| |
 |
|
|
Science Forum Index » Archaeology Forum » I have a theory
Page 2 of 2 Goto page Previous 1, 2
|
| Author |
Message |
| David... |
 Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 1:24 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On May 5, 7:04 pm, Christopher Ingham <christophering... at (no spam) comcast.net>
wrote:
Quote: ...
Or how about the clueless loon? Cloonless?
...
I found it extraordinary that after I recently publicized the
Gobekli site and Ian Hodder's opinion that it is one of the
most important archaeological finds in a very long time,
there was no response from any sci.archer.
Either you are interested in debate and comment on
archaeology in a serious way or trashing/bashing. It's
your choice.
d.c. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| David... |
| Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 2:34 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On May 5, 7:45 pm, Peter Alaca <p.al... at (no spam) purple.invalid> wrote:
Quote: David wrote: on, 06/05/2008 01:24:
...
> and Ian Hodder's opinion that it is one of the
most important archaeological finds in a very long time,
there was no response from any sci.archer.
Because /you/ posted it. There is no discussion
possible with ignorant idiots with a mission like you
...
You forget my post "Göbekli Tepe - Interpretation and Importance".
Grinding an axe has become your main preoccupation.
Get a grip; you have no cause for raging at me.
d.c. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| George... |
| Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 3:49 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On May 6, 11:04 am, Christopher Ingham <christophering... at (no spam) comcast.net>
wrote:
Quote: On May 5, 5:46 pm, Peter Alaca <p.al... at (no spam) purple.invalid> wrote:
George wrote: on, 05/05/2008 23:17:
On May 6, 4:21 am, David <pchristain... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On May 5, 12:06 pm, Peter Alaca <p.al... at (no spam) purple.invalid> wrote:
David wrote: on, 05/05/2008 17:00:
...
Your bad. I dub myself David the Polite. 
Everyone else calls you Carl the Insane
No they don't; you made it up. You are a victim
of confirmation bias.
No. He is correct though I prefer to think of you as a waste of space
Carl the Wasteofspace?
That is only one way to put it.
Or how about the clueless loon? Cloonless?
a runerspism perhaps ? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Christopher Ingham... |
| Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 5:38 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On May 5, 9:49 pm, George <gbl... at (no spam) hnpl.net> wrote:
Quote: On May 6, 11:04 am, Christopher Ingham <christophering... at (no spam) comcast.net> wrote:
On May 5, 5:46 pm, Peter Alaca <p.al... at (no spam) purple.invalid> wrote:
Carl the Wasteofspace?
That is only one way to put it.
Or how about the clueless loon? Cloonless?
a runerspism perhaps ?
I thought of it as a neologism. But your term is apt also,
maybe even more so for this NG, as the runic prefix gives
your word a sense of being an archeospoonerism.
Christopher Ingham |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Peter Alaca... |
| Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 6:45 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
David wrote: on, 06/05/2008 01:24:
Quote: On May 5, 7:04 pm, Christopher Ingham <christophering... at (no spam) comcast.net
wrote:
...
Or how about the clueless loon? Cloonless?
...
I found it extraordinary that after I recently publicized the
Gobekli site
/You/ published that site?
That means that you qouted yourself, like that
'greek thesaurus' guy.
Quote: and Ian Hodder's opinion that it is one of the
most important archaeological finds in a very long time,
there was no response from any sci.archer.
Because /you/ posted it. There is no discussion
possible with ignorant idiots with a mission like you
Quote: Either you are interested in debate and comment on
archaeology in a serious way or trashing/bashing. It's
your choice.
It is your choice to dump your shit here. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Page 2 of 2 Goto page Previous 1, 2
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:07 am
|
|