So we should all rejoice in the Archeo Looney and wish him many happy
returns of the day.

I post on about three to five newsgroups. Every one of them has what I
call a Looney, someone who has no understanding of the purpose of the
newsgroup but feels like a real human being just being allowed to make
a nuisance of themselves. I suggest this is a sign of growth in a
newsgroup, that without the Looney the group disintegrates into petty
bickering and discussions of the same small points over and over.

So we should all rejoice in the Archeo Looney and wish him many happy
returns of the day.

I post on about three to five newsgroups. Every one of them has what I
call a Looney, someone who has no understanding of the purpose of the
newsgroup but feels like a real human being just being allowed to make
a nuisance of themselves. I suggest this is a sign of growth in a
newsgroup, that without the Looney the group disintegrates into petty
bickering and discussions of the same small points over and over.

So we should all rejoice in the Archeo Looney and wish him many happy
returns of the day.

In article
990b6ce6-6305-4995-8a07-edce45c42a92@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
Jack Linthicum <jacklinthicum@earthlink.net> wrote:

I post on about three to five newsgroups. Every one of them has what I
call a Looney, someone who has no understanding of the purpose of the
newsgroup but feels like a real human being just being allowed to make
a nuisance of themselves. I suggest this is a sign of growth in a
newsgroup, that without the Looney the group disintegrates into petty
bickering and discussions of the same small points over and over.

So we should all rejoice in the Archeo Looney and wish him many happy
returns of the day.

Oh, I thought you were going to say, "It must be bunnies." My bad.

"Horace LaBadie" <hwlabadiejr@nospam.highstream.net> wrote in message
news:hwlabadiejr-917518.19483402052008@news.isp.giganews.com...
In article
990b6ce6-6305-4995-8a07-edce45c42a92@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
Jack Linthicum <jacklinthicum@earthlink.net> wrote:

I post on about three to five newsgroups. Every one of them has what I
call a Looney, someone who has no understanding of the purpose of the
newsgroup but feels like a real human being just being allowed to make
a nuisance of themselves. I suggest this is a sign of growth in a
newsgroup, that without the Looney the group disintegrates into petty
bickering and discussions of the same small points over and over.

So we should all rejoice in the Archeo Looney and wish him many happy
returns of the day.

Oh, I thought you were going to say, "It must be bunnies." My bad.

The sad thing is you said it.
The even sadder thing is that I understood the reference and laughed

So is this a job application or an acceptance speech?

In article <soqdnXP58NsxW4bVnZ2dnUVZ_sqinZ2d@internode>,
"Gilgamesh" <gilgamesh@spam.me.not> wrote:
"Horace LaBadie" <hwlabadiejr@nospam.highstream.net> wrote in message
news:hwlabadiejr-917518.19483402052008@news.isp.giganews.com...
In article
990b6ce6-6305-4995-8a07-edce45c42a92@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
Jack Linthicum <jacklinthicum@earthlink.net> wrote:
I post on about three to five newsgroups. Every one of them has what I
call a Looney, someone who has no understanding of the purpose of the
newsgroup but feels like a real human being just being allowed to make
a nuisance of themselves. I suggest this is a sign of growth in a
newsgroup, that without the Looney the group disintegrates into petty
bickering and discussions of the same small points over and over.
So we should all rejoice in the Archeo Looney and wish him many happy
returns of the day.
Oh, I thought you were going to say, "It must be bunnies." My bad.
The sad thing is you said it.
The even sadder thing is that I understood the reference and laughed :-)

"Or maybe midgets."

...
        No. Just hoppy, floppy bunnies.
...

I post on about three to five newsgroups.
...

On May 3, 8:14 pm, Matt Giwer <jul... at (no spam) tampabay.REMover.rr.com> wrote:
...
No. Just hoppy, floppy bunnies.
...

Because of your sorry record, I dub you the Sci.arch Loon. If you
decide to change your image (hard to imagine), start doing some
homework on your own instead of charging in blindly with attacks
on others.

d.c.

In article
990b6ce6-6305-4995-8a07-edce45c42a92 at (no spam) z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
Jack Linthicum <jacklinthicum at (no spam) earthlink.net> wrote:

I post on about three to five newsgroups. Every one of them has what I
call a Looney, someone who has no understanding of the purpose of the
newsgroup but feels like a real human being just being allowed to make
a nuisance of themselves. I suggest this is a sign of growth in a
newsgroup, that without the Looney the group disintegrates into petty
bickering and discussions of the same small points over and over.

So we should all rejoice in the Archeo Looney and wish him many happy
returns of the day.

Oh, I thought you were going to say, "It must be bunnies." My bad.

On May 3, 8:14�pm, Matt Giwer <jul... at (no spam) tampabay.REMover.rr.com> wrote:
...
� � � � No. Just hoppy, floppy bunnies.
...

Because of your sorry record, I dub you the Sci.arch Loon. If you
decide to change your image (hard to imagine), start doing some
homework on your own instead of charging in blindly with attacks
on others.

"David" <pchristainsen at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:13af3719-4be4-4af9-888b-94bb68d6507f at (no spam) x35g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On May 3, 8:14 pm, Matt Giwer <jul... at (no spam) tampabay.REMover.rr.com> wrote:
...
No. Just hoppy, floppy bunnies.
...

Because of your sorry record, I dub you the Sci.arch Loon. If you
decide to change your image (hard to imagine), start doing some
homework on your own instead of charging in blindly with attacks
on others.

d.c.

George wrote: on, 05/05/2008 23:17:
On May 6, 4:21 am, David <pchristain... at (no spam) yahoo.com> wrote:
On May 5, 12:06 pm, Peter Alaca <p.al... at (no spam) purple.invalid> wrote:

David wrote: on, 05/05/2008 17:00:
...
Your bad.  I dub myself David the Polite.
Everyone else calls you Carl the Insane
No they don't; you made it up.  You are a victim
of confirmation bias.

No. He is correct though I prefer to think of you as a waste of space

Carl the Wasteofspace?
That is only one way to put it.

Or how about the clueless loon? Cloonless?