancer, who had a reputation for problems with
soundness! The Jockey Club does not allow artificial insemination with
thoroughbreds and they are criticized for it, but if you get that kind of
influence without AI think what AI might do, or embryo transfer, which is
allowed in some breeds, including Arabians. The gene pool becomes limited
and if a problem arises it is hard to find the genes to correct the problem.
We stopped breeding nearly 20 years ago because we did not like some of what
was happening. They are breeding Arabians to look and perform like prettier
Saddlebreds. Fortunately there are a few breeders who care about soundness
and endurance which is why our breed still absolutely dominates the
endurance/competitive trail ride scene.
It's like what happens to dogs when they win and become #1. Every idiot
decides they will get rich breeding them and they ruin the breed because
they are not qualified to do so.
Barb C.
"Blupencl" <Blupencl.38ylo1 at (no spam) no-mx.forums.yourdomain.com.au> wrote in message
news:Blupencl.38ylo1 at (no spam) no-mx.forums.yourdomain.com.au...
Quote:
I don't believe it's about the money. If I had a million-dollar race
horse, there is no way I would risk that horse in a race.
Also, from my (kind of limited) point of view, just looking at it from
the eventing/hunter/jumper view:
When it was time for Robin to move up and find a horse, we tried
several. I was very proud because I could spend $2500 on a horse. Pah!
CHicken feed. I was the most pitied creature in Kentucky (we were at a
national show there). By the time I got to $2000, I had vetted and tried
two horses and they didn't pass the soundness examination. I bought Jane
as a huge "bargain" at 4x my "budget" because her owner was going to
college, and because I knew she was sound (she'd been shown from our
barn for two years). They are vetted, vetted, x-rayed, vetted again, eye
examination, x-rays of feet and legs, shoes on and off, it was a huge
ordeal.
I don't know why that filly was out there, but I feel 100% positive
they didn't think there was anything wrong with her that would cause the
accident that happened. No way.
"
PS the shame is they are saying that this filly didn't have great
breeding for soundness. The winner has such bad feet they are partly
glued together. So my question is why do the race officials even allow
them to run? That's part of the problem right there. He won, so now he
is going to run two more demanding races within a few short period of
time, one of which, IIRC, the Belmont, is a longer race. "
--
Blupencl
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blupencl's Profile: http://www.scribera.org/forum/member.php?userid=369
View this thread: http://www.scribera.org/forum/showthread.php?t=6668
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| RMJCMT... |
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 8:31 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Horses are not skeletally or muscularly mature until the age of 5 years.
Hundreds, if not thousands, of young horses age 2 years and younger are
crippled in training each year before they even get to the track.
Sadly, horse racing is a business like any other business. The owners,
trainers, jockeys, and everyone involved is in it for the money. Ergo,
the colts and fillies must be started in training at no less than 2
years of age, some even younger. This is because feeding a horse until
the age of 5 years rather than 2 years is "cost prohibitive."
I am not defending horse racing, quite the opposite. It is criminal to
force mere babies to stress their bones and muscles to the point of
breakdown. Two of the best horses I ever owned were off the track. One
had shin bucked and was turned out to pasture and then quickly sold. The
other chipped a bone in the knee which eventually healed, but the horse
could not race and was sold (actually a carpal bone - a horse's knee is
a human's wrist).
The only solution I can see (it would take a nationwide law) is to
require horses to be no less than 5 years of age before being allowed to
race, and that will never happen. Too much BIG MONEY in horse racing.
--
RMJCMT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
RMJCMT's Profile: http://www.scribera.org/forum/member.php?userid=337
View this thread: http://www.scribera.org/forum/showthread.php?t=6668 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Page 1 of 3 Goto page 1, 2, 3 Next
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Tue Oct 07, 2008 3:25 am
|
|