http://tinyurl.com/5njdmu

 http://tinyurl.com/5njdmu

In 10 million years of evolution, that's the best they can do?
They should have been out chasing kudus.

My little boy,

kudu chasers have large mouths,

long canines,

digitigrady, no
SC fat,

can run >60 km/hr,

narrow thoraxes, pronogrady etc.

I forgot:

 http://tinyurl.com/5njdmu

In 10 million years of evolution, that's the best they can do?
They should have been out chasing kudus.

:-DDD
My little boy, kudu chasers have large mouths, long canines, digitigrady,
no SC fat, can run >60 km/hr, narrow thoraxes, pronogrady etc.

On Apr 30, 11:20 pm, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@skynet.be> wrote:



My little boy,

Still lusting after little boys, pervert?

kudu chasers have large mouths,

Wrong, wetloons have big mouths, Homo has mouths just
right for eating kudu meat.

long canines,

Stupid wetlloon, who do you thing made the tools that put the cut
marks on the savanna kudu bones, lions? What an idiot you are.

digitigrady, no
SC fat,

Early Homo  put the cut marks on the kudu bones, you moron.

can run >60 km/hr,

For 100 meters, then they give up, didn't you know that wetloon?

narrow thoraxes, pronogrady etc.

BS, tools =s cutmarks =s Homo on the savanna. Got it yet?

 Here is what the pros say:

 National Geographic, April 2008:128

http://tinyurl.com/52ebfy
"Savanna -woodland chimps, unlike their rain forest brethern, spend
most of their waking
time on the ground searching for food and water. Fongoli's mix of
grassland, low trees,
and a hot dry season mirrors the environment that eventually propelled
early humans to hunt and use tools."

Absurd.  Lions (Sabertoothed cats) and hyena have mouths just right
for eating kudu meat.

On May 1, 8:30 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

Absurd.  Lions (Sabertoothed cats) and hyena have mouths just right
for eating kudu meat.

No one said they didn't, burp. I think I'll have a second....

Ever notice that you are always telling us what you didn't say.

Olson doesn't seem to know that humans have much smaller mouths than apes.

Wrong, wetloons have big mouths, Homo has mouths just
right for eating kudu meat.

Absurd. Lions (Sabertoothed cats) and hyena have mouths just right
for eating kudu meat.

Olson doesn't seem to know that humans have much smaller mouths than apes.
Funny, but that didn't stop early Homo from eating kudus

Yes, my little boy, very curious, and an intelligent person would (IOW, not
you) like to know how that might be: the answer is simple: because we had
been adapted to the waterside:

Collection of waterside foods (fruits & nuts, turtle & bird eggs,
shell/crayfish, water(side)plants, drowned herbivores, stranded whales etc..)
explains unique Homo traits (not seen in apes & australopiths) better than
dwelling in forests or dry plains: huge brain, slow-diving skills, breath
control, vocality, small mouth+chewing muscles, tongue bone descent, longer
airway, projecting nose, poor sense of smell, handiness & tool use, late
puberty, long legs, alined body, poor climbing, flat feet, fur loss,
fatness, profuse sweating, high needs of water, sodium, iodine,
poly-unsat.fatty acids (DHA), etc.  All these features are typically seen in
different combinations in waterside & (semi)aquatic animals, but are
strikingly absent in savanna dwelling mammals.

Homo & Pan separated ~6­4 Ma. Homo populations dispersed along
lakes/shores/rivers in savannas & elsewhere, eg, crossed 18 km sea to reach
Flores 0.8 Ma.
Homo tools/fossils 2.5­0.1 Ma are found near Rift valley lakes & even (sea
level fluctuations hindered fossilisation) Indian Ocean & African coasts,
often amid seashells (Mojokerto, Dungo V Baia Farta, Terra Amata, Table Bay,
Eritrea etc.).

http://allserv.rug.ac.be/~mvaneech/outthere.htm
IOW, if Savanna Fantasists who believe that fossils & tools of extinct human
relatives have been discovered in ancient savanna milieus, think that the
waterside theory is wrong, they have to prove that there were no rivers,
lakes or coasts in these milieus.http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AAT

SF:

If you weren't a half-wit it would be obvious to you that you can
"prove" just about any species had an aquatic past with your dimwitted
comparative techniques.

My little boy,

just prove us that giraffes had (semi)aquatic ancestors.  Or
monkeys.  Or lions.  Or mice.  Or bats.  Or...

Olson doesn't seem to know that humans have much smaller mouths than apes.

Funny, but that didn't stop early Homo from eating kudus